• Aucun résultat trouvé

Brain imaging working group summaries for the european joint programme for neurodegenerative disease research

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Brain imaging working group summaries for the european joint programme for neurodegenerative disease research"

Copied!
3
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Article

Reference

Brain imaging working group summaries for the european joint programme for neurodegenerative disease research

FRISONI, Giovanni, JOVICICH, Jorge

FRISONI, Giovanni, JOVICICH, Jorge. Brain imaging working group summaries for the

european joint programme for neurodegenerative disease research. Alzheimer's & Dementia , 2019, vol. 11, p. 67-68

DOI : 10.1016/j.dadm.2018.11.004 PMID : 30671531

Available at:

http://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:118244

Disclaimer: layout of this document may differ from the published version.

1 / 1

(2)

Special Section: Brain imaging Working Group Summaries for the European Joint Programme for Neurodegenerative Disease Research (JPND)

Brain imaging working group summaries for the European Joint Programme for Neurodegenerative Disease Research

Harmonization of procedures is key in all fields of biomedicine. In the clinic, the standardization of methods and techniques makes it possible to offer consistent and reli- able care across health care delivery centers of a country and to deliver a similar level of quality health care to all patients irrespective of geographic location. In research, it allows for the collection of large national and supranational databases that can be effectively used to address a much larger set of scientific questions and with much greater efficiency and precision.

In the dementia field, magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography are neuroimaging tools heavily used for diagnosis, but their acquisition, processing, and reporting are still significantly heterogeneous across geographic locations and medical specialties[1]. With the

aim of promoting imaging harmonization, the EU Joint Programme—Neurodegenerative Disease Research, a multi- national funding scheme, launched in 2016 to support 10 working groups organized to study and recommend ap- proaches for harmonization and alignment in brain imaging methods for neurodegeneration [2], encompassing tradi- tional and innovative magnetic resonance imaging tech- niques and technologies, as well as traditional and innovative positron emission tomography molecular tracers for Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, and neurode- generative diseases in general. Some of the working groups capitalized on existing consortia.Table 1lists the 10 project titles and coordinators.

The working groups organized one or more in-person workshops over a period of 12 months to identify gaps of

Table 1

Joint Programme—Neurodegenerative Diseases Research2016 working groups “Harmonisation and Alignment in Brain Imaging Methods for Neurodegeneration”

Project title Coordinators

ASAP SynTau: Alignment and Standardization of Neuroimaging Methods in Atypical Parkinsonism, specifically Synucleinopathies and Tauopathie

Thilo van Eimeren, University of Cologne, Germany Hartwig R. Siebner, University of Copenhagen, Denmark BioFIND: Biomagnetic Framework for Identifying Network Dysfunction in

dementia

Laura Hughes, Medical Research Council, Cambridge, UK

EUFIND: European Ultrahigh-Field Imaging Network for Neurodegenerative Diseases

Emrah Duzel and Oliver Speck, University of Magdeburg, Germany

FULL-HD: Full exploitation of High-Dimensionality in brain imaging Arfan Ikram, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands HARNESS: Harmonising Brain Imaging Methods for Vascular

Contributions to Neurodegeneration

Eric Smith, University of Calgary, Canada Joanna Wardlaw, University of Edinburgh, Scotland HSG: Harmonized Hippocampal Subfield Segmentation Working Group Rosanna Olsen, Rotman Research Institute, Toronto, Canada

Gael Chetelat, University of Caen, France IMBI: Framework for Innovative Multi-tracer molecular Brain Imaging to

enable multi-centre trials and image evaluation in early neurodegenerative diseases

Andreas H. Jacobs, University Muenster, Germany Daniela Perani, IRCCS-San Raffaele, Italy

ND-PETMRI: Development of a Methodological Framework for Integrated PET/MR Imaging of Neurodegeneration

Henryk Barthel, University Leipzig, Germany Thomas Schwarzlmuller, University of Bergen, Norway PETMETPAT: Harmonisation metabolic FDG brain pattern characteristics K.L. Leenders and Ronald Boellaard, University Medical Center

Groningen, Netherlands

Jose Obeso, Hospitales de Madrid, Spain SRA-NED: Harmonization of acquisition and processing of Brain Imaging

Biomarkers for Neurodegenerative Diseases: A strategic Research Agenda for best-practice guidelines

Giovanni B. Frisoni, University of Geneva, Switzerland Jorge Jovicich, University of Trento, Italy

NOTE. Projects are presented in alphabetical order according to their acronym.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dadm.2018.11.004

2352-8729/Ó2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the Alzheimer’s Association. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring 11 (2019) 67-68

(3)

knowledge in their respective domains, and to draft research agendas. Importantly, the working groups were not tasked with providing answers to these gaps of knowledge, but with identifying and spelling them out as clearly and neatly as possible for them to be amenable to investigation in future research programs. In theEU Joint Programme—Neurode- generative Disease Research initiative funding scheme, this is a common approach, and the guidance from these working groups will be considered in developing future calls for research grant programs, contingent on the availability of funds from the participating countries.

The conclusions of the working groups are summa- rized in the series of articles within this issue of Alz- heimer’s & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment &

Disease Monitoring. While not claiming to be an exhaus- tive checklist, we believe that this collection of reports will provide a useful reference for funding agencies and scientists worldwide.

Giovanni B. Frisonia Jorge Jovicichb,*

aUniversity of Geneva Geneva, Switzerland

bUniversity of Trento Mattarello, Trento, Italy

*Corresponding author. Tel.:139 0461 28 3064; Fax:

139-0461-28-3066.

E-mail address:jorge.jovicich@unitn.it References

[1] Frisoni GB, Boccardi M, Barkhof F, Blennow K, Cappa S, Chiotis K, et al. Strategic roadmap for an early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease based on biomarkers. Lancet Neurol 2017;16:661–76.

[2] JPND. Neuroimaging Harmonization Working Groups. Available at:

http://www.neurodegenerationresearch.eu/initiatives/annual-calls-for- proposals/closed-calls/brain-imaging-working-groups-2016/brain-imagi ng-working-groups/. Accessed August 31, 2016.

G.B. Frisoni and J. Jovicich / Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring 11 (2019) 67-68 68

Références

Documents relatifs

Epigenetic context as a consequence of the interaction between the oncoprotein, cell type, developmental stage, and tissue microenvironment emerged as dominant theme in the

Translational research on reserve against neurodegenerative disease: consensus report of the Interna- tional Conference on Cognitive Reserve in the Dementias and the

Les grandes entreprises négocient plus souvent les salaires que les petites : en 2004, 85 % des salariés des entreprises d'au moins 50 sala- riés sont concernés par un proces- sus

• REs are at the center of long term knowledge management and further development of applied and fundamental research on radioactive waste management beyond national borders. –

Figure 6 shows the overall workflow that is supported by the AETIONOMY KB: starting with candidate gene lists that result from, e.g., differential gene expression analysis

It has been repeatedly shown that glutamate receptors, and in particular NMDA receptors are involved in both LTP and learning [10–13] as well as in Huntington’s disease [14–16]..

53 Figure 3.1: Total antioxidant activity of blueberry fruit vs leaf extracts.. 64 Figure 3.2: Total antioxidant activity of the blueberry