• Aucun résultat trouvé

Trade-offs between growth and reproduction in a long-lived plant

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Trade-offs between growth and reproduction in a long-lived plant"

Copied!
41
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Trade-offs between growth and reproduction

Valentin JOURNÉ, Hendrik DAVI, Emily WALKER, Etienne KLEIN, François COURBET, Francois LEFÈVRE, Sylvie ODDOU-MURATORIO, Julien PAPAÏX

Example with a long-lived plant

PhD Student, INRA URFM, Avignon

Wed, 22 August

S-69 Evolutionary Physiology

(2)

Acknowledgements Funding:

Collaborators:

(3)

survival

growth

reproduction

Context

Physiological and

genetic constraints

(4)

survival

growth

reproduction

Context

Adapted from Cody 1966

Reznick, 1983

What is trade-off ?

(5)

survival

growth

reproduction

Context

Reznick, 1983

(6)

survival

growth

reproduction

Context

Adapted from Cody 1966

Reznick, 1983

(7)

Context

Reproduction

Growth

individual a

Reproduction

Growth

individual b

a

reproduction

growth b

(Reznick, 1985; Reznick et al., 2000; Roff, 2000)

How to measure trade-off between growth and

reproduction ?

(8)

Context

Reproduction

Growth

individual a

Reproduction

Growth

individual b

a

reproduction

growth

Difficulties to estimate resources … variation between years and individuals

b

<

>

Resources

Resources

(9)

Context

Resources = energy (Carbon, Nitrogen, Water...)

Stearns, 1989; Zera & Harshman, 2001 Biotic factors

(interaction)

Abiotic factors (climate...)

Need to integrate physiology

(10)

Context

Bayesian approach

Hierarchical model

Unobserved variables

Direct correlation estimation

Roff & Fairbairn, 2007; Worley et al., 2003

Resources = energy (Carbon, Nitrogen, Water...)

Stearns, 1989; Zera & Harshman, 2001 Biotic factors

(interaction)

Abiotic factors (climate...)

(11)

Material and Methods

The species :

Cedrus atlantica

Conifer

(12)

Material and Methods

Patterns of resource allocation during reproduction

Male

reproduction Female reproduction

Cones

initiation Pollination Female cone

Maturation

J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D

Year n Year n+1

(13)

Material and Methods

Sault

(14)

Material and Methods

Sault

~ 100 km

*Boy ! A Marseillaise-style RICARD

(15)

Material and Methods

1200 stems/ha = high density

Plantation with two density populations

250 stems/ha = low density

Even aged populations !

(16)

Material and Methods

Observation during 4 years

Female cones quantity

high density low density

(17)

Material and Methods

Observation during 4 years

Female cones quantity Male pollen index

(18)

Material and Methods

Observation during 4 years

Growth increment

high density low density

(19)

Material and Methods

Observation during 4 years

Female cones quantity Male pollen index Growth increment

Reproduction Growth

(20)

Material and Methods

Year n Year n+1

Process

(21)

Material and Methods

Climate DBH

Tmean Precip Sizei

Growthi

Cones initiationi

Females cones survivali

Year n Year n+1

Process Resourcesi

+ δi

p 1- p

(22)

Material and Methods

Climate DBH

Tmean Precip Sizei

Growthi

Cones initiationi

Females cones survivali

Year n Year n+1

Process

Resourcesi Climate DBH

Tmean Precip Sizei

Resourcesi

+ δi + δi

p 1- p

(23)

Material and Methods

Climate DBH

Tmean Precip Sizei

Growthi

Cones initiationi

Females cones survivali

Year n Year n+1

Process

Data Growth

Incrementi

Male pollen indexi

Female conesi

Resourcesi Climate DBH

Tmean Precip Sizei

Resourcesi

+ δi + δi

p 1- p

(24)

Material and Methods

Climate DBH

Tmean Precip Sizei

Growthi

Cones initiationi

Females cones survivali

Year n Year n+1

Process

Data Growth

Incrementi

Male pollen indexi

Female conesi

Resourcesi Climate DBH

Tmean Precip Sizei

Resourcesi

+ δi + δi

p 1- p

(25)

Material and Methods

Growth

i,n

= γ * Resources

i,n

+ ε

1,i

Cones Initiated

i,n

= X

i,n

* ( β

1

* Resources

i,n

+ ε

2,i

)

Females cones survival

i,n

= β

0

+ β

2

* Resources

i,n

+ ε

3,i

Allocation of resources to 3 energetic sinks

X: Probability to reproduce

ε

: Residual term

(26)

Material and Methods

ε

1,i

ε

2,i

ε

3,i

Multivariate Normal (0, Σ)

σ1,1

σ2,2

σ3,3 σ2,3

σ1,3 σ1,2

... ...

