HAL Id: jpa-00208551
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00208551
Submitted on 1 Jan 1976
HAL
is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire
HAL, estdestinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
Selection rules for the space group of cuprite, the symmetry points and lines
K. Olbrychski, R. Kolodziejski, M. Suffczyński, H. Kunert
To cite this version:
K. Olbrychski, R. Kolodziejski, M. Suffczyński, H. Kunert. Selection rules for the space group of cuprite, the symmetry points and lines. Journal de Physique, 1976, 37 (12), pp.1483-1491.
�10.1051/jphys:0197600370120148300�. �jpa-00208551�
SELECTION RULES FOR THE SPACE GROUP OF CUPRITE,
THE SYMMETRY POINTS AND LINES
K. OLBRYCHSKI
(*),
R. KOLODZIEJSKI(*),
M.SUFFCZY0143SKI (*)
Institute of
Physics,
PolishAcademy
ofSciences, Warsaw,
Poland and H. KUNERT(**)
Institute of
Physics,
TechnicalUniversity, Pozna0144,
Poland(Reçu
le2 juillet 1976, accepté
le 23 aout1976)
Résumé. 2014 Les produits directs de représentations irréductibles du groupe double
O4h
de cupritesont réduits. Un facteur correspond au point de symétrie, l’autre à la ligne de symétrie dans la zone
de Brillouin.
Abstract. 2014 The paper presents selection rules for the double space group
O4h
of cuprite, i.e.decompositions of direct products of the irreducible representations in which one factor refers to a
high symmetry point and the other to a symmetry line of the Brillouin zone.
Classification Physics Abstracts
7.152 - 8.800
. 1. Introduction. - The
present
paper is a conti- nuation of the paper[1],
it lists further selection rules for the space group ofcuprite.
Selection rules are usefulin the
investigation
of the electron bandsymmetries, optical transitions,
infrared latticeabsorption,
elec-tron
scattering
andtunnelling,
neutronscattering,
magnon
sidebands,
etc.[2]. Analysis
ofscattering
processes
involving photons, phonons
or magnons incrystalline
solidsgenerally requires
theappropriate
selection rules to be worked out.
Recently
much attention has been directed to the calculation of the Clebsch-Gordan coefficients of the space grouprepresentations [3-9].
Inparticular,
Birman and coworkers
[8, 9, 10]
have shown that the elements of thefirst-order, one-excitation, scattering
tensor are
precisely
certain Clebsch-Gordan coeffi- cients orprescribed
linearcombinations;
the elements of thesecond-order, two-excitation,
process are aparticular
sum ofproducts
of Clebsch-Gordan coeffi- cients.The factorization of a matrix element or a
scattering
tensor element into a Clebsch-Gordan coefficient and
a reduced matrix element
yields
a maximum realiza- tion of thesimplifications
due to the symmetry of aproblem.
(*) Address : Instytut Fizyki PAN, Al. Lotnik6w 32/46, 02-668 Warszawa, Poland.
(**) Address : Instytut Fizyki Politechniki Poznanskiej, ul.
Piotrowo 3, 60-965 Poznan, Poland.
The Clebsch-Gordan
coefficients
for the irreduciblerepresentations
of thecrystal
space groups or thecrystal point
groups are useful for ananalysis
of theBrillouin
scattering
tensor,scattering
tensors formorphic effects, two-photon absorption
matrix ele-ments,
scattering
tensors formultipole-dipole-reso-
nance Raman
scattering, higher-order
moment expan- sions in infraredabsorption
anddiagonalization
ofthe
dynamical
matrix ofcrystal
vibrations.For a calculation of the Clebsch-Gordan coefficients
or
scattering
tensors an elaboration of the selection rules is a first necessarystep.
Infact,
a reduction ofproducts
of the irreduciblerepresentations
of therelevant
crystal
groupgives
thefrequency
of occur-rence of each irreducible
representation
in aproduct
and thus a survey of the matrix elements which vanish
by
symmetry alone and of thoseremaining
for whichthe calculation of the Clebsch-Gordan coefficients is
required.
A
listing
of the selection rules for the irreduciblerepresentations
of the space group ofcuprite, Cu20,
seems of
particular
interest in view of wide scope ofexperimental
and theoreticalinvestigations performed
on this
crystal [11-28].
