• Aucun résultat trouvé

FOSTERING SPEAKING SKILLS THROUGH SELF-AND PEER-ASSESSMENT: STUDENTS ENGAGEMENT AND MOODLE

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "FOSTERING SPEAKING SKILLS THROUGH SELF-AND PEER-ASSESSMENT: STUDENTS ENGAGEMENT AND MOODLE"

Copied!
9
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-03217974

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03217974

Submitted on 5 May 2021

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

SELF-AND PEER-ASSESSMENT: STUDENTS ENGAGEMENT AND MOODLE

Raffaella Fiorini

To cite this version:

Raffaella Fiorini. FOSTERING SPEAKING SKILLS THROUGH SELF-AND PEER-ASSESSMENT:

STUDENTS ENGAGEMENT AND MOODLE. MOOCs, Language learning and mobility, design, integration, reuse, Apr 2021, Colloque en ligne, Italy. �hal-03217974�

(2)

FOSTERING SPEAKING SKILLS THROUGH SELF- AND PEER- ASSESSMENT: STUDENTS ENGAGEMENT AND MOODLE

Raffaella Fiorini

MAECI Language Assistant, Paul-Valéry Montpellier 3 University, (FRANCE)

Abstract

The article focuses on a pedagogic activity which has unfolded during the present year with a group of students following their second year of bachelor degree in LLCR Italian (Langues, littératures et civilisations étrangères et régionales) at Paul-Valéry University, Montpellier, France. The initiative was implemented using the Moodle

“workshop” tool. The activity required that documents relating to an oral task be uploaded onto the platform in video/audio format. Each student was then asked to assess 2 videos/audios (their own and a fellow student’s) with the aid of a provided grid populated with descriptors from the CEFR. The article focuses on the various stages of the experience with reference to the theoretical framework that has guided it and the results obtained.

Keywords: Self-assessment; Peer-assessment; video-recording; oral skills; task-based approach

1 INTRODUCTION

A complex society such as the one we live in requires individuals to acquire skills sets which enable them to become autonomous learners. School-acquired knowledge, in fact, may easily become insufficient owing to individual’s personal and social changes. It is not by chance that autonomous learning is central in the CEFR which encourages teachers to consider learning to learn an essential part of the linguistic acquisition (CEFR, 2001, p.141). Indeed, as Trim (1978, quoted in Little, 2007) points out to make the process of language learning more democratic one should enable students to steer and control their own progress. According to Diadori (Diadori, Palermo and TroncarellI, 2016) one possible way for students to achieve autonomy is by acquiring the ability to self-assess their own work.

The present situation of global health emergency has further stressed the central role of autonomy as schools and universities have been forced to adopt online teaching and adapt to new types of learning: in terms of foreign language acquisition, this has meant a reduction of students’ exposure to the L2 and less time for teacher-directed learning which has, in turn, led to the necessity to find alternative ways to enhance speaking skills through technology. Indeed, despite an increasingly widespread use of the ICT in the classroom, technology has often been employed - especially in the university - for logistical-managerial purposes (dissemination of materials, communication with students, etc) or “in continuity” with traditional methods, i.e. without any substantial change in the teaching practises (Capogna, 2014). On the contrary, an innovative use of the ICT in the classroom should result into new educational practises and a change in the teacher-student relationship (Wong et al, 2008).

One possible way to achieve this purpose is by engaging students in video-based tasks. In fact, Kearney & Schuck (2006 cited in Nikitina, 2009) hold that video-based projects can prove useful both to encourage students to take responsibility for their own learning process and as a way to involve them in authentic learning experiences

Indeed, various scientific studies have highlighted the benefits of video-recording to:

• develop students’ self-assessment skills (Capre R., Gomez R., Peclard M. et al.,2011)

• improve students’ communication skills (Hee-Kyung, K., 2014; Demouy, V., Kukulska-Hulme, A.,2010)

(3)

2 AIMS

The hypothesis underlying the pedagogic activity illustrated in this article is that the use of video- recording associated to peer- and self-assessment might foster oral skills as it encourages students to reflect and take responsibility for their use of the language.

