• Aucun résultat trouvé

MAY XEROXED 10

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "MAY XEROXED 10"

Copied!
115
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

CENTRE FOR NEWFOUNDLAND STUDIES

TOTAL OF 10 PAGES ON Y MAY BE XEROXED

(Without Author's Permission)

(2)
(3)

1u0084

(4)
(5)

I .

\. '· . i

I ..

.

: .,

.

. .

. ~

' .

~. . .·. ~

.

.·.

·. •, .. ·'•

. - .-

~--

.... . .

-t~

. . . ·.· - - - --

· ·· +

Nati?_fla!·

uJ\ ~;~

91

C~nada

.

1 . _

· ,,._. .. , Cataloguing Branch · . \

... : I · ."'

Canadian·Th,s,es Divisi~n e \

. !

. L Ottawa, Canada · · · · f t K1A ON4 . \

_. i t

. ..

.

. .

. .

\\'

. '

'\ .

,, .

NOT~CE _·· · ..

I) . \ \ .

.

'

. ·n·

'·

. ' q

I ~ ,I

, [ ~- ..~ .

. .' :

.

. .

;,.

' ..• ,jll

. -

...

___

...

__

.. __ ~~ ~ ....

'

.

.

· ~ibliothiiqu~· ~ationale du C~nada ·'

Oirec;tion du· catalogage;

·'Division des theses canadiennes ..

.

·.

.. . ' t

·. ; . { . . I

.. ·.' . f .. ' ...

./

..

·

-. . •.

.

.

AVIS -·.Q

't ...

-.

.... _ ... --··- 1.-

., I

'

. -~~-..

. .

' . !

1.; ' . .f '

. 1 :

. ~

·I • • ., n " • ..

:~ .

; ' \ '' ~

, . The quality oflhls

rilkr~;lche 1~\eavnY depend;~-,

upon ;

L~

.<tualltB de·cette

~lcroflche

.• dl>pend

gra~dement

de Ia :.;

·.' · . the quality of the original thesis submitted for microfilm- · . qualite de Ia these sou mise au -microfilmage. Nous avons 1

~, · . · ·. "- ing. Every effort has· been ·nitme\ to· ensur'e. the high~st .. ·.tout fait pour assurer .une. ~ualite ·superieur~ de rep~o- , -~·

! · quality of reproduction'posslble. \, : . · .? · · . duction. · · ~ · . A

1. · 1. ' · · · . . ·' · ·. :. .. '.z.'

,a ·-.... . . . ~ . . . " . "'

i ·If pages are missing; contact 'the univ~rsity. wt)ich S'il manque des pages, veuillez ·communiq.uer avec·: .

·.l·

1 grant,ed t~e degree. · ), . · l'universite qui a conf{m! le grade. ·. ·

. . .

.

. ..

··.,r•· ...

I.' \..._ I

._ · Some .... pag.es may'·h~ve iridistin~~ print especially if · La qu.alite •d'impression de certain~s pages peut .

.

.~

.

: ... . ; . . the· original pages were ty!J.ed with a poqr typewr~ter ribbon or-If thell{jniversity sent us a poor photocopy.

.

. .

t . : •

. laisser

a

desirer, surto'ut si res pages originates ·ont ete

. ." . dactylographiees

a

l'aide d'un ruban' use ou Si l'universite--·;

~ . r)ous a fait ·parvenir une photocopie d~ma.uv.aise qualjte.·

" .

0 .

Previously copyrighted materials (journal articles;·. . published tests, etc.t are not filmed., ·· ··

. . . . 0

, "o. . '

. "" ,· . . ~-

..

" .

·~. · . f Reproducti'on in fulltP'~ in part of, this film is_goveroed

..

.~ by t~e Canadian Copyright ~ct;· R.s:c. 1970., c .. C-30.

~- P~ease read the auttlbrization forms which accompany j: · t~is ttie~is. · o ·

f . . ~ ' \ , ' 11 Cl

t

,,

· ; ' . . · ... · ::

J·~·

F .

. ~

a

\

. THIS 'oiSSER.TATI.ON- '

HAS BEEN MICROFILMED

. 0

0 ~.

~ . .

· ·\'

·' .\

· t

.' . · ·EXACT Y . AS--RECEIVED.

