• Aucun résultat trouvé

Multi-stakeholder process as a tool for facilitating research integration: Lessons from Cameroon

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Multi-stakeholder process as a tool for facilitating research integration: Lessons from Cameroon"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Humidtropics

Multi-Stakeholder Process as a tool for facilitating

Research Integration: Lessons from Cameroon

Utility of the legacy product

This LP documents the process and outcomes in innovation systems thinking that promotes knowledge exchange and learning among stakeholders. This may happen through soft transfer (Paulré, 2004), co-creation (Kilelu et al., 2013,

Schut et al., 2015) or community-based activities at the more operational level (Waters-Bayer et al., 2015). The three processes correspond respectively to knowledge transfer or internalization, knowledge hybridization and knowledge externalization and can occur simultaneously within MSPs, depending on the type of activities to be implemented.

Introducing the legacy product

Multi-stakeholder processes (MSP) are increasingly seen as a promising vehicle for agricultural innovation in

developing countries. MSP and its instruments such as Research for Development Platforms (R4D) and Innovation

Platforms (IP) could play a strategic role in the transformation of Africa’s agriculture. However, the implementation of MSP in innovation system thinking to improve livelihoods is still not fully understood in terms of process and

outcomes. This poster is building on two years constructive analysis of the influence of MSP in Cameroon on research integration with a diversity of stakeholders and how this impacted their efficiency in integrated systems research

under Humidtropics in Cameroon.

Key partners

ICRAF, IITA, IRAD, FARA, CASD – NGO, KEY FARMERS ORGANIZATION, NOWEFOR,

AVRDC, MINADER, UNIVERSITIES OF DSCHANG, YAOUNDE II, BUEA

This document is licensed for use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

November 2016

Potential users of this legacy product

MSP could be used to mainstream CAADP and country NAFSIP; Projects and programs in

CAADP countries, NGOs and Community development programs; or by the AFS CRP during

delivery and dissemination of technologies; or by the AfDB TAAT and AARP.

Results and outputs

Key contacts

Authors: Sygnola Tsafack*1, Ann Degrande1, Syndhia Mathé2, Latifou Idrissou3, Hervé Bisseleua4, Jean-Claude

Bidogeza5, Apollin Fotso6 and Christopher Suh7

Contact author: [email protected]

Affiliations: 1 = World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Cameroon, 2 = IITA & CIRAD Cameroon, 3 = IITA Ibadan Nigeria,

4 = ICRAF Nairobi Kenya, 5 = AVRDC Cameroon, 6 = IITA Cameroon, 7 = IRAD Cameroon

How does it work?

Process

Inception

workshop

Vision and objectives

Entry themes & potential sites

RAAIS

(Rapid Appraisal of Agricultural Innovation Systems)

workshop

R4D

+ Research topics Launching of Innovation Platforms + Contextualisation & Executive committee

Meetings &

trainings

IPs

IPs

Planning

Proposals

Activities

Stakeholders and engagements

R4D level (active members)

Institutions

Roles / Activities

CGIAR centres (IITA, ICRAF, AVRDC) Coordinate research activities (based on expertise and field site), disseminate innovations

NARS (IRAD) Coordinate research activities (based on expertise), link R4D with IPs

Universities (Buea, Dschang, Yaounde 1 and 2)

Contribute in the supervision of students involved in Humidtropics activities

Ministries (MINADER) Guide with relevant policies, assist in identification of stakeholders and activities.

