HAL Id: jpa-00248056
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00248056
Submitted on 1 Jan 1994
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
Associating behaviour of pure polar liquids: dielectric properties of lauric acid
E. Mognaschi, L. Laboranti
To cite this version:
E. Mognaschi, L. Laboranti. Associating behaviour of pure polar liquids: dielectric properties of lauric acid. Journal de Physique II, EDP Sciences, 1994, 4 (9), pp.1469-1475. �10.1051/jp2:1994212�.
�jpa-00248056�
Classification Physics Abstracts 61.20
Associating behaviour of pure polar liquids: dielectric
properties of lauric acid
E-R-
Mognaschi
and L.M. LaborantiDipartimento di Fisica "A. Volta" dell'Universith, Pavia, Italy
(Received
15 April 1994, accepted 14 June1994)
Abstract. In this paper measurements of the static dielectric perrnittivity of lauric acid at different temperatures from about 10 K above the MP to 352 K are reported. These data, together with the dependence of the refractive index and density on temperature, are used in order to investigate the associative behaviour of lauric acid. The Kirkwood correlation factor
calculated both with the classical Kirkwood-Fr6hlich equation and with that corrected for ellip- soidal shaped molecules are reported and discussed. Both correlation factors obtained indicate the existence of a prevailing antiparallel order of dipole moments. The static perrnittivity and the correlation factors increase with increasing temperature and this suggests that the number of apolar dimers decreases on going from low to high temperature.
1 Introduction.
It is well-known
that,
in theliquid phase
ofmonocarboxylic fatty acids, hydrogen
bonds be- tweencarboxylic
groups areresponsible
for the formation of dimers in statisticalequilibrium
between pairs of molecules and that
they
are also the main source of short range interactions between molecules. Theassociating
behaviour of purepolar liquids
can be studieddirectly
from their dielectricproperties, particularly by
means of the static andhigh frequency
dielec- tricpermittivity.
To this aim the statistical mechanicaltheory developed by
Kirkwood [I] and extendedby
Fr6hlich [2, 3] in the case ofpolarizable
molecules with permanentdipole
mo- ment, is a useful tool forobtaining
information about molecular stucture and intermolecularinteractions.
The main feature of the model
proposed by
Kirkwood and Fr6hlich with respect to thewidely
usedOnsager theory
[4], is the introduction of a correlation factor g which takes into account the correlations between molecular anddipolar
orientations due toshort-range ordering
interactions.
On the basis of the
analogy occurring
between theOnsager
and Kirkwood-Fr6hlich equa- tions, the Abbott-Bolton [5] correction forellipsoidal
molecules to theOnsager
formula hasbeen extended to the Kirkwood-1i6hlich equation, in order to take into account the
elongated
1470 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE II N°9
molecular
shape
offatty
acids.Thus,
the correlation factorg'
evaluated in this way assumes values different from those of g, calculated via the usual Kirkwood-Fr6hlichequation,
but morerealistic.
In the present work measurements of the static
permittivity
of lauric acid as a function of temperature arereported
and the results will be discussed in view of the above considerations.Moreover an attempt is done of
interpreting
the associative behaviour of lauric acidby
means of a different model [6]
developed
within the frame of the Kirkwood-Fr6hlichtheory
for solutions. In this model
associating compounds
are treated as a mixture of dimers andmonomers which behave as
apolar
solvent andpolar soluted, respectively.
A new correlationfactor gm is
introduced, taking
into account the correlation among the orientations of thedipole
moments carried
by
monomers and it can be put in relation with thedegree
of associationcalculated via the association factor obtained
by
adiabaticcompressibility
data.2.
Properties
of Iauric acid.2, I GENERAL. Lauric acid
CH3(CH2 )IOCOOH,
is a saturatedmonocarboxylic fatty acid,
with molecular
weight
Mm 200.32 g mol~~. The total chain
length
is about 13.5I
[7]
and,
asoccurs for all saturated
fatty acids,
the molecule is rod-like and the moleculardipole
moment is localized in the acid group [8]. Themelting point
is about 44 ° C. Lauric acid ofpurity
greater than 99.5% was obtained from Fluka AG andemployed
without further treatments.2.2 DENSITY. The temperature
dependence
of thedensity
oflauric acid in theliquid phase
was obtained from literature data
[9-12].
The inverse of the
density
was found todepend linearly
on the absolute temperature:d~~
= A + BT
(1)
with A
= 8.14 x 10~~
g~~
cm~ and B= 1.03 x 10~~
g~~
cm~ K~~The number N of molecules per unit volume is calculated
by
N =
NAd/M, (2)
where NA is the
Avogadro
number.2. 3 REFRACTIVE INDEX AND HIGH FREQUENCY PERMITTIVITY. The refractive index nD
of lauric
acid,
for the sodium D-line,
was taken from literature[9-12].