•' , ...

.

· . .. · .

.

. .

,, ' (l .. ·

. '

': ' . . i · . . . . . . . . "'

... ~ ..·. .. . . '·. r· f.·

{ <.

r

·

j·.

. •

. l

! .

1. '. (

I ~

i •

' . ·t : t

.

.

.

. )

.. p

I I

i. I

' I o : ~>,)

0 '

' .

.'o . . '

. - .. ; ' .. .. ~

. .

.

'

..

0

I .

'\

.

'. ', . .

.

' . ., . r.

..

.

'

. I

·.~ ..

' \

,' . -'

·~ r

,I

0 .

..

' .

.

. .

) ·,

.

'

•,'

I .

I .

' I

. .... . ' ' . ' ' ' . ·~

Les ddcuments qu·i font deja· l'objet.d'•'Un droi.t d'ai.l-· · . · ~ . ' leur (articles

de

revue. exameris pub lies, etc.) 1ie sont pas . mi¢rofllnies.:: · · . · · ; ·. · ·. , , : •.

. .

.

~- .. .

,. . La repro.duction; meme partielle, de ce mic'rofil~ est·.

sou mise·

a

Ia loi canadienne sur le 'droit d'au(eur,·SRC ·

o 1970,

c .'

C-30, Veuitlez prendre connaissanc'e des for·

mule~ d'autorisatio~ qui acco~);a,gne~t ·ce~e thes~ . • · ·

,•

.

.

. . ~

' ~-, . .. .

.

. ' .···

· LA

THESE A ETE;, . .

·,

. ' .

.. . .

.

'

.·.-. Ml ROFIL

MEE

TELLE

· a

UE _

· -'.

·vNSt~S

-L'

~ \/.O~S ' ~E<;_ UE :·· '

; ./

·.;'"'

/··.' .. . .

·. .

. .

··~ .'

' f I ~ .. :1j,,

..

.

. ... ·~: .. '

.. · .. '

. .

· .' ~

, ') . .

-·· ..

. . : . lll:'b'

.

· .. ·,, .

. ·.

-

() ..

' . .'1 · .. <

..

\ ' ...

• I I ' , ' o

. .. ·.

•' '. ..

.. ·

. .. ... .

'. ·

. .

.. ·· .

.

~ . ~ .....

:

; ; . . .

:._·: .. .

..

'•

. . '

. ".'·. .. . '~ J.

.. .. · ·.

· .

. ..

, '!: ·', ·• :·. :

•• ' ·. ·.· ... :':-: . '{j ,,· .. . .. . ~ .

.

.··

' t • -· •

~ ', I:> • '

. . ~ I) '

. 0, '

.

' . ·, -~ .. : ;~,~ ~

...

I ~' I

' t ,

.,

NL·~9 '(3n7)

, : -.'0 ·--·-::--.... ~~~..!...-~-... 4.. . ..... ~··--• - .,-· .\·~~~ -~.,. . .. . ~ · ··; , : ·· ·.) ~-:'"T~~~-.. .,.., :.-~·,...'·: ... ~~-~·_-:-. ':": ,:-~, .. -... ~. -. : .. --'-,-.---'.·,. ,' . . """. ~..,, .... wi'uou~"'""'-""· ..,.~,.,....~,._ .,..,. . ..,.., ... _

(6)

...

•.

- ·

.. ,

''

.

:'.

<;., .. • ~.

' l

.i .. J

!/. J. ~··

,·. _l

· .....

.... ' . · .. ~ ..

'•," , ~"1 : ' I

~. ' I ' '

"",':0 '

..

.. h.'' '

. ~. .,

..

w ,, \ .

··' r . .;

,, . ;

·. ·:'

~ . ., .. . ~;

•..

,• ··.

· : :·.,

· . !··

' , '\.'

. - ' . '

! • • :·· . / · ··:4

·. " ....

. .,. ·.

'.: ,.·

.·: ··. :···,

' .

.

· .

(7)

"' ' ..

t J ~-· ,

·

. ..

., ,. '.

. .

I . ,

·'

)

. . .

I

.

-:--'.

' ' .

-;!. r

i . . . ;

I

: f · . · .

\'

\ ..

·

.

I

\ .

.

