• Aucun résultat trouvé

October30 ,2020andNovember2 ,2020 CAUCHY’SRESIDUETHEOREM ComplexVariables

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "October30 ,2020andNovember2 ,2020 CAUCHY’SRESIDUETHEOREM ComplexVariables"

Copied!
13
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

MAT334H1-F – LEC0101

Complex Variables

CAUCHY’S RESIDUE THEOREM

October 30th, 2020 and November 2nd, 2020

Jean-Baptiste Campesato MAT334H1-F – LEC0101 – Oct 30, 2020 and Nov 2, 2020 1 / 13

(2)

Cauchy’s residue theorem – 1

Theorem: the residue theorem

Let𝑈 ⊂ ℂbe open. Let𝑆 ⊂ 𝑈be finite. Assume that𝑓 ∶ 𝑈 ⧵ 𝑆 → ℂis holomorphic/analytic.

Let𝛾 ∶ [𝑎, 𝑏] → ℂbe a positively oriented piecewise smooth simple closed curve on𝑈 ⧵ 𝑆awhose insidebis entirely included in𝑈. Thenc

𝛾𝑓 (𝑧)d𝑧 = 2𝑖𝜋 ∑

𝑧∈Inside(𝛾)

Res(𝑓 , 𝑧)

ai.e.𝛾doesn’t pass through any point of𝑆.

bSee Jordan’s curve theorem, September 28.

cThe following sum is finite sinceRes(𝑓 , 𝑧) ≠ 0only for𝑧 ∈ 𝑆.

Corollary

Let𝑈 ⊂ ℂbe open and simply-connected. Let𝑆 ⊂ 𝑈be finite.

Assume that𝑓 ∶ 𝑈 ⧵ 𝑆 → ℂis holomorphic/analytic.

Let𝛾 ∶ [𝑎, 𝑏] → ℂbe a positively oriented piecewise smooth simple closed curve on𝑈 ⧵ 𝑆. Then

𝛾𝑓 (𝑧)d𝑧 = 2𝑖𝜋 ∑

𝑧∈Inside(𝛾)

Res(𝑓 , 𝑧)

Jean-Baptiste Campesato MAT334H1-F – LEC0101 – Oct 30, 2020 and Nov 2, 2020 2 / 13

(3)

Cauchy’s residue theorem – 2

Proof. 𝛾

𝑧1

𝑧2

𝑧3 𝑧4

We may find pairwise disjoints disks𝐷𝑟𝑘(𝑧𝑘) ⊂ 𝑈where{𝑧1, … , 𝑧𝑛}are the points of𝑆enclosed in𝛾.

We apply Green’s theorem to𝑇 =Inside(𝛾) ⧵ (

𝑛

𝑖=1

𝐷𝑟𝑘(𝑧𝑘) ), then

𝛾𝑓 (𝑧)d𝑧 −

𝑛

𝑘=1𝛾𝑘𝑓 (𝑧)d𝑧 = 𝑖

𝑇(

𝜕𝑓

𝜕𝑥+ 𝑖𝜕𝑓

𝜕𝑦 )= 0 where𝛾𝑘∶ [0, 1] → ℂis defined by𝛾𝑘(𝑡) = 𝑧𝑘+ 𝑟𝑘𝑒2𝑖𝜋𝑡.

The last equality is due to the Cauchy–Riemann equations.

Then∫𝛾𝑓 (𝑧)d𝑧 =

𝑛

𝑘=1𝛾

𝑘

𝑓 (𝑧)d𝑧 = 2𝑖𝜋

𝑛

𝑘=1

Res(𝑓 , 𝑧𝑘) ■

Jean-Baptiste Campesato MAT334H1-F – LEC0101 – Oct 30, 2020 and Nov 2, 2020 3 / 13

(4)

Cauchy’s residue theorem – 3

Corollary

Let𝑆 ⊂ ℂbe finite. Assume that𝑓 ∶ ℂ ⧵ 𝑆 → ℂis holomorphic/analytic. Then Res(𝑓 , ∞) +∑

𝑧∈𝑆

Res(𝑓 , 𝑧) = 0

Proof.Take𝑟 > 0such that𝑆 ⊂ 𝐷𝑟(0)and define𝛾 ∶ [0, 1] → ℂby𝛾(𝑡) = 𝑟𝑒2𝑖𝜋𝑡. Then

𝑧∈𝑆

Res(𝑓 , 𝑧) = 1

2𝑖𝜋 ∫𝛾𝑓 (𝑧)d𝑧 by Cauchy’s residue theorem

= −Res(𝑓 , ∞)

■ We may rewrite the above conclusion as

𝑧∈̂

Res(𝑓 , 𝑧) = 0.

