• Aucun résultat trouvé

Buried utilities: software tools

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Buried utilities: software tools"

Copied!
31
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la

première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca.

Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at

PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information.

https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits

L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.

READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE.

https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright

NRC Publications Archive Record / Notice des Archives des publications du CNRC :

https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=3090c094-f7dd-4ad5-a7e5-0acdfe186c63 https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=3090c094-f7dd-4ad5-a7e5-0acdfe186c63

NRC Publications Archive

Archives des publications du CNRC

Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at

Buried utilities: software tools Abdel-Akher, A.

(2)

February 2008

D-WARP: Distributed Water Mains Renewal Planner

Q-WARP: Water Quality – Water Mains renewal Planner

SSAM-I: Strategic and Sustainable Asset Management

- Integrator

Buried Utilities Group

Software tools

(3)

Factors affecting water

main breaks

Year 100 200 300 400 1973 1978 1983 1988 1993 1998 No. of Breaks Static: ¾ material ¾ dimensions ¾ soil ¾ installation Dynamic: ¾ climate ¾ environment ¾ operations

D-WARP

(4)

Collecting data

(5)

Pipe data and water main

grouping

Homogeneous groups more likely to have

similar breakage rate patterns.

Better modeling of breakage rate.

(6)

Pipe data and water main

grouping

(7)

Modeling

(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)

Q-WARP

water Quality - Water mAin Renewal

Planner

(12)

Medium Low Low Low Low V. low Medium High Medium Medium Low V. high Medium Low Medium Medium Low Medium Medium V. low V. low V. low V. low V. low V. low V. low V. low V. low V. low V. low V. low Low V. low V. low V. low

Q-WARP

(13)

Water quality indicators Site-specific factors (Environs) Operational and hydraulic factors Interventions Pipe attributes

Water quality failures (WQF)

Pipe deterioration mechanisms

Water quality deterioration mechanisms W ate r m ain

Q-WARP

Conceptual Framework

(14)

Potential for contaminant intrusion

Potential for water quality deterioration mechanisms

Potential for Internal corrosion

Potential for leaching

Potential for Biofilm formation

Potential for disinfectant loss and THMs formation

Potential for permeation

Modular FCMs

Physico-chemical water quality failure

Microbiological water quality failure

Aesthetic

water quality failure

Supervisory FCM

Potential for water quality failures ⊕ ⊕ ⊕

Q-WARP

Predicting WQF- using FCM

(15)

Q-WARP

Baseline analysis

• Evaluation of water quality based on currently

implemented interventions.

• Interventions:

• Cathodic protection

• Leak detection methods • Flushing/swabbing/pigging

• Internal corrosion control program • Cross connection control program • Water quality monitoring

(16)

Q-WARP

Decision analysis

• Evaluation of water quality based on additional scenario

of interventions.

• Produces less risk of water quality failure than Baseline

analysis

• Is the same as baseline analysis, if no additional

interventions are selected.

(17)

Q-WARP

Sensitivity analysis

• Is based on either baseline or decision analysis.

• Evaluation of the contribution of input parameters to

water quality failure.

(18)
(19)

Q-WARP

(20)

Q-WARP

(21)

Q-WARP

(22)

SSAM-I

Strategic and Sustainable Asset

Management-Integrator

(23)

SSAM-I

• Is a decision tool for prioritizing intervention

(repair) projects for infrastructure assets.

• Demonstrates how a systematic and

quantitative process can assist the

management of infrastructure assets.

(24)

SSAM-I

• Uses benefit/cost ratio to determine which

intervention projects should be funded each

year.

o

Cost is the cost of intervention.

o

Benefit is a normalized score derived

from a weighted combination of average

risk, average condition and life cycle cost

within an assumed planning horizon.

(25)

SSAM-I

• Selects for the first year these intervention

projects that have the highest benefit/cost

ratio within a target annual budget.

• Asset conditions are

updated.

• Projects are selected

for every subsequent

year within a planning

horizon.

(26)

SSAM-I

SSAM-I Project file (Access) SSAM-I SSAM- I Yearly intervention projects Yearly intervention projects Yearly intervention projects Excel «import» «display» «output» «import»

(27)

SSAM-I

Network data

• Discount rate

• Planning horizon (years)

• Yearly Budget within the planning horizon

• Condition states (Excellent, very good, good, fair, failed)

• Consequence categories

• Deterioration profiles (linear, quadratic, etc.)

• Maintenance options (preventive, none)

• Intervention types (replacement, major repair, minor repair,

etc.)

(28)

SSAM-I

Asset types (bridge, road, water main)

• Service life (years)

• Preventive maintenance cost

• Intervention costs and condition changes.

• User weights ( %Risk, %Condition, % Life Cycle Cost)

Data

Assets

• Asset type

• Replacement value ($)

• Maintenance option

• Condition rating at last inspection

• Year of last inspection

• Last intervention

(29)

SSAM-I

(30)

1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Planning Horizon We igh te d C ondit ion 0.0000 5,000.0000 10,000.0000 15,000.0000 20,000.0000 25,000.0000 Weighted Condition Required Budget Annual Budget B udge t

SSAM-I

Using Excel

(31)

1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Planning Horizon We ight e d C ond it ion 0.0000 2,000.0000 4,000.0000 6,000.0000 8,000.0000 10,000.0000 12,000.0000 14,000.0000 16,000.0000 18,000.0000 20,000.0000 Weighted Condition Required Budget Annual Budget Bu d g e t

SSAM-I

Using Excel

Références

Documents relatifs

Minimum ten- year results of a 28-mm metal-on-metal bearing in cementless total hip arthroplasty in patients fifty years of age and younger.. Primary cementless total hip

This thesis examines the role of the coiled-coil structural motif in the structure and function of two very different proteins: hemagglutinin (HA), the membrane-fusion protein

In summary, we have demonstrated that THz radiation can control the coherent emission from molecular nitrogen ions in air via a nonlinear seeding mechanism, shedding new light on

We then develop an equivalent electrical circuit 19 representing onion characteristics using a computer assis- 20 ted optimization technique that allows us to monitor the 21 response

Several Reynolds number sweeps were conducted for models S2-B and S9-Sim in both turbulent flow and smooth flow to evaluate the Reynolds insensitivity of the ice shells, as shown

• To investigate the role of aquaporin-mediated water transport during pollen grain germination and tube growth, Arabidopsis thaliana plasma membrane intrinsic proteins (PIPs)

The uncertainties in the CS signal fits are obtained by varying each of the signal shape parameters within the uncertainty obtained from the CF mode data

L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB..