• Aucun résultat trouvé

Jensen type inequalities for twice differentiable functions

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Jensen type inequalities for twice differentiable functions"

Copied!
7
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Research Article

Jensen type inequalities for twice differentiable

functions

Abdallah El Frissi, Benharrat Bela¨ıdi∗, Zinelaˆabidine Lareuch

Department of Mathematics, Laboratory of Pure and Applied Mathematics, University of Mostaganem (UMAB), B. P. 227 Mostaganem-(Algeria)

Dedicated to George A Anastassiou on the occasion of his sixtieth birthday Communicated by Professor C. Park

Abstract

In this paper, we give some Jensen-type inequalities for ϕ : I → R, I = [α, β] ⊂ R, where ϕ is a continuous function on I, twice differentiable on ˚I = (α, β) and there exists m = inf

x∈˚I

ϕ00(x) or M = sup

x∈˚I

ϕ00(x) . Furthermore, if ϕ00 is bounded on ˚I, then we give an estimate, from below and from above of Jensen inequalities. c 2012 NGA. All rights reserved.

Keywords: Jensen inequality, Convex functions, Twice differentiable functions. 2010 MSC: 26D15.

1. Introduction and main results

Throughout this note, we write I and ˚I for the intervals [α, β] and (α, β) respectively −∞ ≤ α < β ≤ +∞. A function ϕ is said to be convex on I if λϕ (x) + (1 − λ) ϕ (y) ≥ ϕ (λx + (1 − λ) y) for all x, y ∈ I and 0 ≤ λ ≤ 1. Conversely, if the inequality always holds in the opposite direction, the function is said to be concave on the interval. A function ϕ that is continuous function on I and twice differentiable on ˚I is convex on I if ϕ00(x) ≥ 0 for all x ∈ ˚I (concave if the inequality is flipped).

The famous inequality of Jensen states that:

Corresponding author

Email addresses: elfarissi.abdallah@yahoo.fr (Abdallah El Frissi), belaidi@univ-mosta.dz (Benharrat Bela¨ıdi ), z.latreuch@gmail.com (Zinelaˆabidine Lareuch)

(2)

Theorem 1.1. ([1], [3]) Let ϕ be a convex function on the interval I ⊂ R, x = (x1, x2, · · · , xn) ∈ In

(n ≥ 2), let pi ≥ 0, i = 1, 2, · · · , n and Pn=Pni=1pi. Then

ϕ 1 Pn n X i=1 pixi ! ≤ 1 Pn n X i=1 piϕ (xi) . (1.1)

If ϕ is strictly convex, then inequality in (1.1) is strict except when x1 = x2 = · · · = xn. If ϕ is a concave

function, then inequality in (1.1) is reverse.

Theorem 1.2. [3] Let ϕ be a convex function on I ⊂ R, and let f : [0, 1] −→ I be a continuous function on [0, 1]. Then ϕ Z 1 0 f (x) dx  ≤ Z 1 0 ϕ (f (x)) dx. (1.2)

If ϕ is strictly convex, then inequality in (1.2) is strict. If ϕ is a concave function, then inequality in (1.2) is reverse.

In [2], Malamud gave some complements to the Jensen and Chebyshev inequalities and in [4], Saluja gave some necessary and sufficient conditions for three-step iterative sequence with errors for asymptotically quasi-nonexpansive type mapping converging to a fixed point in convex metric spaces. In this paper, we give some inequalities of the above type for ϕ : I → R such that ϕ is a continuous on I, twice differentiable on ˚I and there exists m = inf

x∈˚I

ϕ00(x) or M = sup

x∈˚I

ϕ00(x) . We obtain the following results:

Theorem 1.3. Let ϕ : I −→ R be a continuous function on I, twice differentiable on ˚I, x = (x1, x2, · · · , xn) ∈

In (n ≥ 2), let pi ≥ 0, i = 1, 2, · · · , n and Pn=Pni=1pi.

