HAL Id: jpa-00220709
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00220709
Submitted on 1 Jan 1981
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
FINITE SIZE SCALING APPROACH TO ANDERSON LOCALIZATION
J. Pichard, G. Sarma
To cite this version:
J. Pichard, G. Sarma. FINITE SIZE SCALING APPROACH TO ANDERSON LOCALIZATION.
Journal de Physique Colloques, 1981, 42 (C4), pp.C4-37-C4-45. �10.1051/jphyscol:1981405�. �jpa-
00220709�
JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE
CoZZoque 64, suppl6ment au nOIO, Tome 42, octobre
1981FINITE SIZE SCALING APPROACH TO ANDERSON LOCALIZATION
J . L . Pichard and G. Sarma
Service de Physique du SoZide e t de ~Gsonance Magngtique, CEN-SacZay,
B.P.N02,
91190Gif-sur-Yvette, France
A b s t r a c t .
-
The Anderson l o c a l i z a t i o n problem i s s t u d i e d by a new s c a l i n g t h e o r y of f i n i t e systems which has been proved t o be powerful f o r d i f f e r e n t phase t r a n s i t i o n problems [ 11.I n t h r e e dimensions, t h e r e i s a t r a n s i t i o n a t a c r i t i c a l v a l u e Wc of t h e d i - s o r d e r parameter from a r e g i o n of e x p o n e n t i a l l y l o c a l i z e d s t a t e s t o a r e g i o n of
extended
s t a t e s . When W d e c r e a s e s t o Wc, we f i n d a v a l u e e q u a l t o 0 . 6 6 f o r t h e c r i t i c a l exponent v urelative t o t h e divergence of t h e l o c a l i z a t i o n l e n g t h I n two dimensions, a c r i t i c a l v a l u e Wc of t h e d i s o r d e r parameter s e p a r a t e s a r e g i o n of e x p o n e n t i a l l y l o c a l i z e d s t a t e s (W>
Wc) from a r e g i o n of"quasi extended" s t a t e s
which a r enon square s m a b l e
and f a l l o f f a s ~ - n ( ~ ) . We g i v e t h e v a r i a t i o n of t h e exponent n(W) i n t h e whole "quasi extended" r e g i o n . On t h e o t h e r hand, we show t h a t t h e divergence of t h e l o c a l i z a t i o n l e n g t h when W d e c r e a s e s t o Wc i s now c o n t r o l l e d by anessential singularity.
The behaviour of t h e dimensionless oonductance i s given i n a l l t h e c a s e s . I n p a r t i c u l a r , i n t h e two dimensional wehk d i s o r d e r phase, i t i s shown t o obey
lL
-2n(Wa
power law decay \$
v e r s u s t h e " s i z e " L.I. INTRODUCTION.
-
The f i r s t p a r t of t h i s paper w i l l be devoted t o a review of t h e method and t h e r e s u l t s t h a t we d e s c r i b e d i n two previous p u b l i c a t i o n s 121, 131. I n a second p a r t , we w i l l e x t r a c t from t h e s e r e s u l t s t h e behaviour of t h e zero tempera- t u r e conductance of two o r t h r e e dimensional d i s o r d e r e d systems i n t h e absence of any i n e l a s t i c p r o c e s s e s . A comparison w i l l be made w i t h o t h e r t h e o r i e s .The b a s i s of our method l i e s i n t h e s t u d y of t o p o l o g i c a l l y one dimensional systems, taken i n f i n i t e i n one d i r e c t i o n , as a f u n c t i o n of t h e f i n i t e v a l u e R of t h e
(d-1) remaining t r a n s v e r s e d i r e c t i o n s . Such a n approach
never provides a d i r e c t simu- l a t i o n
of t h e d-dimensional i n f i n i t e l a t t i c e , b u t allows t o p r e d i c t i t s behaviour thanks ascaling theory
whose parameter i s p r e c i s e l y t h e f i n i t e t r a n s v e r s e l e n g t h R.With t h e h e l p of
OseZedec's theorem
on random m a t r i x p r o d u c t s , we d e f i n e d and c a l c u l a t e d i n [ 2 ] t h ereZavrmt
l o c a l i z a t i o n l e n g t h Lmax f o r " s t r i p s t ' and "bars", l e a d i n g r e s p e c t i v e l y t o two o r t h r e e dimensional systems. These c a l c u l a t i o n s were made f o r a t i g h t b i n d i n g model a t zero energy (band c e n t r e ) w i t h "diagonal" d i s o r d e r c h a r a c t e r i z e d by a r e c t a n g u l a r d i s t r f b u t i o n of width W of t h e random p o t e n t i a l .11. THE OSELEDEC'S THEOREM AND ITS IMPLICATIONS.