Jean-Baptiste Campesato MAT334H1-F – LEC0101 – Oct 30, 2020 and Nov 2, 2020 4 / 13

(5)

Example: ∫

−∞+∞ 𝑃 (𝑥)

𝑄(𝑥)

d𝑥 (rational function) – 1

Assume that𝑃 and𝑄are two polynomials. Set𝑓 (𝑧) = 𝑃 (𝑧)𝑄(𝑧). We know that

+∞

−∞

𝑃 (𝑥)

𝑄(𝑥)d𝑥is convergent if and only ifdeg𝑄 ≥deg𝑃 + 2, let’s assume the latter.

Then lim

|𝑧|→∞𝑧𝑓 (𝑧) = 0.

Assume that𝑄has no real root.

ℜ ℑ

−𝑅 𝑅

Define𝛾𝑅∶ [0, 1] → ℂby𝛾𝑅(𝑡) = 𝑅𝑒𝑖𝜋𝑡.

For𝑅 > 0big enough, all the poles of𝑓 whose imaginary part is positive are included within the upper-half disk centered at0and of radius𝑅.

Then∫

𝑅

−𝑅

𝑓 (𝑧)d𝑧 +

𝛾

𝑅

𝑓 (𝑧)d𝑧 = 2𝑖𝜋 ∑

𝑧s.t.ℑ(𝑧)>0

Res(𝑓 , 𝑧).

But|∫𝛾

𝑅

𝑓|≤ 𝜋𝑅sup

𝛾𝑅 |𝑓 | −−−−−→

𝑅→+∞ 0since lim

|𝑧|→∞𝑧𝑓 (𝑧) = 0.

Hence

+∞

−∞

𝑃 (𝑥)

𝑄(𝑥)d𝑥 = 2𝑖𝜋 ∑

𝑧s.t.ℑ(𝑧)>0

Res( 𝑃 𝑄, 𝑧

).

Jean-Baptiste Campesato MAT334H1-F – LEC0101 – Oct 30, 2020 and Nov 2, 2020 5 / 13

(6)

Example: ∫

−∞+∞ 𝑃 (𝑥)

𝑄(𝑥)

d𝑥 (rational function) – 2

Example

Compute

+∞

−∞

d𝑥

(𝑥2+ 𝑎2)(𝑥2+ 𝑏2) où0 < 𝑎 < 𝑏.

The poles of𝑓 (𝑧) =(𝑧2+𝑎21)(𝑧2+𝑏2) are−𝑖𝑎,𝑖𝑎,−𝑖𝑏and𝑖𝑏which are simple. Hence

+∞

−∞

d𝑥

(𝑥2+ 𝑎2)(𝑥2+ 𝑏2) = 2𝑖𝜋Res(𝑓 , 𝑖𝑎) + 2𝑖𝜋Res(𝑓 , 𝑖𝑏)

= 2𝑖𝜋

2𝑖(𝑏2− 𝑎2)𝑎+ 2𝑖𝜋 2𝑖(𝑎2− 𝑏2)𝑏

= 𝜋

𝑎𝑏(𝑎 + 𝑏)

Jean-Baptiste Campesato MAT334H1-F – LEC0101 – Oct 30, 2020 and Nov 2, 2020 6 / 13

(7)

Example: ∫

02𝜋

𝑅(cos 𝑡, sin 𝑡)d𝑡

Set𝑧 = 𝑒𝑖𝑡thencos(𝑡) = 1

2(𝑧 +1𝑧),sin(𝑡) = 1

2𝑖(𝑧 −1𝑧), andd𝑧

𝑖𝑧 =d𝑡.

