Modelling Water, Nitrogen and Carbon Fluxes
during Decomposition of Crop Residues,
Incorporated or left at the Soil Surface
Filip Coppens 1,3, Patricia Garnier 1, Antoine Findeling2, Sylvie Recous 1, Roel Merckx3
1INRA, Unité d’Agronomie LRM, Laon (France)
2CIRAD-AMIS – Programme Agronomie, Montpellier (France)
3K.U.Leuven, Department of Land Management, Heverlee (Belgium)
Introduction
• Global change:
– carbon sequestration in agricultural land
• Reduced / no-tillage
– change in crop residue localisation
• Soil column experiment
• Modelling
Residue decomposition
Fate of C, N in soil
soil water dynamics
nutrient distribution
microbial activity
Experimental setup
• Soil columns:
– Silt loam soil
• sieved at 2 mm
• compacted in columns (1.3 g/cm3 ; 25 cm, ∅ 15 cm)
– Oilseed rape residue
• labelled 13C and 15N
• particle size of 1 cm
• incorporated (0-10 cm) or mulch
• 14 g DM/column (equivalent 7.4 t/ha)
• Incubation during 9 weeks at 20°C
– 3 dry-wet cycles
Experimental setup
CO2
Soil solution samplers Tensiometers
TDR Rain simulator
Modelling
• Why modelling?
– Interaction water dynamics ~ residue decomposition
– Gross fluxes N-mineralization/immobilization
– Scenario analysis
• different rain applications • other crop residue quality
• Which model?
– Link soil physical - biological processes
– surface residue decomposition
Modelling: PASTIS model
• PASTIS :
1-dimentional, mechanistic model
– module biotransformations C + N
• residue-C decomposition
– module transport
• water transfer θ(t,z) => fθ(t,z)
• heat transfer T(t,z) => fT(t,z)
• solute transport [NO3](t,z) => f[NO3](t,z)
B N W T i i
C
f
f
f
f
K
dt
dC
−
=
(Garnier et al., 2003) (Lafolie, 1991)Modelling: C + N
Soluble Organic Matter (SOL)
Biomass Zymogenous
(ZYB)
Humified Organic Matter (HOM)
Biomass Autochtonous
(AUB) Fresh Organic Matter (FOM)
Rapidly decomposable Hemicellulose Cellulose Lignin
material (RDM) (HCE) (CEL) (LIG)
CO2 NO3 -CO2 NH4 + NH4 + CO2 NH4 + NH4 + CO2 NO3 -NH4 + Vmax K1 K2 K3 K4 H l Ha Kh Kz Ks Ka Hz Yh Ys Yz Ya N/C
Modelling: mulch decomposition
Qnc Qc TM, θM decomposable protected Ninorganic Physical parameters - initial mass of mulch- max. mass in contact with soil - min./max. water content
- max. rain interception …..
Biological parameters - quality = incorporation - specific functions for
- Temperature - Water content - N availability Soil
Modelling: concept
Input
Model
Output
Water potential CO2-flux NO3--N residual 13C Initial conditions Boundary conditions Constant temperature Hydrodynamic parameters - column control soil
Biological parameters - incubation experiment
Observation vs. Simulation
Control -500 -400 -300 -200 -100 0 0 20 40 60 days M at ric P o te n ti al (c m ) Mulch -500 -400 -300 -200 -100 0 0 20 days 40 60 M a tr ic P o te n ti a l ( c m )Soil water potential
Observation (-6 cm)
Simulation (-6 cm)
Observation (-14 cm)
Simulation (-14 cm)
Calibration: control columns
Incorporation 0 20 40 60 80 0 20 Days 40 60 kg C-CO 2 / h a / d ay Incorporation > Mulch Rain application!
Water content mulch
Control 0 20 40 60 80 0 20 Days 40 60 k g C-CO 2 / ha / day Mulch 0 20 40 60 80 0 20 Days 40 60 k g C-CO 2 / h a / d a y
CO
2- flux
Observation vs. Simulation
Water content mulch
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 0 20 40 60 Days g w a te r / g r e s idue
Incorporation 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 20 Days 40 60 % of a dde d 13 C
Residual oilseed rape-C
Observation vs. Simulation
Mulch 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 20 40 60 Days % of a d ded 13 C Incorp.: 55% C mineralized Mulch: 18% C mineralizedControl 0 5 10 15 20 25 0 20 Days 40 60 kg N O3 - -N / h a Incorporation 0 5 10 15 20 25 0 20 Days 40 60 kg N O3 - -N / h a Mulch 0 5 10 15 20 25 0 20 Days 40 60 kg N O 3 - -N / h a
NO
3--N
(0-5 cm soil layer)Observation vs. Simulation
Incorp.: net N immobilization Mulch: net N mineralization Measured NO3--N:
mineralization-immobilization, leaching + upward transport
Conclusion / Perspectives
• Model
– interaction water / N-dynamics
• Improvements for
– initial rate of C-mineralization
– mulch decomposition
• transport of nitrate, soluble C from mulch