Results of extensiveoptical experiments
inCU20, including
thetwo-photon absorption [19]
and the Ramanscattering [20, 21, 24]
are available.
It is established that the extrema of the electronic bands in
cuprite
are at the center of the Brillouin zone.In
cuprite
thesimilarity
of the calculateddensity
ofArticle published online by EDP Sciences and available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/jphys:0197600370120148300
1484
states
[17]
and theexperimental absorption
andreflection spectra in the ultraviolet suggests
[18]
thatthe maxima on the lower energy side could corres-
pond
to transitions to the symmetrypoints
M andX,
and that thepeaks
in the violet canoriginate
fromtransitions to the conduction bands MFX. For the
phonon
spectra incuprite
less information is avai- lable[25-28],
the occurrence of the extrema of thepho-
non branches away from the zone center cannot be excluded. Therefore a list of selection rules
including
all symmetry
points
andsymmetry
lines seemsappropriate.
2.
Decomposition
formula. - The transitionampli-
tude of an electron from the state
§§l
to the state§f
due to an interaction described
by
the operatort/J
isproportional
to theintegral
The
integral
vanishes unless therepresentation Dh
iscontained in the
product D’
xD’.
Thus the selectionrules are obtained from
decomposition
of the Kro-necker
product
of two irreduciblerepresentations
intoirreducible ones. The irreducible
representations
arelabelled
by
the wave vectorsk,
m, h and the indices p, q, r,respectively. C;::;h will
be coefficientsexpressing
the
frequency
of occurrence of therepresentation Dh Dk
xDm
qFor the space group G with the elements
{ a I v }
andwith the characters
xp, Xr;, i
of the irreducible repre- sentationsDp, Dq , D’, respectively,
thefrequencies
of occurrence are
given by
Here
the
vectorsk,
m, hbelong
to thesuitably
cho-sen
1/1 Ul I part
of the Brillouin zone, the so-calledrepresentation domain 0, containing
one arm fromeach star.
The integer I U I
is the order of thesingle point
group G of the group G. Anexample
of therepresentation
domain of the space groupOh
is shownin
figure 1, by heavy
lines.Eq. (3)
can beexpressed
interms of the characters
ql’
of the small representa- tionsd’
which induce therepresentations D k
ofG
[29, 30] :
Here the sum indexed
by
a is taken over the rele-FIG. 1. - The first Brillouin zone and the representation domain for the space group 0: of cuprite. b1, b2, b3 are the basic vectors
of the reciprocal lattice.
vant
leading
wave vector selection rules(LWVSRs),
see Lewis
[30],
i.e. over theelements
determinedby
theexpansion
of thepoint
group G into double cosets([29],
p.208),
where
G’
is thepoint
group of the wave vectorgroup Gh of h and
G’
is thepoint
group ofGk.
The indexP(a)
meansthat fl
isdependent
on a ; it is anarbitrary
element of Gsatisfying
where = means
equality
modulo a vector of the reci-procal
lattice of the group G. Thesymbol If
is toremind
usthat,
if forgiven k,
m, h and a noelement fl
of G
satisfying
eq.(5) exists,
then we have zeroinstead of the sum over S.
La
is thepoint
group ofLa
=G
AGb,
the intersection of the groupGak
of the vector ak and the groupGh
of h. The is, ta and rpare
fixed,
e.g. thesimplest
fractional translations associated withS,
a andp, respectively,
in thegroup’G.
t/J:p
andt/J’q
aregiven by
the relations of the typeFor the small
representation d’
of the unbarredprimitive
translation{ E t}
we assume the conventioni.e. we choose the +
sign
in the exponent on theright-hand
side.1
is the unit matrix of dimension of therepresentation d’.
In the above considerations Gcan be a
single
or a double space group. Corres-pondingly
all the groups considered aresingle
groups or double groups,
respectively.
If G is adouble space group, we use the same
symbols
for thepoint operations
of a double group as forcorrespond-
ing operations
of thesingle
group. Forgiven k,
m from therepresentation
domain 0 all the vectors h for which the coefficient(4)
may be different from zero can be found as follows[1] :
we consider the vectorski
from the star of k and mj from the star of m. We
construct the vectors
ki
+ mj with one of the vectorski,
mj fixed and the second varied. In this way, onaccount
of eq. (5),
we obtain representants h =ki
+ mj of the star of the vector h for which the coefficient(4)
may be
nonvanishing.
