A NNALES DE L ’I. H. P., SECTION A
A. K. P OGREBKOV
I. T. T ODOROV
Relativistic hamiltonian dynamics of singularities of the Liouville equation
Annales de l’I. H. P., section A, tome 38, n
o1 (1983), p. 81-92
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=AIHPA_1983__38_1_81_0>
© Gauthier-Villars, 1983, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Annales de l’I. H. P., section A » implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.
org/conditions). Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
81
Relativistic Hamiltonian dynamics
of singularities
of the Liouville equation
A. K. POGREBKOV (*)
I. T. TODOROV (**)
Institute of Nuclear Research and Nuclear Energy of the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia
Steklov Mathematical Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Moscow
Vol. XXXVIII, n° 1, 1983, Physique ’ théorique.
ABSTRACT. - A constraint Hamiltonian
description
of thedynamics
of
singularities (regarded
aspoint particles)
isgiven
for apreviously
consi-dered class of solutions of the Liouville
equation
in twospace-time
dimen-sions.
Reparametrization
invariant Newton likeequations
are writtendown for the
N-particle
motion. Thecorresponding phase
space Hamil- tonianapproach
is formulated in terms ofasymptotic particle
coordinates and momenta. In the2-particle
caseinterpolating
canonical coordinates areintroduced in the Markov-Yukawa gauge (in which (q1 - q2)(p
1+ p2)
= 0),thus
making
contact with current formulation of relativisticparticle dynamics.
The relation between(non-canonical) physical position
variablesand the
corresponding
velocities on one hand andasymptotic
canonicalcoordinates and momenta on the other is also established in the
2-particle
case.
(*) Permanent address, Steklov Mathematical Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Moscow.
(**) Permanent address, Institute of Nuclear Research and Nuclear Energy of the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia.
l’Institut Henri Poincaré-Section A-Vol. XXXVIII, 0020-2339/1983/81/S 5,00/
cÇ) Gauthier-Villars
82 A. K. POGREBKOV AND 1. T. TODOROV
RESUME. 2014 On propose une
description
hamiltonienne avec contraintes de ladynamique
dessingularites (considerees
commeparticules
ponc-tuelles)
pour une classe de solutions de1’equation
de Liouville a deux dimensions. On ecrit desequations
de type newtonien pour Ie mouvement de Nparticules
sous une forme invariante par rapport a lareparametri-
sation.
L’image
hamiltoniennecorrespondante
estpresentee
dansl’espace
des
phases
des coordonnees et desimpulsions asymptotiques.
Dans Iecas de deux
particules
on introduit aussi des coordonneesinterpolantes
utilisant
la jauge
de Markov-Yukawa(dans lequel (~i 2014 q2) (pl
+p2) _
0),ce
qui
etablit une connexion avec la formulation courante de ladynamique
des
particules
relativistes. On etablit aussi une relation entre les variables(non-canoniques)
depositions physiques
et leurs vitesses d’un cote etles coordonnees et les
impulsions asymptotiques canoniques
de l’autre dans Ie cas de deuxparticules.
1. INTRODUCTION
The time-like lines of
singularities
for a class of solutions of the Liouvilleequation
have been
interpreted
as theparticle
world lines of a relativisticdynamical
system
(with
a finite number ofdegrees
offreedom)
in twospace-time
dimensions
[7] ] [2 ].
Theobjective
of the present note is toprovide
a cova-riant Hamiltonian
description
of thisparticle
system(without
a referenceto the
underlying field).
Thus we will end up with an action-at-a-distancedescription
of the motion ofsingularities
of the solution ofEq. (1.1)
whichis a
perfectly
causal fieldequation.
There is a fundamental
difficulty
on the way towards such anobjective.
It is related to the so called « no interaction theorem »
[3 ] - [5] ]
whichhas for a
long
while embarassed attemps to construct a canonical Hamil- toniandynamics
for aninteracting
relativistic system of a finite number ofdegrees
of freedom. We shall summarize here our presentunderstanding
of this
problem (see [6 ]- [8 ]).
Gauge dependence
of canonical world lines in the presence of interaction.It is
intuitively
clear that if weregard
thespace-time properties
of amechanical system as fundamental, in
particular,
if weregard particle
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré-Section A
world lines as’
observables,
we should demand that thedynamics
and theworld lines do not
depend
on the choice of an evolution parameter. We shall refer to such an invariance under the infinite parameter group ofreparametrizations
of individual world lines as gauge invariance.There is a
good justification
for such aterminology.
A set of N relativisticinteracting particles
can be defined as a constraint Hamiltonian system[9 ].
Its
dynamics
isspecified by giving
a 7N dimensional Poincare invariant surfaced in the 8N dimensional canonicalphase
space r, which defineslocally particle energies
as functions of theremaining
variables. It is assumed that the restriction to ~’ of the canonicalsymplectic
formvanishes on an N-dimensional kernel
(*) ~V’
and that the foliationis a
locally
trivial fibre bundle(with
an N-dimensionalfibre N).
Thus wearrive at a finite dimensional gauge
theory
as describedby
Faddeev(see Appendix
to[76~]);
thespecification
ofequal
time surfaces and evolution parametersplays
the role of a choice of gauge.Roughly speaking,
the above mentioned no-go theorem says that thereare no gauge invariant world lines in the space of canonical coordinates unless the
particles
are free. Moreprecisely,
we have thefollowing
resultvalid for any number of
particles
N and anarbitrary space-time
dimension D.Let the
projection
of each fibre of the bundle(1. 3)
on theD-space
of cano-nical
coordinates qk
is 1-dimensional(for k
= 1, ...,N)
and let the cano-nical Hamiltonian
N
be
non-degenerate
in the sense that the systemcan be solved with respect to pk.
Then the canonical
(q - space) trajectories
of allparticles
arestraight
lines
(see [8 ]
Theorem2).
(*) More precisely, we assume that there are exactly N linearly independent vectors Xk in the tangent space at each point ( p, q) E ~ such that co(Xk, Y) = 0 for any Y E The vector fields Xk are assumed to be in involution, XjJ =0, and ~V’ is defined as their (N-dimensional) integral surface.
84 A. K. POGREBKOV AND I. T. TODOROV
(Note
that the abovenon-degeneracy
condition excludes systems involv-ing
free zero massparticles.)
The way out of this
difficulty
has been indicated on more than oneoccasion
[77] ] [5] ] [12 ]- [15 ] :
thephysical position
variables xk shouldnot be identified with the canonical coordinates qk ; rather,
they
are vectorvalued functions of all the
q’s
andp’s.
An iterativeprocedure
has beendeveloped [14] [15]
to construct xk in the2-particle
case(in
terms ofproducts
of derivatives of the interactionfunction) satisfying
the « initialcondition »
(appropriate
for avelocity independent potential
in the centre-of-mass
frame)
v - - 1 o
for
One of our
objectives
in this work is to find a closedexpression
or ~in the model we are
studying
and to get an idea of theambiguity
involvedin the definition of the x’s.
2. GAUGE INVARIANCE
OF SINGULARITIES’ WORLD LINES FOR THE LIOUVILLE
EQUATION
The «
particle
world lines » of thesingular
solutions of the Liouvilleequation (1.1)
can be definedby
a set of Nimplicit parametric equations
of the type
where
and =
f~( p 1, - - . , pN), j
= 1...., N - 1 are any set of N - 1positive
Lorentz invariant functions of The = 1, ..., N, which will be
interpreted
asasymptotic particle
momentasatisfy
the freemass-shell constraint
equations
Eqs. (2 .1 )
do 0 notdepend
0 on k ; we have in fact asingle equation
or x ( = xk).Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré-Section A
Using
the results of[1 ],
it is not difficult to show that thisequation
hasexactly
N solutionssatisfying
theasymptotic
conditionwhere
Indeed, in the
equal
time gauge in which = 0,~,k
=1 o (r
== ~ =qk )
pk
we fall into the setup of ref.