It has been carried out with the aim of verifying if:

1. Video-recording leads to tangible improvement in students’ oral skills and language awareness

2. Peer and self-assessment can effectively contribute to achieve such a goal

The experience has been undertaken in the form of action research which, according to Mertler encourages teachers to reflect on their own teaching practices in order to better understand and consequently improve them (Mertler, 2009).

3 METHODOLOGY

The activity has been based on the action-oriented approach of the CEFR according to which “users and learners” of a language are seen as “social agents” who have tasks to accomplish (CEFR, 2001, p.9). According to the Framework, “Communicative pedagogic tasks (as opposed to exercises focusing specifically on decontextualised practice of forms) aim to actively involve learners in meaningful communication, are relevant (here and now in the formal learning context), are challenging but feasible (with task manipulation where appropriate), and have identifiable (and possibly less immediately evident) outcomes.” (CEFR, 2001, pp 157-158)

In the activity students have been asked to carry out 4 tasks each based on a different topic and a different role-playing. It has involved a group of 11 students following their second year of bachelor degree in LLCR Italian (Langues, littératures et civilisations étrangères et régionales) at Paul-Valéry University, Montpellier, France. The group, all female students, is composed of an Italian girl, 2 Italian- speaking girls and 8 French students with different language proficiency levels.

The activity has been divided into 3 phases.

Phase 1: Students have been asked to do some research on a subject previously studied in class using websites provided by the teacher and containing different point of views on the chosen theme.

The subjects were all related to topical issues in contemporary society.

Phase 2: Students have been then asked to present the subject interpreting the role provided by the teacher and to upload the presentation onto the platform in video/audio format. As above mentioned, each task was to be performed with a different role (journalist, teacher, etc) and a different public (students, adults, children, etc) so that students had to adjust their linguistic register accordingly.

Phase 3: Each student has finally been asked to assess 2 videos/audios (their own and a fellow student’s) with the aid of a provided grid populated with descriptors from the CEFR.

4 DATA COLLECTION

In order to collect the data:

1. An assessment grid has been preliminary used to inquire about students’ self-assessment of the knowledge of the language. The grid contained the same competences and descriptors used for the assessment of the videos.

2. At the end of the first 2 tasks, a questionnaire was administered in oral form to the students to investigate their appreciation of the activity in terms of satisfaction and language acquisition.

The same questionnaire will be submitted again at the end of the fourth and last task to see if any change has occurred in the students’ overall perception of the activity.

(4)

4.1 The assessment grid

The assessment grid was populated with B2 level competences and descriptors taken from the CEFR.

The competencies assessed have been the following:

• Planning

• Sociolinguistic Appropriateness

• Thematic Development

• Lexical Competence;

• Grammatical Competence;

• Phonological Competence;

• Fluency

For each competency students have been invited to give a grade out of 20 - plus a brief optional commentary - and then to give a total grade for the overall task.

4.2 The questionnaire

The questionnaire administered at the end of the second task contained questions related to the students’ perception of the activity in terms of language acquisition and language awareness. The questionnaire contained 8 questions investigating the following areas:

 Linguistic and non-linguistic competences learned through the activity

 Advantages and disadvantages of the activity compared to teacher-directed communication practise

 Benefits of the peer- and self-assessment activity

4 RESULTS

The results illustrated in this section refer to the first 2 tasks carried out so far.

In the first task, peer assessment’s total mean score for the overall task was 20 on a scale of 20, while it decreased to 16 in the second task with a difference of 4 as shown in table 1.

Table 1: Peer- assessment scores

20 20 20 20

0

20

0 0

20 20

0

18 18

13

17 15 15

19

15 16 15 16

Stud 1 Stud 2 Stud 3 Stud 4 Stud 5 Stud 6 Stud 7 Stud 8 Stud 9 Stud 10 Stud 11

Peer-assessment: total scores for tasks 1 and 2

Atelier 1 Atelier 2

(5)

A difference can also be noted in self-assessment’s total mean score which was 20 for the first task and 15.1 in the second task with a decrease of 4.9 (see table 2).