Set𝑓 (𝑧) = 1

𝑖𝑧𝑅 (12(𝑧 +1𝑧) ,2𝑖1 (𝑧 −1𝑧)). Then

2𝜋 0

𝑅(cos𝑡,sin𝑡)d𝑡 =

𝑆1

𝑓 (𝑧)d𝑧 = 2𝑖𝜋 ∑

𝑧∈𝐷1(0)

Res(𝑓 , 𝑧).

Example

Compute

2𝜋 0

𝑎

𝑎2+sin2𝑡d𝑡where𝑎 > 0.

Set𝑓 (𝑧) = 1 𝑖𝑧

𝑎 𝑎21

4(𝑧 −1𝑧)

2 = − 4𝑖𝑎𝑧

(𝑧2+ 2𝑎𝑧 − 1)(𝑧2− 2𝑎𝑧 − 1).

Note that the singularity at0of the LHS is removable since we may extend𝑓 through0using the RHS, so thatRes(𝑓 , 0) = 0.

Then, the only poles of𝑓 within the unit disk are𝑧1= −𝑎 + √𝑎2+ 1and𝑧2= 𝑎 − √𝑎2+ 1which are simple.

Hence

2𝜋 0

𝑎

𝑎2+sin2𝑡d𝑡 = 2𝑖𝜋Res(𝑓 , 𝑧1) + 2𝑖𝜋Res(𝑓 , 𝑧2) = 2𝜋

√𝑎2+ 1

Jean-Baptiste Campesato MAT334H1-F – LEC0101 – Oct 30, 2020 and Nov 2, 2020 7 / 13

(8)

Jordan’s lemma

The following trick called,Jordan’s lemma, can be very useful.

Let𝛾𝑅∶ [0, 𝜋] → ℂbe defined by𝛾𝑅(𝑡) = 𝑅𝑒𝑖𝑡.

|∫𝛾𝑅𝑔(𝑧)𝑒𝑖𝑧d𝑧

|=

|∫

𝜋 0

𝑔(𝑅𝑒𝑖𝑡)𝑒𝑖𝑅(cos𝑡+𝑖sin𝑡)𝑖𝑅𝑒𝑖𝑡d𝑡

|

≤∫

𝜋

0 |𝑔(𝑅𝑒𝑖𝑡)𝑒𝑖𝑅(cos𝑡+𝑖sin𝑡)𝑖𝑅𝑒𝑖𝑡|d𝑡

≤ 𝑅sup

𝛾𝑅

|𝑔|∫

𝜋 0

𝑒−𝑅sin𝑡d𝑡

= 2𝑅sup

𝛾𝑅

|𝑔|∫

𝜋/2 0

𝑒−𝑅sin𝑡d𝑡

≤ 2𝑅sup

𝛾𝑅

|𝑔|∫

𝜋/2 0

𝑒−2𝑅𝑡/𝜋d𝑡 by Jordan’s inequality: ∀𝑥 ∈ [0,𝜋 2 ], 2

𝜋𝑥 ≤sin(𝑥) ≤ 𝑥

≤ 𝜋sup

𝛾𝑅

|𝑔| (1 − 𝑒−𝑅)

≤ 𝜋sup

𝛾𝑅

|𝑔|

Jean-Baptiste Campesato MAT334H1-F – LEC0101 – Oct 30, 2020 and Nov 2, 2020 8 / 13

(9)

Example: ∫

−∞+∞ 𝑃 (𝑥)

𝑄(𝑥)

𝑒

𝑖𝑎𝑥

d𝑥 – 1

We want to compute𝐼(𝑎) ≔

+∞

−∞

𝑃 (𝑥)

𝑄(𝑥)𝑒𝑖𝑎𝑥d𝑥where𝑃 , 𝑄are real polynomials and𝑎 ∈ ℝ. Assume that𝑄 has no real root.

Note that𝐼(−𝑎) = 𝐼(𝑎), so we may restrict our attention to𝑎 > 0.

The integral is convergent if and only ifdeg𝑄 ≥deg𝑃 + 1(integration by parts), so we assume the latter.

