• Aucun résultat trouvé

FERMI-GST: A NEW VIEW OF THE GAMMA-RAY SKY

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "FERMI-GST: A NEW VIEW OF THE GAMMA-RAY SKY"

Copied!
5
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-00511153

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00511153

Submitted on 24 Aug 2010

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access

archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-entific research documents, whether they are pub-lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

FERMI-GST: A NEW VIEW OF THE GAMMA-RAY

SKY

Sylvain Chaty

To cite this version:

Sylvain Chaty. FERMI-GST: A NEW VIEW OF THE GAMMA-RAY SKY. 22nd Rencontres de Blois - Particle Physics and Cosmology, Jul 2010, Blois, France. �hal-00511153�

(2)

FERMI-GST: A NEW VIEW OF THE γ-RAY SKY

S. CHATY on behalf of the Fermi-LAT collaboration

Laboratoire AIM (UMR 7158 CEA/DSM-CNRS-Universit´e Paris Diderot), Irfu/Service d’Astrophysique, CEA-Saclay, FR-91191 Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, France, e-mail: chaty@cea.fr

The Large Area Telescope on the Fermi γ-ray Space Telescope (FGST, ex-GLAST) provides unprecedented sensitivity for all-sky monitoring of γ-ray activity. It is an adequate telescope to detect transient sources, since the observatory scans the entire sky every three hours and allows a general search for flaring activity on daily timescale. This search is conducted automatically as part of the ground processing of the data and allows a fast response –less than a day– to transient events. Follow-up observations in X-rays, optical, and radio are then performed to attempt to identify the origin of the emission and probe the possible existence of new transient γ-ray sources in the Galaxy. Since its launch on 11th June 2008, Fermi-LAT has detected nearly 1500 γ-ray sources, nearly half of them being extragalactic. After a brief census of detected celestial objects, we report here on the LAT results focusing on Galactic transient binary systems. The Fermi-LAT has detected 2 γ-ray binaries, a microquasar and an unexpected new type of γ-ray source: a symbiotic nova.

1 Introduction

There has been two firmly established classes of variable sources in the high-energy γ-ray sky: blazars and γ-ray bursts (GRBs). The Energetic γ-Ray Experiment Telescope (EGRET) on the Compton Γ-Ray Observatory discovered a population of variable γ-ray blazars above 100 MeV7

. However, EGRET also left the legacy of a large fraction of unidentified sources in the 3EG catalog. Many of these were found at low Galactic latitudes and believed to be Galactic in nature. EGRET established γ-ray pulsars as a Galactic population and these were thought to contribute to the unidentified sources. Several studies found indications of variability in some of the sources along the Galactic Plane (GP)12

,9,13, a behavior not expected of the pulsars, which

are steady on these timescales. Additionally, no blazar counterpart was identified in several cases. This suggested the possible existence of a new Galactic γ-ray class.

Several sources showed both strong variability and a convincing lack of a blazar counterpart within the EGRET localization errors, like for instance 3EG J0241+6103, 3EG J1824-1514 and 3EG J1837-0423 (GRO J1834-04). The most dynamic example is GRO J1834-04, which produced an intense outburst in June 199510

. The flux above 100 MeV in a 3.5 day period was found to be a factor of 7 brighter than in later observations of the region. Notably, no blazar counterpart is known within the 99% EGRET error contour. The absence of a flat spectrum radio source at the levels typical of the EGRET blazars made this a candidate for a different type of γ-ray emitter. The proximity of such a unique outburst to the inner Galaxy led to speculation of a possible Galactic origin. The question of the progenitor of this activity remains as well as the broader question of the existence of similar sources of this type. As stated in Ref. 10

, “other unidentified EGRET sources near the GP appear to be time variable with V> 1.5 in Ref. 8

(3)

2 The Fermi-LAT γ-ray sky

After a bit more than 2 years of observations, the Fermi-LAT γ-ray sky is already a pretty rich one. It includes ∼1500 sources, among which we find:

• the Sun (Inverse Compton interactions of the solar radiation field and proton interactions in the outer atmosphere), the Moon (from proton interactions in the rock),

• ∼5 Supernova remnants (SNRs) and Pulsar Wind Nebulae (PWN) (γ-ray emission pro-duced by cosmic ray protons deflected by magnetic field, and accelerated in SNRs, mech-anism predicted by Enrico Fermi in 1949),

• 64 pulsars and millisecond pulsars (16 discovered by LAT, among which 12 brand new γ-ray only pulsars),

• 8 globular clusters (magnetospheric emission, allowing to study the millisecond pulsar population spun up by mass accretion from binary companions),

• 2 γ-ray binaries, 1 microquasar (X-ray binary) and 1 symbiotic nova,

• ∼750 Active Galactic Nuclei and blazars, starburst galaxies, the Small Magellanic Cloud, the Large Magellanic Cloud,

• Galactic diffuse emission, extragalactic γ-ray background (for which AGNs contribute only to ∼30%, the rest being probably particle acceleration in normal star-forming galaxies, cluster of galaxies, and cosmological dark matter annihilation),

• 16 GRBs (GRB090510, at a distance of 7.3 Gyr, exhibited the fastest ejected matter, at 0.9999995c, and allowed a quantum gravity test, showing that there was no strong energy dependance in c, a 31 GeV photon arriving only 0.83s after the 1st X-ray photon), • and still ∼500 unidentified yet sources...

