• Aucun résultat trouvé

Medical errors, old habits, bad practice

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Medical errors, old habits, bad practice"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

College

Collège | President’s Message

Medical errors, old habits, bad practice

David White

MD CCFP FCFP How many things served us yesterday for articles of faith,

which today are fables for us?

Michel de Montaigne (1533-1592)

S

taying up to date with changing evidence is the goal of every conscientious physician. In striving for this ideal, members of the College of Family Physicians of Canada make a commitment to lifelong learning. Nevertheless, in everyday practice, habits based on years of following previous guidelines make it diffcult to change course. Inevitably, these habits are reinforced by our patients, who have come to expect certain medications, tests, and approaches.

Family physicians are bombarded with guidelines.

As the broadest discipline, we have the widest range of guidelines to try to keep up with, let alone imple- ment.1 Inevitably, we fnd that some guidelines confict with other guidelines or contradict our clinical experi- ence, especially in patients with several chronic con- ditions. We regularly face true management dilemmas:

people suffering from painful osteoarthritis who also have hypertension and gastroesophageal refux disease represent but one common example.

I recently attended a workshop on deprescribing, the delicate art of weaning people off medications that they have been taking for years. It is diffcult to tell patients that a medication they have been using—and that we have been prescribing—is doing them more harm than good. It can sometimes be a little easier to discuss this with those patients we have “inherited.” For example, for those patients who use sedatives for insomnia that their previous physicians prescribed, we can gently explain to them that the evidence has evolved since they started using it. However, at this stage of my own practice life, I have been looking after most of my patients for many years; so the “previous physician” whose advice they have been following and who has been writing their prescriptions is none other than … me.

The drug category makes a difference: I find that it is straightforward to tell patients that their proton Cet article se trouve aussi en français à la page 174.

pump inhibitor is not ideal for long-term management of mild gastroesophageal refux disease. Yes, it was the latest-and-greatest drug a few years ago, and likely was the right choice when the specialist started it follow- ing the gastroscopy; but over the long haul, the stron- gest medication is not necessarily the best.2 It is much more challenging with narcotic and sedative medica- tions. In those cases, our desire to relieve serious symp- toms—such as chronic pain, considerable anxiety, or poor sleep—and the patient’s experience that the medi- cation provides relief both conspire to maintain a pat- tern that we recognize as problematic. A lot of people do not have coverage for nonpharmacologic options, such as physiotherapy or cognitive behavioural therapy, that can help manage symptoms while reducing medi- cation dependence.

The workshop defnitely triggered a sense of guilt, leaving me ruminating on the remaining people in my practice who have been taking narcotics or sedatives for years. It is a relatively small group, the ones who are most resistant to my efforts to introduce today’s best practices. The reasons that it is diffcult are usually evident: diffcult life circumstances, multimorbidity, and concomitant mental health problems. As workshop par- ticipants shared their clinical stories, there was comfort in knowing that we were all grappling with this. There was reassurance in the knowledge that a patient-centred approach was the foundation for success. Fortunately, I could leave with a sense of cautious optimism and sev- eral tools that will help me to help my patients.3,4

References

1. Østbye T, Yarnall KS, Krause KM, Pollak KI, Gradison M, Michener JL. Is there time for management of patients with chronic diseases in primary care? Ann Fam Med 2005;3(3):209-14.

2. Wintemute K. Bye-bye, PPI. Ottawa, ON: Choosing Wisely Canada, Canadian Medical Association; 2016. Available from: www.choosingwiselycanada.

org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/CWC_PPI_Toolkit_v1.0_2016-03-31.

pdf. Accessed 2017 Jan 6.

3. Deprescribing.org [website]. Ottawa, ON: Bruyère Research Institute; 2017.

Available from: http://deprescribing.org/. Accessed 2017 Jan 6.

4. Choosing Wisely Canada [website]. Hone your skills: are you an effective deprescriber? Tackling sedative-hypnotic drugs in older adults. Ottawa, ON:

Choosing Wisely Canada, Canadian Medical Association. Available from:

www.choosingwiselycanada.org/webinars/hone-your-skills-are-you- an-effective-deprescriber-tackling-sedative-hypnotic-drugs-in-older- adults/. Accessed 2017 Jan 6.

VOL 63: FEBRUARY • FÉVRIER 2017

|

Canadian Family Physician Le Médecin de famille canadien

173

Références

Documents relatifs

Traditional algorithms may simply reinforce one’s current behaviors (e.g. ‘perhaps you want a bag of crisps’), rather than allowing users to discover new items that might have a

Parfois, le chef cuisinier porte un gilet d’une couleur différente (noir, bleu...) pour se distinguer des autres cuisiniers.. Le chef et

The interpretation of this result is that each time a choice is made, the stimulus chosen is reinforced through Hebbian learning, in the connection from the cognitive to the

the effect of environmental factors (such as type of house, urban or rural area, dog's activity level, number of daily walks) on the dog feeding habits as well as the

This factsheet describes eating habits of 6 to 9-year-old children in the WHO European region, using data from 23 countries participating in the 4th round of COSI (2015-2017,

Adam et Ève étaient nus sans se faire mutuellement honte. La sortie de l’innocence brusquement ouvrit leurs yeux, ils ressentirent le besoin de se cacher. Par les

Car il s’agit d’un destin bien singulier que le mien, quoique partagé sans doute par beaucoup d’« Algériens » (1) de ma génération, celle qui avait 20 ans lors des