• Aucun résultat trouvé

Converting heating degree-days from below 65 degrees F to below 18 degrees C

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Converting heating degree-days from below 65 degrees F to below 18 degrees C"

Copied!
10
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Publisher’s version / Version de l'éditeur:

Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca.

Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at

PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information.

https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits

L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.

Building Research Note, 1975-08

READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE. https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright

NRC Publications Archive Record / Notice des Archives des publications du CNRC :

https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=35dc2518-af0e-4611-9af4-11e5e0ae314e https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=35dc2518-af0e-4611-9af4-11e5e0ae314e

NRC Publications Archive

Archives des publications du CNRC

This publication could be one of several versions: author’s original, accepted manuscript or the publisher’s version. / La version de cette publication peut être l’une des suivantes : la version prépublication de l’auteur, la version acceptée du manuscrit ou la version de l’éditeur.

For the publisher’s version, please access the DOI link below./ Pour consulter la version de l’éditeur, utilisez le lien DOI ci-dessous.

https://doi.org/10.4224/40000607

Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at Converting heating degree-days from below 65 degrees F to below 18 degrees C

(2)
(3)

CONVERTING HEATING DEGREE-DAYS FROM BELOW 65 O F TO BELOW 18 OC

Donald

W.

Boyd

C u r r e n t values of heating degree-days published by the

meteosolsgical services in North America will probably b e expressed as

degree days below 18 "C starting sometime in 1975 and continuing f o ~ a considerable time before tables of normal degree-days below I8 O C are

available. To compare cument values with t h e normal it will be

necessary t o convert t h e published, normal degree-days below 65 OF t o

degree days below 18

"c.

Because 65 "F and 18 "C are slightly different temperatures the degree-day conversion is not simply a matter of

multiplying by a constant. In a d d i t i o n to t h e multiplication t h e r e is an adjustment, which in a 30-day month may mount to 18 F a r e n h e i t

degree-days or 10 Celsius degree-days. For any month in which t h e

d a i l y mean temperature exceeds 65 O F for one or more days the conversion

cannot be exact but the method o u t l i n e d i n t h i s Note w i l l give

adequately accurate r e s u l t s .

The heating degree-days f o r a single day are d e f i n e d as the number of degrees t h a t the mean temperature f o r t h e day i s below the base temperature.

PE

t h e mean temperature for the day is above the base temperature then the degree days are zero. The h e a t i n g degree- days for a month are t h e sum of t h e daily values. The normal h e a t i n g degree-days for a particulas month are the average of t h e values for t h a t month over some standard period, usually 30 years.

From these definitions it follows t h a t t h e only method af

computing exact normal values is t o go through the records day by day for 30 years. Degree days below 45 "E have been computed for a number of weather stations in t h i s way. In Canada, however, most of t h e published normal values are based on afz inexact b u t s u f f i c i e n t l y

accurate computation method devised by H . C. S

.

Thorn,

'

He showed t h a t normal monthly degree-days below 65 "F could be computed from t h e normal monthly mem temperatures, t, and t h e i r standard deviations, s. To do this h e used two equations:

where N is t h e number o f days in t h e month and D is t h e average number of degree days p e r day. The value of h i s defined by Eq. [I). The v a r i a b l e E i s a f u n c t i o n of h defined in Thorn's paper by a graph and a l s o by a t a b l e . Knowing t h e monthly mean temperature and its standard d e v i a t i o n one can compute h from E q . ( I ) and hence o b t a i n R from the

(4)

t a b l e . D is then computed from Eq. (21 and t h e degree days below 65

"F

f o r t h e month are given by ND.

It seems, therefore, that t h e ~ e a r e three obvious methods of o b t a i n i n g heating degree-days below 18 'C:

1. To convert d a i l y temperatures to C for the past 30 years and compute C degree days exactly,

2. To use Thorn's method to compute degree days below 64.4 "F from

monthly mean temperatures and standard deviations and multiply

t h e r e s u l t b y 519, and

3 . To use Thorn's t a b l e to establish t h e relationship between degree days below 65 O F and below 6 4 . 4 "F, and multiply by

5/9 to convert to degree days below 18 OC.

The f i r s t method is exact but would require a great deal of computation. The second is reasonably accurate but would be tedious except on a

d i g i t a l computer. The t h i r d should equal the second i n accuracy and should be simple enough f o r hand calculation. The remainder of this note is concerned o n l y with the third method in the hope that it will be useful until complete tables can be computed using e i t h e r method one or t w o .