, TABLE I
3.
Description
of tables. - Table I list coordinates of thesymmetry points,
lines andplanes
of the repre- sentation domain 0 forcuprite.
In table II wegive
the characters of the small
representations
for all the symmetryplanes
of therepresentation
domain of the group01 :
the labels I of theoperations h,
are thoseof Miller and Love
(M-L) ([31],
p.123).
Tables III-XII present the
decompositions
of theKronecker
products
of the irreduciblerepresentations
of the space group
Oh
into irreduciblerepresenta- tions,
eq.(2),
where k runs over the foursymmetry points
and m-over the six symmetry axes of the Brillouin zone. The irreduciblerepresentations
of thegroup
0’
are labelledby
labels of thecorresponding
small
representations
of Miller and Love[31].
Powersmean
frequency
of occurrence c; of thegiven
irre-ducible
representation [32].
In some cases there is a need to reduce the wave
vectors to the
representation
domain 0 : if in theTABLE II
Symbol.d in the left side margin refers only to the selection rules r x A = Zci A j.
Symbol.d in the right side margin refers only to the selection rules R x A = Eci Ti’.
TABLE IV
1486
TABLE V
Symbol I in the left side margin refers only to the selection rules for F x E = 2;ci fi.
Symbol 2; in the right side margin refers only to the selection rules for R x 2; = Eci S’*
TABLE VI
TABLE VII
TABLE VIII
TABLE IX
TABLE X
selection
rules,
eq.(2),
a vector h goes out of therepresentation
domain 0 for certain values of k and m, then a vector h’ can be found in 0 such thatwhere a E G and K is a vector of the
reciprocal
lattice.E.g.
forand
we have
and
The latter vector lies in the
representation
domain 0for
0 , ii -1
butfor 2
q 5 1 it goes out of 0.The vector
for ’ 2 I I
liesjust
in 0.In
general,
the relation betweenrepresentation dh
and a
representation d"’
which induces the same full grouprepresentation
asdh
is ,where
I# lvlc-G h, I LX I r..}is
an element of G with the rotational part a,qlh
and§ti
are characters of therepresentation dh
andd"’, respectively.
A closer examination of the tables reveals that a
reduction of the wave vectors h to the
representation
domain 0 is
required only
in tablesVIII,
IX and XI1488
TABLE XI
TABLE XII
where the relations
(8)
are written out for each case.Note that our
representation
domain 0 can be definedby
the coordinates of itspoint (kx, ky, k) 7r/a
whichsatisfy
theinequalities
In the tables the wave vectors h
parametrized
in a way different from that of table I aredistinguished by primes
and their coordinates arespecified
in theappropriate
table. The samesymbols
label the vec-tors h and their
representations,
e.g. in table VIII : io eis the vectorand
2°
ei (i
=1, 2, 3, 4)
are full grouprepresentation corresponding
to wave vectorand
In table XIII we summarize the notations of the
single-valued
and thespinor, separated by
space,representations
forsymmetry points r, R,
M andX, according
to Miller and Love[31],
Zak et al.[33],
Kovalev
[34]
andBradley
and Cracknell[29].
Labelsof the irreducible
representations
for the symmetry lines aregiven
in table XIV.While
establishing
thecorrespondence
betweenrepresentations
one should notice different definitions of the smallrepresentations dp
of theprimitive
TABLE XIII
TABLE XIV
TABLE II A
1490
translations
{ E I R,, I
where E is the rotationthrough 0° :
Kovalev andBradley
havewhereas Miller and Love
and’Zak
assume(1 is
the unitmatrix).
We follow Miller and Love and Zak and we compare their
representations
with thecomplex conjugate
repre- sentations of Kovalev and ofBradley
and Cracknell.In the tables II A-VI A we
supplement
the selection rules of ref.[1] :
we list thedecompositions
of Kro-necker
products
ofsingle-valued by
the double-valuedrepresentations
at four symmetrypoints
in theBrillouin zone.
Numbers with the minus
sign
abovecorrespond
to the odd
representations,
numberedby
M-L with-
sign;
those without anysign correspond
to evenrepresentations,
numberedby
M-L with +sign.
TABLES III A AND IV A
TABLE V A
TABLE VI A
4.
Examples.
