• Aucun résultat trouvé

Evaluation of two c-ELISA tests for detection of antibodies against PPR in African wildlife

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Evaluation of two c-ELISA tests for detection of antibodies against PPR in African wildlife"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Proceedings

The 12th International Conference of

THE ASSOCIATION OF INSTITUTIONS FOR

TROPICAL VETERINARY MEDICINE

Montpellier, France

(2)

Proceedings of the 12th international conference of the

Association of institutions of Tropical Veterinary Medicine

EVALUATION OF TWO C-ELISA TESTS FOR DETECTION OF

ANTIBODIES AGAINST PPR IN AFRICAN WILDLIFE AMAN ULLAH GUITIAN J. 1, W ARET A. 1 *, PFEIFFER D. 1, ROGER F

.2,

LIBEAU G.2, DIALLO A.3

1. The Royal Veterinary College, Hawkhead Lane -North Mymms, Hat.field-Herdfordshire, England

2. Cirad, Contra! of Emerging and Exotic Animal Diseases Research Unit Campus international de Baillarguet, 34398 Montpellier Cedex 5, France

3.FAO-Agence internationale de l'énergie atomique (AJEA) ABSTRACT

Peste des petits ruminants (PPR) is a viral disease affecting both

domestic and wild Artiodactyles. lts surveillance and control relies on the

use of serological techniques like competitive ELISA. Here we evaluated the performance of c-ELISA-H and c-ELISA-N in wildlife species. We used data from 1244 serum samples obtained from individual animals within 13 African countries that were tested by both, ELISA and VNT (gold standard) in 144 cases. For the prescribed eut-off Sp and Se were estimated as 99.04% (95% CI = 96.19%-100%) and 10.24% (95% CI: 5.53%-16.35%) for c-ELISA-N and 22.72% (95% CI: 14.59-30.95%) and 98.15% (95% CI: 94.55-100%) for c-ELISA-H. ROC curves were obtained to identify eut-offs that would optirnize the performance of the tests. New eut-offs were suggected : PI= 21.479 for ELISA-N and PI= 30.45 for c-ELISA-H with new Se and Sp estimates of 74.02% (95% CI: 66.39%-81.64%) and 56.60% (95% CI: 47.17%-66.04%) for c-ELISA-N and 55.54% (95% CI: 45.75%-65.12%) and 72.73% (95% CI: 60.96%-84.50%) for c-ELISA-H respectively. The apparent prevalences of PPR in the studied sites were corrected and 'true' prevalences ranging between 1.45% and 97.85% were obtained. Selection bias as well as lack of blinding were the main limitations of this study.

*Contact author: E-mail: awaret@rvc.ac.uk

Références

Documents relatifs

Cirad, Contrai of Emerging and Exotic Animal Diseases Research Unit Campus international de Baillarguet, 34398 Montpellier Cedex 5, France.. Royal Veterinary College ,

Cirad, Contrai of Emerging and Exotic Animal Diseases Research Unit Campus international de Baillarguet, 34398 Montpellier Cedex 5 ,

Sensitivity and specificity of the ELISA To use the ELISA as a single dilution test, the threshold between positive and negative sera was determined at · optimum

Case not detected Farmer detects symptoms and calls a veterinarian No Yes Case not detected Veterinarian has a bTB suspicion and conducts a tuberculin test No Yes CASE

3 Cirad, UMR BGPI ”Biology Genetic of Population Interaction”, TA A-54-K/Cirad-BIOS, Campus international de Baillarguet, 34398 Montpellier cedex 5, Montpellier, France

INRA, UMR CMAEE / 1309, Campus International de Baillarguet, 34398 Montpellier, France Keywords: saliva, Ornithodoros, african swine fever virus, Langerhans cells,

He is the deputy director, as well as the epidemiology team leader, in the INRA-CIRAD research unit “Control of emerging and exotic animal diseases” (Montpellier,

Laboratoire des Symbioses Tropicales et Méditerranéennes-UMR 113, Campus CIRAD de Baillarguet, TA-A 82/J, 34398 Montpellier cedex 5, France.. La surexploitation des ressources