Modal testing and finite element modelling of a reduced-sized tyre for rolling contact investigation
Texte intégral
(2) Modal testing and finite element modelling of a reduced-sized tyre for rolling contact investigation
(3)
(4)
(5) . !" #
(6) $ %&'()
(7)
(8) !. **(( " ". +,, . - . / 0 # / . 1 / # , 0/ 0 / . / , 2 #/ 0, 0,, . / 1 3#,0 ,, 430 , , / . "5 3 03 6/ 03, . 0,, 7 / ., 430 , ,# , / 8 # 3.0 / . 9 : 3 4 0, 30 $.2 03 ) / 0, .2 , 6/ / : 3 / 8 ,0 $ ) # , 0, / # #, ; 3 0, # , / / # .0 00 . / : 3 - , / 0, # 0, / 0 #/ . ,, , 3 . ./ . / 0 1 3#,0.
(9) . .
(10)
(11) !"#$ %&' (
(12) $ )
(13) *
(14)
(15) +, -'
(16)
(17) !.#$ %
(18) *
(19)
(20) *
(21)
(22) & & & &' / $
(23)
(24) & &'
(25) !0 1 + 2 3 4 5 ",#$ 6
(26) &
(27)
(28) &
(29)
(30)
(31) *&
(32)
(33) $ % &
(34) 7 &
(35)
(36) )8%%9:
(37) * 7 & 7
(38)
(39)
(40)
(41) $ 9 - & ; /
(42) &
(43)
(44) . Copyright© (2015) by EAA-NAG-ABAV, ISSN 2226-5147 All rights reserved. 1001. 7
(45)
(46)
(47)
(48) & 7
(49)
(50)
(51)
(52) <
(53) &$
(54) *
(55)
(56)
(57) & * <
(58) 7
(59)
(60)
(61)
(62)
(63) !1#. * - & $ = * & *
(64) &
(65)
(66)
(67) $ % 7
(68)
(69)
(70) 7 ( =
(71) - &
(72) $
(73) . % - & 7- 7
(74) -
(75) & * * >$ % & ; 7 ",1$+,+
(76) " ""1'++:+ )8? ; &$ 7 & ; * .,+'++:"2
(77)
(78) & !""# - & 7
(79) & 1,@
(80) +2@ 7 $ % & 7 *
(81) & .
(82) Y. Zhang et al.: Modal testing.... EuroNoise 2015 31 May - 3 June, Maastricht.
(83)
(84) . !
(85)
(86) .
(87) .
(88)
(89)
(90)
(91)
(92)
(93)
(94)
(95)
(96) !"
(97) .
(98)
(99) #
(100)
(101)
(102)
(103) $#% & $ #%' ! (
(104)
(105)
(106) )
(107) * +)
(108)
(109)
(110)
(111)
(112)
(113) ,- .
(114)
(115) /
(116)
(117)
(118)
(119)
(120)
(121) * *
(122)
(123) )
(124)
(125)
(126) )
(127)
(128)
(129)
(130)
(131) .
(132) 01
(133)
(134)
(135)
(136) ) *
(137) ) 2 /
(138)
(139)
(140) .
(141)
(142) ) 21
(143)
(144) . 1002. 0 $
(145).
(146)
(147)
(148)
(149)
(150)
(151) + 03
(152)
(153)
(154) + * )
(155) /
(156) .
(157)
(158) $
(159) * )
(160) /
(161)
(162) )
(163)
(164)
(165) )
(166) 4
(167)
(168) .
(169)
(170)
(171)
(172) )
(173)
(174) ! 0
(175)
(176) 2
(177)
(178)
(179)
(180)
(181)
(182)
(183)
(184) ) / *
(185)
(186)
(187) )
(188)
(189) + 5+++ 64
(190) /
(191)
(192)
(193) 7 *
(194) %
(195) 4)
(196)
(197)
(198) * 8
(199) & / 8
(200)
(201)
(202) ' H1 (ω) H2 (ω)
(203)
(204) CF A (ω) ) *
(205)
(206) ) .
(207) EuroNoise 2015 31 May - 3 June, Maastricht. Y. Zhang et al.: Modal testing....