CBO/Local NGO (CASD, NOWEFOR, Key Farmers)

Mobilize IP members, coordinate/ supervise activities, do follow-up, link with expertise

IP level (mainly facilitator or executive committee members)

 Teach and advise

 Provide follow-up and

orientation

 Facilitate information between IP & stakeholders

 Serving link between IP members and the R4D

Interrelation among the Components

Facilitation

team

Innovation

Platform

R4D

Platform

Mother

Plot

Baby trial

Baby trial

= Influence; = Feedback

R4D Level

Joint venture of CGIAR Centres / integrated actions

Dissemination of innovations based on priorities & needs

Achievement of six Humidtropics IDOs:

increase rural income, nutrition and productivity, Sustainable natural resource management, women & youths, enhance innovation capacities

1 PhD

Capacity

development

≥ 10 MSc

03 Innovation Platforms (Ips)

IP Level

9 Mother plots

110 baby trials

Trainings

≥ 100 activities

in one year

Improved seeds/seedlings

distributed and available • of leaders

• on gender empowerment • on crops integration

Functioning cassava processing center, cocoa nurseries and propagators for tree domestication

Many positive changes have been

noticed In some areas, difficulties have forced beneficiaries to innovate MSP process has been understood by many stakeholders

Lessons

 MSPs help to improve agricultural productivity in Africa

 Arena to share vision among stakeholders and develop interventions of mutual benefit

through co-creation and community-led action research

 Arena to adapt technologies to existing local conditions

 MSPs help to build formal and informal relationships and to develop

mutual/interpersonal trust between researchers and other stakeholders

We suggest more investments in MSPs to enable the development and effective

dissemination of agricultural innovations, thus fostering pro-poor growth and improving

farmers’ livelihoods.

Members who were able to improve their livelihoods

could help to prove the effectiveness of the approach

Community radios to mobilize more communities

around the MSP approach and inform stakeholders on time on MSP activities

"quick win" activities to convince more stakeholders

Take advantage of

 Research and other stakeholders can work closely to improve the agricultural sector

 MSP needs good preparation and significant resources (like finance & trained facilitators)  Capacity development and sensitization should be permanent

 Failures are sometimes turned into new opportunities to the benefit of stakeholders

References

PAULRÉ, B., 2004, "L'analyse évolutionniste contemporaine du changement technique et de l'innovation". CLES. Cahiers lillois d'économie et de

sociologie(43-44)

SCHUT, M., L. KLERKX, M. SARTAS, D. LAMERS, M. M. CAMPBELL, I. OGBONNA, P. KAUSHIK, K. ATTA-KRAH and C. LEEUWIS, 2015, "Innovation Platforms: Experiences with

Their Institutional Embedding in Agricultural Research for Development". Experimental Agriculture, 1-25

KILELU, C. W., L. KLERKX and C. LEEUWIS, 2013, "Unravelling the role of innovation platforms in supporting co-evolution of innovation: contributions and

tensions in a smallholder dairy development programme". Agricultural Systems(118), 65-77

WATERS-BAYER, A., P. KRISTJANSON, C. WETTASINHA, L. VELDHUIZEN, G. QUIROGA, K. SWAANS and B. DOUTHWAITE, 2015, "Exploring the impact of farmer-led research

supported by civil society organisations". Agriculture & Food Security 4(1), 1

Trial set up in South West Cameroon

R4D Trained members in Communication in Cameroon

IP facilitator visiting an IP

Références

Documents relatifs

“Commit to mobilize sufficient and sustainable financing, with the aim of increasing overall global investments to 2 billion dollars, in order to close the estimated 1.3

Plusieurs matrices de score on été élaborées pour calculer le degré de similarité entre les séquences protéiques. Généralement, Il existe quatre catégories de

The TAP CF – as formulated at the beginning of the CDAIS project – lacked clarity on the concepts used and on practical guidance, especially in a more managerial perspective

In French agricultural research institutions, such as INRA (with INRA-Transfert) or CIRAD (with its Technology Transfer and Development Office), programmes and subsidiaries

Dans cette communication, nous nous intéressons aux plateformes d’innovation et à leurs rôles dans l’accompagnement des innovations pour la transformation de

the project is coordinated at regional level by CArbAP with the support of CIrAD and has involved more than 50 such organizations as national research centres,

Key words : multi-stakeholder platforms, varietal innovation, partnership research, Africa, participatory plant breeding, participatory assessment, plantain, scaling,

Over time and across all countries, LISF pilots have generally been moving toward more farmer-led governance mechanisms and structures, while supporting organisations (mostly