[1] ]
where the existence of N solutions has been established.Eq. (2 .1 )
involves 2N(gauge independent)
parameters : the vectors pk(which
aredetermined,
say,by
their space components pk because of the constraints(2 . 3))
and theskewsymmetric products pk *
qk. Theasymptotic
conditions
(2.4) involve,
in addition, the gauge freedom which is reflected in theLagrange multipliers 03BBk
and in the timecomponents q0k (for T
=0).
We shall show in what follows that the world lines
(in
the2-space
of eachxk)
are gauge
independent.
Eqs. (2 . 4)
demonstrate that qkandpk
do indeedplay
the role ofasymptotic particle
coordinates and momenta. We shallregard
the 4N-dimensional vector spacespanned by
theq’s
and thep’s
as asymplectic
manifold with canonical 2-form(1.2)
orequivalently
with a Poisson bracket structure definedby
Following
thegeneral
framework of ref.[9] we
define the Hamiltonian of the system whose world linessatisfy (2.1)
as a linear combination of the constraints(2 . 3)
withpositive (variable)
coefficients :It
gives
rise to the freedynamics
in theasymptotic
variables qk, pk.Indeed,
so that the momenta, the
velocities,
and thepseudoscalars
pk * qk are constants of the motion :Moreover,
they
are gaugeindependent,
sincethey
have zero Poissonbrackets with each of the constraints
(2.3) separately. (Eqs. (2.6)
andVol. XXXVIII, n° 1-1983.
86 A. K. POGREBKOV AND I. T. TODOROV
(2. 7)
involve the weakequality sign,
~ which indicates thatthey
areonly
valid on the mall-shell(2.3).)
The fact that coefficients of
Eq. (2.1)
are constants of the motion(as
functions
of pk and pk * qk)
and that theasymptotic
condition(2 . 4)
relatesxoutk
to qk demonstrates thatand
As a consequence of
(2.3)
and of the assumedpositivity
off~
the vectorsin the square brackets in
(2.9)
arepositive
time like for all k’s. Hence,the normalized velocities uk are determined
uniquely
from(2 . 9) :
Thus the tangent to the k-th
particle
world line at eachpoint
is gaugeindependent.
In order tocomplete
theproof
of the gauge invariance of the world line in the Minkowski2-space (x~ xk)
itsuffices,
due to(2.4),
to
verify
the invariance of theasymptotic
line qk =Eq. (2.4b) yields
.It follows that we can exclude the gauge
dependent Lagrange
multi-pliers ~k
from theequation
of theasymptotic line;
we find3. A NEWTON-LIKE FORMULATION OF THE N-PARTICLE PROBLEM
Eqs. (2 .1 )
and(2.10)
can beregarded
as 2Nequations
for the 2N inde-pendent
gauge invariant variables px and px * qx(for
=0).
For space- like i.e. forAnnales de l’Institut Henri Poincare-Section A
the functions can be chosen in such a way that pk qk could be
expressed
in terms of thex/s
andui’s. (It
can be shown-in thesimplest
case, for N = 2- that for a time like x12 eqs.
(2.1) (2.10)
admit no solutionfor pk and pk *
qk, whatever the choice offl(p)).
The Nindependent
compo- nents, say Pb of pkprovide
N translation invariantintegrals
of motionthat are in involution. In other words, as noted in
[2 ],
thedynamical
system under consideration is
completely integrable.
Differentiating (2.10)
with respect to T we arrive at thefollowing
repara- meterization invariant Newton likeequations
/ ~ B
where
and the scalar « forces »
~k
aregiven by
with pj and pj *
qjexpressed
in termsof xi
and uL from(2.1), (2.10).
Inderiving (3.3)
we have used theidentity
valid for
~/1 + u~.
Finding
the functionspk(x, u)
and(pk
*qk)(x, u)
isequivalent
tofinding
the solution of a
general
N-thdegree algebraic equation.
We shall restrictour attention to the
simplest
case N = 2 in whicheverything
can be eva-luated
explicitly.
We have .Vol. XXXVIII, n° 1-1983.