- Numerousexamples
of theappli-
cation of the selection rules at the center of the Brillouin zone of
cuprite
have beengiven
for the multi-pole
radiation transitions in ref.[13]
andcompared
with
experiment
in ref.[16],
and for the Ramanscattering
tensor in ref.[9]
andcompared
withexperi-
ment in ref.
[24].
In
cuprite
the Is exciton of theyellow
series iselectric-dipole forbidden,
and we have to considerthe next term
beyond electric-dipole (ED)
in theelectron-photon
interaction[9].
In a cubiccrystal
of the symmetry class
Oh
the term reduces to Electric-Quadrupole EQ(r 25 +)
+Electric-Quadrupole EQ(Fl2+)
+Magnetic-Dipole MD(Fl5+)-
When theincoming photon
is in resonance with anEQ(F251)
transition and the
outgoing photon corresponds
toan
ED(F,,-)
transition thephonon symmetries
which can arise are
given by
For in
photon
in resonance with anEQ(Fl2l)
transition and out
photon
at ED transition thephonon symmetries
which can arise aregiven by
For in
photon
in resonance with aMD(FL 5 1)
transition and out
photon
at ED transition thephonon symmetries
which can arise aregiven by
All these selection rules can be read from table
II,
withhelp
of the tableVII,
in paper[1].
The selection rulesT x R, T x M, T x X, r x 11, FxA,
Fx2:, etc.have
analogous meaning.
In our papers we derive and list the selection rules
at all symmetry
points
and lines in the Brillouin zoneof
cuprite.
While atpresent experimental
data havenot been
yet
accumulated for detailedcomparison,
these
general
selection rules areimportant, particularly interesting
is theisomorphism
of the selection rulesat the r and the R
point.
Theisomorphism
is seenin table II of paper
[1],
andexamples
of similaritiescan
be seenin
tablesIII, IV, V,
VI of the present paper.Furthermore,
incuprite
thegradient
of the electron and thephonon
energy versus wave-vectordispersion
curves may vanish at the off-center symmetry
points [17, 18, 26, 28].
Ascertainment of theirpossible
contribution to the interband and the exciton
phonon-
assisted
optical
transitionsrequires
further inves-tigation.
Appendix.
-Comparison
of the irreducible repre- sentations of Miller and Love(M-L) [31],
Zak et al.[33], Bradley
and Cracknell(B-C) [29]
with those of Kovalev[34]
is facilitatedby noticing
thefollowing
relations between their
spinor
matricesD1/2.
Wedenote the matrices of the
two-dimensional,
double-valued
representation
of the fullorthogonal
groupby D112
with thesymbol
of therespective
authors.1° The relation between the matrices
D112
of Millerand Love and of Kovalev is
([31],
p.14, 123, [34],
p.
24-26)
where the
sign -
holds for the Miller and Love’srotations j
=3, 6, 7, 8, 17, 24, 27, 30, 31, 32, 41,
48(or
Kovalev’soperations hi
=h3, h65 h7, hs, hl7g
h249 h27, h3o, h31, h32, h41, h4s);
; for theremaining
rotations the matrices
D2L(j)
are the same asK 2 (h j)
.where R
{
0,n }
is the active rotationthrough
theangle 4?
about the axis with the versor n and6/2
is the Pauli
spin
vector. Theangles
of the successive rotations are :qf(O 4/
27r)
about the zaxis, 8(0 K
0n)
about the new xaxis,
T(O
T 27r)
about the z axis which is obtained after the twoprevious
rotations.20 The relation between the matrices of
Bradley
and Cracknell
([29],
p.418)
and of Kovalev iswith
where the
angles
of the active rotation R are([29],
p.
52) :
and the matrix S is of the form
30 The relation between the matrices of
Bradley
and Cracknell and of Zak
([33],
p.5)
iswith
where the
angles
of the successive rotations are :4/(0 ik
27r)
about the zaxis, e(o
e ,7c)
about the new yaxis,
T(O , T
27r)
about the z axis which is obtained after the twoprevious rotations,
and the matrix S is of the formReferences
[1] OLBRYCHSKI, K., KO0141ODZIEJSKI, R., SUFFCZY0143SKI, M. and KUNERT, H., J. Physique 36 (1975) 985.
[2] CRACKNELL, A. P., Adv. Phys. 23 (1974) 673.