..;

\

'

,_I . - .

.

.... -. ~

II '

'

; .

. ..

.

.. ·,.

I

'<' :

. .. .

" .

•.

\ .

. .

-T~e ·purpose of this study wa-s to construct a question- .·

.

'

naire to measure thE;! attitudes 'of' the chi·l~,. age 8 .to· i2 ··

. .

· . years I· tO Self 1 SCh!)Ol ~nd teaC~~r and tO investigate ~~

. '

rei-1-ability and validity of the ,devised instrument·:

. ~-Th~ theore~ical cohstructs' of fhe questionnaire were 'ba-se·d on self-c.Once.J?t, attitude and s~lf-~ep?rt-.t~eory. The

.

'

."}terns _.were· devised f_rom- a review· of _self"":conc-~t instruments · ·

'

arid· studies alld from consultations with. p~ren-ts·,

.... '

.

'"

. :.. . . graduate

~tudents and eg)Jcational psychologi-sts. From. a pool of 500'

1!, . !"' . . l ••

i terns,

so:~ we~e

chosen

:~it~

tlie

concurr~nce~ ·

of 11,

~people.

in

the equcational psychology field. These items formed the

'

. .

'

.

' .

'

'· -~

initial' ~~~st-~onnkire. · ..

· ... '• .... . .

· . /'7·T~i.\ q~~s~ionnai.re -~a~ administered to a sample of

' 11"

211 students from Grades IV. to VII-, inclusive, in two .sele!cted

' ·. .. (

. . ,.

· ')

.

.

. Ne~-i~oupdl~nd- schools.· It' was re-administered three .weeks

· later. ....

' ' I

~hr~~~~ i_te~ an:~lys~s an~ . ~~ctor

anal;Yti_c . studies a . . .

This final .. : , . version, The . ·I

' ~ . : . . .

Student Self':"'Attitude Questionnaire, con'tained 31 items,.

. . '

.

. . ' . ' . \

olS

m~asuring

attitude -.to self I 9'

nt~ -s~rin~f

'attitude to schoc;l

. ,·· ''' . . . . ,, .' . ;· 'i•.

·and 7 measuri'ng ·attitude to te·ae~~e.r. ·i·. / '

:~ ' . )

· A .... ·questionna:ire to ·rate the· teacher's percep.tion>~f

I , ' . ,. ' ' I ..Jf :

:-specific

st~d~nt ;beha~iors ·wa~ de~igned ,:-:·.

Ten

: ·st·u~ent s,

in

· ' 1'1·· • ' · ·'. r /

·•: ·~'(", I ' ' '

'!>· (~, . . '

. :t:.· ··~- . : ·

.

, ii

. ..~

. .

·, . . ~

·.:

" I

. :~ i .

' I

" .... /

I

' '

\

I! ' ..

. ..

..

~---~~·~.:.~~~-~~"

:-. '

(8)

',.

~ ' I

1-

.f. t

:

·t' i!

r

r ·

f

( '

;

I

J

f.

'

•1 '~ ">!

{)!_,

•J

. I ' I

,.

1.' - --.. • -·----. ''

'

.

·a -_: __ . -... -.t'O"O'~·~ ... : .... ~-..-. ... , ••.... :-~· ... . . ~ .... . ~ . ··~ ---·

-

..

-

.... -~-.. , ..... -:·-·· ... ····-· -. . .. ............

-

- - --::---.

.

'.

..

.

. ::

· "

'

. ' '

;-· --.•

·each grade in the ~a~ple were 'selected. ra~4omly and their.·

- . . :,Q ' ' . '. . ' .

·teachers were: as~ed to rate each· of them 'individua-l-ly on the·

·,

·-

.

.

\ .. •'

items. Teachers' and_ students.' .rat_~ngs w~~e correlated and·

found to be low.

The int~rnal.consistency , . of ~he q~estionnaire . . · r was

' '

J .. f " '

c9roparable to that of other self-concept instruments. Tp~

• ' .... . •1

test-retest findings_ we're lqwer. ' .'Factor analysis procedu~es _indicate·d the. presence. .

. .

. .

of

construct validity in th.e study

sample.' The test-retest ·reti.. . abillt/ and empirical validity

' , ·. . . .