Table 2: Self- assessment scores

20 20 20

0 0

20

0

20 20 20 20

16 16 16 15

12 14 14

19 13

16

Stud 1 Stud 2 Stud 3 Stud 4 Stud 5 Stud 6 Stud 7 Stud 8 Stud 9 Stud 10 Stud 11

Self-assessement: total score for tasks 1 and 2

Atelier 1 Atelier 2

It is also worth noticing that in the evaluation of the first task the total mean score resulting from the mean of the separate scores given to each skill is 3.4 lower than the total mean score given as final grade for the overall task as table 3 shows.

Table 3: Peer- assessment scores for task 3

Stud1 Stud 2 Stud

3 Stud 4 Stud

5 Stud 6 Stud

7 Stud 8 Stud

9 Stud 10 Stud

11 Evaluation par les pairs 20 20 20 20 0 20 0 0 20 20 0 Moyenne réelle 15,7 19,7 15,5 17,7 16,7 0 16,2 15

0 5 10 15 20 25

Peer-assessment for Task 1: Comparison between total score and actual total mean score

Evaluation par les pairs Moyenne réelle

However, in the second task, this difference decreases to 0.19 (see table 4).

(6)

Table 4: Peer- assessment scores for task 2

Stud1 Stud 2 Stud

3 Stud 4 Stud

5 Stud 6 Stud

7 Stud 8 Stud

9 Stud 10 Stud

11 Evaluation par les pairs 18 18 13 17 15 15 19 15 16 15 16 Moyenne réelle 17,7 17,7 13 17,1 15 14,7 19,4 14,8 16,2 14,5 15,8

0 5 10 15 20 25

Peer-assessment for task 2: Comparison between total score and actual total mean score

Evaluation par les pairs Moyenne réelle

As in the peer assessment, in the self-assessment for task 1 the total score resulting from the mean of the separate scores given for each skill is lower than the score given as final grade for the overall task (in this case it shows a decrease of 4.4 as table 5 shows).

Table 5: Self- assessment scores for task 1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Auto-évaluation 20 20 20 0 0 20 0 20 20 20 20 Moyenne réelle 16 0 16 0 14,2 14 19,7 14,7 15

0 5 10 15 20 25

Self-assessment for task 1: Comparison between total score and actual total mean score

Auto-évaluation Moyenne réelle

In the second task, though there is little or no difference between the 2 scores (see table 6).

(7)

Table 6: Self- assessment scores for task 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Auto-évaluation 16 0 16 16 15 12 14 14 19 13 16 Moyenne réelle 16,4 0 16,1 16 14,5 11,5 14,1 14 19,2 13,2 16

05 1015 2025

Self-assessment for task 2: Comparison between final score and actual total mean score

Auto-évaluation Moyenne réelle

Data analysis has also shown that while the total mean score for task 1 shows no difference between peer and self-assessment, in the second task, the difference between peer assessment and self- assessment mean score is of 0.9 as tables 7 and 8 show.

Table 7: comparison between peer and self-assessment total mean score for task 1

(8)

Table 8: comparison between peer and self-assessment total mean score for task

2

Here again, the mean score resulting from the mean of the separate scores given to each skill was calculated. It has shown that self-assessment score is 1 point lower than peer assessment. Almost the same difference can be noticed in the second task (where it is 0,9).

As regards the appreciation of the activity and the benefits it has brought to students the analysis shows that:

1. 8/11 students think the competence they have improved best is the lexical one

2. 6/11 students have identified content as the non-linguistic aspect they have learned best through the activity

3. Only 2 students think that video recording is more difficult than teacher-directed conversation in class

5 CONCLUSIONS

Although, as above mentioned, the data analysis refers to the first 2 tasks a few reflections can be made and preliminary conclusions can be drawn.

1. Awareness of the knowledge of the language seems to increase. Indeed, the decrease in the score seen in the second task both in peer- and self-assessment might reveal an improvement in the

students’ ability to assess the language which in turn may be interpreted as a higher awareness of the knowledge of the language.

2. Self-assessment tends to be slightly lower than peer assessment.

3. Students think video-recording is useful to enlarge their vocabulary and, as regards the non- linguistic aspects, to acquire an in-depth knowledge of the culture of the target language.