...

ρx,y σx,y

σx,x

*

σy,x

=

Define correlation coefficient

Estimation of trade-off

(27)

Results

Effects of Climate and Size on resources

Size

Precipitation Temperature

(28)

Results

Resources vary among years and competition levels

high density low density

estimated observed

(29)

Results

Negative correlation between Growth and Cones initiated

Growth

i,n

= γ * Resources

i,n

+ ε

1,i

Cones Initiated

i,n

= X

i,n

* ( β

1

* Resources

i,n

+ ε

2,i

)

= -0.63

Prob[ρ1,2<0] = 0,95

ρ1,2

high low

ε

1,i

ε

2,i

(30)

Results

Positive correlation between Growth and Female cones survival

Growth

i,n

= γ * Resources

i,n

+ ε

1,i

Females cones survival

i,n

= β

0

+ β

2

* Resources

i,n

+ ε

3,i

= 0.34

Prob[ρ1,3> 0] = 0,82

ρ1,3

high low

ε

1,i

ε

3,i

(31)

Results

Negative correlation between Cones initiated and Female cones survival

Cones Initiated

i,n

= X

i,n

* ( β

1

* Resources

i,n

+ ε

2,i

)

Females cones survival

i,n

= β

0

+ β

2

* Resources

i,n

+ ε

3,i

= -0.84 Prob[ρ2,3< 0] = 1 ρ2,3

high low

ε

2,i

ε

3,i

(32)

Discussion

1) Clear trade-off between growth and reproduction at initial stage (negative correlation)

2) Positive variation of growth and cone survival (positive correlation)

3) Current year of reproduction impact future

reproduction (negative correlation)

(33)

Discussion

1) Clear trade-off between growth and reproduction at initial stage (negative correlation)

2) Positive variation of growth and cone survival (positive correlation)

3) Current year of reproduction impact future reproduction (negative correlation)

Same trend for both populations: density did

not impact all three relations identified

(34)

Discussion

Several hypothesis exists (e.g. resource

matching, resources switching...)

(Kelly & Sork, 2002;

Pearse et al, 2016)

growth

reproduction

Current reproduction Future

reproduction

Not only one hypothesis

Why trees produces variable quantities of seeds?

(35)

Discussion

Evolution is needed to understand

ecological phenomenon : Why trees produces variable quantities of seeds ?

Mechanistic approach for trade-off

investigation : a touch of physiology allows a

better understanding of evolution

(36)

Discussion

Growth Increment drives the level of resources

How to simulate resources?

Integration of more physiological process?

Variation of resources : depending of climate,

tree size and density

(37)

Discussion

Comparison of resources estimated with an ecophysiological model

Dufrêne et al., 2005

(38)

- We combined physiology and evolution

- We found evidence for growth-reproduction trade-offs in trees

More information ?

@Valentin_Journe Valentin.journe@inra.fr

(39)

Initialized Males cones

i,t

= Phenotypic gender

i,t

* Initialized cones

i,t

Notations convert into Multinomial observation

Supp

(40)

Initialized Males cones

i,t

= Phenotypic gender

i,t

* Initialized cones

i,t

Notations convert into Multinomial observation

Link Initialized Males cones (observed) to latent

variable Initialized Males cones in the process model

Supp

(41)

Supp

Prior for correlation : inverse Wishart

Références

Documents relatifs

Different types of variables (either as response or explanatory variables) were considered: qualitative (occurrence of budburst; GU type: vegetative, flowering, fruiting; GU

[ 66 ], cell growth rates can be predicted from the demand for metabolic enzyme, divided by the rate of biomass production (see Section 1.3 in S1 Text )).. coli cells contain also

Considering a monopoly union which cares for wages and employment, we determine a range of trade union objectives and characterize the aggregate technology so that the union's

Five alternative climatic mechanisms were proposed: (a) cone production (occurrence and intensity) is affected by climate during the current and each of the three previous years;

Using a pollen- specific PME (Fig. 1B) knock-out mutant (At3g06830), we investigated in vitro pollen tube growth and morphology, as well as the impact of this mutation on 1)

Effects of the reproductive effort of the ancestor GU [vegetative (V) &lt; flowering (F) &lt; fruiting (FR)] on the number of terminal descendant GUs (A) and on the leaf area

included a negative effect of early horn growth on yearly survival of 8-12 years old females 131.. (Figure 2, model M4 in

Compared to rapeseeds grown in R monocrop and in mixture with lupine and vetch, rapeseed mixed with clover showed significantly higher SPAD values in old leaves.. In our