0

A is t h e normal number of degree days below 6 5 F in a month, but it is mere convenient to work w i t h D, t h e average number of degree days p e r day, where:

As 18 "C is exactly equal to 64.4 O F , the average C degree days per day below 18 C' will be e x a c t l y equal to 5/9 of the average

F

degree days

p e r day below 64.4 O F (Dl)

.

What is required, therefore, is the conversion from D to Dq.

Equations (I] and (23 can be combined to give:

Knowing D, s and N , one can compute h + R and from Thorn's t a b l e obtain

t h e corresponding value of h

.

Equation (11 gives (65 - t'g

,

and t

.

Thorn's method can then be used in t h e usual order to give D', the

average degree days per day below 64.4 O F .

These calculations weTe done f o r odd values o f D from I to 21 and f o r five values of s ~ ranging from ~ / ~ 5 to 25. The mean temper- atures in Cmadian Normals, Volume 1 and t h e standard deviations given by Kendall and Anderson3 were searched and only four station-

months of concern were found t h a t were not covered by these ranges.

They were Carmi, British Columbia, in May, Holman and P o r t Radium, Northwest Territories, in August and Embarras, Alberta, in April.

Thorn's values for h and R are quoted to two figures and is

(5)

the r e l a t i o n s h i p between D and D'. The values of R were therefore smoothed and t a b u l a t e d to four figures. For values of h from 0 . 7 8 to

zero and of R from zero to 0.19 the R-values themselves were smoothed. Were there were

n

identical values of II, say

L,

they were replaced by

the series:

where m takes only odd i n t e g r a l positive values less than 2n. For

values of h from -0.70 to zero and of E from 0.70 to 0 . 1 9 t h e same smoothing was applied to the sum h + R.

Using these smoothed values the calculations of D l were repeated. The results, expressed as values o f the difference D - ! I t are shown in Table I and are plotted in Figure 1.

The plotted values obviously needed some smoothing and after

t r y i n g several methods the following equation was finally selected:

log

(a

-

y) = log d

-

C D / S N ~ / ~

151

where :

d = 0.6, the difference in degrees

F

between the base temperatures 65 O F and 18 "C or 6 4 . 4 O F .

y = D - D l , the required adjustment in

F

degree days per day.

c = 1.5, a dimensionless constant.

This equation is shown in F i g u r e I for each of the f i v e values of

S N I P

in Table I. No attempt has been made t a j u s t i f y t h e form of t h e equation on theoretical grounds; it is purely empirical. Na attempt has been made to use any mathematical analysis t o obtain the b e s t value f o r the

constant c , it is s i m p l y a convenient. number which g i v e s a sufficiently close fit to t h e computed values of y. "Suf.EicientLy close" in t h i s case means t h a t most o f the plotted p o i n t s a r e within about 0.05 F

degrees [on the y-scale) of the corresponding curve, This corresponds to about one degree day per month and hence is more accurate t h a n the

degree days computed from monthly mean temperatures quoted only to

0 . 1 O F , corresponding to about 3 degree days p e r manth.

The conversion from A (the F degree-days below 65 "F) to

B

( t h e C degree-days below I 8

'c)

is therefore accomplished by using t h e two e q u a t i o n s :

These equations may be u s e f u l when s is known and when t h e conversion is being done by a d i g i t a l computer.

In many cases, however, t h e value of s will n o t be readily available and t h e precision of t h e s e equations will n o t be necessary. It is evident from Figure 1 t h a t the central curve f o r = 15 is

(6)

corresponds to about 3 degree days per month. If this is sufffciently accurate then Eq. ( 5 ) reduces to:

log (d

-

Y ) = log

a

-

0.1

D.

171

The values of Ny need not be calculated any more accurately than one degree day. Equation (7) was heref fore used to calculate t h e range o f D , or of A =

ND,

f o r each integral value of Nyformonths of28 1/4, 30 and

31 days. The three t a b l e s d i f f e r only slightly. If the central one f o r N = 30 were used for all months t h e m a x i m u m e m o r in Ny would be one degree day per month.

Table I1 w a s calculated u s i n g N = 30 b u t it could be used for any month. Knowing only A ( t h e F degree-days below 65 O F ] , one can obtain a value of B (the C degree-days below 18 "C) in two steps:

obtain the adjustment Ny from Table TI, and compute £3 from the equation:

The inverse conversion from Celsius to Fahrenheit can be

accomplished with equal accuracy and simplicity. For N = 30, Eqs. 16) and (73 can be written:

where :

z = 5yS9 (or y = 1.823

Combining these gives:

Equation (8) was used to calculate the range of B for each i n t e g r a l

value of 302. The results are given in Table 111. Although it is

based on N = 30 and S N I - J ~ = 1 5 , it could be used for any month. bowing only I3 (che C degree-days below 18

'c) ,

one can obtain a value of A

0

[the F degree-days below 6 5 F), in two steps: obtain the adjustment Nz from Table 111, and compute A from the equation:

CONC LUS ION

Monthly h e a t i n g degree-days can be converted exactly from below 65 O F to below 18 " C only by recalculation en a day-by-day b a s i s .