(i) If there exists m = inf

x∈˚I ϕ00(x), then 1 Pn n X i=1 piϕ (xi) − ϕ 1 Pn n X i=1 pixi ! ≥ m 2   1 Pn n X i=1 pix2i − 1 Pn n X i=1 pixi !2 . (1.3)

(ii) If there exists M = sup

x∈˚I ϕ00(x) , then 1 Pn n X i=1 piϕ (xi) − ϕ 1 Pn n X i=1 pixi ! ≤ M 2   1 Pn n X i=1 pix2i − 1 Pn n X i=1 pixi !2 . (1.4)

Equality in (1.3) and (1.4) hold if x1 = x2 = · · · = xn or if ϕ (x) = αx2+ βx + γ, α, β, γ ∈ R.

Theorem 1.4. Let ϕ : I −→ R be a continuous function on I, twice differentiable on ˚I. Suppose that f : [a, b] −→ I and p : [a, b] −→ R+ are continuous functions on [a, b] .

(i) If there exists m = inf

x∈˚I ϕ00(x), then Rb ap (x) ϕ (f (x)) dx Rb ap (x) dx − ϕ Rb ap (x) f (x) dx Rb a p (x) dx !

(3)

≥ m 2   Rb ap (x) (f (x)) 2dx Rb ap (x) dx − Rb ap (x) f (x) dx Rb ap (x) dx !2 . (1.5)

(ii) If there exists M = sup

x∈˚I ϕ00(x), then Rb ap (x) ϕ (f (x)) dx Rb ap (x) dx − ϕ Rb ap (x) f (x) dx Rb a p (x) dx ! ≤ M 2   Rb a p (x) (f (x)) 2dx Rb ap (x) dx − Rb ap (x) f (x) dx Rb ap (x) dx !2 . (1.6)

Equality in (1.5) and (1.6) hold if ϕ (x) = αx2+ βx + γ, α, β, γ ∈ R.

Corollary 1.5. Let ϕ : I −→ R be a continuous function on I, twice differentiable on ˚I and let f : [a, b] −→ I be a continuous function on [a, b] .

(i) If there exists m = inf

x∈˚I ϕ00(x), then 1 b − a Z b a ϕ (f (x)) dx − ϕ  1 b − a Z b a f (x) dx  ≥ m 2 1 b − a Z b a (f (x))2dx −  1 b − a Z b a f (x) dx 2! . (1.7)

(ii) If there exists M = sup

x∈˚I ϕ00(x), then 1 b − a Z b a ϕ (f (x)) dx − ϕ  1 b − a Z b a f (x) dx  ≤ M 2 1 b − a Z b a (f (x))2dx −  1 b − a Z b a f (x) dx 2! . (1.8)

Equality in (1.7) and (1.8) hold if ϕ (x) = αx2+ βx + γ, α, β, γ ∈ R.

Corollary 1.6. Let ϕ : I −→ R be a continuous function on I, twice differentiable on ˚I, x = (x1, x2, · · · , xn) ∈

In (n ≥ 2), let pi ≥ 0, i = 1, 2, · · · , n and Pn=Pni=1pi. If there exist m = inf x∈˚I ϕ00(x) and M = sup x∈˚I ϕ00(x), then we have m 2   1 Pn n X i=1 pix2i − 1 Pn n X i=1 pixi !2  ≤ 1 Pn n X i=1 piϕ (xi) − ϕ 1 Pn n X i=1 pixi ! ≤ M 2   1 Pn n X i=1 pix2i − 1 Pn n X i=1 pixi !2 . (1.9) Equality in (1.9) occurs, if ϕ (x) = αx2+ βx + γ, α, β, γ ∈ R.

(4)

Corollary 1.7. Let ϕ : I −→ R be a continuous function on I, twice differentiable on ˚I, and let f : [0, 1] −→ I be a continuous function on [0, 1] . If there exist m = inf

x∈˚I ϕ00(x) and M = sup x∈˚I ϕ00(x), then we have m 2 Z 1 0 (f (x))2dx − Z 1 0 f (x) dx 2! ≤ Z 1 0 ϕ (f (x)) dx − ϕ Z 1 0 f (x) dx  ≤ M 2 Z 1 0 (f (x))2dx − Z 1 0 f (x) dx 2! . (1.10) Equality in (1.10) holds if ϕ (x) = αx2+ βx + γ α, β, γ ∈ R.