-
For d e f i n i t e n e s s , l e t us c o n s i d e r on an i n f i n i t e s t r i p of width R t h e Anderson model r e p r e s e n t e d i n t h e t i g h t - b i n d i n g approximation by t h e S c h r 6 d i n g e r e q u a t i o nArticle published online by EDP Sciences and available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/jphyscol:1981405
JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE
where sn i s d i s t r i b u t e d randomly between - ~ / 2 and ~ / 2 . The l a t e r a l boundary condi- t i o n s a r k taken t o be p e r i o d i c ($n,m+R = I ) ~ , ~ ) . When n goes t o i n f i n i t y , t h e v e c t o r
%(E), whose 2R components a r e :
n i s o b t a i n e d from a n i n i t i a l v e c t o r Ao(E) by a p p l y i n g t h e m a t r i x product hdn=
II
Ti, where Ti i s a r e a l (2Rx 29,) t r a n s f e r m a t r i x . i= 1These t r a n s f o r m a t i o n s and t h e i r product a r e s y m p l e c t i c , i . e . : t h e i r eigen- v a l u e s a r e p a i r s whose elements a r e t h e i n v e r s e of each o t h e r . ~ s e l e d d c ' s theorem s t a t e s [ 4 1 t h a t
a matrix r e&sts,
d e f i n e d by :*
1,211,
r
= l i m (Mn Mn) n+-
where
*
denotes a m a t r i x t r a n s p o s i t i o n .I f we c a l l exp y l , . . . , e x p ygR t h e e i g e n v a l u e s of
r
and v l ,...,
V ~ R t h e corresponding e i g e n s p a c e s , t h e n t h e p r o p e r t y :l i m
;
1 kn ~ ~ = Mya ~ u ~ ~n +-
h o l d s f o r any v e c t o r u E va. These ya a r e the"Lyapounov c h a r a c t e r i s t i c exponents"
(L.C.E.) of t h e random m a t r i x p r o d u c t
%.
T h i s i m p l i e s , f o r any system a s a s t r i p o r a b a r , t h a t any a r b i t r a r y v e c t o r ho(E) i s a l i n e a r combination of a s e t of v e c t o r s whose asymptotic behaviour i s g i v e n by t h e d i f f e r e n t L.C.E. ya. Thephysical
wave- f u n c t i o n s , however, a r enecessarily
a l i n e a r combination of only R f u n c t i o n s decaying a s exp- Y a l ~ I ,
where appear t h e only R p o s i t i v e L.C.E. (We r e c a l l h e r e t h a t t h e 2%L.C.E. go by p a i r s of o p p o s i t e v a l u e s ) . I t i s obvious t h a t f o r l a r g e Z and f o r any
f i n i t e
v a l u e of R , t h e decay a t i t i f i n i t y i s t h e n c o n t r o l l e d by t h esingZe term
c o r r e s ponding t othe smaZZest
L.C.E. ymin = ( L ~ ~ ~ ) - ~ . Thushx
i s indeed t h e r e l e v a n tlocalization Zength
f o r " s t r i p s " and "bars".111. THE LOCALIZATION LENGTH
ha,. -
The d i f f e r e n t L.C.E. have been c a l c u l a t e d w i t h t h e h e l p of a method d e s c r i b e d i n t h e case of e r g o d i c problem of h a m i l t o n i a n and d i s s i p a t i v e dynamical systems [ 5 ] , [ 6 ] . The numerical p r o c e s s i s based on a mathema- t i c a l method which r e l a t e s t h e sum of t h e f i r s t 6 L.C.E. t o t h e asymptotic divergence of a volume d e f i n e d by b orthogonal u n i t v e c t o r s . Contrary t o o t h e r "simulation"methods, we emphasize t h a t t h e s e c a l c u l a t i o n s can be performed
t o any fixed accuracy.