Theplot
of refractive index versus absolute temperature follows a linear law for 318<T/K<353
nD = C + DT
(3)
where C
= 1.54 and D
= ~3.4651 x 10~~ K~~ are obtained from a best fit of literature data.
For the
high frequency permittivity
e~, I.e. thepermittivity
due to inducedpolarization,
we used [13]
e~ =
1.05n[. (4)
3.
Experimental
details.STATIC PERMITTIVITY. The
permittivity
of lauric acid wasmeasured,
in theliquid phase, by
a General Radiobridge,
mod. 1616. A three-terminal cell for measurements onliquids,
with
platinum electrodes,
was used.Permittivity
was measured in a field of 50 V m~~ and the results were found to beindependent
of fieldintensity
andfrequency.
In table I the values ofpermittivity
of lauric acid from about 10 K above the MP to 352 K arereported.
All the valuesreported
were obtained from measurements made at I kHz. At thisfrequency
thepermittivity
values can be considered static, because the relaxation times are of the order of10~~° s [8].Table I. Static
permittivity
e of lauricacid,
values of (~~~)~phere and (~~~)~ph~rojd obtainedby
means of(6)
and(9)
and correlation factors g andg'
evaluated for ~o= 1.5 D.
T f (jLefl)sphere g
(/lefl)spheroid g'
lK) ID) ID)
318.44 2.295 0.539 0.129 1.065 0.504
321.84 2.298 0.556 0.138 1.080 0.519
328.03 2.290 0.560 0.139 1.090 0.528
338.48 2.281 0.577 0.148 1.112 0.549
344.33 2.280 0.594 0.257 1.130 0.568
349.82 2.281 0.614 0.167 1.151 0.589
351.39 2.281 0.619 0.171 1.157 0.594
353.19 2.280 0.623 0.172 1.161 0.599
357.27 2.291 0.655 0.191 1.193 0.633
365.44 2.295 0.688 0.211 1.229 0.671
368.69 2.300 0.708 0.223 1.248 0.693
372.88 2.306 0.732 0.238 1.273 0.720
379.23 2.310 0.759 0.256 1.302 0.754
382.77 2.311 0.773 0.265 1.317 0.771
393.05 2.321 1.823 0.301 1.370 0.835
4. Discussion and conclusions.
The correlation factor g, which characterizes the Kirkwood-Fr6hlich statistical mechanical the- ory of dielectrics
taking
into account the correlations between the orientations ofdipole
mo-ments due to
short-range ordering interactions,
is defined as:fit
g #
£(COBRq) (5)
j=I
where,
Rq is theangle
between the orientations of the I-th andj-th dipole
moment, fit is the number of molecules which enter the Kirkwoodsphere
and theangle
brackets denote the1472 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE II N°9
statistical mechanical average. from the above
expression
for g, it can be seen that g c~ 0 or g - cc,respectively,
when most of the molecules of theliquid
lies withantiparallel
orparallel alignment
of theirdipole
moments. When there is no correlation betweendipoles
then g c~ 1.According
to this model theOnsager equation
derived in the continuumapproach
must be rewritten in this way]~~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~
~~~
47rNe(ef
+
2)2
~ ~~~
where e and e~ are the static and
high frequency permittivity respectively,
T is the absolute temperature, N the number of molecules in theliquid
per unit volume and ~o the permanentdipole
moment of the molecule in vacua. One may observe that(6)
is very similar to theOnsager equation
obtainedby neglecting short-range interactions,
apart from the left hand side term. To extend thevalidity
of theOnsager equation including short-range correlations,
one
usually
introduces an effectivedipole
moment forspherical
molecules(~~~)~phere
related to the truedipole
moment in vacuo ~o of the moleculeby
(/lefl)~phere "
g/l~ (~)
and whose
meaning
is that of the averagedipole
moment to be attributed to each molecule whenshort-range
interactions occur.Equation (6)
has been derived forpolar liquids
withspherical
molecularshape
and this is not the case formonocarboxylic fatty
acids whose molecules are indeed rod like. Nevertheless thisequation
also holds forliquids
with molecules of ashape
different fromspherical
since it has been observed [14] that the dielectricproperties
of a considerable number ofliquids
can
satisfactorily
be describedby
a hardsphere
model. This isprobably
due to thepartial
compensation of different factorsincluding
the presence ofhydrogen bonds,
the existence of real(not ideal) multipoles,
the nonspherical shape
of molecules and theirflexibility.
