• Aucun résultat trouvé

Active biomonitoring for assessment of chemical contamination and toxicity of aquatic environments

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Active biomonitoring for assessment of chemical contamination and toxicity of aquatic environments"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-02606888

https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02606888

Submitted on 16 May 2020

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Active biomonitoring for assessment of chemical contamination and toxicity of aquatic environments

R. Recoura Massaquant, Aurélie Maurice, A. Tsoukalas, T. Hombert, Y.

Penru, Arnaud Chaumot, Geffard Olivier, G. Jubeaux

To cite this version:

R. Recoura Massaquant, Aurélie Maurice, A. Tsoukalas, T. Hombert, Y. Penru, et al.. Active biomon- itoring for assessment of chemical contamination and toxicity of aquatic environments. 96ème édition du congrès de l’ASTEE, Jun 2017, Liège, Belgium. pp.1, 2017. �hal-02606888�

(2)

Active biomonitoring for assessment of chemical contamination and toxicity of aquatic environments

Presentation of in situ bioassays by caging gammarids

R. Recoura-Massaquant 1 , A. Maurice 1 , A. Tsoukalas 1 , T. Hombert 1 , Y. Penru 2 , A. Chaumot 3 , O. Geffard 3 , G. Jubeaux 1

b. INDUSTRIAL DISCHARGE c. WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS

Wide range of applications for public managers and industrials

* * *

REGULATION Compliance to EQS in biota (WFD, 2013) Spatial and temporal comparison of stations into monitoring networks Impact studies of industrials and hydraulic structures Assessment of WTP treatment efficiency

In situ bioassays: relevant and complementary approach for biomonitoring

* * *

Selected organisms (versus passive monitoring) to control biological confounding factors Realistic and integrative exposure (versus laboratory exposure)

Proposition of reference values integrating effects of environmental confounding factors Spatial and/or Temporal gradients with a « one-week » resolution scale

Operational for large scale deployment

Standard approaches used to monitor the quality of continental surface water

 Chemical analysis of water  Toxicity? Bioavailability of chemical substances? …

 Ecological indicators  Sources of pollution ? (habitat, chemicals, …), …

Development of ACTIVE BIOMONITORING with a freshwater crustacean 1. Method for in situ bioassays with Gammarus fossarum

2. Method for endpoints interpretation 3. Applications for field monitoring

One natural source of organisms

= Reference population

(GAMMAREF®)

Acclimatization

Laboratory controlled

conditions during 2 weeks

Calibration of

individuals: size, sex, reproductive status, …

Caging of individuals Launch of bioassays

Field exposure

during 1 or 3 weeks

with continuous temperature control

Transport

to laboratory

ENDPOINTS

Bioaccumulation : bioavailable concentration of micropollutants (metals and organic compounds)

Ecotoxicological effects : survival, feeding, AChE, reproduction and endocrine disruption

2 3

4

6

5

Transport

to field stations

c. Ecotoxicological effects THRESHOLDS

defined from both laboratory and field experiments (database)

Example for feeding inhibition

1 BIOMÆ, F-69100 Villeurbanne, France

2 CIRSEE, SUEZ Group, F-78230 Le Pecq, France

3 Irstea, MALY Research Unit, Laboratory of ecotoxicology, F-69100 Villeurbanne, France Contact: guillaume.jubeaux@biomae.fr

REFERENCES

[1] JP. Besse, O. Geffard, M. Coquery. Relevance and applicability of active biomonitoring in continental waters under the Water Framework Directive. Trends in Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 36, 2012

[2] M. Carere, V. Dulio, G. Hank. A. Hebert. Guidance for sediment and biota monitoring under the Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive. Trends in Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 36, 2012.

[3] P.Y. Kunz, C. Kienle, A . Gerhardt. Gammarus spp. in aquatic ecotoxicology and water quality assessment: Toward integrated multilevel tests. (2010) Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 205, pp.

1-76.

[4] DIRECTIVE 2013/39/EU OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 12 August 2013 amending Directives 2000/60/EC and 2008/105/EC as regards priority substances in the field of water policy. Official Journal of the European Union

[5] Coulaud, R.; Geffard, O.; Xuereb, B.; Lacaze, E.; Quéau, H.; Garric, J.; Charles, S.; Chaumot, A. In situ feeding assay with Gammarus fossarum (Crustacea): Modelling the influence of confounding factors to improve water quality biomonitoring. Water Research. 2011, 45, 6417−6429

Need of complementary approaches like ecotoxicological assays to monitor contamination and toxicity of aquatic environments

CONTEXT & CHALLENGE OBJECTIVES

1. METHOD for IN SITU BIOASSAYS with Gammarus fossarum

3. APPLICATIONS for FIELD MONITORING

2. METHOD for ENDPOINTS INTERPRETATION

CONCLUSION

High contamination due to metallic discharge Temporal variation (dilution due to outflow)

Dilution after confluence (data not shown)

8

WTP#1 : no toxic impact ; upstream neurotoxicity (AChE)

WTP#2 : toxic impact, especially in autumn (strong low-water period)

For more information

AKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Thanks to Water Agencies and Onema/French Agency of Biodiversity

1

7

Sev er ity sc ale

Background Assessment Concentration

0.95

Fee ding inhibitio n (%) Sev er ity sc ale

Reference values

a. LARGE SCALE DEPLOYMENT IN WATER AGENCIES

a. Bioaccumulation BIOTA EQS CONFORMITY

tracking of 15 substances for conformity to the WFD

b. Bioaccumulation THRESHOLDS

defined from a large scale field experiments (database)

Example for bioaccumulation of nickel

Comparison of measured concentration to EQS Ranking and prioritization of sites according to contamination

EQS for crustacean and molluscs PAH, DEHP and dioxins

96ème édition du congrès de l’ASTEE, Liège, Belgique, 06/06/2017

Références

Documents relatifs

Plus pr´ecis´ement notre contribution est la suivante : nous posons le probl`eme sous la forme du calcul d’un ranking, le LiveRank, qui essaie de s´eparer les pages mortes des

Le chapitre 4 portera sur une évaluation des performances des contrôleurs ONOS et ODL sur la découverte de la topologie dans un environnement avec un contrôleur unique puis dans le

Our selection and prioritization procedure is different from the methods used in other studies: In GerES [6,7] see above, a scientific committee conducts the selection of

Underlying mechanisms of intraspecific variation with (B) importance of genotypic variability in the sensitivity of seven genotypes of Myriophyllum spicatum exposed to Cu and

In cases where high concentrations of mercury are observed, communication prepared for health- care professionals should include general information on mercury and its health

The objective of this study is to assess whether metrics based on diatom ecological guilds and life forms could be used to assess the impact of chemical and physical water

For example, the IOBS index was applied from 2010 to 2013 by the Water Ecology Service of the canton of Geneva (Switzerland) as part of watercourses quality mon- itoring program

We considered abiotic factors (temperature and conductivity) in a previous study, whereas the present study investigated the effects of gender, the female reproductive stage, and