.

findings we~ff!. low,·. s_pgg~s~ing ·th~ questionnaire would not be

' ' ' : ·, I

applicable for . I ind}yoidual '. dicfgnosis. . ...

' The theoretical constructs, the st.atlstical data, the\

r~;l:iabili

ty ·

~·~~ ~·a·~£~~ t~ stu~~·es · w~re · cornprehensiv~~

•' I \ '

, . ' l

results of.' the study ·indic;:a-t;:e. that 'the questionrlafre is

' . .

~.5'-de~uate'

;or

_res.earch purposes .

I

·v '

~I .

•\ '

.,,

...

· . ..

•.

\

' I

e ~-• ·-·-. -~---·--··-' · -

\. .\

fl

, .

. - , .

I .'

' .

i i i

· .. i:.--·~.;:.. .... 'U'

· -·

J' .

·.

./

' ~

'

'•.

. .

and The

. \ '

.

·'

<I ..

..

(9)

'..

~ .

' ..

: ' '. r '

·~.

.

r :

'• .. t '

r.· .

,,_. ~' I

. a ... -

" !, .

7, < . l .

J II

. I

'

. l

,' I

I'. ( )

. \'' . I

/

. .

.

..

. .

. ' -·- . ,;, , .. . . ... ---·~;--. ...-.,..._.,

_____

~---·--;· --·-:----..-.- -- ----~-.. "'

- \

.~!i .. i,,

--~ ..

.

.

. , .

\,) .. , "'

--"

., , . ' .

.

\

. . / ~

·,

. .

\

~ACKNO~EDGMENT~ :~.

·

.

I express my appreciatio·n to D,.+. Terry Boak ·for' ·

; ' . I

· his --advice· .and· assistance in the planning an.d writing· of .

, '·•.· , , . t · . I

this tryesis. My si_ncere gratitude· 'goes to _Dr. wi11~am \ . Spain f.or his. direction and guidance in the ·design. and 1

, , I .\

\

analysis of ·the .Fesults.

l .

· Appreciat~ol} is ·expressed to 'th.e p·rofessors and

' ' ,. , . ' I I '

. . .

graduate students in-the. :~;:C!.ucational Psychology _oep~r;t-·

1

• •

.rnent, and ·to the.Er~ncipals, teachers and students in

the schools, who participated in this study • . · . . 1-

· · I extend my ~peciai thanks to the -staff of the• ·. i

. . .. .

~

Education Libra·ry ,· and 'to my typist,- Mrs. Dailas s_trang~· •.

0 -

·-. · .. . ,·.

I I

' ji

~

. ,

' . . ,

I ~P,

I '

""

'•

.

-

..

\\'

<'

-·-·

I . .

•I '

...

I , . .,

\ '~

'

'i

I :, .''40 ', I,'

\ '\ . .

\ i

-I

'-.

. · )( :

' .

. '

''·

' ,. ·-:---·~·~

... ---:"

·--~-·~ --:-"~T. ~~·--'··;;-:

<-:--_

-~~;:~~~~··

...

,.~7~-·-.~~'.,:~':··;·~·~·

• •• ~ - · :' : .. :.. ... • t t i. . ,,f• ,l . ~

(10)

. ..

•' ·

..

I r

j i

~

I·.

'

: ...

.

...

~=

. ~ ·. . '

-~

.:·

. '

·;,: .

~-.

·,

c; ~' I

·t .

~\.

i-~ ,., ,, . (~.

·

. .. ..

~I.,

.r-·

}·.

L

..

I ..

r

!'

.l

r D

~

t

f.

I

!

'

' !

:)

•I

I

. I

j ' I . ..

I t.

.... I

' ! i t

l I

•' ...

' y

· " \ · · .

.. ..

•.

. .

,

,. :

..

' '

·~

' . , .

--~~ ... -~ ... :. ... - -~~ ~....,.... .. ...,..~ ... _ .... ._.;.,,_ ... -•. ---·--"''"''""'&0''""-·-.. ·-··:!._._ \

..

'

·'· .

.

' I

<"-

TAQLE . OF eONTENTS '. . . . · '

,.,..,/"' ... ... ~

,;_·

_____ -_;...~---/:.

/ /

. ·? '•.

'Abst~act : . ,... .. /__...,. .... ....-.;-

.