88 A. K. POGREBKOV AND I. T. TODOROV
where
The « force »
~~
exhibits characteristicproperties
which are valid forarbitrary
N.First,
it isindependent
of the choice of the functionsin
(2.1). Secondly,
it satisfies the finitepredictivity
condition of ref.[12 ],
where ~k is the proper time of
particle k,
so thatEq. (3 . 7)
guarantees that the system under consideration is a second order differential system in theterminology
of ref.[15 ] ;
it is another form ofthe gauge invariance condition.
It is instructive to
point
outwhy
bothproperties
takeplace
ingeneral.
Since the momenta 1, ..., N - 1 are
light-like (because
of(2 . 3))
the
change
of variablesleaves the constraints
(2.3)
unaltered. Thischange
allows to exclude thefunctions
f~
from eqs.(2.1), (2.10)
and(3.3)
and hence from~.
To prove the
general validity of eq. (3 . 7)
we first note that thevariables pk and pk *
qk are gauge invariant so thatOn the other hand,
according
to(3.3), 03C6k depends
on xiand ui through
these variables and
through xk
and uk(with
the same index k as~~). Thus,
due to
(3.8), they
dosatisfy (3.7)
forarbitrary
N.4. INTERPOLATING CANONICAL VARIABLES AND PHYSICAL POSITIONS IN THE 2-PARTICLE CASE
We now turn to a more detailed
study
of the case N = 2.Noting
thatin- and out-coordinates and momenta are obtained from one another
by
a
particle permutation,
we shall introduce someinterpolating
canonicalvariables in a
specific
gauge and will then construct thephysical position
Annales de Henri Poincaré-Section A
2-vectors as functions of these variables
(and
hence of theoriginal
asymp- totic coordinates andmomenta).
The
general
form of the world lines in the2-particle
case(cf. [1 ])
isdisplayed
onFig.
1. It is an essential feature of thispicture
that in- and out-coordinates and momentaexchange places :
so that
Identifying
the canonical variables pand q
of thepreceding
sectionswith
qout,
we shall introduceinterpolating
canonical coordinates pand q
in the Markov-Yukawa gaugesatisfying
thefollowing
conditions :(«
Interpolating »
means that pand q
tend to the out-variables for t -~ x’and to the in-variables for t -~ 2014
oo).
Because of (4.4) weonly
need toexpress the relative coordinate and momentum.
Vol. XXXVIII, n° 1-1983.
90 A. K. POGREBKOV AND I. T. TODOROV
in terms of the
asymptotic
variables. A solution of thisproblem
isgiven by
where
(x can be
regarded
as a Lorentz invariant evolutionparameter).
If weselect
qout
to bespace-like
or zero,then q
isalways space-like.
It is
easily
verified that the set(q, Q ; p, P)
is canonical. We shall demons-trate that it satisfies an
equation
of the type(2.1)
in the gauge(4.3). Indeed,
the
right-hand
side isindependent
ofqout
in the gauge(4 . 3) :
We now turn to the
problem
ofconstructing physical position
variables ~(with
gauge invariant worldlines)
thatsatisfy
the « initialcondition » (1.6) along
with the property(The consistency
of thisequation
is verified in both the Markov-Yukawa gauge(4 . 3)
and theequal-time
gauge of ref.[7].) Eqs. (2.1),
withfl - ,
/given by (4.9),
and thesupplementary
condition(4.10)
have aunique
solution for the relative coordinate x = x1 - x2
given by
If we denote the constraints of Sec. 2
by
then theequivalent
constraints
satisfy
the gauge invariance criterion of refs.[7] ] [8 ] :
Solving
eqs.(4.6), (4.7)
with respect topout
and we can express xkand in terms of the
interpolating variables p
and ~. ..We end up with a final remark
concerning
the centre of mass variableand eq.
(4.10).
