• Aucun résultat trouvé

The amici curiae and the WTO dispute settlement system : the doors are open

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "The amici curiae and the WTO dispute settlement system : the doors are open"

Copied!
45
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Article

Reference

The amici curiae and the WTO dispute settlement system : the doors are open

BOISSON DE CHAZOURNES, Laurence, MBENGUE, Makane Moïse

BOISSON DE CHAZOURNES, Laurence, MBENGUE, Makane Moïse. The amici curiae and the WTO dispute settlement system : the doors are open. Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals, 2003, vol. 2, no. 2, p. 205-248

Available at:

http://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:6160

Disclaimer: layout of this document may differ from the published version.

1 / 1

(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)
(25)
(26)
(27)
(28)
(29)
(30)
(31)
(32)
(33)
(34)
(35)
(36)
(37)
(38)
(39)
(40)
(41)
(42)
(43)
(44)
(45)

Références

Documents relatifs

With the continuing use of the investor-State dispute settlement (ISDS) mechanism (2012 and 2013 saw the largest numbers of known investment arbitrations filed in a single year,

As such, in the Case Concerning the Land and Maritime Boundary Between Cameroon and Nigeria, while recognising that basin organizations and commissions can be equipped

Except for the very early years where contracting parties voted,68 decisions of the CONTRACTING PARTIES have been taking place when no country formally objected to it;

14. If the covered person who is the subject of the evidence is a rnember of the Standing Appelbte Body or of the Standing Appellate Body support staff, the party shall

Therefore, it may be argued that in the case of a dispute between, say the United States and the European Communities, an interpreter may consider as relevant and

In a situation where a human rights provision could potentially supersede a WTO provision — but as such could not be received into the WTO legal system and could not be enforced by

In a situation such as the EC -.Sword{ish dispute, it is conceivable that bath 'adjudicating bodies (that of ITLOS and WTO) would examine whether UNCLOS effectively

moreover, whilst such communications were addressed to Bank Maoagement and staff, the Board was not infonned. The Inspection Pane!'s jurisdiction ooly extends to Bank