Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la
première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca.
Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at
PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information.
https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits
L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.
READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE.
https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright
NRC Publications Archive Record / Notice des Archives des publications du CNRC :
https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=3090c094-f7dd-4ad5-a7e5-0acdfe186c63 https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=3090c094-f7dd-4ad5-a7e5-0acdfe186c63
NRC Publications Archive
Archives des publications du CNRC
Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at
Buried utilities: software tools Abdel-Akher, A.
February 2008
D-WARP: Distributed Water Mains Renewal Planner
Q-WARP: Water Quality – Water Mains renewal Planner
SSAM-I: Strategic and Sustainable Asset Management
- Integrator
Buried Utilities Group
Software tools
Factors affecting water
main breaks
Year 100 200 300 400 1973 1978 1983 1988 1993 1998 No. of Breaks Static: ¾ material ¾ dimensions ¾ soil ¾ installation Dynamic: ¾ climate ¾ environment ¾ operationsD-WARP
Collecting data
Pipe data and water main
grouping
•
Homogeneous groups more likely to have
similar breakage rate patterns.
•
Better modeling of breakage rate.
Pipe data and water main
grouping
Modeling
Q-WARP
water Quality - Water mAin Renewal
Planner
Medium Low Low Low Low V. low Medium High Medium Medium Low V. high Medium Low Medium Medium Low Medium Medium V. low V. low V. low V. low V. low V. low V. low V. low V. low V. low V. low V. low Low V. low V. low V. low
Q-WARP
Water quality indicators Site-specific factors (Environs) Operational and hydraulic factors Interventions Pipe attributes
Water quality failures (WQF)
Pipe deterioration mechanisms
Water quality deterioration mechanisms W ate r m ain
Q-WARP
Conceptual FrameworkPotential for contaminant intrusion
Potential for water quality deterioration mechanisms
Potential for Internal corrosion
Potential for leaching
Potential for Biofilm formation
Potential for disinfectant loss and THMs formation
Potential for permeation
Modular FCMs
Physico-chemical water quality failure
Microbiological water quality failure
Aesthetic
water quality failure
⊕
Supervisory FCM
Potential for water quality failures ⊕ ⊕ ⊕
Q-WARP
Predicting WQF- using FCMQ-WARP
Baseline analysis
• Evaluation of water quality based on currently
implemented interventions.
• Interventions:
• Cathodic protection
• Leak detection methods • Flushing/swabbing/pigging
• Internal corrosion control program • Cross connection control program • Water quality monitoring
Q-WARP
Decision analysis
• Evaluation of water quality based on additional scenario
of interventions.
• Produces less risk of water quality failure than Baseline
analysis
• Is the same as baseline analysis, if no additional
interventions are selected.
Q-WARP
Sensitivity analysis
• Is based on either baseline or decision analysis.
• Evaluation of the contribution of input parameters to
water quality failure.
Q-WARP
Q-WARP
Q-WARP
SSAM-I
Strategic and Sustainable Asset
Management-Integrator
SSAM-I
• Is a decision tool for prioritizing intervention
(repair) projects for infrastructure assets.
• Demonstrates how a systematic and
quantitative process can assist the
management of infrastructure assets.
SSAM-I
• Uses benefit/cost ratio to determine which
intervention projects should be funded each
year.
o
Cost is the cost of intervention.
o
Benefit is a normalized score derived
from a weighted combination of average
risk, average condition and life cycle cost
within an assumed planning horizon.
SSAM-I
• Selects for the first year these intervention
projects that have the highest benefit/cost
ratio within a target annual budget.
• Asset conditions are
updated.
• Projects are selected
for every subsequent
year within a planning
horizon.
SSAM-I
SSAM-I Project file (Access) SSAM-I SSAM- I Yearly intervention projects Yearly intervention projects Yearly intervention projects Excel «import» «display» «output» «import»SSAM-I
Network data
• Discount rate
• Planning horizon (years)
• Yearly Budget within the planning horizon
• Condition states (Excellent, very good, good, fair, failed)
• Consequence categories
• Deterioration profiles (linear, quadratic, etc.)
• Maintenance options (preventive, none)
• Intervention types (replacement, major repair, minor repair,
etc.)
SSAM-I
Asset types (bridge, road, water main)
• Service life (years)
• Preventive maintenance cost
• Intervention costs and condition changes.
• User weights ( %Risk, %Condition, % Life Cycle Cost)
Data
Assets
• Asset type
• Replacement value ($)
• Maintenance option
• Condition rating at last inspection
• Year of last inspection
• Last intervention
SSAM-I
1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Planning Horizon We igh te d C ondit ion 0.0000 5,000.0000 10,000.0000 15,000.0000 20,000.0000 25,000.0000 Weighted Condition Required Budget Annual Budget B udge t
SSAM-I
Using Excel
1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Planning Horizon We ight e d C ond it ion 0.0000 2,000.0000 4,000.0000 6,000.0000 8,000.0000 10,000.0000 12,000.0000 14,000.0000 16,000.0000 18,000.0000 20,000.0000 Weighted Condition Required Budget Annual Budget Bu d g e t