HAL Id: hal-01312695
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01312695
Submitted on 8 May 2016
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-entific research documents, whether they are pub-lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
Fundamental Physics and the Fine-Structure Constant
Michael A. Sherbon
To cite this version:
Michael A. Sherbon. Fundamental Physics and the Fine-Structure Constant. International Journal of Physical Research , Science Publishing Corporation 2017, 5 (2), pp.46-48. �10.14419/ijpr.v5i2.8084�. �hal-01312695�
Fundamental Physics and the Fine-Structure Constant
Michael A. Sherbon
Case Western Reserve University Alumnus E-mail: michael.sherbon@case.edu
Abstract
From the exponential function of Euler’s equation to the geometry of a fundamental form, a calculation of the fine-structure constant and its relationship to the proton-electron mass ratio is given. Equations are found for the fundamental constants of the four forces of nature: electromagnetism, the weak force, the strong force and the force of gravitation. Symmetry principles are then associated with traditional physical measures.
1. Introduction
Leonhard Euler was one of the greatest mathematicians of the eighteenth century. In The Legacy of Leonhard Euler mathematician Lokenath Debnath says, “It is remarkable that Euler discovered two elegant and most beautiful formulas in mathematics.” [1].
eiπ+ 1 = 0 and e2πi
− 1 = 0. (1)
William Eisen’s description and interpretation of Euler’s equation eiπ+1 = 0 in relation
to the Great Pyramid design shows four curves of ex from x = 0 to x = π, one curve on
each side. Dividing the sides by π lengths results in a small square in the center called the Golden Apex A, the geometry and symmetry thought to generate the four fundamental forces of nature [2]. Eisen then asks the obvious question about the exponential function and Golden Apex interpretation, “Just how could the builders of the Great Pyramid have been so knowledgeable of the mathematics of the universe ...?”
A = eπ− 7π − 1 ≃√2/3π ≃ 0.1495. (2)
A is the side of the Golden Apex square. √A ≃ e/7 and A + 1 = eπ
− 7π ≃ R ≃ 1.152, radius of the regular heptagon with side one. The sin(2πA) ≃ φ/2, where φ is the golden ratio, 1/2φ ≃ √φ
A. The tan(2πA) ≃ 1 +√A ≃ K/2π, see Eq. (7) [3]. The polygon circumscribing constant is K ≃ 2 tan(3π/7) ≃ φ2
/2A, see Eq. (7) and discussion [3]. A is also the reciprocal harmonic of the gravitational constant. Also, A ≃ tan2
A−1
≃ cosh2(p7/e) ≃ φ√2πe. ln(A−1
) ≃ π/√e ≃ 6/π, with the cube-sphere proportion. The regular heptagon radius, R = csc(π/7)/2 ≃ φ/√2 ≃ cot2
α−1
and 2πR ≃ 1/φ√α. Also, RA ≃ 2√α, where alpha α is the fine-structure constant, see the Eq. (7) discussion.
RA ≃pφ/e2
≃ ln(π/√7) ≃p7/π/K. (3)
R−1
≃√φ sin α−1with eπ
−πe≃ sin α−1[3]. The cosh2(√A) ≃ eA
−Ae≃ π/e. The silver constant from the heptagon is S ≃ pπ/2A ≃ 2√2R ≃ 3.247.√S = 2 cos(π/7) ≃ 7φ/2π, 2πA ≃ S/2√3 and S/√π ≃p11/S ≃p1/2A ≃ ln(2π). Again, with a Golden Apex A:
A ≃√11/7π ≃√e/11 ≃√πα ≃ 2παS. (4)
With the fine-structure constant, 2πα is equal to the electron Compton wavelength di-vided by the Bohr radius and πα is the percentage of light absorbed by graphene [4]. 4/π ≃√A/2A ≃pS/2, with Eq. (8) discussion. K + 2R ≃ 11 and √e/φ ≃ 1 + αφ2 [3].
