• Aucun résultat trouvé

Managing trade-offs in climate-smart landscapes: a global analysis at multiple levels

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Managing trade-offs in climate-smart landscapes: a global analysis at multiple levels"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Oral Presentations L3.4 Climate-smart landscapes, watersheds and territories

73

11:15

Managing trade-offs in climate-smart landscapes: a global analysis at

multiple levels

Locatelli Bruno1, Pramova Emilia2, Chazarin Florie2, Fedele Giacomo3

1CIRAD-CIFOR, Montpellier 34098, France 2CIFOR, Av La Molina 1895, Lima 15024, Peru 3CIFOR, Jalan Cifor, Bogor 16000, Indonesia

An adequate management of land uses and human activities in landscapes can contribute to climate change mitigation and the adaptation of societies to climate variations, while ensuring that the direct and indirect impacts of climate change on landscapes and their ecosystems are anticipated and minimized. The challenge is to implement an effective combination of approaches to understand, manage, avoid or accept the multiple possible trade-offs between the three objectives of climate-smart landscapes (societal adaptation, climate change mitigation, and ecological resilience). One of the barriers for broad implementation of climate-smart landscape strategies is the lack of information on the synergies and trade-offs between the three objectives, the added value of integrated strategies, and the context in which they should be pursued. We present an analysis of existing information on climate-smart landscapes at multiple levels. First, we review 100+ scientific papers on the interaction between the three climate objectives. Second, we report an assessment of how 200+ climate change projects worldwide in agriculture and forestry consider multiple climate objectives. Third, we present how this integration is considered in global climate funds based on the perceptions of fund managers. Several major narratives on climate-smart landscapes emerge from the cross-level analyses at the international, national and local levels about the integration of different climate objectives into landscape related activities. Finally, we discuss factors that can facilitate the development of climate-smart landscapes.

Références

Documents relatifs

In the present paper we analyse data on the trade in live amphibians and reptiles in the United States of America in the 2001–2009 period and focus on the diversity of species

Female cones quantity Male pollen index Growth increment. Reproduction Growth.. Material

– Synergy between local services (water and scenic beauty) – Biodiversity conservation contributes to local services (water) – Prioritizing carbon may not favor local services.

We will prove that the hop count for an end-to-end transmission is bounded by O ( n 1−α/(d F −1) ) where α < 1 and d F > 2 is the fractal dimension of the mobile nodes

We first analysed a subset of 286 releases (comprising 120 species from 10 families) for which we had information on whether the release resulted in the establishment of a

To investigate whether the accumulation of senescent cells with age could be optimal, and might lead to deceleration and decline of incidence of cancer with age, we develop in Box 1 a

Fraction of mean served requests for an average rate constraint given by (Φ HC , F ∗ ) (inner bound to the local trade-off region (13)) for the lognormal shadowing and LOS model,

There is, however, a notable excep- tion to this: maximization of crop yield mean (both at the landscape scale and per unit of agricultural area) and crop yield stability can