.

. . .

;

. .

~

.

...' !

. ... ....

Acknowledgments ·.:

; . / .

/ ·· .

.

.

List

of

:T~bles ·• ;

. / . . 1

List oy'Fig~re~ .. •

. / .

.

Chapter , . . . / I.

i~RODUC~

' . '

. . .

. . . .

. I

· · / ··.

.

.. / /

.

\ . .·

. . , .

. , ;

\

.

·

. Ql!l • : ....

\:

..

\

- . - . .

,

.

-"

.·, ..

·,

. .

.·.·

J?age : i i 0 iv·

I

yiii ix

..

:_.. .

.

1

;, , State/ent of

\

I ·,

f. ~ \ .

/ .

I

..

II;.

• •

'·

III.

. 1.'

Purpose

• · . .

. :

.\

1

. / 1 ' ·.

~igpi'ficance

. ,. . .

\

1

. .

of the Proj_ect

/

REVIEW o·F THE LITERATURE.

.

.

. ')~elf-The~~

' Self ... Report Theory·

., . .

Attitude .Thedry • ·

. . - , . ..·

.

.

. .

~

.

.

. .

The.ory Underlying Construction

·

/

/

of Items "'

' . .

. . I , .

Instrument ·constructlon . v

. .

.,

,

;

. . .

"~

.

~-,,

. . 7

.

'

. .

.

· · \, : .

\ ' ...

\ .'J

\

\ ~

·

\

·

16 l

f

:. :

.

I I l .

\ 1 . ..

• I f

•. \ ~2 ' , / I ..f:_;: .

\ ~; .. " , . ~

. ·(a) ·Item Selection . •

-~~ ·

· • • , •

yt~· .

(b) Reliability and

\1a1i<Ih~ -~-· ...

---r 'J\'24 scaling.·.·. ·._ ·· •

1

: ·!

~, -

.... · .l ...

:/: ~.: \ a '"

•. . / t ~·-

INSTRUMENTATION

Gene'ra1 Design o : In.str'ument De~~lopmen

, , s:.

'·· .... v

, .

. . / \ '•\

; · • ..

Y~

. ..

~

3o\· . ·

. ' . ·.

\

~ ' .

. Stl:Jd~ •J'.30 \ .

. . . ·

... \

. ' j . i

30 \ '

~ \.

. 1

\ .

. \

·. / l

. ~

'

: \

l r

' . . ·. ~ ...

... . ,

\

;

-~

;t -~

.. . .

'f '

>,

'I

. _.· .. · . . ... . ·· J ·:··~··

, ;--;-~~~ .. ,,._-..,~---·:\\,... ' ...,~~~ !A4tsa _. ;e ~'riW111cN.:....,.~o-.,1 .J.~ . . ·i4'~',)4".1. · ;~t~-~

.

~r

.. · : · ; . . · . .. · .. , _ . . :. ·.. .

~

: .. · . . , . . . . . .

I #

.

(11)

' .. f. ' . ,.', l " '

) ' c '\

' i ' .

'. ~

:

.

'.

'I

t

' ~

.

} .·.

' '

'

..

. ~

'· .. I - . . . .

~ ·= . . .•

' .. \I ' '

.. . . . . -- . . . ·: -~·t : :- :~ \ . • •. , ; ' : : "" ~~~- .

.. . . ' J . ' ' . .. : :· : ; : .·

. . . ·•

~·.··

' ... , . ·: :.· ;,_

:~~

r. ' .,

~

·-~·

. I ~J" ' : ' ,• . ,"

.

' - ,'

.

: '· . ·. '.r' .. -~. . -'· ,··':· -~-

.... . .. }· '·CHAP~.~R· ... I:_-_·. ~ .. "'. ' ._ .. --~ . ·

. ,

.. ' ~ . ~ ~

I . . ~ . , . . . . . , . .

(a} - Items ..• .• · • . • . · . ... .

I· . . . - .. . . .

j

b) c) .' . Form

Sc~ri·ri~

>~ .• "'

. . ' " " :~.:< " . . . · .• .

I :I ~

..

... · ' I

' . 'u

.

. . .

'

. ..

.

.

,· : I '

; ~d)

'; I

Tea~he:r1.s. Percept•ions of -·.