(208) A(ω)
(209) F (ω)
(210)
(211) H1 (ω) H2 (ω)
(212)
(213) . H1 (ω) =. SF A (ω) , SF F (ω). ! !. ω = 2πf
(214) SAF (ω) SF A (ω)
(215)
(216)
(217)
(218)
(219)
(220) SF F (ω)
(221)
(222)
(223) F (ω) SAA (ω) .
(224)
(225)
(226) A(ω) " # CF A (ω) "" H1 (ω) H2 (ω) $. %!
(227) &
(228)
(229) '
(230) & ( &
(231)
(232) " )
(233)
(234)
(235)
(236)
(237) " SF A (ω)SAF (ω) , SAA (ω)SF F (ω). %!. * +,
(238)
(239) &
(240) -
(241)
(242) " # & &
(243)
(244)
(245)
(246)
(247) %''' ./
(248)
(249)
(250) H1 (ω) H2 (ω) 0
(251) " #
(252)
(253)
(254) 0
(255) H1 (ω) &
(256).
(257)
(258) " #
(259)
(260)
(261)
(262) " # &
(263) &
(264) (
(265)
(266)
(267)
(268) 0
(269). " #
(270)
(271)
(272)
(273)
(274) '
(275) " #
(276)
(277)
(278)
(279) 1234$ -0 5 *
(280)
(281) " #
(282)
(283)
(284)
(285) .
(286) " # 1 1 !
(287)
(288) 0
(289)
(290) 0
(291) %" )
(292) 0
(293)
(294) H(ω) 0
(295)
(296)
(297) H(ω) =. N . ω2 k=1 k. −. ω2. 2N −1. H(ω) =. SAA (ω) , H2 (ω) = SAF (ω). CF A (ω) =. N
(298)
(299)
(300) Ak k 0
(301) ωk k ζk k
(302) &
(303) "" . .
(304) . Ak , + 2iωωk ζk. 6!. 1003. k=0 2N k=0. ak (iω)k. +!. , bk. (iω)k. ak bk 7
(305) " # 7
(306) / ef
(307) ˜ f )
(308)
(309) ωf H(ω ef =. 2m−1 k=0. 2m ˜ f) ak (iωf )k − H(ω bk (iωf )k ,. 8!. k=0. m
(310)
(311)
(312)
(313)
(314)
(315) f
(316) &
(317)
(318)
(319) " ) &
(320)
(321)
(322) " ) +
(323) 95) 9 0 5 ) !
(324)
(325) & -
(326)
(327) . " # 95)
(328)
(329) (
(330)
(331) " # &
(332)
(333) ,' '' ./
(334) &
(335)
(336)
(337) (
(338)
(339) . %" + &
(340)
(341)
(342)
(343)
(344) ,'
(345)
(346) " :
(347) 0
(348)
(349)
(350) /
(351)
(352)
(353). 0 " $0
(354)
(355)
(356)
(357)
(358)
(359) 0 &
(360) " #
(361)
(362) * 5*9 5 *
(363)
(364) 9 . (
(365)
(366)
(367) &
(368) " 8
(369)
(370) ; -
(371)
(372) " #
(373) (
(374)
(375) " #
(376)
(377) &
(378)
(379) <
(380)
(381)
(382) <
(383)
(384)
(385) &
(386)
(387)
(388)
(389) < .
(390) Y. Zhang et al.: Modal testing.... EuroNoise 2015 31 May - 3 June, Maastricht 1100 1000 900 800 f (Hz). 700 600 500. 0 bar 1 bar 2 bars. 400 300 200.
(391) f
(392) ζ .
(393) . $ % & '#
(394) &
(395) ! ( ! #
(396) ) . '# # & & '# * + . # . $ ## # % # ( . ( , 90◦ & . (
(397) . $ % # & #( ( #(-. '# ./*0 /00 1$2. 1004. 4 5 Mode order. 6. 7. 8. Drive point: Magnitude − Accelerance FRF. 2.
(398) ! " #
(399) . 3. 60 40 20 0 Experimental H1 Synthesized. −20 −40. 0. 200. 400. 600 f (Hz). 800. 1000. 1200. Drive point: Phase − Accelerance FRF 4 Accelerance phase (rad).
