• Aucun résultat trouvé

Inoculants of leguminous crops for mitigating soil emissions of the greenhouse gas nitrous oxide

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Inoculants of leguminous crops for mitigating soil emissions of the greenhouse gas nitrous oxide"

Copied!
13
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-02746096

https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02746096

Submitted on 3 Jun 2020

HAL

is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire

HAL, est

destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Inoculants of leguminous crops for mitigating soil emissions of the greenhouse gas nitrous oxide

Catherine Hénault, Cécile Revellin

To cite this version:

Catherine Hénault, Cécile Revellin. Inoculants of leguminous crops for mitigating soil emissions of the

greenhouse gas nitrous oxide. Agricultural Ecology Research : its role in delivering sustainable farm

systems, Jun 2011, Dundee, United Kingdom. �hal-02746096�

(2)

Inoculants of leguminous crops for mitigating soil emissions

of the greenhouse gas nitrous oxide

Catherine Hénault and Cécile Revellin

UMR Microbiologie des Sols et de l’Environnement – Dijon – France UR SOLS – Orléans – France

Agricultural Ecology Research: its role in delivering sustainable farm systems – Dundee, 15-16 june 2011

(3)

CHANGES IN ATMOSPHERIC CONCENTRATIONS OF TRACE GASES

Atmospheric concentrations of

greenhouse gases

(4)

SOURCES OF N 2 O (Tg N-N 2 O y -1 ), from IPCC 2007

Agricultural Ecology Research: its role in delivering sustainable farm systems – Dundee, 15-16 june 2011

SOURCE value range

Fossil fuel combustion and Industrial processes 0.7 0.2-1.8

Agriculture 2.8 1.7-4.8

Rivers, estuaries, coastal zones 1.7 0.5-2.9

Biomass and biofuel burning 0.7 0.2-1.0

Human excreta 0.2 0.1-0.3

Atmospheric deposition 0.6 0.3-0.9

Anthropogenic total 6.7

Soils under natural vegetation 6.6 3.3-9.0

Oceans 3.8 1.8-5.8

Atmospheric chemistry 0.6 0.3-1.2

Natural sources total 11

Total sources 17.7 8.5-27.7

Atmospheric sink 12.3

Atmopheric increase 3.9

Unbalanced 1.5 ??? large range

AR4 (2007)

Natural sources

Anthropogenic sources

(5)

MECHANISMS INVOLVED IN N 2 O BUDGET IN SOILS

SOiL

ATMOSPHERE

NO

3-

NO

2-

NH

4+

NO + N

2

O N

2

denitrification (anaerobic) – nitrification (aerobic)

N

2

O reductase

(6)

0 10 20

La Saussaye (28) - 1998

Chalons (51) - 1995

Villamblain (45) - 1998

Longchamp (21) - 1995

Arrou (28) - 1998

N-N2O, g N ha-1 d-1-

Mean annual emissions from 5 different locations

,

 Study of N

2

O

production by the first steps of

denitrification and by nitrification

Study of N

2

O Consumption N

2

O reduction very fast N

2

O reduction very

slow

(From Hénault et al., 2001)

Agricultural Ecology Research: its role in delivering sustainable farm systems – Dundee, 15-16 june 2011

REGULATION OF THE LEVEL OF N 2 O EMISSION BY THE REDUCTION OF N 2 O

Agricultural Ecology Research: its role in delivering sustainable farm systems – Dundee, 15-16 june 2011

(7)

 To mitigate N

2

O emission by managing the N

2

O to N

2

reduction, specially in soils where this function is inefficient

 By managing soil microbial communities : use of

microorganisms that grow in symbiosis with crop plants

 Some rhizobia, symbionts of leguminous crops possess the nosZ genes coding for the enzyme involved in the N

2

O reduction (Sameshima-Saito et al., 2006)

To crop some leguminous

• Inoculated with strains carrying the nosZ genes

• On soil emitting high levels of N 2 O due to an inefficient N 2 O reduction

OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

[SOIL] PhN

2

ORed- + [Plant + Inoculant ] PhN

2

Ored+  [SOIL + Plant + Inoculant ] PhN

2

ORed+

Agricultural Ecology Research: its role in delivering sustainable farm systems – Dundee, 15-16 june 2011

(8)

A greenhouse experiment for testing the previous equation

 Some laboratory experiments to develop knowledges on the process

 A modelling approach to assess quantitative benefits of this process at the field scale

STEPS OF THE STUDY

[SOIL] PhN

2

ORed- + [Plant + Inoculant ] PhN

2

Ored+  [SOIL + Plant + Inoculant ] PhN

2

ORed+

Agricultural Ecology Research: its role in delivering sustainable farm systems – Dundee, 15-16 june 2011

MAIN USED MATERIALS

 Soybean plants inoculated with different strains of Bradyrhizobium japonicum

 Gas chromatography

(9)

Soil inefficient to reduce N

2

O

USDA 110

G 49 D nosZ

0 0.2 0.4 0.6

0 4 8 12

0 40 80

Kr, g

N-N2O, µg N

Incubation time (hours)

0 0.2 0.4 0.6

0 4 8 12

0 40 80

Kr, g

N-N2O, µg N

Incubation time (hours)

0 0.2 0.4 0.6

0 4 8 12

0 40 80

Kr, g

N-N2O, µg N

Incubation time (hours)

0 0.2 0.4 0.6

0 4 8 12

0 40 80

Kr, g

N-N2O, µg N

Incubation time (hours)

0 0.2 0.4 0.6

0 4 8 12

0 40 80

Kr, g

N-N2O, µg N

Incubation time (hours)

0 0.2 0.4 0.6

0 4 8 12

0 40 80

Kr, g

N-N2O, µg N

Incubation time (hours)

0 0.2 0.4 0.6

0 4 8 12

0 40 80

Kr, g

N-N2O, µg N

Incubation time (hours)

0 0.2 0.4 0.6

0 4 8 12

0 40 80

Kr, g

N-N2O, µg N

Incubation time (hours)

0 0.2 0.4 0.6

0 4 8 12

0 40 80

Kr, g

N-N2O, µg N

Incubation time (hours)

0 0.2 0.4 0.6

0 4 8 12

0 40 80

Kr, g

N-N2O, µg N

Incubation time (hours)

0 0.2 0.4 0.6

0 4 8 12

0 40 80

Kr, g

N-N2O, µg N

Incubation time (hours)

0 0.2 0.4 0.6

0 4 8 12

0 40 80

Kr, g

N-N2O, µg N

Incubation time (hours)

0 0.2 0.4 0.6

0 4 8 12

0 40 80

Kr, g

N-N2O, µg N

Incubation time (hours)

0 0.2 0.4 0.6

0 4 8 12

0 40 80

Kr, g

N-N2O, µg N

Incubation time (hours)

0 0.2 0.4 0.6

0 4 8 12

0 40 80

Kr, g

N-N2O, µg N

Incubation time (hours)

GREENHOUSE EXPERIMENT

Kr N 2 O

(10)

LABORATORY EXPERIMENT

Agricultural Ecology Research: its role in delivering sustainable farm systems – Dundee, 15-16 june 2011

(11)

QUANTIFICATION BY A MODELING APPROACH

-5 0 5 10

31/3 30/4 30/5 29/6 29/7

Emissions of N2O, g N-N2O ha-1

USDA 110 - unfertilised system

-5 0 5 10

31/3 30/4 30/5 29/6 29/7

Emissions of N2O, g N-N2O ha-1

MSDJG49 - unfertilised system

THE MODEL

A new version of the NOE model (Hénault et al., 2005) that includes the reduction of N

2

O by rhizobia

Parametrisation of the model using results

obtained during both the laboratory and greenhouse experiments

N 2 O emission by soil

by nodules inoculated into soybean in a hypothetical system including

active nodules

(12)

CONCLUSIONS

Agricultural Ecology Research: its role in delivering sustainable farm systems – Dundee, 15-16 june 2011

• Switch from an N 2 O emitting system to a consuming one by means of the inoculation of strains containg the nosZ gene

• Observations

– that the process is insensitive to the O 2 concentration – that rates increase with the ambient N 2 O concentration – that the efficiency of the process is strain dependant

• Assessment of a significant benefit of the process at the field scale

 To measure the environmental benefit of the process on the

field scale

(13)

Thank you

Références

Documents relatifs

Pour répondre à cette problématique, je me concentre sur l’étude du coût et du potentiel d’abattement de deux mesures clés dans l’atténuation des émissions à savoir la

Est régressive et moins épaisse (35m), elle est délimitée à sa base par la surface condensée de l'Ammonitico rosso supérieur; et au sommet par la discontinuité sd1 qui correspond

" Technology and people - Focusing on the impact of technology and social trends on design of tower components (retail ,office & housing) This study will argue that

Beyond the various modelling methods (optimisation, rule-based, agent-based...), these models are framed by their objectives -defining input data and users- which can be:

This paper aims to compare different pasture-based livestock systems: the smallholder mixed dairy-beef livestock system based essentially on self-consumption, with

We conducted three separate ANOVAs with the three news factors (elite- persons, elite-nations, and proximity) as dependent variables and the different actor types

We address the following issues: (i) carbon and GHG balance of managed grasslands, (ii) vulnerability of grassland C stocks to climate change and to biodiversity loss and (iii) the

tributed along a trajectory of evolution of a given type of APS. Tl\e use- fulness of such typology of trajectories of evolution of the APS for monito- ring