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré-Section A
Let
then it is
easily
seen that the generator of the Lorentz boosts can be written in the formv v
and,
furthermore
where
It is
argued
in ref.[9] ]
that eqs.(4.15), (4.16)
should remain valid also for thephysical
centre of mass variableXc
and thecorresponding
relativemomentum jr
orthogonal
to P.Setting
we find
Condition
(4.19) (unlike (4.10))
can beimposed
on thephysical
coordi-nates for more
general
relativistic2-particle
systems.ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors take the
pleasure
to thank M.C. Polivanov for a number ofenlightening
andenjoyable
discussions.REFERENCES
[1] G. P. JORJADZE, A. K. POGREBKOV, M. C. POLIVANOV, On the solutions with singu-
larities of the Liouville equation ~ $$03C6
± m2/2
exp 03C6 = 0, ICTP preprint IC/78/126.Trieste, 1978. 2
G. P. GEORJADZE, A. K. POGREBKOV, M. K. POLIVANOV, Singular solutions
of the equation ~ $$03C6
+ m2/2
exp 03C6 = 0 and the dynamics of singularities, Theor.Math. Phys., t. 40, 1979, p. 706-715.
[2] A. K. POGREBKOV, Complete integrability of dynamical systems, generated by the singular solutions of the Liouville equation, Theor. Math. Phys., t. 45, 1980.
p. 951-957.
[3] D. G. CURRIE, T. F. JORDAN, E. C. G. SUDARSHAN, Relativistic invariance and Hamiltonian theories of interacting particles, Rev. Mod. Phys., t. 35, 1963, p. 350-375; ibid 1032.
Vol. XXXVIII, n° 1-1983.
92 A. K. POGREBKOV AND I. T. TODOROV
[4] H. LEUTWYLER, A no-interaction theorem in classical relativistic Hamiltonian
particle mechanics, Nuovo Cim., 37, 1965, p. 556-557.
[5] R. N. HILL, Canonical formulation of relativistic mechanics, J. Math. Phys.,
t. 8, 1967, p. 1756-1773.
[6] R. GIACHETTI, E. SORACE, Nonexistence of two body interacting Lagrangians
invariant under independent reparametrizations of each world-line, Lett. Nuovo Cim., t. 26, 1979, p. 1-4.
[7] V. V. MOLOTKOV, I. T. TODOROV, Frame dependence of world lines for directly interacting classical relativistic particles, Int. Rep. IC/79/59 Trieste, 1979.
[8] V. V. MOLOTKOV, T. T. TODOROV, Gauge dependence of world lines and invariance of the S-matrix in relativistic classical mechanics, Comm. Math. Phys., t. 79, 1981,
p. 111-132.
[9] I. T. TODOROV, Dynamics of relativistic point particles as a problem with cons- traints, Commun. JINR E2-10125 Dubna, 1976; Constraint Hamiltonian mecha- nics of directly interacting relativistic paricles, preprint BI-TP 81/24, Bielefeld, 1981 ; Differential geometric methods in relativistic particle dynamics. Single particle systems, Lecture notes, USP Mathematizierung, Bielefeld, 1981 (This
latter reference contains an extended bibliography).
[10] L. D. FADDEEV, Feynman integrals for singular Lagrangians, Theor. Math.
Phys., t. 1, 1969, p. 1-13.
[11] E. H. KERNER, Can the position variable be a canonical coordinate in a many
particle relativistic theory? J. Math. Phys., t. 6, 1965, p. 1218-1227.
[12] Ph. DROZ-VINCENT, Relativistic systems of interacting particles, Physica Scripta, t. 2, 1970, p. 129-134; N-body relativistic systems, Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré, t. 32A, 1980, p. 377-389.
[13] L. BEL, J. MARTIN, Formes Hamiltoniennes et systèmes conservatifs, Ann. Inst.
H. Poincaré, t. 22A, 1975, p. 173-195.
[14] H. SAZDJIAN, Position variables in classical relativistic Hamiltonian mechanics, Nucl. Phys., t. B161, 1979, p. 469-492.
[15] P. A. NIKOLOV, I. T. TODOROV, Space-time versus phase space approach to rela-
tivistic particle dynamics, Lecture Notes in Mathematics (to be published).
(Manuscrit reçu le 1 D fevrier 1982)
Annales de Henri Poincaré-Section A