Most o f t h e normal monthly degree-days below 65 *F in Canada were

computed from normal monthly mean ternperarures using Thorn's method. It is assumed t h a t h i s method yields adequately accurate r e s u l t s .

Monthly degree-days computed by Thorn" method can be

converted without any significant l o s s of accuracy by using Eqs. (5)

and (6) provided the standard deviation of the monthly mean temperatures

(7)

A more practical conversion which may involve errors of about 3 F o r 2 C degree-days per month can be accomplished without considering the standard deviation or the number af days in t h e month. Table I1 and Eq. ( 6 ) can be used to convert from monthly degree-days below 65 O F to

below 18 "C. Table

III

and Eq. (9) can be used for the inverse conversion.

REFERENCES

( I ) Thorn, H.C.S. The r a t i o n a l felationship between h e a t i n g degree

days and temperature. Monthly Weather Review, V o l . 82, No. 1, p . 1-6, Jan. 1954.

(2) Canadian Nomals, Vol. 1, Temperature 1941-1970. Atmospheric Environment Service, Downsview, 1973.

(3) Rendall, G.R. and S.R. Anderson. Standard deviationsofmonthly and annual mean temperatures. Canada, Dept. of Transport, Meteorological Branch, Toronto, Climatological Studies Number 4 . 1966.

(8)

TABLE I

Values of y = D

-

D' in F degree-days p e r day

TABLE I 1

Adjustments Ny in F degree-days to be used i n equation: B = 5 (A - Ny)/9

A , in E degree-days

h'y, in

(9)

TABLE I I I

Adjustments Nz in C degree-days to be used in equation: A = 9

(B

+ N z ) / 5 B, in C degree-days Nz, in C degree-days TABLE IV PRINCIPAL SYMBOLS F : F a h r e n h e i t C : Celsius A : F degree-days below 65 O F B E C degree-days below 18 OC

!I : AJN, average F degree-days p e r day below 6 5 "F D t : Average F degree-days per day below 64.4 "F N : Number of days in t h e month

c : 1.5, a dimensionless c o n s t a n t

d : 0.6, the difference between 65 and 6 4 . 4 O F

h : Factor in Thorn" t a b l e R : Factor in Thorn's t a b l e

t : Normal monthly mean temperature

s : Standard d e v i a t i o n of monthly mean temperatures y : D-Df, t h e adjustment in F degree-days per day

(10)

0 0 2 4 6 8 1 0 12 24 1 6 18 20 2 2 24 D I N F D E G R E E - D A Y S PER D A Y F I G U R E 1 1 V A L U E S OF y FOR V A R I O U S V A L U E S O F D AND s ~ '

Figure

Table  I1  w a s   calculated  u s i n g  N  =  30  b u t   it  could  be  used  for  any  month

Références

Documents relatifs

(2013) Length-weight relationship and seasonal effects of the Summer Monsoon on condition factor of Terapon jarbua (Forsskål, 1775) from the wider Gulf of Aden including

Identification and detection of a novel point mutation in the Chitin Synthase gene of Culex pipiens associated with diflubenzuron resistance...

These depend on which actor controls the trait (the vector or the parasite) and, when there is manipulation, whether it is realised via infected hosts (to attract vectors) or

Brennan TP, Woods JO, Sedaghat AR, Siliciano JD, Siliciano RF, Wilke CO: Analysis of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 viremia and provirus in resting CD4+ T cells reveals a

The newly employed reactive magnetron co-sputtering technique has allowed us to enhance the absorption coefficient from the MLs owing to the high density of Si-ncs achieved and/or the

Market and communication schemes have taken a noticeable place in temples and some of them can be regarded as types of “mega-temples.” 2 This article describes the

Altogether, these results indicate that expression of the endogenous DRP1 protein is important for maintaining normal mitochondrial morphology in NHEK and that loss of this

sour rot symptoms in the field and in the laboratory (n = 5 bunches), ‘Post-harvest mild rot’ indicates fruit that were collected without rot symptoms but showed mild rot in