2. The Nature of the Fine-Structure Constant
Introduced by Arnold Sommerfeld, the fine-structure constant determines the strength of the electromagnetic interaction. Alpha, the fine-structure constant is α = e2
/~c in cgs units [3]. The fine-structure constant related to the Golden Apex of the Great Pyramid:
2A ≃ 2√πα ≃ 4me/mpα ≃ φ 2
/K. (5)
Also, 2A ≃ tanh S−1
≃ tan2(1/2) ≃ √K/π2 and √
2A ≃√π/S. When substituting the fine-structure constant value and approximate value for the proton-electron mass ratio αmp/4me≃ φ +
√
3 and ln(mp/me)/ ln(α−1) ≃ 2πφA, see the discussion of Eq. (14) [3].
The Wilbraham-Gibbs constant is Gw and the sinc function is the sinc x = sin x/x [5]:
Gw =
ˆ π
0 sinc x dx ≃ e sin α −1
≃ K/√7π. (6)
The Wilbraham-Gibbs constant Gw ≃ φ ln π ≃ φ2/
√
2 ≃ 1.852. The Wilbraham-Gibbs constant is related to the overshoot of Fourier sums in the Gibbs phenomena [5] and other approximations: Gw≃ sec(1) ≃ exp(φ−1) ≃ 7A√π ≃ 5/7
√
A, Eq. (17) discussion. The inverse Kepler-Bouwkamp constant is the polygon circumscribing constant K [3]:
K = π 2 ∞ Y n=1 sinc 2π 2n + 1 = ∞ Y n=3 secπ n . (7)
Also, the polygon circumscribing constant K ≃ 2π(1 +√A) ≃ p7/4πα ≃ √11φ2 and
K ≃ φ2
/2A ≃ 5A/√α ≃ 4π√SA ≃ 3/2RA ≃ 2 tan(3π/7) ≃ 8.7. KA ≃pe/φ ≃ R + A. Half the face apex angle of the Great Pyramid plus half the apex angle is approximately 70◦ and sin α−1
≃ 2 cos 70◦ [3]. csc α−1
≃ R√φ ≃ p7/S ≃ √85/2π ≃ ln(372/85), see below. 528/504 ≃ 7A, see discussion of Eq. (17) [3]. First level sum of Teleois proportions is 85, foundational in Great Pyramid design [3]. 85/11 ≃ R/A and 528/85 ≃
2π, see Eq. (17). The latest value for the inverse fine-structure constant by Aoyama et al, α−1
≃ 137.035 999 157 (41), from the most recent experimental results and quantum electrodynamics [6]. Eq. (8) derives the approximate value for α−1
≃ 137.035 999 168 [7]: sin α−1
≃ 504/85K = 7!/(713 + 137)K. (8)
Sum of the eight main resonant nodes on the Turenne Rule is 372 ≃ e/α, part of a spectrum analysis also related to crystallographic groups [8]. K ≃ φ ln(372 − 137), ln 372 ≃ 1 + ln 137 ≃√π/2A and ln(137 × 372) ≃ φ/A. 1372
+ 3722
≃ 3962 and from the harmonic radii of the Cosmological Circle, 108 + 396 = 504 [3]. 504/396 = 14/11 ≃ 4/π. Pyramid base angle θB ≃ tan
−1
(4/π). The ln(4/π) ≃ Aφ and π/4 ≃ csc α−1
− sin α−1≃ sin θB. The pyramid apex angle θA, sin α
−1
≃ θB/θA ≃
√
2 tan(π/7) ≃ pS/7 ≃ 2π/√85 [3]. 528/396 = 4/3 and 396/85 ≃ pS/A. The quartz crystal harmonic is Qc = 786432
and 1/√α ≃ ln(AQc). Base octave harmonic of Qc, 192 ≃ 7πK and φ/π ≃ 192/372 [7].