ℜ ℑ

−𝑅 𝑅

Define𝛾𝑅∶ [0, 1] → ℂby𝛾𝑅(𝑡) = 𝑅𝑒𝑖𝜋𝑡.

For𝑅 > 0big enough, all the poles of𝑓 (𝑧) =𝑃 (𝑧)𝑄(𝑧)𝑒𝑖𝑎𝑧whose imaginary part is positive are included within the upper-half disk centered at0and of radius𝑅.

Then

𝑅

−𝑅

𝑓 (𝑧)d𝑧 +

𝛾

𝑅

𝑓 (𝑧)d𝑧 = 2𝑖𝜋

𝑧s.t.ℑ(𝑧)>0

Res(𝑓 , 𝑧) (∗) But, by Jordan’s lemma,

|∫𝛾𝑅 𝑃 (𝑧) 𝑄(𝑧)𝑒𝑖𝑧d𝑧

|≤ 𝜋sup

𝛾𝑅

|𝑃 /𝑄| −−−−−→

𝑅→+∞ 0 Hence, by taking𝑅 → +∞in(∗), we get

+∞

−∞

𝑃 (𝑥)

𝑄(𝑥)𝑒𝑖𝑎𝑥d𝑥 = 2𝑖𝜋

𝑧s.t.ℑ(𝑧)>0

Res( 𝑃 (𝑧) 𝑄(𝑧)𝑒𝑖𝑎𝑧, 𝑧

)

Jean-Baptiste Campesato MAT334H1-F – LEC0101 – Oct 30, 2020 and Nov 2, 2020 9 / 13

(10)

Example: ∫

−∞+∞ 𝑃 (𝑥)

𝑄(𝑥)

𝑒

𝑖𝑎𝑥

d𝑥 – 2

Example

Compute

+∞

−∞

cos(𝑥)

𝑥2+ 𝛼2d𝑥where𝛼 > 0.

Note that

+∞

−∞

cos(𝑥)

𝑥2+ 𝛼2d𝑥 = ℜ (∫

+∞

−∞

𝑒𝑖𝑥 𝑥2+ 𝛼2d𝑥

). The poles of𝑓 (𝑧) = 𝑒𝑖𝑧

𝑧2+ 𝛼2 are𝑖𝛼 and−𝑖𝛼which are simple.

By the previous slide,

+∞

−∞

𝑒𝑖𝑧

𝑧2+ 𝛼2d𝑧 = 2𝑖𝜋Res(𝑓 , 𝑖𝛼) = 2𝑖𝜋𝑒−𝛼

2𝑖𝛼 = 𝜋𝑒−𝛼 𝛼 . Hence

+∞

−∞

cos(𝑥)

𝑥2+ 𝛼2d𝑥 = 𝜋𝑒−𝛼 𝛼 .

Jean-Baptiste Campesato MAT334H1-F – LEC0101 – Oct 30, 2020 and Nov 2, 2020 10 / 13

(11)

Example: ∫

0+∞ 𝑥𝑝

1+𝑥𝑛

d𝑥, 𝑛, 𝑝 ∈ ℕ

We know that the integral

+∞

0

𝑥𝑝

1 + 𝑥𝑛d𝑥is convergent if and only if𝑛 ≥ 𝑝 + 2. Set𝑓 (𝑧) = 𝑧𝑝

1 + 𝑧𝑛 and𝑎 = 𝑒𝑖𝜋𝑛. We consider the following sector of the circle centered at0and of radius𝑅, such that the only pole of𝑓 enclosed in its inside is𝑎.

ℜ ℑ

0 𝑅

𝑎2𝑅

𝑎

Let𝛾 ∶ [0,2𝜋𝑛] → ℂbe defined by𝛾(𝑡) = 𝑅𝑒𝑖𝑡.

By the residue theorem,2𝑖𝜋Res(𝑓 , 𝑎) =

[0,𝑅]𝑓 +

𝛾𝑓 +

[𝑎2𝑅,0]

𝑓.

• Res(𝑓 , 𝑎) = 𝑎𝑝

𝑛𝑎𝑛−1 = −𝑎𝑝+1

𝑛 .