On the other
hand,
one may take the molecularshape
of the molecule into account and use, in the case offatty acids,
theequation
derivedby
Abbot and Bolton [5] which extends theOnsager equation
toliquids
with molecules whoseshape
isapproximately
that of aprolate spheroid. Moreover,
in the same way as onegeneralizes
theOnsager equation introducing
the effectivedipole
moment(~~~)sphere
in order to consider theshort-range
correlation betweenmolecules,
onemight
introduce an effectivedipole
moment forspheroids
definedby
(/lefl)~pheroid " g'/l~>
(8)
where
g'
is a correlation factor whose valuesmight obviously
differ from those of g obtained in the case ofspherical
molecules. Thisgeneralizing equation
may bepresented
in thefollowing
form:
~~~~
~~~ ~~~
~~ ~~~~ °~~~~~~
~~ ~
+ ~~ °~~ ~~~
where
y m
3~~
~~~~~~~~~
~~,(lo)
n + 2
e(Ai
1) AiKn
m ijje i)le)An (o
m 1,2) (ii)
and the
An
are thedepolarizing
factors of theprolate spheroid
whose numerical values were tabulatedby
Osbom [15].The purpose of this work is to determine the correlation factor from
experimental
databy
means of
(6)
or(9), and, possibly,
to find a link between g and thedegree
of associationfl
defined as the ratio between the number d of dimers and the maximum attainable number
N/2
of dimers, I-e-
fl
=~. (12)
In table I the measured values of the static
permittivity
e, at different temperatures, for lauric acid in theliquid phase
arereported, together
with the values g andg'
of the correlation factors calculatedby (6)
and(9)
and those of the effectivedipole
moments,(~~~)sphere
and(~~~)spheroid
evaluatedby (7)
and(8) assuming
~o = 1.5 D. Thisassumption
has been made on the basis of apreviously reported
discussion [16], eventhough
the value of lauric acid moleculardipole
moment, at 20°C,
in dioxanesolution,
was found to be ~o= 1.64 D [8].
The discussion of the results may be
approached
in two different ways, based on twopossible interpretations
of the correlation factor. In the firstapproach,
since g accounts forshort-range
interactions, we may suppose that these correlation effectsplay
a relevant roleonly
amongnearest
neighbours
and use thefollowing approximate expression
for the Kirkwood correlation factor [13]:g = I +
z(cos Rq). (13)
where z is the number of nearest
neighbours. Moreover,
in theassociating compounds,
wemainly
deal with dimers and monomers and this would induce to considercouples
ofinteracting
molecules and take z
= I. In this way, if the
degree
of dimerization ishigh,
that is, a great number of dimers is present in theliquid,
we may expect that(cos
R,~ ci -I since the moleculesconstituting
each dimercouple
withantiparallel dipole
moments. Thus we may concludethat,
if g - 0, then a strong dimerization occurs, while when g - I no association is present.
The
reliability
of thisapproach
is indeed deniedby
theexperimental
evidence. Infact,
measurements of the
degree
of dimerization evaluatedby
means of acoustical measurements[17], for the first terms of the series of
monocarboxylic fatty acids,
showed that thedegree
of association increases with
decreasing
molecularweight.
from our dielectric measurements [6] we observed that the Kirkwood correlation factor g increases from 0 to I with molecularweight
and this reveals atendency
in the associative behaviour offatty
acids which is in clear contrast withexperimental
data deduced from acoustic measurements.The
inadequacy
of thisinterpretation
of the values obtained for g mustundoubtly
be at- tributed to the fact that theassumption
z = I is toorigid.
On the otherhand, considering
a nearestneighbours sphere
with z > I, the presence of one or more dimers in thesphere
does notsignificantly
influence the values of g since inexpression (13)
one must use the value ofR,j averaged
for all thedipole
momentsentering
thesphere.
In the second
interpretative approach
we consider theassociating liquid according
to a pre-viously presented
model [6] in which the fluid is considered as a system ofpolar
molecules(monomers)
in anapolar
medium(dimers).
In this frameworkequation (6)
must be revisedaccording
to the Kirkwood-libhlichtheory
for mixtures and a new correlation factor gm ac-counting
for the short range interactions among monomers must be introduced. This correla- tion factor can be related to the Kirkwood correlation factor g which appears in(6)
and thedegree
of associationfl by
thefollowing
relationgm =
g(I fl)~~ (14)
We may note that gm represents the
degree
of orientational correlation among monomers.As one
might
expect, iffl
- 0, I.e. no association occurs, gm = g, while iffl
- I, I.e.strong
association occurs, gm becomes very greatsuggesting
that theremaining
monomerstend to
align
themselves withparallel dipole
moments. To evaluate gm one should know g1474 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE II N°9
and
fl independently.