3. The Four Fundamental Forces of Nature
The heptagon is a feature of the Cosmological Circle, geometric template for many ancient architectural designs; related to the cycloid curve and history of the least action principle [7]. Golden Apex A, silver constant S and fine-structure constant of Eq. (4) discussion.
αE ≃ exp(−2/Ae) ≃ A/2πS ≃ 7.29 × 10
−3
. (9)
The electromagnetic coupling constant is αE = α = e
2
/~c in cgs units [7]. Together with Eq. (12) the ratio αW/αE ≃ Aπ
3 ≃√πφ2 .√α ≃ Ae/φ√K ≃√R/4π and 2πφR ≃ 1/√α. Gravitational constant G = ~c/m2 P l ≃ 6.67191(99)ÃŮ10 −11 m3 kg−1 s−2 and Planck
mass mP [9, 10]. Gravitational coupling αG= Gm
2 e/~c = (me/mP) 2 , Golden Apex A: αG≃ exp(−K √ π/A) ≃ 1.752 × 10−45. (10) Also, − ln(αG) ≃ 2R/A 2
≃ exp(Aπ3) ≃ 2πRd/√α, where dodecahedron circumradius
Rd= φ
√
3/2. Aπ3
≃ K sin θC, where θC≃ 32
◦
, half the Great Pyramid face apex angle. An approximation with the Golden Apex A for the strong force coupling constant [11]:
αS ≃ exp(A −
√
2φ) ≃ A/pφ ≃ 1.177 × 10−1
. (11)
The tetrahedral angle θt ≃ 109.5◦, csc2(θt) = 9/8, the whole tone. αS ≃ ln(9/8) ≃
√ α tan(2πA) ≃p2/A/π3 ≃ K√α/2π, √2φ − A ≃ e/√φ and α−1 S ≃ 7π √ A ≃ π2 /R [7]. Approximation with the Golden Apex for the coupling constant of the weak force [12]:
αW ≃ exp(−1/2A) ≃ 2A/K ≃ 3.4 × 10 −2 . (12) Also, αW/αE ≃ Aπ 3 ≃ √πφ2 . Coupling constant αW = g 2 w/4π ≃ A/ √ 2π, where gw is
the coupling constant mediating the weak interaction. The Fermi coupling constant GF
determines the strength of Fermi’s interaction that explains the beta decay caused by the weak nuclear force. GF = g
2 w/4 √ 2m2 W = αWπ/ √ 2m2
W [13], mW is the mass of the
W boson. The weak interaction is mediated by the exchange of W and Z gauge bosons. Weinberg angle θW, sin
2
θW ≃
√ αφ2
≃ 3A/2 [12, 14], Eq. (17); cos θW = mW/mZ ≃
√
2/φ. K2
≃ cos(2θW)/α ≃ A
p6/π. The pyramid base angle θB, θW/θB ≃
√
4. Symmetry Principles and Physical Measures
Steven Weinberg is often quoted, “... there are symmetry principles that dictate the very existence of all the known forces of nature.” [15]. Saul-Paul Sirag says, “By far the deepest theoretical advance afforded by the group-theory approach is the set of ADE Coxeter graphs, .... It is plausible to think of the ADE graphs as the ultimate Platonic archetypes.” [16]. The discovery of symmetry principles and their application [17, 18] has advanced to the monster group and the modular j-function (referred to as “monstrous moonshine”) [19], the umbral moonshines and string theory; along with vertex operator algebras in related physical approaches with conformal field theory [20]. For a half-period ratio of τ, the modular function j(τ) with q = exp(2πiτ) has the Fourier expansion [21]: j(τ ) = q−1+ 744 + 196884q + 21493760q2+ .... (13) The ln(21493760/196884) ≃ √7π ≃ √2/2A. The ln 196884 ≃ p2/A/2A ≃ KRd and
Rd = φ
√
3/2 is the circumradius of the regular dodecahedron with the side equal to one. From Grumiller et al, the chiral half of the monster group conformal field theory originally proposed by Ed Witten has a partition function given by the j-function. “The number 196884 is interpreted as one Virasoro descendant of the vacuum plus 196883 primary fields corresponding to flat space cosmology horizon microstates.” The quantum correction in the respective low-energy entropy is then proportional to the ln 196883 [22]. G.f. is a Fourier series which is the convolution square root of j(τ ), see Eq. (13) [23].