The p r e c i s i o n a t t a i n s 1% f o r a product of 104 m a t r i c e s . We have a l s o checked t h a t t h e L.C.E. go by p a i r s of o p p o s i t e v a l u e s .
The f i g u r e s (1) and ( 2 ) show t h e v a r i a t i o n of t h e l o c a l i z a t i o n l e n g t h ,L v e r s u s t h e width R of a s t r i p o r t h e s i d e R of a b a r a t t h e band c e n t r e ( E = O ) f o r d i f f e r e n t v a l u e s of t h e d i s o r d e r parameter W.
I V . SCALING STUDY OF THE LOCALIZED REGION.
IV.a) Three dimensional systems.
-
The f i g u r e 2 shows t h e v a r i a t i o n of Lmax v e r s u s t h e s i d e R of a b a r f o r d i f f e r e n t v a l u e s of W. For W > We, Lmax converges f o r i n c r e a - s i n g R towards a f i n i t e l i m i t wbich i s t h eZocaZization Zength 5,
of t h ei n f i n i t e
Lattice.
Our a n a l y s i s o f t h i s r e g i o n i s based upon t h e fundamentalseazing m s a t z :
Figure 1 : ,,L versus the width
R
of as t r i p
Figure 2 : Lmax versus of the s i d e
R
of abaa.
JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE
A t t h e t r a n s i t i o n , where &(W) becomes i n f i n i t e , t h e a n s a t z (1) obviously i m p l i e s a l i n e a r growth of Lmax v e r s u s R, which g i v e s t h e c r i t i c a l v a l u e of t h e d i s o r d e r parameter Wc 19 t 0.5. Our method f o r t h e d e t e r m i n a t i o n of t h e c r i t i c a l behavior of
cao
c o n s i s t s i n t h e r e s e a r c h of which p o s t u l a t e d divergence w i l l a c t u a l l y g i v e t h e s c a l i n g function f d e f i n e d by ( 1 ) . We have looked f o r a divergence of t h e form:Ern -
(w-w,)-', s o a s t o map t h e r a t i o s Lmax(R,W)/crn(W) of t h e l o c a l i z e d r e g i o n i n t o t h e s i n g l e f u n c t i o n f ( x ) . This requirement i s s a t i s f i e d withv -
0.66 ? 0.02 i n agreement w i t h t h e r e s u l t of S t e i n and Krey [71. The s c a l i n g f u n c t i o n f i s shown i n f i g u r e 3 .1V.b) Two dimensional systems. - The f i g u r e 1 shows t h e v a r i a t i o n of Lmax v e r s u s t h e width R of a s t r i p f o r d i f f e r e n t v a l u e s of W. For W > Wc (Wc
-
5.95+
0.05). Lmax a g a i n converges towards a f i n i t e l i m i t f o r i n c r e a s i n g R, corresponding t o exponen- t i a l Z y l o c a l i z e d s t a t e s . But h e r e , we f a i l e d i n a l l our t r i a l s f o r f i n d i n g a s c a l i n g f u n c t i o n f ( x ) w i t h a power law divergence of&.
This l e d us t o look f o r an e s s e n t i a l s i n g u l a r i t y of t h e form 5,-
exp(w-wc)-9. I n such a c a s e , a new s c a l i n g assumption has t o be p o s t u l a t e d[a].
T h i s t u r n s o u t t o be s u c c e s s f u l and g i v e s a v a l u e of 9-
0.5+
0.1. The s c a l i n g f u n c t i o n i s shown i n f i g u r e 4.V . QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE EXTENDED ( o r "quasi extended") REGION
For W < Wc, L m a x d i v e r g e s v e r s u s i n c r e a s i n g R , which i m p l i e s t h a t we cannot d e f i n e a f i n i t e l o c a l i s a t i o n l e n g t h f o r t h e i n f i n i t e l a t t i c e . The problem i s t o r e l a t e t h i s t o t h e a c t u a l asymptotic behaviour of t h e wave f u n c t i o n i n t h e i n f i n i t e l a t t i c e .
