• Aucun résultat trouvé

Correction to: How effective are strategies to control the dissemination of antibiotic resistance in the environment? A systematic review (vol 9, 4, 2020)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Correction to: How effective are strategies to control the dissemination of antibiotic resistance in the environment? A systematic review (vol 9, 4, 2020)"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-03216922

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03216922

Submitted on 4 May 2021

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access

archive for the deposit and dissemination of

sci-entific research documents, whether they are

pub-lished or not. The documents may come from

teaching and research institutions in France or

abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est

destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents

scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,

émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de

recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires

publics ou privés.

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution| 4.0 International License

Correction to: How effective are strategies to control the

dissemination of antibiotic resistance in the

environment? A systematic review (vol 9, 4, 2020)

Anais Goulas, Drifa Belhadi, Alexandre Descamps, Antoine Andremont,

Pierre Benoit, Sophie Courtois, Christophe Dagot, Nathalie Grall, David

Makowski, Sylvie Nazaret, et al.

To cite this version:

Anais Goulas, Drifa Belhadi, Alexandre Descamps, Antoine Andremont, Pierre Benoit, et al..

Cor-rection to: How effective are strategies to control the dissemination of antibiotic resistance in the

environment? A systematic review (vol 9, 4, 2020). Environmental Evidence, 2021, 10 (1), pp.9.

�10.1186/s13750-021-00222-2�. �hal-03216922�

(2)

Goulas et al. Environ Evid (2021) 10:9 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-021-00222-2

CORRECTION

Correction to: How effective are strategies

to control the dissemination of antibiotic

resistance in the environment? A systematic

review

Anaïs Goulas

1,2*

, Drifa Belhadi

3

, Alexandre Descamps

1,3

, Antoine Andremont

1

, Pierre Benoit

4

, Sophie Courtois

5

,

Christophe Dagot

6

, Nathalie Grall

1,7

, David Makowski

8,9

, Sylvie Nazaret

10

, Sylvie Nélieu

4

, Dominique Patureau

11

,

Fabienne Petit

12,13

, Céline Roose‑Amsaleg

14

, Marion Vittecoq

15,16

, Barbara Livoreil

2

and Cédric Laouénan

1,3*

© The Author(s) 2021. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://crea‑ tivecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdo‑ main/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Correction to: Environ Evid (2020) 9:4

https:// doi. org/ 10. 1186/ s13750- 020- 0187-x

Following publication of the original article [

1

], the

authors reported that the Additional file 10 is a duplicate

of the additional file 8. The correct Additional file 

10

has

been attached in this correction.

The original publication of this article has been

corrected.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at https:// doi. org/ 10. 1186/ s13750‑ 021‑ 00222‑2.

Additional file 10. The validity assessment ofstudies on effect of exposure

of wildlife to contamination on antibioticresistance.

Author details

1 1UMR 1137 IAME, INSERM, Universités Paris‑Nord et Paris‑Diderot, 75018 Paris,

France. 2 Fondation pour la Recherche sur la Biodiversité, 75005 Paris, France. 3 Département d’Epidémiologie Biostatistiques et Recherche Clinique, Hôpital

Bichat‑Claude‑Bernard, 78018 Paris, France. 4 UMR EcoSys, INRA, Agro‑Paris‑

Tech, Université Paris‑Saclay, 78850 Thiverval‑Grignon, France. 5 Centre Interna‑

tional de recherche sur l’Eau et l’Environnement, SUEZ, 78230 Le Pecq, France.

6 UMR INSERM 1092, Université Limoges, Limoges, France. 7 Laboratoire de

Microbiologie, AP‑HP, Hôpital Bichat, 75018 Paris, France. 8 UMR Agronomie,

INRA, AgroParisTech, Université Paris‑Saclay, 78850 Thiverval‑Grignon, France.

9 Centre International de Recherche sur l’Environnement et le Développement

(CIRED)‑CIRAD, UMR 8568, Nogent‑sur‑Marne, France. 10 UMR Ecologie Micro‑

bienne CNRS 5557, INRA 1418, VetAgroSup, Université Lyon 1, 69622 Villeur‑ banne Cedex, France. 11 LBE, Univ Montpellier, INRA, 11100 Narbonne, France. 12 UniRouen, UniCaen, CNRS, UMR M2C, Normandie Université, Rouen, France. 13 UPMC, CNRS, EPHE, UMR 7619 METIS, Sorbonne Universités, Paris, France. 14 CNRS‑UMR Ecobio, Université de Rennes, 263 avenue du général Leclerc,

35042 Rennes Cedex, France. 15 Institut de Recherche de La Tour du Valat,

Arles, France. 16 UMR IRD‑CNRS‑UM MIVEGEC, Montpellier, France.

Reference

1. Goulas A, Belhadi D, Descamps A, Andremont A, Benoit P, Courtois S, Dagot C, Grall N, Makowski D, Nazaret S, Nélieu S, Patureau D, Petit F, Roose‑Amsaleg C, Vittecoq M, Livoreil B, Laouénan C. How effective are strategies to control the dissemination of antibiotic resistance in the environment? A systematic review. Environ Evid. 2020;9:4. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1186/ s13750‑ 020‑ 0187‑x.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in pub‑ lished maps and institutional affiliations.

Open Access

Environmental Evidence

The original article can be found online at https:// doi. org/ 10. 1186/ s13750‑ 020‑ 0187‑x.

*Correspondence: anaisgoulas@gmail.com; cedric.laouenan@inserm.fr

1 1UMR 1137 IAME, INSERM, Universités Paris‑Nord et Paris‑Diderot,

75018 Paris, France

Références

Documents relatifs

Relevant interventions All interventions aiming to reduce the contamination of the environment by anti- biotic resistance (i) directly, by acting on the concentra- tion, abundance

esistant bacteria (ARB) measured through culture‑based methods: Concentration or absolute abundance, e.g., in colony forming unit (CFU) per volume or mass of sample Proportion

共 Received 24 February 2005; accepted 17 October 2005; published online 2 December 2005 兲 We demonstrate that changes in electrolyte composition and applied potential during

In eastern European countries where left parties have historical af fi nities with ethnic minorities as these originate from the old communist federal center (Croatia, Estonia,

In the announcement for his studio, Vey stated that he would do photographs, tintypes, picture framing, the “celebrated” $8.00 oil paintings in heavy gold frames, and that he

Voltammetric evidence for Zn metal deposition, in conjunction with Schottky-barrier heights that are consistent with values expected for a ZnO–Zn junction, suggests that more

This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article... This article is copyrighted as indicated in

Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitationnew.aip.org/termsconditions... This article is copyrighted as indicated in