• ∫

[𝑎2𝑅,0]

𝑓 (𝑧)d𝑧 = −𝑎2

𝑅 0

𝑎2𝑝𝑡𝑝

1 + 𝑎2𝑛𝑡𝑛d𝑡 = −𝑎2(𝑝+1)

𝑅 0

𝑡𝑝 1 + 𝑡𝑛d𝑡

• |∫𝛾𝑓 (𝑧)d𝑧

|≤2𝜋 𝑛𝑅sup

𝛾

|𝑓 | −−−−−→

𝑅→+∞ 0sincelim

𝑧→∞𝑧𝑓 (𝑧) = 0.

Hence, by taking the limit as𝑅 → +∞, we get−2𝑖𝜋𝑎𝑝+1 𝑛 =

+∞

0

𝑥𝑝

1 + 𝑥𝑛d𝑥 − 𝑎2(𝑝+1)

+∞

0

𝑥𝑝 1 + 𝑥𝑛d𝑥.

Finally

+∞

0

𝑥𝑝

1 + 𝑥𝑛d𝑥 = 2𝑖𝜋 𝑛

𝑎𝑝+1 𝑎2(𝑝+1)− 1= 𝜋

𝑛 2𝑖

𝑎𝑝+1− 𝑎−(𝑝+1) = 𝜋 𝑛sin(𝑝+1)𝜋

𝑛

.

Jean-Baptiste Campesato MAT334H1-F – LEC0101 – Oct 30, 2020 and Nov 2, 2020 11 / 13

(12)

Example: ∫

0+∞ sin𝑡

𝑡

d𝑡

ℜ ℑ

−𝑅 −𝑟 𝑟 𝑅

Define𝛾𝑅∶ [0, 1] → ℂby𝛾𝑅(𝑡) = 𝑅𝑒𝑖𝜋𝑡 and𝛾𝑟∶ [0, 1] → ℂby𝛾𝑟(𝑡) = 𝑟𝑒𝑖𝜋𝑡.

By Cauchy’s integral theorem

𝛾

𝑅

𝑒𝑖𝑧 𝑧d𝑧 −

𝛾

𝑟

𝑒𝑖𝑧 𝑧d𝑧 +

−𝑟

−𝑅

𝑒𝑖𝑡 𝑡 d𝑡 +

𝑅 𝑟

𝑒𝑖𝑡 𝑡 d𝑡 = 0.

•By Jordan’s lemma:

|∫𝛾𝑅 𝑒𝑖𝑧

𝑧d𝑧

|≤ 𝜋sup

𝛾𝑅

|1/𝑧| −−−−−→

𝑅→+∞ 0

•Since0is a simple pole of𝑓 (𝑧) =𝑒𝑖𝑧

𝑧, we have that 𝑓 (𝑧) =Res(𝑓 , 0)𝑧−1+ 𝑔(𝑧)where𝑔is holomorphic.

Then∫𝛾

𝑟

𝑓 (𝑧)d𝑧 =

𝛾

𝑟

Res(𝑓 , 0)𝑧−1d𝑧 +

𝛾

𝑟

𝑔(𝑧)d𝑧but

𝛾

𝑟

Res(𝑓 , 0)𝑧−1d𝑧 =Res(𝑓 , 0)𝑖𝜋and

|∫𝛾𝑟𝑔(𝑧)d𝑧

|≤ 𝜋𝑟sup

𝛾𝑟

|𝑔| −−→

𝑟→0 0.

Hence

𝛾

𝑟

𝑓 (𝑧)d𝑧 −−→

𝑟→0 Res(𝑓 , 0)𝑖𝜋 = 𝑖𝜋.