Forexample
we could getfl starting
from values of association factor x obtained from adiabaticcompressibility
measurements. The association factor x is defined as the factorby
which the average molecularweight R
increases with respect to the molecularweight
when association occurs. Infact,
if association is assumed to be thegrouping
of some of the molecules to form dimers ormultimers,
the average molecularweight
increases to xM.According
tothis,
x can vary from one, when no association occurs, to two, when all the molecules dimerize; x can also be greater than two if multimers are also present. It is easy to show that the association factor x is linked to thedegree
of associationfl by
thefollowing
relation:
p
=2ji 1lx). jis)
For lauric acid the
only
valuereported
in the literature for the association factor[17],
obtainedby
means of adiabaticcompressibility
measurementsis, surprisingly,
less than one, which should mean that the average molecularweight
is decreased with respect to the molecularweight
and this isclearly impossible.
We may note that the model usedby
the authors to calculate the association factor is based on the assumpion that the molecules of theassociating compounds
arespherical
and this isnearly
true for the low molecularweight
terms of the series offatty acids,
but it does not hold for thehigher
terms.So,
for lauricacid,
an evaluation ofthe correlation factor among monomers is not, at this
point, possible.
from the results
reported
in table I we mayobserve,
atfirst,
that the values ofg'
are about three times greater than thecorresponding
values of g, at the same temperature. Eventhough
we may suppose that the values of
g'
are more realistic than those of g, sincethey
take into account the molecularshape
of themolecules,
nevertheless thegeneral interpretation
does notchange
since bothg'
and g are less than 1.So, finally,
we may concludeaccording
to thegeneral meaning
of the Kirkwood correlation factor that the correlation among thedipole
moments of each molecule occursmainly
withantiparallel orientation,
whoseintensity
decreases withincreasing
temperature, asexpected
since thermalagitation
contrastsdipolar
orientation.From the
experimental
resultsreported
in table I one can observe that thepermittivity
values of Iauricacid,
in the range of temperatures of ourinvestigation,
lies between those ofundecylic
acidin
=
11)
[18] and ofmargaric
acidin #17)
[19] at the same temperature.Here below, we also report the value of molar refraction R for lauric acid calculated
using
theextrapolated
values of refractive index nD anddensity
dby
means of(3)
and(1)
at 20 °C andby
thefollowing expression:
~
~)
+j~'
~~~~In this way we get R = 58.733 cm~ which is in
good
agreement with the value of R= 59.411 cm~ obtained from the
atomic,
group and structural contributions [20].Acknowledgements.
The collection of
physical
data on lauric acid from literature and dielectric measurements madeby
A. Chierico aregratefully acknowledged.
Thanks are also due to L. Cattaneo for theconstruction of the cell for measurements. The Consorzio Interuniversitario Nazionale per la Fisica della Materia
(C-INFM)
of the Ministero dell'Universith e della llicerca Scientifica eTecnologica supported
this work.References
[1] Kirkwood J-G-, J. Chem. Phys. 7
(1939)
911.[2] Fr6hlich H., Trans. Faraday Sac. 44
(1948)
38.[3] Fr6hIich H., Theory of Dielectrics
(Clarendon
Press, 1958).[4] Onsager L., J. Am. chem. Soc. 58
(1936)
1486.[5] Abbott J-A- and Bolton H-C-, Trans. Faraday Soc. 48
(1952)
422.[6] Mognaschi E-R-, Laboranti L-M- and Chierico A., Mol. Phys. 74
(1991)
211.[7] Garner W-E- and Ryder E-A-, J. Chem Sac. D 127
(1925)
720.[8] Kovrigina L-P- and Bogdanov L-I-, Russ. J. Phys. Chem. 44
(1970)
881.[9] Beilsteins Handbuch der Organischen Chernie, B. Prager and P. Jacobson Eds.
(Springer-Verlag, 1920).
[10] Beilsteins Handbuch der Organischen Chemie, F. Richter Ed., 3rd ed
(Springer-Verlag, 1942).
ill]
BeiJsteins Handbuch der Organischen Chemie, F. Richter Ed., 4th ed(Springer-Verlag, 1960).
[12] Beilsteins Handbuch der Organischen Chemie, H-G- Boit Ed., sth ed
(Springer-Verlag, 1975).
[13] B6ttcher C-J-F-, Theory of Electric Polarization, Vol. I
(Elsevier, 1973).
[14] Perram J-W- and Anastasiou N., J. Chem. Sac. Faraday Trans. II 77
(1981)
101.[15] Osborn J-A-, Phys. Rev. 67
(1945)
351.[16] Mognaschi E-R- and Chierico A., z. Naturf.
(a)
41(1986)
491.[17] Rao P-S-R-K- and Rao C-R-, J. phys. Sac. Jap. 37
(1974)
864.[18] Mognaschi E-R- and Chierico A., z. Phys. B 67
(1987)
107.[19] Mognaschi E-R- and Chierico A., Mol. Phys. 68
(1989)
241.[20] Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 44th edition