• Aucun résultat trouvé

Feedback in family medicine training

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Feedback in family medicine training"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Vol 62: may • mai 2016

|

Canadian Family PhysicianLe Médecin de famille canadien

445

Feedback in family medicine training

Jaspreet Mangat

MD

Emy Martineau-Rheault

MD

Kyle MacDonald

MD

Jemy Joseph

MSc MD

On behalf of the Section of Residents

F

eedback is key to developing the skills, behaviour, and competencies necessary for independent prac- tice. However, soliciting and making good use of feedback can be challenging. In this article we outline the components of good feedback and offer tips to assist residents in making effective use of any feedback they receive (Figure 1). An easy-to-print handout containing this information is also available from CFPlus.*

What are field notes

and why are they important?

A field note is written feedback given to a resident after observation of his or her interactions with a patient, family member, or health professional. Feedback can be documented for interactions with patients or team members, discussions with preceptors, written commu- nications, presentations, clinical skills, or procedures.

Field notes serve as a reminder of the skills you have acquired and the skills that might require further devel- opment throughout residency training.

How do I ask for feedback?

Ensure the observer providing feedback has sufficient time to sit with you in a confidential setting. Feedback should not take longer than a couple of minutes. It might be helpful and appreciated if you inform your preceptor in advance that you will be seeking feedback on spe- cific skills. Be flexible with time or location changes due to clinical activities or commitments. If either space or time are not available immediately, invite the observer to provide feedback at a later date or time. Follow up with the preceptor in a timely fashion if feedback is not given immediately.

How do I prepare for a feedback session?

Before meeting with your preceptor, reflect on your clinical encounters and prepare a list of what you did well and what you think requires further improvement.

Highlight specific examples during your feedback meet- ing. What challenges did you face? What would you do differently? How can your preceptor support you in meeting your learning needs? Bring these ideas to your feedback session.

What do I do with positive feedback I receive?

Positive feedback is intended to reinforce behaviour and

College

Collège | Residents’ Views

*An easy-to-print handout is available at www.cfp.ca. Go to the full text of this article and click on CFPlus in the menu at the top right-hand side of the page.

Feedback Ingredients

Immediate: feedback from your preceptor should be received as soon as possible after the encounter Specific: feedback should be focused on what was done well and what can be improved

Case-based: feedback should relate to a specific clinical encounter

Competency-based: feedback should be centred on core competencies in family medicine

Objective and concise: feedback should be to the point

Instructions

Ask your preceptor for feedback after the clinical encounter Document the feedback immediately after a clinical encounter For on-service family medicine rotations, stack your field notes to see what domains are lacking and require more attention

For off-service family medicine rotations, frequently ask your preceptor for feedback on how you managed a case. Document this feedback as a field note

Provide a summary of field notes to your preceptor for in-training evaluation reports during off-service rotations

Set aside time each day to reflect on your feedback: read around the case and reflect on how you might change your practice or continue doing what you are doing

1

2

3

4

5

Tools

Keep your electronic field note URL bookmarked

Keep your paper evaluation forms with you each day

Preceptors Not all preceptors have the same teaching style. If you want specific feedback,

just ask

Daily D – description: of the clinical encounter

O – observer: preceptor, nurse, patient, or allied health professional

C – coaching: specific advice from the observer; either positive reinforcement or constructive feedback

In Person S – summary: of the clinical encounter, keeping patient confidentiality in mind

O – observer: preceptor, nurse, patient, or allied health professional

W – well: what the resident has done well, including strengths

E – enhancement: preceptor suggestions for resident improvement

R – recommendations: for further learning, resident plan for follow-up 1

2 3

4

5

6

Figure 1. Effective feedback for residents

Reprinted from the Section of Residents Council. Guide to effective feedback in family medicine residency. Mississauga, ON: College of Family Physicians of Canada; 2016.

La traduction en français de cet article se trouve à www.cfp.ca dans la table des matières du numéro de mai 2016 à la page e282.

(2)

446

Canadian Family PhysicianLe Médecin de famille canadien

|

Vol 62: may • mai 2016

skills essential for practice. Residents should take note of what behaviour and skills they have acquired, and residents are expected to maintain those skills through- out their practice and careers.

What do I do with constructive feedback I receive?

It is normal to have skills that require improvement dur- ing residency. If constructive feedback is given, ensure the feedback you receive is specific and that you understand which behaviour or skill requires improvement. Do not be afraid to ask your preceptor for clarification. After feed- back has been given, make a plan to work on the iden- tified skills and schedule a time to reassess the skill at a later date.

Some residents might take feedback personally.

Feedback is intended to facilitate development of specific skills, behaviour, and competencies. It is important to avoid becoming defensive, assigning blame elsewhere, or taking the feedback personally. If you believe that the feedback you received is not appropriate, talk with your faculty advisor, chief resident, or program director.

Dr Mangat is a second-year resident at the University of Alberta in Edmonton. Dr Martineau-Rheault is a second-year resident at the University of Sherbrooke in Quebec. Dr MacDonald is a first-year resident at the University of Saskatchewan in Regina. Dr Joseph is a first-year resi- dent at the University of Toronto in Ontario. All are on the Executive of the Section of Residents Council for the College of Family Physicians of Canada.

Competing interests None declared

Resident’s Views

Références

Documents relatifs

Now that the College of Family Physicians of Canada’s Triple C cur- riculum includes a call for training by family medi- cine doctors, 2 there is a new opportunity for innovative

Formerly, Canada lagged behind many other indus- trialized countries in creating primary care, practice- based research networks, so the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel

The objectives are to reduce variations in prac- tice, improve interdisciplinary cooperation, integrate care, and, ultimately, improve clinical outcomes. Clinical pathways

The ministry of health and social services should either recognize continuity of care as a specific medical activity or abolish specific medical activities

T he College of Family Physicians of Canada (CFPC) has endorsed the recommendation from the Section of Teachers’ Working Group on Postgraduate Curriculum Review that

In a US study by Helton and Pathman, 3 family practice residents reported very positive attitudes toward elderly patients, yet only two-thirds of them thought that

It is also important that all stakeholders, including health system planners, understand that although fam- ily physicians are vital providers of primary care services,

It is important, however, that family physicians with special interests continue to practise collaboratively in family medicine settings where comprehensive care can be