Corollary 1.8. Let ϕ : I −→ R be a convex function on I, twice differentiable on ˚I, and let f : [a, b] −→ I be a continuous function on [a, b] . If there exists m = inf

x∈˚I ϕ00(x) , then 1 b − a Z b a ϕ (f (x)) dx − ϕ  1 b − a Z b a f (x) dx  ≥ m 2 1 b − a Z b a (f (x))2dx −  1 b − a Z b a f (x) dx 2! ≥ 0 (1.11) and 1 Pn n X i=1 piϕ (xi) − ϕ 1 Pn n X i=1 pixi ! ≥ m 2   1 Pn n X i=1 pix2i − 1 Pn n X i=1 pixi !2 ≥ 0. (1.12)

Corollary 1.9. Let ϕ : I −→ R be a concave function on I, twice differentiable on ˚I, and let f : [a, b] −→ I be a continuous function on [a, b]. If there exists M = sup

x∈˚I ϕ00(x) , then 1 b − a Z b a ϕ (f (x)) dx − ϕ  1 b − a Z b a f (x) dx  ≤ M 2 1 b − a Z b a (f (x))2dx −  1 b − a Z b a f (x) dx 2! ≤ 0 (1.13) and 1 Pn n X i=1 piϕ (xi) − ϕ 1 Pn n X i=1 pixi ! ≤ M 2   1 Pn n X i=1 pix2i − 1 Pn n X i=1 pixi !2 ≤ 0. (1.14)

(5)

2. Lemma

Our proofs depend mainly upon the following lemma.

Lemma 2.1. Let ϕ be a convex function on I ⊂ R and differentiable on ˚I. Suppose that f : [a, b] −→ I and p : [a, b] −→ R+ are continuous functions on [a, b]. Then

ϕ Rb ap (x) f (x) dx Rb ap (x) dx ! ≤ Rb ap (x) ϕ (f (x)) dx Rb ap (x) dx . (2.1)

If ϕ is strictly convex, then inequality in (2.1) is strict. If ϕ is a concave function, then inequality in (2.1) is reverse.

Proof. Suppose that ϕ is a convex function on I ⊂ R and differentiable on ˚I. Then for each x, y ∈ ˚I, we have

ϕ (x) − ϕ (y) ≥ (x − y) ϕ0(y) . (2.2)

Replace x by f (x) and set y =

Rb ap(x)f (x)dx Rb ap(x)dx in (2.2), we obtain ϕ (f (x)) − ϕ Rb ap (x) f (x) dx Rb ap (x) dx ! ≥ f (x) − Rb ap (x) f (x) dx Rb ap (x) dx ! ϕ0 Rb ap (x) f (x) dx Rb ap (x) dx ! . (2.3)

Multiplying both sides of inequality (2.3) by p (x) we obtain

p (x) ϕ (f (x)) − p (x) ϕ Rb ap (x) f (x) dx Rb ap (x) dx ! ≥ p (x) f (x) − p (x) Rb ap (x) f (x) dx Rb a p (x) dx ! ϕ0 Rb a p (x) f (x) dx Rb ap (x) dx ! . (2.4) By integration in (2.4) we obtain (2.1). 3. Proof of the Theorems

Proof of Theorem 1.3. Suppose that ϕ : I → R is a continuous function on I and twice differentiable on ˚

I. Set g (x) = ϕ (x) −m2x2. Differentiating twice times both sides of g we get g00(x) = ϕ00(x) − m ≥ 0. Then g is a convex function on I. By formula (1.1), we have

g 1 Pn n X i=1 pixi ! ≤ 1 Pn n X i=1 pig (xi) (3.1)

which implies that

ϕ 1 Pn n X i=1 pixi ! −m 2 1 Pn n X i=1 pixi !2 ≤ 1 Pn n X i=1 piϕ (xi) − m 2 1 Pn n X i=1 pix2i. (3.2)

(6)

Then, by (3.2) we can write 1 Pn n X i=1 piϕ (xi) − ϕ 1 Pn n X i=1 pixi ! ≥ m 2   1 Pn n X i=1 pix2i − 1 Pn n X i=1 pixi !2 . (3.3)