I n t h e whole r e g i o n W < Wc, we f i n d t h a t : Lmax
-
a(W) R and Lmax-
b(W) R 2r e s p e c t i v e l y f o r s t r i p s and b a r s . The n e c e s s i t y of such behaviours can be t h e o r e t i - caZly shown i n a weak d i s o r d e r ( o r weak s c a t t e r i n g ) t r e a t m e n t .
It i s now n a t u r a l t o a s s i g n some " u n i v e r s a l " meaning t o :
R 1
lim - = - R2 1
a(w) o r l i m
-
=-
& - + a Lmax ~ + mLmax b (W)
r e s p e c t i v e l y . These two q u a n t i t i e s a r e indeed given by t h e f o l l o w i n g g e o m e t r i c a l i n v a r i a n t :
These i n t e g r a l s a r e d e f i n e d on a very long s t r i p ( o r b a r ) and t h e boundary c o n d i t i o n s a r e f i x e d i n t h e middle, s o a s t o g e t t h e exp(-;kL) decay i n both d i -
\ Lmax'
r e c t i o n s . Because of t h e p e r i o d i c l a t e r a l boundary c o n d i t i o n s , t h e f l u x has t o be taken only through t h e upper and lower s i d e s ( o r f a c e s ) of a s t r i p ( o r a b a r ) , and
(2) indeed g i v e s
- -
a(W) ( o r 1- rn).
1 Now, i f we assume t h a t I$(R,w)I
i n t h e i n f i n i t e l a t t i c e f a l l s o f f i s o t r o p i c a l l y , t h e i d e n t i f i c a t i o n of (2) w i t h t h e i n f i n i t e l a t t i - c e l i m i t g i v e s1 d
a(W) - n R ;iii l o g l $ ( ~ )
I
i n two dimensions I - Zn I2$
logl$(R)I
i n t h r e e dimensions b (W)F i g u r e 3 : The s c a l i n g f u n c t i o n f f o r t h r e e dimensional systems W
2
Wc.F i g u r e 4 : The s c a l i n g f u n c t i o n f o r two dimensional systems W Wc.
JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE
V . a ) T h e t h r e e dimensional system. - I n t e g r a t i n g (4) g i v e s t h e following
asymptotic
behaviour :I$(R,w)
I
I+co(w)I
exp 2Tlb(W) 1T h i s shows t h a t i n t h r e e d i m e n s i o n s , t h e d i s o r d e r f o r W < Wc i s
insuffGeient
f o r l o c a l i z i n g t h e s t a t e s , I$(R,w)I decreasing
towards af i n i t e
l i m i t I I J J ~ ( W )I
whenI$(R,W)
I
i s c o n s t r a i n e d t o b e e q u a l t o u n i t y i n some f i n i t e r e g i o n of t h e system.The l i m i t i s g i v e n by : l $ C O ( ~ ) I = exp
-
& w h e r e c i s some c o n s t a n t . A non z e r o v a l u e of1$001
i s c h a r a c t e r i s t i c ofextended s t a t e s .
The f i g u r e 5 shows a s i t should be t h a tl ~
goes t o one i n t h e~ ~ l
l i m i t of v a n i s h i n g d i s o r d e r and t o z e r o when W reaches We. So ($,(w)I
appears t o us a s a n a t u r a l "order parameter" i n t h e r e g i o n of extended s t a t e s . To our knowledge, such a concept has n o t been proposed t i l l now.-
. -
I n t e g r a t i n g (3) g i v e sI $ ( R , ~ >
1 -
R-~(') w i t h n(w) =-
n a(w> 1This r e s u l t proves a
power Zau decay
of t h e wave f u n c t i o n s i n t h ewhole "quasi ex- tended" region
(W<
Wc). The knowledge of t h e numbers a(W) allows us t o p l o t n(W) v e r s u s W ( f i g u r e 6 ) . A t t h e t r a n s i t i o n , we f i n d ?j(Wc) = 1 a I n W e whose r e g i o n W < W,,thewave f u n c t i o n s a r enon square s m a b Z e ,
which l e d us t o c a l l them"quas7,-esterrded".