G.f. = q−1+ 372q + 29250q3− 134120q5+ .... (14) The ln(29250/372) ≃ φ2
/4A ≃ K/2 and the ln(2 × 372) ≃ A−1
. The ln 372 ≃ φp2/A ≃ √
π/2A ≃ 2K cos 70◦ and sin 70◦
≃ 372/396 ≃ 2πA, with the hieroglyphic geometry for gold. An application in a special case of umbral moonshine is the Mathieu moonshine work of Eguchi, Ooguri and Tachikawa [24] and followed by others, includes the q-series e(q) whose coefficients are then “ ... twice the dimension of some irreducible represen-tation of the Mathieu group M24.” Pierre-Philippe Dechant continues, “Modularity is
therefore very topical, also in other areas and a Clifford perspective on holomorphic and modular functions could have profound consequences.” [25]. A normalized q-series e(q):
e(q) = 90q + 462q2 + 1540q3 + 4554q4 + 11592q5 + .... (15) The ln(462/90) ≃√7/φ ≃√Aφ3 with the ln 90 ≃ √3φ2
≃ 2/3A ≃ U√K, see Eq. (16). Also correlated, 90/372 ≃ φA and 462/372 ≃ φA + 1 ≃ 2/φ, recall discussion of Eq. (8). A gold pyramid at the tip of the Great Pyramid, with octahedral and icosahedral symmetry [26], was the “Golden Tip” described by John Michell with the support of Algernon Berriman’s metrology [27]. This was represented by the height of a pyramid with 5 cubic inches, 0.152 ≃ 11.7/(7 × 11), √137 ≃ 11.7 and 0.152 is the tenth part of the Greek cubit of 1.52′
. This pyramidion might have been similar to the legendary Golden Sun Disc of Mu. Apex angle of the regular heptagon triangle is 3π/7 and an approximation to the apex angle of the Great Pyramid [7]. The “Golden Tip” harmonic of U ≃ φ sin 70◦
found in the Cosmological Circle, AU ≃ R/πφ ≃ 5/7π ≃ cot(3π/7) ≃ 0.227 and the tan(3π/7) ≃ eφ ≃ 4.4. The ratio 7/5 ≃ φ/R ≃ Rd, the circumradius of the regular
dodecahedron having the side equal to one, see the discussion following Eq. (13) and [7]. AU ≃ 85/372 ≃ φ√eα ≃ exp(−ARK) ≃ 2/3√K. (16) The sum of A+U ≃ 1/4A, A/U ≃ R√α and the ARK ≃p7/π ≃ coth2
R ≃ 3/2 ≃ 10A. Interesting parallels can be found between William Eisen’s Golden Apex of the Great Pyramid design, the torus topology of Einstein’s relativity and Wolfgang Pauli’s World Clock Vision; with his i ring imaginal geometry of the unit circle on the complex plane and also symbolic of the unus mundus as the natural ontology of quantum theory [28].