Therefore not only the LAT allows to detect astrophysical sources, it also allows us to perform cosmology, particle astrophysics studies, measure of the cosmic-ray specrum, dark-matter annihilation, etc...

3 LAT Detection of γ-ray transients

The Fermi Large Area Telescope (LAT) is very well suited for monitoring variability in the GeV sky. The large effective area (> 8000 cm2

on axis above 1 GeV), wide field-of-view (∼ 2.4 sr), and excellent angular resolution (better than 1◦

above 1 GeV) greatly enhance the sensitivity to transient activity in comparison to previous γ-ray instruments in this energy range. A notable departure from previous observations is that the energy range of the LAT (20 MeV to > 300 GeV) extends above that covered by EGRET. The combination of the wide field-of-view with the sky scanning observational mode supplies coverage of the sky every ∼ 3 hours (2 orbits). This enables the detection of fainter objects in shorter intervals than previously possible. Also, the localizations for sources above threshold are much better than 1◦

even on short timescales. All these capabilities are critical for triggering rapid multiwavelength follow-up observations of LAT transients. The LAT has so far detected three transient events near the GP, high-confidence detections that appeared in multiple 6 hour and daily ASP searches, that have not been associated with blazars or other known sources: 3EG J0903-3531, Fermi J0910-5041 and Fermi J1057-6027. The γ-ray characteristics and the multiwavelength follow-up observations that were triggered shortly after their detections have been intensively described in Chaty et al. (2010)5

(4)

4 Galactic transient sources 4.1 Two γ-ray binaries: LSI +61

303 & LS 5039 LSI+61◦

303

One of the transient EGRET sources has emerged as a new type of γ-ray source with the redis-covery of 3EG J0241+6103 (COS-B 2CG 135+01), which was associated, although the position was uncertain, with LSI +61◦

303, a ”prominent radio flaring star system”11

, high mass X-ray binary (HMXB) system located at 2 kpc and constituted of a neutron star orbiting a B0 Ve star on an excentric orbit, with a 26.5 days period. A daily/monthly variability was seen with EGRET, but no periodicity detected11

. A TeV source has then been detected by MAGIC and then VERITAS, at this position, with a periodic signal modulated at the orbital period. Fermi has detected a γ-ray source, 0FGL J0240.3+6113, at the position RA=40.076, DEC=61.233 with a 95% error radius of 1.8′

, consistent with the optical counterpart, and with a periodicity of 26.6 ± 0.5 days, the emission peaking at the periastron, and a spectrum reminiscent of the pulsars, therefore definitely identifying in the MeV-GeV domain the first γ-ray binary source with the HMXB system, the pulsar wind interacting with the companion stellar wind1

. LS5039

The second interesting source is the case of 3EG J1824-1514, detected by EGRET, but without modulation, as spatially coincident with LS 5039, an HMXB constituted of a likely neutron star orbiting around an O6.5 star. HESS detected a periodic signal modulated at the orbital period of 3.91 days. Fermi firmly detected at more than 12σ a periodic source, modulated at 3.91±0.05 days, in a complicated region with a very intense Galactic diffuse emission. The second γ-ray binary was definitely detected by Fermi2

. 4.2 A microquasar: Cyg X-3

Recently, Fermi has detected a variable γ-ray source coinciding with the position of the X-ray binary and microquasar Cygnus X-3, modulated at its short orbital period of 4.8 hours. Cygnus X-3 is an HMXB system located at a distance of ∼ 7 kpc, with a compact object of nature still matter in the debate, orbiting a Wolf-Rayet (WR) star3

. The high-energy source is detected during periods of relativistic ejection events. The emission is likely coming from the interaction between the wind of the WR star and the accretion disk, the corona, and probably also the relativistic jets... Cygnus X-3 is a unique source among X-ray binaries: it has a very tight orbit, a strong WR wind (10−5

M⊙/yr, 10 3

km/s, high density), favorizing the UV stellar photons to strike ultrarelativistic particles (e−

), creating γ-rays. This source is therefore a good candidate for neutrino and cosmic-ray protons emitter.

4.3 A symbiotic nova: V407 Cyg

Finally, one of the most recent results is that Fermi has unexpectedly detected γ-ray emission for 15 days from a nova in the symbiotic binary V407 Cygni, containing a white dwarf and a red giant star about 500 R⊙

4

. The mechanism is the following one: for decades to centuries, the white dwarf captures some of the red giant’s wind, which accumulates on its surface, up to the point when this gas produces a thermonuclear explosion: the “nova” outburst occurs. The shock wave created by this blast, composed of high-speed particles, ionized gas and magnetic fields, is accelerated from ∼ 0.01c to c, and then enters in collision with the red giant wind, creating the γ-ray emission.

