• Aucun résultat trouvé

Measurement of prompt ${\mathrm{D^0}}$ and ${\mathrm{\overline{D}}{}^0}$ meson azimuthal anisotropy and search for strong electric fields in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} =$ 5.02 TeV

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Measurement of prompt ${\mathrm{D^0}}$ and ${\mathrm{\overline{D}}{}^0}$ meson azimuthal anisotropy and search for strong electric fields in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} =$ 5.02 TeV"

Copied!
25
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Contents lists available atScienceDirect

Physics Letters B

www.elsevier.com/locate/physletb

Measurement of prompt D 0 and D 0 meson azimuthal anisotropy and search for strong electric fields in PbPb collisions at √ s

NN

= 5 . 02 TeV

.The CMSCollaboration

CERN,Switzerland

a rt i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t

Articlehistory:

Received29September2020

Receivedinrevisedform21February2021 Accepted25March2021

Availableonline29March2021 Editor:M.Doser

Keywords:

CMS Heavy-flavor Charm

Electromagneticfields

ThestrongCoulombfieldcreatedinultrarelativisticheavyioncollisionsisexpectedtoproducearapidity- dependentdifference(v2)inthesecondFouriercoefficientoftheazimuthaldistribution(ellipticflow, v2)betweenD0(uc)andD0 (uc)mesons. Motivatedbythesearchforevidenceofthisfield,theCMS detectoratthe LHCisused toperformthe firstmeasurementofv2.Therapidity-averagedvalue is foundtobev2=0.001±0.001 (stat)±0.003 (syst) inPbPbcollisionsats

NN=5.02 TeV.Inaddition, theinfluenceofthecollisiongeometryisexploredbymeasuringtheD0andD0mesonsv2andtriangular flowcoefficient(v3)asfunctionsofrapidity,transversemomentum(pT),andeventcentrality(ameasure oftheoverlapofthetwo Pbnuclei).Aclear centralitydependenceofprompt D0 meson v2 valuesis observed,whilethev3islargelyindependentofcentrality.Thesetrendsareconsistentwithexpectations offlowdrivenbytheinitial-stategeometry.

©2021TheAuthor.PublishedbyElsevierB.V.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCCBYlicense (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).FundedbySCOAP3.

1. Introduction

The observation of a strongly-coupled quark-gluon plasma (QGP), astate ofmattercomposed ofdeconfinedquarks andglu- ons, was established by experiments investigatingultrarelativistic heavy ioncollisions at the BNL RHIC [1–4] and CERN LHC [5,6].

The azimuthal particle correlationsconstitute an effectivetool to probethe propertiesoftheQGP [1–9].Thesecorrelationsare pa- rameterized by aFourier expansion [10–12],with themagnitude of the Fourier coefficients, vn, providing information about the initial collision geometry and its fluctuations [12]. The second- (v2) and third- (v3) order Fourier coefficients are referred to as

“elliptic”and“triangular”flow harmonics,respectively.Measuring thesecoefficientsforparticlespecieswithdifferentquarkcompo- sition provides additional information about this hot and dense medium [13]. Because of their large mass, charm and bottom quarksareproducedearlierinthecollisions thanthelightquarks (upanddown) [14,15].Inaddition,thecharmandbottomquarks have massesmany timeslarger than the typical temperatures in theQGP [16].Theseheavyquarksexperiencethefullevolutionof themedium untilthehadronizationphase.Asaconsequence,the vn of charmedD0 (uc)and D0 (uc) mesons (henceforthreferred toasD0mesons,exceptwhereexplicitlystatedotherwise)areex-

E-mailaddress:cms-publication-committee-chair@cern.ch.

pected to receive important contributions from medium energy lossandcoalescenceeffects [17,18].

In ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions, very strong and tran- sient (101 fm/c) magnetic andelectric fields are expected to beinduced bythecollision spectatorsandparticipants [19].Such electromagnetic(EM)fieldsare predictedto producea difference in the vn harmonics for positively and negatively charged parti- cles [19].Insuchapicture,themagneticfieldismainlyresponsible for splitting the rapidity (y)-odd directed flow (v1) [19,20]. The electricfieldispredictedtoinduceacharge-dependentsplittingin thev2 coefficientandintheaveragetransversemomentum(pT) valuesoftheemittedparticles [19].Ascharmquarksareexpected tobecreatedveryearlyinthecollision,theyhaveahigherproba- bilityofinteractingwiththisstrongEMfield thanthelightflavor quarks [20,21].