~ ,'1 • ~ '

. .

,

.

. .~ \

. . . .,

.. -·- ..... , . .,

. . __

.i

~-

.

' '

. . .

' '• 'I

, . .,·.

.

. . . .

. 'q

~ - . ... ' ·. •• • . • . . ·-!.

'l_

.

~

. - · · . ... , ,

v~

. . _:· j

: · St.u'c'ient Behavior Rating~ Form·

• I

. The . Sample

. . ...

.

.

1- .... .r

,•

. ' . ...

'.

. , I

·i'

. ' '

, .

' .

IV .

..,) '

. 0

'

' . ' I . . . . . . I · ' '

.Admin;i.strati ve Proced.ures

. rJem

~electi~n

. . .

. . .

.

: ·.

. .

.I_'

1 (a) Item Analys,is .· . . .· . , • • -. .; .

.,

.. ·.,. ·.: .

.

\

' \ '

I

(b.) Factor AnalYiS-15 • • • • • • •

.

. \

{c) Final Item. S~lection. • • • . . .

f ,.

-~L~AB'iLITY. ANq( VALIDI.TY STUDIES

. ·I . . ' ~ . I

·.Descriptive Statistics

I ' \ I . '. . \

4' . . \

Reliabil'ity of Final Questionnaire

. J· 't •. . . \ . -. . ...

I .

Ya~i5iity of Final· Quest ionnaire

I <>

( ) . 1' ..:1. . \

a · Con17ent Va 1\ .. lty· · •

{ ' ' ' f t

' . (b) Ernpiri.cal' Validity

.

... .

.

'

· (c) Construct Validity · \ .

"' . , \

)

. .

.

.

. . . .

. .

. :.

. .

'

" '

. '

\

_ 1 . r. ,,:· .. · f~ -

Page. •

31 ~ 3,3 33

: ,~ 35 36

37

; 31

3 .

38 ~

41 41 .4'1 42 42 43 4.3

\ < I

. l ,

'

I '

1 ./·

.

/ ·

.i

', '

i .

.,

1 ; .,

''

\

.

53·

53.

54 : .Vi

co:c_ ol. _ Lusaa:rJ. · ·.N s:n0~ . ~~o~N~A:I~N~ : ~: :· . - ~: . : · . : I.

o~p

....

Yl ~ th

Other Questionnaires . ·• ;

. .

/ \

r.' o I ' ' '

·t

' 1 .,

J •

'

. _,(a)~-. It~w- M~ke-Up · •

I( b)

(c)

I. . .

Co_n!?t ruct Validi•ty

. . . ~... ' I

Reliabi lity

i \ .

: ' · · :· · ~. · vi

. .

.

.

54 f

... . .

·' .: 58

59 "

4 '-1,

./

: '

\, '

.

~

- .

~·..

I . . .

~

. •. :. . :· . >. .

l . . .... \ · . ' ' .·. . .

--- _ ... ,~i"

·. -

\·--

.

- -·

:

--··._

.

... , ...

·.

-... :.. ..

.

--~~

· . . . . . .

't' ... b\~ .... ... ~j ..... ;.

.

_._~·--..w::~ ·~

. :· · . · : ....

.. - - - -

'.· ..

~~-~ ~ .

....

---..,,.::;;;~:.:u '

..

~ r.

...

~

-"·

Références

Documents relatifs

Much of human existence is mediated through, if not outright dependent on, technology. This includes our experience of space, not as a scientifically quantified structure

Using one-way analysis of variance, the clusters were compared on levels of schizotypy traits, depressive symptoms and cannabis use, academic achievement, variables sensitive

Although the manifestation of the higher self is transitory and the imaginative world of the dream is often shattered by the reality of the phenomenal world, based on

[r]

[r]

Chapter Five shows that second moment methods (FOSM, 11\1-FOSM, and AFOSM with normal parameters) give approximately the same answer most of the time for calculating probability

Canadian Fitness and Lifestyle Research Institute (1994). The Research File. ottawa, ON: Author. Self-reported alcohol, drug, and eating- disorder problems among male

Calcarenit~ beds'are distributed throughout the Northern Head group, but dominate the Upper Cam~rian portion of the Cooks Brook Formation and are generally sparse