(400) . 2. ) '# 03 /
(401) . Accelerance magnitude (dB rel 1(m/s )/N).
(402)
(403) . 1. 2 0 −2 −4. 0. 200. 400. 600. 800. 1000. 1200. * ## # % . ( .
(404) .
(405) " . " 2 & # #
(406) ' & &# # '# & # # ( 03 /
(407) 4 3 # #
(408) ( & # # '# -. 5 3 # #
(409) 6 # #.
(410) & # # &
(411) !! , $ .
(412) Y. Zhang et al.: Modal testing....
(413) 2#
(414)
(415) , 2
(416)
(417) . Transfer point at 90 degrees: Magnitude − Accelerance FRF. 2. Accelerance magnitude (dB rel 1(m/s )/N). EuroNoise 2015 31 May - 3 June, Maastricht. 50. f . 0. ! ! . −50 Experimental H1 Synthesized −100. 0. 200. 400. 600 f (Hz). 800. 1000. 1200. Transfer point at 90 degrees: Phase − Accelerance FRF Accelerance phase (rad). 4 2 0 −2 −4. 0. 200. 400. 600. 800. 1000. 1200. .
(418)
(419)
(420)
(421)
(422)
(423)
(424) .
(425)
(426) . .
(427)
(428) . Y. . Y. Y. Z Z. Z.
(429). !
(430)
(431)
(432) "
(433)
(434) !
(435)
(436) #.
(437)
(438) "
(439)
(440) $ !
(441)
(442) %
(443) "
(444)
(445)
(446)
(447)
(448) & &
(449) #
(450)
(451)
(452) #
(453)
(454) $ ! "
(455)
(456)
(457)
(458) '
(459)
(460) ()* '
(461) "
(462) +
(463)
(464)
(465) !
(466)
(467)
(468)
(469)
(470) "
(471) +
(472) ,
(473) kg/m3 ! - ' . /0
(474)
(475) 0 '
(476) )1 "
(477)
(478) " "
(479) "
(480) +
(481)
(482)
(483) &
(484)
(485)
(486) "
(487) "
(488) . 1005.
(489)
(490) , "
(491) 34 5% " #
(492) 67 " 8
(493) % & ()* / " +
(494) #
(495) !
(496) " m = 2 to 9 "
(497)
(498) ,
(499)
(500) 9
(501) " #
(502)
(503) , &
(504)
(505) !
(506)
(507) &
(508)
(509) &
(510) , ! " :
(511) &
(512)
(513) "
(514)
(515)
(516)
(517)
(518) # !
(519)
(520) (*
(521) (.* # "
(522)
(523)
(524) ;;7 <;
(525) ;
(526) 7
(527) =
(528)
(529) "
(530)
(531)
(532) &
(533) #
(534) !
(535). +
(536).
(537) !
(538)
(539)
(540).
(541)
(542)
(543) &
(544)
(545) &
(546).
(547)
(548) ,
(549) "
(550)
(551)
(552) , #
(553)
(554)
(555)
(556)
(557)
(558) &
(559)
(560) >
(561) " 1
(562) !
(563) !
(564) !
(565) .
(566)
(567)
(568).
(569)
(570) &
(571)
(572)
(573) 90◦
(574)
(575) ,
(576) .
(577) .1 5% 1 5%. #
(578)
(579)
(580)
(581) "
(582) +
(583)
(584) ?
(585)
(586) !
(587) .
(588)
(589)
(590)
(591) , "
(592) ? "
(593)
(594)
(595)
(596)
(597) "
(598) #
(599) , . 5%
(600)
(601)
(602) ,
(603). "
(604) %
(605).
(606) ,
(607) &
(608)
(609)
(610) .
(611) "
(612) & . & + ,
(613) !
(614) + "
(615) 67 # '
(616) .
(617) " #
(618)
(619) #
(620) .