In this letter, measurements of the v2 and v3 coefficients as functionsofD0 mesonrapidity, pT,andlead-lead (PbPb)collision centralityare presented.Thecollision centralitybins aregivenin percentagerangesofthetotalinelastichadroniccrosssection,with the 0–10% centrality bin corresponding to the 10% of collisions havingthe largestoverlapof thetwo nuclei. Theflow harmonics aremeasuredusingthescalarproductmethod [22,23].Inthisanal- ysis, the selection of D0 mesons uses multivariate methods [24]

forselectingD0 candidatesandtheirantiparticles.Thecontamina- tionfromnonpromptD0candidates,arisingfromBmesondecay,is consideredasasystematicuncertainty.Usingthedatarecordedin PbPbcollisions duringthe2018LHCrunperiod,correspondingto

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136253

0370-2693/©2021TheAuthor.PublishedbyElsevierB.V.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCCBYlicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).Fundedby SCOAP3.

(2)

0.58 nb1 ofintegratedluminosity,theflowcoefficientsaremea- suredwithintherapidity range|y|<2,whichistwiceaslargeas achievedinpreviousCMSmeasurements [25].Theextensionofthe measurements tothislargerrapidity range,together withsmaller statisticaluncertainties provided bya larger dataset,furnish im- portantinputsforabetterunderstandingofthethree-dimensional evolutionoftheQGPformedinheavyioncollisions.Measurements ofthe v2 difference betweenD0 andD0 mesons,v2,asa func- tionofrapidityarepresentedasamethodtoprobepossibleeffects originatingfromtheCoulombfields.

2. Experimentalapparatusanddatasample

The central feature of the CMS apparatus is a superconduct- ing solenoidof6 m internal diameter,providinga magneticfield of 3.8 T. Within the solenoid volume, there are four primary subdetectors including a silicon pixel and strip tracker detector, a lead tungstate crystalelectromagnetic calorimeter, and a brass and scintillator hadron calorimeter, each composed of a barrel andtwoendcapsections.Ironandquartz-fiberCherenkovhadron forward (HF) calorimeters cover the pseudorapidity range 2.9<

|η|<5.2.TheHFcalorimetersaresegmentedtoform0.175×0.175 (η×φ) towers. Muons are measured in gas-ionization detec- tors embedded inthesteelflux-returnyokeoutsidethesolenoid.

The silicon tracker measures charged particles within the range

|η|<2.5.AdetaileddescriptionoftheCMSdetector,togetherwith a definitionofthecoordinatesystemusedandtherelevantkine- maticvariables,canbefoundinRef. [26].

Theanalysispresentedinthisletterusesapproximately4.27× 109minimumbias(MB)PbPbcollisioneventscollectedbytheCMS experimentduringthe2018LHCrun.TheMBeventsaretriggered byrequiringsignalsinbothforwardandbackwardsidesoftheHF calorimeters [27]. Further selections are applied offline to reject eventsfrombackgroundprocesses(beam-gasinteractionsandnon- hadroniccollisions),seeRef. [28] fordetails.Eventsarerequiredto have atleast one interaction vertex, reconstructed basedon two tracks ormore,andwithadistance oflessthan15 cm fromthe centerof thenominalinteraction pointalong thebeamaxis.The primary interaction vertex is defined as the one with the high- est track multiplicity in the event. The shapesof the clusters in thepixeldetectorhavetobecompatiblewiththoseexpectedfrom particles producedattheprimary vertexlocation. ThePbPb colli- sioneventsarealsorequiredtohaveatleasttwocalorimetertow- ersineachHFdetectorwithenergydepositsofmorethan4 GeV pertower.Thesecriteriaselect(99±2)%ofinelastichadronicPbPb collisions.The possibilitytohavevalueshigherthan100% reflects the possible presence of ultra-peripheral (nonhadronic)collisions intheselectedeventsample.

