• Aucun résultat trouvé

Preface

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Preface"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Third International Workshop on Business/IT Alignment and Interoperability

BUSITAL’08

Organizations are today becoming more and more dependent on their information systems and other kinds of IT-based support systems to realise their business strategies, building value networks with partners, and managing their resources effectively. But how can organizations ensure that their IT investments are well aligned with the needs of their business? A number of frameworks and methods have been designed to help managers in aligning business and IT. Such alignment is a critical “early stage” activity to understand how information systems contribute to business strategy and to set directions for the development and maintenance processes that follow. Recently, novel methods and techniques based on conceptual and enterprise modeling have been proposed to support mutual alignment between business needs and IT solutions. The Third International Workshop on Business/IT Alignment and Interoperability (BUSITAL’08) is a forum for practitioners and researchers that want to explore the benefits, challenges and solutions of business and IT alignment.

BUSITAL’08 received thirteen submissions of which nine high quality papers were accepted for presentation at the workshop. These papers contribute to an understanding of how conceptual modelling, goal modelling, value modelling and other modelling approaches can be used to support the alignment of business and IT.

We would like to thank all the members of the program committee of BUSITAL’08 for their efforts in reviewing the papers and all the authors for their work in contributing to the workshop. We hope you will enjoy the BUSITAL’08 proceedings.

April 2008 Paul Johannesson Jaap Gordijn

Program Chairs BUSITAL’08

(2)

Organizers

Paul Johannesson KTH, Sweden

Jaap Gordijn Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Program Committee

Eric Dubois Public Research Centre Henri Tudor,

Luxembourg

Guido Geerts University of Delaware, USA Pavel Hruby Microsoft, Denmark

Jesper Kiehn Microsoft, Denmark John Krogstie NTNU, Norway

Kalle Lyytinen Case Western Reserve University, USA William McCarthy Michigan State University, USA Michael Petit University of Namur, Belgium Yves Pigneur University of Lausanne, Switzerland Alain Wegmann EPFL, Switzerland

Hans Weigand Tilburg University, The Netherlands Roel Wieringa University of Twente, The Netherlands Carson Woo University of British Columbia, Canada Eric Yu University of Toronto, Canada

Références

Documents relatifs

An additional limitation is the focus of their data models on the context of experience (e.g., who, where, when, and how), with only partial attention paid to its

Whether numerical or experimental, modelling is now widely used in sedimentology, but it covers a large range of domains both in time and space: experimental analogical models

La pose des implants chez l’enfant reste donc très controversée du fait de la croissance, à l’excep- tion des implants antérieurs mandibulaires chez les enfants atteints

The Witness tool provides standard modelling elements which can be used to create a simulation model of the EMS process.. These elements are grouped according to

The Object Paradigm (OP) proposed by Partridge (2005) has advantages in the area of ontology engineering over the other perdurantist approaches because it: (1) Provides

compound was to carry out in silico a ligand‐based rational design, also known as “indirect”  drug  design.  In  brief,  starting  from  the  structure 

It entails the institutional integration of collective learning developed at a local level, taking into account stakeholders who are not present at the local level, and the need

• Models and especially conceptual models consist of a number of models and thus form a model suite.. We got now additionally a number of special necessities for conceptual