(5)

5 Conclusion

The Fermi-LAT γ-ray sky is therefore very rich, with many astrophysical sources of various types detected. And it only observed for a bit more than 2 years, so many more sources are expected! Apart from the classical γ-ray sources –blazars and pulsars–, the LAT has detected plenty of SNRs, PWN, globular clusters, and even GRBs. It has also detected 2 γ-ray binaries, 1 microquasar, and a previously unexpected symbiotic nova...

The observatory is constantly watching for new sources, especially transient sources. Fur-thermore, the yet unidentified sources are not to be forgotten. The task of identifying the coun-terparts for unidentified transients remains challenging though. While greatly reduced from EGRET, the LAT error circles remain large compared to the resolution of telescopes in other wavebands. Additional arguments based on temporal and spectral characteristics are required to support firm associations. Ultimately, identifications of the Galactic transients require obser-vations of related variability between the γ-ray source and a candidate Galactic counterpart at lower frequency. In the absence of a detection of significant activity of the potential radio and X-ray counterparts for the LAT transients, they remain unidentified. These sources continue to be monitored regularly for γ-ray activity as a part of the Fermi sky survey observations. Acknowledgments

The Fermi-LAT Collaboration acknowledges support from a number of agencies and institutes for both the development and operation of the LAT as well as the scientific data analysis. These include NASA and the DOE in the United States, the CEA/Irfu and IN2P3/CNRS in France, ASI and INFN in Italy, MEXT, KEK, and JAXA in Japan, and the K.A. Wallenberg Foundation, the Swedish Research Council and the National Space Board in Sweden. Additional support from INAF in Italy for science analysis during the operations phase is also gratefully acknowl-edged. This work was supported by the Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales (CNES), based on observations obtained through MINE: the Multi-wavelength INTEGRAL/Fermi NEtwork. References

1. A. A. Abdo and The Fermi/LAT Collaboration, 2009, ApJ 701, L123 2. A. A. Abdo and The Fermi/LAT Collaboration, 2009, ApJ, 706, L56 3. A. A. Abdo and the Fermi LAT Collaboration, 2009, Science 326, 1512 4. A. A. Abdo and the Fermi LAT Collaboration, 2010, Science in press

5. S. Chaty and the Fermi LAT Collaboration, 2010, Proceedings Twelfth Marcel Grossmann Meeting on General Relativity, Paris, France (arXiv 1005.0100)

6. J. Chiang, J. Carson and W. Focke, 2007, Automated Science Processing for GLAST LAT Data, in The First GLAST Symposium, ed. S. Ritz, P. Michelson, & C. A. Meegan, American Institute of Physics Conference Series, Vol. 921, 544.

7. R. C. Hartman, D. L. Bertsch, S. D. Bloom and et al., 1999, ApJS 123, 79.

8. M. A. McLaughlin, J. R. Mattox, J. M. Cordes and D. J. Thompson, 1996, ApJ 473, 763. 9. P. L. Nolan, W. F. Tompkins, I. A. Grenier and P. F. Michelson, 2003, ApJ 597, 615. 10. M. Tavani, R. Mukherjee, J. R. Mattox, J. Halpern, D. J. Thompson, G. Kanbach,

W. Hermsen, S. N. Zhang and R. S. Foster, 1997, ApJ 479, L109.

11. M. Tavani, D. Kniffen, J. R. Mattox, J. M. Paredes and R. Foster, 1998, ApJ 497, L89. 12. D. F. Torres, G. E. Romero, J. A. Combi, P. Benaglia, H. Andernach and B. Punsly, 2001,

A&A 370, 468.

13. P. M. Wallace, N. J. Griffis, D. L. Bertsch, R. C. Hartman, D. J. Thompson, D. A. Kniffen, S. D. Bloom, 2000, ApJ 540, 184.

Références

Documents relatifs

The main aim of this work is to obtain the EBL normal- ization using an approach that (i) avoids, as much as possible, any assumption on the parametrization of the intrinsic

In the case where the Earth lies within the GRB emission cone (i.e. the direct light of the GRB could have been seen in the past), the Compton trail appears as a ring of

The black solid line represents the total emission; the red line represents the synchrotron emission by leptons; the green line the SSC component; the pink line the EIC

We have tested gtbary and gtpphase with giant radio pulses from the Crab pulsar B0531+21 and from the millisecond pulsar B1937+21, recorded at the Nançay radio telescope, X-ray

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des

Then, their variability is characterized as power-law noise with a forward folding method with simulated light curves, taking the sampling of the data, described in Kastendieck et

c) (bottom right) To obtain the period one can study the power spectrum density of X and Y positions of photons detected on the imager. Here we show the periodogram, i.e. the