Events fromMonte Carlo (MC) simulations are used to study both promptandnonpromptD0 mesonprocesses.The eventsare generated using an embedding procedure, in which D0 mesons generatedbypythia8.212 [29] (tuneCP5 [30])areembeddedinto MB eventsfromhydjet 1.9 [31]. Afull simulationoftheCMSde- tectorisperformedusingGeant4 [32].ThepromptD0 mesonMC simulationisemployedtodefinesignalselectionsandmeasureef- ficiencycorrections,whilethenonpromptD0 mesonMCsampleis usedtoestimatesystematicuncertaintiescomingfromnonprompt D0contamination.

3. ReconstructionandselectionofD0mesons

Prompt D0 mesons are reconstructed from the decay D0π++K andD0π+K+withabranchingfractionof(3.94± 0.04)%,usingselected trackswith pT>1.0 GeV/c andwithin the acceptanceof|η|<2.4.Candidatesareformedbycombiningpairs

of tracks from oppositely charged particles andrequiring an in- variantmass(minv) withina ±200 MeV/c2 windowoftheworld- averageD0mesonmassof(1864.83±0.05)MeV/c2[33].Foreach pair of selected tracks, two possible candidates for D0 and D0 mesonsareconsideredbyassumingoneofthetrackshasthepion mass, while the other track has the kaon mass, and vice versa.

Kinematicvertexfits are performedto reconstructthe secondary verticesofD0 candidatedecays.

After the D0 candidate reconstruction, a selection using a boosted decision tree (BDT) algorithm from the tmva pack- age [24] isemployed.FortheBDTtraining,misidentifiedD0 candi- datesindataevents,wherepionandkaonhavethesamecharge, areusedtomimicthecombinatorialbackground.Thesignalcandi- datesaretakenfromMCsimulationsofpromptD0 mesonsandare requiredtomatchD0 particlesatthegeneratorlevel.Thevariables related to D0 mesons used to discriminate the signal from the backgroundare: χ2 probability fortheD0 vertexfit, 3D distance betweenthe secondaryand primary verticesand its significance, the decay length significance projected in the xy-plane, and the angleintwoandthreedimensionsbetweenthemomentumofthe D0 mesoncandidateandthelineconnectingtheprimary andthe secondaryvertices(pointingangle).Relatedtothedecayproducts oftheD0mesoncandidate,thevariablesusedare:theuncertainty in pT returned by thetrack fittingprocedure, the significanceof thezandthexydistancesofclosestapproachtotheprimaryver- tex,andthenumberofhitsinthetrackerdetector.Thesevariables are chosen by analyzing their BDT ranking (variables more fre- quentlyused in the decisiontree) and correlation matrixamong all variables. Different BDT boost algorithms are tested, choosing theadaptive boost algorithm [24] asdefault. Overtrainingchecks aredone forall analysisbins bycomparing theBDT distributions fromtrainingandtestingD0mesonsamples.Inaddition,aBDTcut optimization is performedin bins of centrality, pT, and rapidity, doingascanindifferentBDTscoresandfindingtheoneresulting in maximal D0 mesons signal significance for each analysis bin.

Comparedto acutoff-based procedure, thisBDT selection almost doublesthe signalsignificancefor D0 mesonsin1<|y|<2,and increasesthesignal significanceby30%forD0 mesonsin|y|<1, for events with collision centrality in the range 0–30%. For the remaininganalysisbins asimilar performance ofBDTandcutoff- basedmethodsisobserved.

4. Analysistechnique

The elliptic andtriangular flow coefficientsof D0 mesons are extractedusingthescalarproduct(SP) method,similarly towhat wasdone inapreviousCMSpublication [25].Inthismethod,the vn coefficientsofD0 candidates(includingbackgrounds)aremea- suredusing

vn{SP} ≡ QnD0QnA QnAQnBQnAQnC

QnBQnC

, (1)

with the Q-vectors expressed as QnM

j=1wjeinφj, where the sumis over the total number(M) of HF towers above a certain energy threshold (with the weights wj taken as the energy de- positedintheHFtoweratazimuthalangle φj),oftrackswith pT aboveacertainthreshold(with wj takenastrackpT inφjangle), orofselectedD0 mesoncandidates(withwjtakenequalto1).

