• Aucun résultat trouvé

Improving surveillance of emerging infectious diseases: ecological modelling of the spatial distribution of wild waterbirds to identify main areas of avian influenza viruses circulation in the Inner Niger Delta, Mali

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Improving surveillance of emerging infectious diseases: ecological modelling of the spatial distribution of wild waterbirds to identify main areas of avian influenza viruses circulation in the Inner Niger Delta, Mali"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Iguazú, Argentina.

59th Annual International Conference of the Wildlife Disease Association

Oral Presentations 40

40

IMPROVINGSURVEILLANCEOFEMERGINGINFECTIOUSDISEASES:ECOLOGICAL

MODELLINGOFTHESPATIALDISTRIBUTIONOFWILDWATERBIRDSTOIDENTIFY

MAINAREASOFAVIANINFLUENZAVIRUSESCIRCULATIONINTHEINNERNIGER

DELTA,MALI

Cappelle J1, Girard O2, Fofana B3, Gaidet N1 and Gilbert M4

1

CIRAD-ES, AGIRs, Montpellier, France; 2Réserve de Chanteloup, France; 3Wetlands International,

Direction Nationale des Eaux et Forêts, Mali; Nicolas Gaidet1, 4CIRAD-ES, AGIRs, Montpellier,

France.

Presenting author: Cappelle, Julien julien.cappelle@cirad.fr

Predicting areas of emergence when no epidemiological data is yet available is essential to implement efficient surveillance programs. The Inner Niger Delta (IND) in Mali is a major African wetlands where >1 million Palearctic and African waterbirds congregate. Our objective was to model the spatial distribution of these birds recognised as the main reservoir of Avian Influenza Viruses (AIV), in order to predict where these viruses would be more likely to circulate in the IND. We developed five generalized models and a boosted regression trees model (BRTs) based on total aerial bird counts over six years and high temporal resolution (10 days) remotely sensed environmental variables to predict the spatial distribution of four waterbirds groups. The predicted waterbirds abundances were weighted with an epidemiological indicator based on the prevalence of low pathogenic AIV reported in the literature. BRTs model had the best predictive power and allowed predicting the high variability of the IND. Years with a low flood level showed areas with higher risk of circulation and had better spatial distribution predictions. The model identified for each year few areas with a higher risk of avian influenza circulation. This model can be applied every 10 days to evaluate the risk of AIV emergence in wild waterbirds. By taking into account the variability of the IND, it allows better targeting of areas considered for surveillance. Applications of this methodology could enhance the control of emerging diseases at a local and regional scale, especially when scarce resources are available for surveillance programs.

Références

Documents relatifs

Spatial distribution of the main anthropogenic indicators associated with the relative risk for HPAI H5N1 in chicken and duck flocks: population density, location of major cities

Preliminary results for 630 swab samples collected during the cool season found that no bird tested positive for AI RRT-PCR, and that the proportion of birds positive for ND

and tracheal swabs collected from wild birds were immediately placed in conservative medium and sent to Montpellier where an automation workstation (Biomek FxP,

A strength of Sentinel over Found dead is that it does not depend on HPAI H5N1 causing high mortality in order to detect it, in fact as live birds visit the sentinel, the lower

Case not detected Farmer detects symptoms and calls a veterinarian No Yes Case not detected Veterinarian has a bTB suspicion and conducts a tuberculin test No Yes CASE

However, given the recent multiplication of bird and pig zoonotic strains, particularly in China where livestock farming conditions facilitate the spread and

Background Avian influenza viruses (AIV) have been detected in wild birds in West Africa during the northern winter, but no information is available on a potential

When we considered the 80 households interviewed 6 times, observation of sick poultry and signs suggesting HPAI varied over time (p = 0.043 and p = 0.018, respectively, by