Towards Context Graphs for Argumentation Logics

This demonstration will show how one can generate a benchmark of argumenta- tion graphs issued from logical knowledge bases expressed using existential rules.. The

It is obvious that in the case of a consistent knowledge base, the corresponding argumentation framework has exactly one extension, which contains all arguments, in- dependently of

We start by showing that under some reasonable conditions on the attack relation, an argumentation system built from a knowledge base 6 has a finite number of extensions even if its

Tryptophan catabolism mediated by indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) is an important mechanism of peripheral immune tolerance contributing to tumoural immune resistance.. 1

While inflammatory and demyelinating lesions of the white matter (WM) remain the hallmark of the disease and the most characteristic marker for diagnosis, grey matter (GM)

Summarizing, this logic of meta-argumentation allows us to specify and verify complex requirements for extended frameworks, such as extended argumentation frameworks with higher

Evaluation without justification (ex. in Figure 5) Non-codable answer No answer Context-based answer (ex. in Figure 8) Correct mentioning of data, but wrong conclusion is drawn

ASPIC+ On a high level, the structure of ASPIC+ [MP18] frameworks is similar to LBA in that it consists of a base logic (called the logical language) and an argumentative