𝑅 𝑟

sin𝑡 𝑡 d𝑡 = 1

2𝑖 ∫

𝑅 𝑟

𝑒𝑖𝑡− 𝑒−𝑖𝑡 𝑡 d𝑡 = 1

2𝑖 ∫

𝑅 𝑟

𝑒𝑖𝑡 𝑡 d𝑡 −1

2𝑖 ∫

𝑅 𝑟

𝑒−𝑖𝑡 𝑡 d𝑡 = 1

2𝑖 ∫

𝑅 𝑟

𝑒𝑖𝑡 𝑡 d𝑡 +1

2𝑖 ∫

−𝑟

−𝑅

𝑒𝑖𝑡 𝑡d𝑡 = 1

2𝑖 (∫𝛾𝑟 𝑒𝑖𝑧

𝑧d𝑧 −

𝛾

𝑅

𝑒𝑖𝑧 𝑧 d𝑧

) Hence, taking𝑟 → 0and𝑅 → +∞we get that

+∞

0

sin𝑡 𝑡 d𝑡 =𝜋

2

Jean-Baptiste Campesato MAT334H1-F – LEC0101 – Oct 30, 2020 and Nov 2, 2020 12 / 13

(13)

Example: ∫

0+∞ (log𝑡)2

1+𝑡2

d𝑡

We set𝑓 (𝑧) = (log𝑧)1+𝑧22 but for that we need to fix a branch of the logarithm. Let’s fixlog∶ ℂ ⧵ {𝑖𝑦 ∶ 𝑦 ≤ 0} → ℂdefined by log𝑧 =log|𝑧| + 𝑖Arg(𝑧)whereArg(𝑧) ∈ (−𝜋2, 3𝜋2).

−𝑅 −𝑟 𝑟 𝑅

𝑖

Define𝛾𝑅∶ [0, 1] → ℂby𝛾𝑅(𝑡) = 𝑅𝑒𝑖𝜋𝑡and 𝛾𝑟∶ [0, 1] → ℂby𝛾𝑟(𝑡) = 𝑟𝑒𝑖𝜋𝑡.

By Cauchy’s residue theorem

𝛾𝑅𝑓 (𝑧)d𝑧 −

𝛾𝑟𝑓 (𝑧)d𝑧 +

−𝑟

−𝑅

𝑓 (𝑧)d𝑧 +

𝑅 𝑟

𝑓 (𝑧)d𝑧 = 2𝑖𝜋Res(𝑓 , 𝑖) = −𝜋3 4.

Since|log𝑧| ≤ |ln𝑟| + 𝜋on𝛾𝑟,

𝛾

𝑟

𝑓 (𝑧)d𝑧 ≤ 𝜋𝑟(|ln𝑟| + 𝜋)2

1 + 𝑟2 −−−−−−−−→

𝑟→+∞or0 0.

Since𝑧 = 𝑡𝑒𝑖𝜋on[−𝑅, −𝑟], we have

−𝑟

−𝑅

𝑓 (𝑧)d𝑧 =

𝑅 𝑟

(ln𝑡 + 𝑖𝜋)2 1 + 𝑡2 d𝑡 =

𝑅 𝑟

(ln𝑡)2 1 + 𝑡2d𝑡+2𝑖𝜋

𝑅 𝑟

ln𝑡 1 + 𝑡2d𝑡−

𝑅 𝑟

𝜋2 1 + 𝑡2d𝑡

By taking the limits𝑟 → 0and𝑅 → +∞we get

+∞

0

(ln𝑡)2 1 + 𝑡2d𝑡 + 2𝑖𝜋

+∞

0

ln𝑡 1 + 𝑡2d𝑡 −𝜋3

2 +

+∞

0

(ln𝑡)2 1 + 𝑡2d𝑡 = −𝜋3

4. By taking the real part, we get

+∞

0

(ln𝑡)2 1 + 𝑡2d𝑡 =𝜋3

8.

Jean-Baptiste Campesato MAT334H1-F – LEC0101 – Oct 30, 2020 and Nov 2, 2020 13 / 13

Références

Documents relatifs

[r]

[r]

2 That’s actually the usual definition of simple connectedness: a path connected set is simply connected if any closed curve on it is homotopic to a point.... Simple connectedness

A common way to construct an analytic function consists in defining it in a ”small” domain and then to extend it to an analytic function with a bigger domain.. By the above result,

A common way to construct an analytic function consists in defining it in a ”small” domain and then to extend it to an analytic function with a bigger domain.. By the above result,

[r]

practice exercises from

Assume