g i g u r e 5 : l + C O ( ~ )
1
v e r s u s W (d = 3) W < Wc.Figure 6 : The exponent q(W) characteristic of the power-law decay of the
"quasi extended"
states and of the conductance. d = 2 W<
Wc.VI.
RESULTS FOR THE CONDUCTIVITY.-
For any topologically one dimensional system, it was shown above that *he wave functions decay as exp -yaJZI inR independent
"Oseledec subspaces", thus giving
R trrmsmissim c o e f f i c i e n t s
Ta(Z) = exp-
2ya1
ZI .
These Oseledec subspaces correspond to the
"channel" concept
of Anderson et a1 191.The generalization of Landauer's formula [ l o ] gives the dimensionless conductance
It is obvious that for large Z and for any
i n i t e
value of R, this reduces to thesingle term
corresponding to y min = (Lmax)-.f .
V1.a) The
Zocakized
region.-
The infinite lattice limit obviously gives g(Z) = exp- -
22i n any dimension.
Em
V1.b) The three dimensional
extended
region.-
g(Z,R) =b (W) R2
Taking the limit L
* kR,
k 3 1 ,R
-t m, one g a t s g(Z,R) =- ,
whence the con-ductivity 2 2
(figure 7)
JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE
It is interesting to note that b(W -Wc) is of the order of 0.05 which is close to Mott's prediction on the value of the minimum metallic conductivity [ I l l . However, for a definite conclusion about the minimum metallic conductivity, we have to look more carefully to the behaviour of b(W) close to W
.
Figure 7 : d = 3 W < W the conductivity multiplied by
-T
versus W.e
V 1 . c ) The two dimensional
"quasi extendedtr
region.-
For the strip, 2z
g(Z,R)
-
exp- &.
In the same way as for the wave function's decay, this implies theseazing law
g(Z,R)since
R
must disappean in the infinite lattice limit. This result, which gives avanishing
conductance for Z -t a, has been recently derived in a different way by Mott and Kaveh [ 1 2 ] , and a first order expansion in powers of q(W) gives the well known "logarithmic correction" approximation [ 131.REFERENCES
1. B. D e r r i d a , L. de Seze and J. Vannimenus, I n t e r n a t i o n a l Conference on Disordered Systems and L o c a l i z a t i o n Rome, May 13-15, 1981
2. J.L. P i c h a r d and G . Sarma, J. Phys.
e,
L127 (1981) 3. J.L. P i c h a r d and G . Sarma, J. Phys. C , t o b e p u b l i s h e d 4. V.B, Oseledec (1968) Trans. Moscow Math. Soc.19,
197-2315. B e n e t t i n G. and Galgani L. (1979) I n t r i n s i c S t o c h a s t i c i t y i n Plasmas p. 93, G. Lava1 and D. G r e s i l l o n e d i t o r s .
6. I. Shimada and T . Nagashima (1979) Prog. Theor. Phys.
61,
1605 7. J. S t e i n and U . Krey, Z e i t . tiir Phys.z,
287 (1979)8. C.J. Hamer and M.N. B a r b e r , J . Phys.
e,
259 (1980)9. P.W. Anderson, D.J. T h o u l e s s , E. Abrahams and D.S. F i s h e r , Phys. Rev.
E,
8 , 3529 (1981)1 0 . R . Landauer, P h i l o s . Mag.
2,
863 (1970) 11. N.F. Mott, P h i l o s . Mag, t o be p u b l i s h e d 1 2 N.F. Mott and M. Kaveh, P r e p r i n t 198113.E. Abrahams, P.W. Anderson, D.C. L i c c i a r d e l l o and T.V. Ramakrishnan, Phys. Rev.
L e t t . - 42, 673 (1979).