The Q-vectorsrelatedtoHFandthetrackeraremeasuredand correctedfordetectorirregularitiesbyapplyingaflattening anda recenteringprocedure [12,34].The QnAandQnBaredefinedusing the event-planemeasurements fromthe negative (5<η<3, HF) and thepositive (3<η<5, HF+) sidesofHF, and QnC is measuredusingthetrackerinformationintheregionof|η|<0.75,

(3)

allowing to minimize the correlations among the three regions, with a gap of more than two units of rapidity. The QnD0 vector is definedforeach D0 mesoncandidate.The averages QnAQnB , QnAQnC ,andQnBQnC aremadeconsideringallselectedevents, while the average QnD0QnA is made considering all D0 meson candidates in all selected events. To avoid autocorrelations, the termsQnD0QnA andQnAQnB useA=HF(HF+)whentheD0 mesoncandidateisatpositive(negative)pseudorapidity.

One goal of this analysis is to measure the difference (vn) between D0 and D0meson flow coefficients, vn, as a function of rapidity, to probe effects from EM fields. The difference vn is measuredas:

vn{SP} ≡QnD0QnAQnD0QnA QnAQnBQnAQnC

QnBQnC

. (2)

The vn and vn of D0 meson candidates are first measured as a function oftheir minv. The extraction of the D0 mesons signal vn (vn), vsign (vsign ), is performed via a simultaneous binned

χ2 fit of theminv distribution and of vn (vn). The minv distri- bution is fitwith threecomponents: a third-order polynomial to modelthecombinatorialbackground,B(minv);twoGaussianswith the same meanbut differentwidths to describe the minv indif- ferent kinematic regions for the D0 mesons signal, S(minv); and oneadditionalGaussiandistributionfortheswapcomponentcor- respondingtotheincorrectmassassignmentfortheassumedpion andkaonparticles,S W(minv).Thewidthof S W(minv)andthera- tiobetweenthe yieldsof S W(minv)and S(minv)are fixedby the values extractedfromMC simulations. Inthiscase, the following expressioncanbeusedforextractingvsign :

vsign +bkg(minv)=α(minv)vsign + [1α(minv)]vbkgn (minv). (3) The α(minv)parameter, whichcharacterizes thesignal fractionas afunctionofmass,isdefinedasfollows:

α(minv)

= [S(minv)+S W(minv)]/[S(minv)+S W(minv)+B(minv)]

=αsignal(minv)+αswap(minv). (4)

Forextractingthedifferencevsign ,thefollowingexpressionisem- ployed:

vsign +bkg(minv)=vsign signal(minv)αswap(minv))+const. (5)

Thetermvbkgn (minv)fromEq. (3) ismodeledwithalinearfunction, whiletheconstantparameterconst inEq. (5) isaddedtoaccount forpossiblefluctuationsinthebackgroundvncomponent.Therel- evance ofthis const parameter was investigated by redoing vn measurements in MC simulation (without azimuthal correlations oreffectsfromEMfields),indicatingthatthisparameterimproves the fit quality anddoes not introduce artificial signals. A cross- check is performedby redoing the measurements using a linear function insteadofa constant.No significantchanges inthecen- tralvaluesof v2 andon theiruncertainties are observed.Fig.1 showsanexampleofasimultaneousfitforv2 andv2.

After performing the fits forextractingthe signal vn,there is stillasizablefractionofnonpromptD0 mesonsembeddedinvsign . Theextractedvncanbewrittenas

vsign =fpromptvpromptn +(1−fprompt)vnonpromptn . (6)

ThenonpromptD0mesoncontaminationistakenintoaccountasa systematicuncertainty,bycheckingthatthenonpromptD0 meson fraction is always smaller than 12% (i.e., comparable to the un- certaintiesinthereconstructedD0 mesonyield).Thisimpliesthat thecentral valuesof vn willnot be considerablyaffected bythis component,beingcompatiblewithin statisticaluncertainties.Such alowfractionarisesfromtheuseofpromptD0 mesonsignalsin theBDTtraining,togetherwithvariablesthatarehighlycorrelated withthe distance ofclosest approach (DCA) to theprimary ver- tex,whichisdefinedastheflightdistanceoftheD0particletimes thesineofthepointingangleinthreedimensions.AdditionalDCA selectionanddedicatedtraining,involvingpromptandnonprompt D0 mesonsignals,donotbringconsiderableimprovementsinper- formance.ThepromptandnonpromptD0 mesonfractionsareob- tainedusingtheDCA variable.ForpromptD0mesons,thenonzero DCA correspondstothedetectorresolution,andisexpectedtobe concentrated around zero.Fornonprompt D0 mesons, largerval- uesofDCA resultfromtheBmesondecay.Toextracttheprompt andnonpromptD0 mesonfractions,afittotheDCA distributions isperformedindataconsideringDCA shapesfromMCsimulations forpromptandnonpromptD0mesoncomponents.Thenonprompt D0 mesonvnisestimatedbyconsideringtworegionsintheDCA:

one withvery low fraction (2.7–8.0%) ofnonprompt D0 particles (DCA<0.012 cm), and one witha highfraction (62.0–88.0%) of nonpromptD0 particles(DCA>0.012 cm).Usingthisinformation togetherwithEq. (6),itispossibletoestimate vnonpromptn bysolv- ing asystemof two equationsfromthe two DCA regions.Inthe currentanalysisthisprocedurecanonlybe doneinwide pT,cen- trality, andrapidity bins, because ofthe limitedamount of data availableintheregionwithDCA>0.012 cm.

5. Systematicuncertainties

Thesources of systematicuncertainties includethe D0 identi- fication requirements(BDTselection); theprobability distribution function(PDF)formodelingthebackgroundintheinvariantmass fit;theimpactofacceptanceandefficiencyoftheD0 mesonyield;

thevariationofthePDFformodelingthebackgroundvn;andthe remainingnonpromptD0contamination.Withtheexceptionofthe last component, the uncertainties are quoted as absolute values ofvnandvnaftercomparing thedefaultanalysisconfiguration withthevariations.Todiminishtheinfluenceofstatisticalfluctua- tions,afterobservingnospecialtrendsinthedeviationsfromthe defaultmeasurements, the systematicuncertainties are evaluated byaveragingthedeviationswithaconstantfitasafunctionofthe analysisbins.

Inordertotakeintoaccountthesystematicuncertaintyassoci- atedwiththeBDTselection,theBDTcutisvariedupanddownby themaximaldeviationbetweentheBDToptimizedselectionbased onMCsimulationsanddata.TheBDTcuts(andvariationsforsys- tematicuncertainties)aredefinedinbinsofcollisioncentrality,pT, and rapidity, ranging from 0.28 to 0.47 (±0.02–0.03). Regarding theeffectofthebackgroundmassmodeling,eitheranexponential functiontogetherwithasecondorderpolynomial,orjustasecond orderpolynomial,areconsideredinsteadofthedefaultfitfunction usingathird-orderpolynomial.Tofitvnasafunctionofmass,the defaultconfigurationusingalinearfunction isreplaced byeither aconstantora secondorderpolynomial.Althoughthe D0 meson selectionefficiencyessentiallycancelsin vnmeasurements,asys- tematicuncertaintyisassignedbycomparingtheresultswithand withoutapplyingcorrections basedon MC simulationsin binsof pT and rapidity.The D0 meson selection efficiency times accep- tancevaries from0.5 to 12.5% inthe pT rangeof 1.0–8.0 GeV/c, reachingaplateauofapproximately17.0%forpT>15.0 GeV/c.

The systematic uncertainties regarding contamination from nonpromptD0 mesonsareestimatedbymeasuringnonpromptD0

Références

Documents relatifs

kk Also at National Research Nuclear University ’Moscow Engineering Physics Institute’ (MEPhI), Moscow,

National Research Nuclear University ‘Moscow Engineering Physics Institute’ (MEPhI), Moscow, RussiaA. Lebedev Physical Institute,

105 National Research Nuclear University ’ Moscow Engineering Physics Institute ’ (MEPhI), Moscow, Russia.

al Institute for Nuclear Research, Moscow, Russia; National Research Nuclear University ‘Moscow Engineering Physics Institute’ (MEPhI), Moscow, Russia.

115 National Research Nuclear University ’ Moscow Engineering Physics Institute ’ (MEPhI), Moscow, Russia.

ai Also at Institute for Nuclear Research, Moscow, Russia; National Research Nuclear University “Moscow Engineering Physics Institute”. (MEPhI),

37: Now at National Research Nuclear University ‘Moscow Engineering Physics Institute’ (MEPhI), Moscow, Russia 38: Also at Institute of Nuclear Physics of the Uzbekistan Academy

National Research Nuclear University ’Moscow Engineering Physics Insti- tute’ (MEPhI), Moscow, Russia.. Lebedev Physical Institute,