4. Students’ overall impression is that video-recording helps them to reflect on the use of the language More extensive data are needed in order to obtain a more accurate view of the effects of video- recording on the language acquisition process. However, if these findings are confirmed video- recording might prove an effective aid in foreign language acquisition.

(9)

REFERENCES

• AA.VV., (2016) L’approccio orientato all’azione nell’insegnamento delle lingue. Spunti e riflessioni per una didattica attiva. Barcellona, Ed. Cdl.

• R.L. Allwright,(1981) What do we want teaching materials for?. Available at:

https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/36.1.5 (Accessed: 14/04/2021)

• Augustina, N. (2016) The use of digital video project to assess students’ speaking skill.

Available at:

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311581669_The_use_of_digital_video_project_to_a ssess_students'_speaking_skill/citation/download (Accessed: 14/04/2021)

• Capre R., Gomez R., Peclard M. et al., (2011) CECR et autoévaluation guidée d'un exposé oral. Available at: https://www.cairn.info/revue-a-contrario-2011-1-page-135.htm (Accessed:

14/04/2021)

• CEFR Companion volume (2001). Available at: https://www.coe.int/en/web/common- european-framework-reference-languages/level-descriptions (Accessed: 14/04/2021)

• Diadori, P. (2016) Verifica, (auto)valutazione, certificazione in Insegnare l’italiano come seconda lingua. Roma, Carocci editore,cap.12.

• Demouy, V., Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2010). On the spot: using mobile devices for listening and speaking practice on a French language programme. Open Learning : The Journal of Open and Distance Learning, vol. 25, n° 3, pp. 217–232

• Hee-Kyung, K., (2014) Travailler l'oral à travers l'utilisation d'un téléphone portable et d’Internet. (Doctoral dissertation, Université de Grenoble). Retrieved from :

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01254151 (Accessed:14/04/2021)

• Hirata, Y. (2009) Application of video recording in the language classroom. Available at:

http://hokuga.hgu.jp/dspace/bitstream/123456789/852/1/KOUGAKU-36-11.pdf (Accessed:

14/04/2021)

• Little, D. (2007) Language Learner autonomy: some fundamental considerations revisited.

Available at:

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254301006_Language_Learner_Autonomy_Some_F undamental_Considerations_Revisited (Accessed: 14/04/2021)

• Mertler, C.A. (2009) Action research. Second edition. California: Sage.

• Nikitina, L. (2009) Student video project as a means to practice constructivist pedagogy in the foreign language classroom. Available at:

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255664789_STUDENT_VIDEO_PROJECT_AS_A_

MEANS_TO_PRACTICE_CONSTRUCTIVIST_PEDAGOGY_IN_THE_FOREIGN_LANGUAG E_CLASSROOM (Accessed: 14/04/2021)

• Wong, E.M.L. (2008), Insights into innovative classroom practises with ICT: identifying the impetus for change. Available at:

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220374735_Insights_into_Innovative_Classroom_Pr actices_with_ICT_Identifying_the_Impetus_for_Change (Accessed: 14/04/2021)

Références

Documents relatifs

The focal target behind conducting this research is to find out the attitudes of both third year English language students and Written Expression module teachers at

This study focuses on the sedimentological and geochemical characterisation of the main surface sediment sources of El Bibane Lagoon (southeast Tunisia) and its watershed in or- der

This paper is in line with Gagnon’s previous work and its purpose is (a) to examine the internal consistency of a procedure to collect students’ perceptions relative to their

Assistive technology, such as that available in an iPad®, have increasingly been used to support learning for all students and particularly for those with special education needs..

Au total, selon le scénario central, les créations nettes d’emploi additionnées aux départs en fin de carrière engendreraient, sur la période 2012-2022, près de 1,2 million

Reading these figures, it appears that students who experienced the recommender were also more engaged with the course and its community: even though the 271 students in

Dans le cinquième et dernier chapitre, nous développerons dans la première partie un modèle énergétique complémentaire qui compare un système Multi Output Single Input (MISO) avec

We recognized three challenges: (1) calculation of the final grade based on different assessment scenarios, (2) measure- ment of the assessment’s reliability and (3) measurement