[3] BERENSON, R. and BIRMAN, J. L., J. Math. Phys. 16 (1975) 227.
[4] BERENSON, R., ITZKAN, I. and BIRMAN, J. L., J. Math. Phys. 16 (1975) 236.
[5] LITVIN, D. B. and ZAK, J., J. Math. Phys. 9 (1968) 212.
[6] GARD, P., J. Phys. A 6 (1973) 1837.
[7] SAKATA, I., J. Math. Phys. 15 (1974) 1702,1710.
[8] BIRMAN, J. L. and BERENSON, R., Phys. Rev. B 9 (1974) 4512.
[9] BIRMAN, J. L., Phys. Rev. B9 (1974) 4518.
[10] BIRMAN, J. L., Theory of Crystal Space Groups and Infrared and
Raman Lattice Processes of Insulating Crystals, in Hand-
buch der Physik (Encyclopedia of Physics), Vol. XXV/2 b, Light and Matter Ib, edited by S. Flügge (Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York) 1974.
[11] GROSS, E. F., Usp. Fiz. Nauk 76 (1962) 433.
[12] ELLIOTT, R. J., Phys. Rev. 108 (1957) 1384,124 (1961) 340.
[13] MOSKALENKO, S. A., Fiz. Tver. Tel. 2 (1960) 1755; Sov. Phys.
Solid State 2 (1961) 1587.
[14] MOSKALENKO, S. A. and BOBRYSHEVA, A. I., Fiz. Tver. Tel. 4 (1962) 1994; Sov. Phys. Solid State 4 (1963) 1462.
[15] CHEREPANOV, V. I., DRUZHININ, V. V., KARGAPOLOV, Yu. A.
and NIKIFOROV, A. E., Fiz. Tver. Tel. 3 (1961) 2987;
Sov. Phys. Solid State 3 (1962) 2179.
[16] DEISS, L. and DAUNOIS, A., Surf. Sci. 37 (1973) 804.
[17] DAHL, J. P. and SWITENDICK, A. C., J. Phys. & Chem. Solids 27
(1966) 931.
[18] NIKITINE, S., in Optical Properties of Solids, edited by S. Nudel-
man and S. S. Mitra (Plenum Press, New York) 1969.
[19] RUSTAGI, K. C., PRADERE, F. and MYSYROWICZ, F., Phys.
Rev. B 8 (1973) 2721.
[20] Yu, P. Y., SHEN, Y. R., PETROFF, Y. and FALICOV, L. M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 30 (1973) 283.
[21] Yu, P. Y. and SHEN, Y. R., Phys. Rev. Lett. 32 (1974) 373, 939.
[22] PETROFF, Y., YU, P. Y. and SHEN, Y. R., Phys. Rev. B 12 (1975)
2488.
[23] MERLE, J. C., NIKITINE, S. and HAKEN, H., Phys. Stat. Sol. (b)
61 (1974) 229.
[24] GENACK, A. Z., CUMMINS, H. Z., WASHINGTON, M. A. and COMPAAN, A., Phys. Rev. B 12 (1975) 2478.
[25] HUANG, K., Z. Phys. 171 (1963) 213.
[26] CARABATOS, C. and
PREVOT,
B., Phys. Stat. Sol. (b) 44 (1971)701.
[27] REYDELLET, J., BALKANSKI, M. and TRIVICH, D., Phys. Stat.
Sol. (b) 52 (1972) 175.
[28] UNGIER, W., Acta Phys. Pol. A 43 (1973) 747.
[29] BRADLEY, C. J. and CRACKNELL, A. P., The Mathematical
Theory of Symmetry in Solids (Clarendon Press, Oxford) 1972, referred to as B-C.
[30] LEWIS, D. H., J. Phys. A 6 (1973) 125.
[31] MILLER, S. C. and LOVE, W. F., Tables of Irreducible Repre-
sentations of Space Groups and Co-representations of Magnetic Space Groups (Pruett Press, Boulder, Colorado) 1967, referred to as M-L.
[32] STREITWOLF, H. W., Phys. Stat. Sol. 33 (1969) 225.
[33] ZAK, J., CASHER, A., GLÜCK, M. and GUR, Y., The Irreducible Representations of Space Groups (W. A. Benjamin, Inc., New York) 1969.
[34] KOVALEV, O. V., Irreducible Representations of the Space Groups, Kiev 1961 (in Russian).