(621) Accelerance magnitude (dB rel 1(m/s2)/N). Y. Zhang et al.: Modal testing.... EuroNoise 2015 31 May - 3 June, Maastricht. ( )* Drive point: Magnitude − Accelerance FRF. "
(622)
(623) &
(624)
(625)
(626) & ( )*&
(627)
(628) %
(629)
(630)
(631)
(632)
(633) " % %
(634)
(635)
(636) %
(637)
(638) "
(639)
(640)
(641)
(642) + ,$ $-
(643)
(644) . 100. 50. Experimental H1 Synthesized FEM. 0. −50. 0. 200. 400. 600 f (Hz). 800. 1000. 1200. Drive point: Phase − Accelerance FRF Accelerance phase (rad). 4.
(645). 2. " - $ .
(646) / $ 0 1"" . 0 −2 −4. 0. 200. 400. 600. 800. 1000. . 1200.
(647)
(648). .
(649) . . . ! " #. $%. & ' . ( )"&*) +. ,. -. 0% . . $. . ''. .. / % ! . 1' . . &''. 23 ' 4 . 4. % 5 ! 60% 78)7 '9 :: -. ; 9. ,. -. ' . Transfer point at 90 degrees: Magnitude − Accelerance FRF. 2. Accelerance magnitude (dB rel 1(m/s )/N). . . ?. ' 4 " #&. ) &'' B. . 0. . = % : . CC. Experimental H1 Synthesized FEM. −50. D. ( . 9 , - " . 4 #. E . 0. 200. 400. 600 f (Hz). 800. 1000. 1200. '. . '. ' . '' ' % >7 +@ @. :D+ C. Transfer point at 90 degrees: Phase − Accelerance FRF. ( -' 9 > A F &.
(650) ' . 4 Accelerance phase (rad). % ' . A ,'' 9 , - "% 8 ' B $. 50. @. 2. 8 ; FI. 0. G . 4 . > B ! 9 F( H 9 A 4;I. . '' . I 9 8 8% '9. 9 J A '. G '. 4 ' ' % '4 )>$. ? : ++ :. −2. & $ 4 %9 8 8% '9 > B ! 9 F( H I%. −4. = '. ' >7 ?+ @@::@. 100. −100. % %4 < . ' ! . 0. 200. 400. 600. 800. 1000. . '' .
(651) 4 . 1200. 'K.
(652) !
(653). . . 2 8! 9 > B ! 9 F( H 9 A 4;I. I . . ' % )>$ ? 9 @ : ( - . 9 ( 9 , 8 9 A 8 B L G . ' . 1006.
(654) '. < ( B$ . '
(655) ' 4 #. . "
(656) #
(657)
(658)
(659) $ $
(660)
(661)
(662)
(663)
(664) %
(665) & % "
(666)
(667)
(668)
(669)
(670)
(671) %
(672) '(. . 2 ' !. ! . '. ' 4 . . 8 > = $. . E . ' % 9 9. ' & % +. ' . ( )B7 +. . ( 9 . ( ; 2 9 7 A ' . '. % ' 7 ! "% 9 %. . $ . . " ' M A 9 + . 8 '. K '. B9. (
(673) . /N 8 9 . 9. &)9.
(674)
Documents relatifs
Finally, a third reason for using the time integration method is that it could be used without adaptation for systems exhibiting several unstable modes in the complex
Figure 16: Comparison of the energy associated to the analytical solution and the energy associated to the approximated ones for the standard (left) and modified (right) mass
Generally, the second order schemes illustrate one of the difficulties when solving contact prob- lems, namely some oscillations for energy associated with approximate
A Nitsche finite element method for dynamic contact Franz Chouly, Patrick Hild, Yves Renard.. To cite
Mais pour réaliser au mieux ce projet, le comité «stime néeessaire de do ter plus richement cette tombola par des lots plus nombreux.. Jean Frey,
In this paper the use of the mortar element method (MEM) is presented to take into account the coil displacement in a three-dimensional finite element simulation of eddy
Two dif fi culties are associated with running-in, the experimental analysis of the asperity and surface evolutions with time and the numerical modeling of the micro- geometry change
This paper presents a novel CutFEM-LaTIn algorithm to solve multiple unilateral contact problems over geometries that do not conform with the finite element mesh.. We show that