Pauli’s World Clock also has the golden ratio geometry related to the fine-structure constant together with four men swinging pendulums [28]. Ancient Egyptian architects converted celestial time periods into lengths that are equivalent to those of the pendulum measures as rediscovered by Galileo and explained by Sir Isaac Newton. Roger Newton states that “ ... speculations concerning a long-awaited reconciliation between Einstein’s general theory of relativity and the quantum, known in their various guises as superstring theory, employ as their basic element the properties of Galileo’s simple pendulum ....” [29]. Flinders Petrie found the harmonic of the standard day when converted by the pendulum formula results in the length of the Royal Cubit, “... basis of the Egyptian land measures .... This value for the cubit is 20.617′′
while the best examples in stone are 20.620′′
± 0.005′′.” The Egyptian Royal Cubit is the traditionally known measure basis of the Great Pyramid “... and its base measures 440 Royal Cubits in length.” [30]. R.C. ≃ 144/7 ≃ A/α ≃ φ + φ/√α ≃√7π/AU ≃ 7√K. (17) The canonical Royal Cubit of 20.736′′
is the harmonic of 1442and the standard harmonic
Royal Cubit R.C. ≃ 20.618 [27]. Also, R.C. ≃ √7π tan(3π/7). Basic square perimeter of the Cosmological Circle is 44 and 442
+ 1372
≃ 1442 [28]. 22 = √44 + 440 ≃ 7π and A ≃ π/√440 [3]. 372/440 ≃ 4√2A, 144/372 ≃ √A and 504/144 = 7/2. Also, 144/85 ≃ e/φ ≃ A + U [3]. Plato’s “fusion number” 1746, described by John Michell, represented the apex of the Great Pyramid [27]. Fusion number 1746 ≃ 144p7π/A, 372/1746 ≃√2A and AU ≃ 396/1746. 528/372 ≃√2, 528/1746 ≃ 2A, 528/504 ≃ 7A, 1746/504 ≃ 2√3 and R.C. ≃ 1746/85. The Great Pyramid Key is 528 ≃ ln(7/A)/α [3].
5. Conclusion
From the exponential function of Euler’s equation to the geometry of a fundamental form, the Golden Apex of the Great Pyramid was described, leading to a calculation of the fine-structure constant and its close relationship with the proton-electron mass ratio. Golden Apex related equations were then found for four fundamental forces of nature.
Juan Maldacena restates it, “The forces of nature are based on symmetry principles.” [31]. These symmetry principles were then associated with traditional physical measures. And finally, here is William Eisen’s quotation again, “Just how could the builders of the Great Pyramid have been so knowledgeable of the mathematics of the universe ...?” [2].
Acknowledgments
Special thanks to Case Western Reserve University, MathWorld and WolframAlpha.
References
[1] Debnath, L. The Legacy of Leonhard Euler: A Tricentennial Tribute, London: Im-perial College Press; River Edge, NJ: World Scientific Publishing Co., 2009, 180. [2] Eisen, W. The Essence of the Cabalah, Marina Del Rey, CA: DeVorss, 1984, 474-479. [3] Sherbon, M.A. “Quintessential Nature of the Fine-Structure Constant,” Global
Jour-nal of Science Frontier Research A, 15, 4, 23-26 (2015). hal-01174786v1.
[4] Nair, R.R. et al. âĂIJFine Structure Constant Defines Visual Transparency of Graphene,âĂİ Science, 320, 5881, 1308-1308 (2008). arXiv:0803.3718v1 [cond-mat.]. [5] Zi-Xiang, Z. “An Observation of Relationship Between the Fine Structure Constant and the Gibbs Phenomenon in Fourier Analysis,” Chinese Physics Letters, 21.2, 237-238 (2004). arXiv:0212026v1 [physics.gen-ph].
[6] Aoyama, T., Hayakawa, M., Kinoshita, T. & Nio, M. “Tenth-Order Electron Anoma-lous Magnetic Moment: Contribution of Diagrams without Closed Lepton Loops,” Physical Review D, 91, 3, 033006 (2015). arXiv:1412.8284v3 [hep-ph].
[7] Sherbon, M.A. “Fundamental Nature of the Fine-Structure Constant,” International Journal of Physical Research, 2, 1, 1-9 (2014). hal-01304522v1.
[8] Hills, C.B. Supersensonics, Boulder Creek, CA: University of the Trees, 1978, 120. [9] Rosi, G., et al. “Precision Measurement of the Newtonian Gravitational Constant
Using Cold Atoms,” Nature, 510.7506, 518-521 (2014). arXiv:1412.7954v1 [at-ph]. [10] Burrows, A.S. & Ostriker, J.P. “Astronomical Reach of Fundamental Physics,”
PNAS, 111, 7, 2409-2416 (2014). arXiv:1401.1814v1 [astro-ph.SR].