If we put g (x) = −ϕ (x) +M2 x2, then by differentiating both sides of g we get g00(x) = −ϕ00(x) + M ≥ 0. Hence g is a convex function on I and by similar proof as above, we obtain

1 Pn n X i=1 piϕ (xi) − ϕ 1 Pn n X i=1 pixi ! ≤ M 2   1 Pn n X i=1 pix2i − 1 Pn n X i=1 pixi !2 . (3.4)

Proof of Theorem 1.4. Suppose that ϕ : I → R is a continuous function on I and twice differentiable on ˚

I. Set g (x) = ϕ (x) − m2x2. Differentiating both sides of g we get g00(x) = ϕ00(x) − m ≥ 0. Hence g is a convex function on I and by formula (2.1) we have

g Rb ap (x) f (x) dx Rb ap (x) dx ! ≤ Rb a p (x) g (f (x)) dx Rb ap (x) dx (3.5) which implies that

ϕ Rb ap (x) f (x) dx Rb ap (x) dx ! −m 2 Rb a p (x) f (x) dx Rb ap (x) dx !2 ≤ Rb ap (x) ϕ (f (x)) dx Rb ap (x) dx −m 2 Rb ap (x) (f (x)) 2 dx Rb ap (x) dx . (3.6)

Then by (3.6), we can write Rb ap (x) ϕ (f (x)) dx Rb ap (x) dx − ϕ Rb ap (x) f (x) dx Rb a p (x) dx ! ≥ m 2   Rb ap (x) (f (x)) 2 dx Rb ap (x) dx − Rb ap (x) f (x) dx Rb ap (x) dx !2 . (3.7)

If we put g (x) = ϕ (x) −M2 x2, then by differentiating both sides of g, we get g00(x) = ϕ00(x) − M ≤ 0. Thus, g is a concave function on I and by a similar proof as above, we obtain

Rb ap (x) ϕ (f (x)) dx Rb ap (x) dx − ϕ Rb ap (x) f (x) dx Rb a p (x) dx ! ≤ M 2   Rb a p (x) (f (x)) 2dx Rb ap (x) dx − Rb ap (x) f (x) dx Rb ap (x) dx !2 . (3.8)

(7)

References

[1] I. Budimir, S. S. Dragomir and J. Peˇcari´c, Further reverse results for Jensen’s discrete inequality and applications in information theory, J. Inequal. Pure Appl. Math. 2 (2001), no. 1, Article 5, 1-14. 1.1

[2] S. M. Malamud, Some complements to the Jensen and Chebyshev inequalities and a problem of W. Walter, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 129 (2001), no. 9, 2671–2678. 1

[3] D. S. Mitrinovi´c, J. E. Peˇcari´c and A. M. Fink, Classical and new inequalities in analysis. Mathematics and its Applications (East European Series), 61. Kluwer Academic Publishers Group, Dordrecht, 1993. 1.1, 1.2

[4] G. S. Saluja, Convergence of fixed point of asymptoticaly quasi-nonexpansive type mappings in convex metric spaces, J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl. 1 (2008), no. 3, 132-144. 1

Références

Documents relatifs

We discuss an approach based on the model space theory which brings some integral representations for functions in R n and their derivatives.. Using this approach we obtain L p

Bagul, New inequalities involving circular, inverse circu- lar, hyperbolic, inverse hyperbolic and exponential functions, Ad- vances in Inequalities and Applications, Volume

The paper is organized as follows: the first Section is devoted to the basic description of implicit control systems on manifolds of jets of infinite order. In Section 2, we extend

We study equivalence between the Poincaré inequality and several different relative isoperimetric inequalities on metric measure spaces.. We then use these inequalities to

transforms of L1-bounded martingales by bounded predictable processes converge a. Here it is important to know that dual optional projections of processes of

Proof - We may suppose (Xi) to be uniformly bounded : indeed, suppose the inequality proved for uniformly bounded stochastic processes, an.. appeal to Lebesgues

We now assume (as in the statement of the Theorem) that every geodesic minimizes length up to the point it intersects 8M. Hence this holds for geodesies in 8M. Hence the metric on 9M

Let P denote an extremal problem for univalent functions; by a ge- neral principle of Teichmiiller, there is associated a quadratic differential.. on some