[11] d’Enterria, D., Skands, P.Z., Alekhin, S., et al. “High-Precision αS Measurements
from LHC to FCC-ee,” CERN-PH-TH-2015-299, (2015). arXiv:1512.05194 [hep-ph]. [12] Bodek, A. “Precision Measurements of Electroweak Parameters with Z Bosons at the Tevatron,” The European Physical Journal C, 76, 3, 1-12 (2016). In Proceedings of the Third LHCP15, 2015. Saint Petersburg, Russia. arXiv:1512.08256v1 [hep-ex]. [13] Thomson, M. Modern Particle Physics, New York, United States; Cambridge,
United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 2013, 298.
[14] Olive, K.A., et al. (Particle Data Group) “The Review of Particle Physics,” Chinese Physics C, 38, 090001 (2014) & update (2015).
[15] Sundermeyer, K. Symmetries in Fundamental Physics, New York: Springer, 2014. [16] Sirag, S.P. ADEX Theory: How the ADE Coxeter Graphs Unify Mathematics and
Physics, Toh Tuck Link, Singapore; NJ: World Scientific Publishing Co., 2016, 2-4. [17] Jungmann, K.P. “Fundamental Symmetries and Interactions” Nuclear Physics A,
751, 87 (2005). arXiv:nucl-ex/0502012v2.
[18] Quigg, C. “Electroweak Symmetry Breaking in Historical Perspective,” Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, 65, 1, 25-42 (2015). arXiv:1503.01756v3. [19] Gannon, T. Moonshine Beyond the Monster: The Bridge Connecting Algebra,
Modular Forms and Physics, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2006. [20] Duncan, J.F.R., Griffin, M.J. & Ono, K. “Moonshine,” Research in the Mathematical
Sciences, 2,11 (2015). arXiv:1411.6571v2 [math.RT].
[21] Sloane, N.J.A. “Coefficients of Modular Function j as Power Series in q,” The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences, (2001). OEIS:A000521.
[22] Grumiller, D., McNees, R. & Salzer, J. “Black Holes and Thermodynamics,” Quan-tum Aspects of Black Holes, New York: Springer, 2015. 27-70. arXiv:1402.5127v3. [23] Adamson, G.W. “Convolution Square Root of A000521,” The On-Line Encyclopedia
of Integer Sequences, (2009). OEIS:A161361.
[24] Eguchi, T., Ooguri, H., & Tachikawa, Y. “Notes on the K3 Surface and the Mathieu group M24,” Experimental Mathematics, 20, 1, 91-96 (2011). arXiv:1004.0956v2 .
[25] Dechant, P.P. “Clifford Algebra is the Natural Framework for Root Systems and Cox-eter Groups. Group Theory: CoxCox-eter, Conformal and Modular Groups.” Advances in Applied Clifford Algebras, 1-15, (2015). arXiv:1602.06003v1 [math-ph].
[26] Verheyen, H.F. “The Icosahedral Design of the Great Pyramid,” Fivefold Symmetry, Singapore; River Edge, NJ: World Scientific Publishing, 1992, 333-360.
[27] Michell, J. The New View Over Atlantis, New York: Thames & Hudson, 1995, 149. [28] Sherbon, M.A. “Wolfgang Pauli and the Fine-Structure Constant,” Journal of
Science, 2, 3, 148-154 (2012). hal-01304518v1.
[29] Newton, R.G. Galileo’s Pendulum: From the Rhythm of Time to the Making of Matter, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004, 137.
[30] Petrie, F. “Origin of the Time Pendulum,” Nature, 132, 3324, 102 (1933).
[31] Maldacena, J. “The Symmetry and Simplicity of the Laws of Physics and the Higgs Boson,” European Journal of Physics, 37, 1, 12, 015802 (2015). arXiv:1410.6753v2.
