• Aucun résultat trouvé

A characteristic property of Euclidean spaces

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "A characteristic property of Euclidean spaces "

Copied!
4
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

A R K I V F O R M A T E M A T I K B a n d 5 n r 23

1.64021 C o m m u n i c a t e d 22 J a n u a r y 1964 b y OTTO FROSTMAN

A characteristic property of Euclidean spaces

B y STEN OLOF CARLSSON

L e t B be a real normed linear space. The well-known J o r d a n - y o n Neumann characterization of Euclidean spaces states t h a t if B satisfies

I l u + ~ l l * + l l u - v l l ~ = 2 ( l l u l l ~ + l l ~ l l ~) for all u, v E B (1) then B must be Euclidean. An improvement of this result is due to Schoen- berg [3], who proved t h a t in (1) the sign of equality m a y be replaced b y either

>~ or ~<, the same throughout B. In a previous paper [1] the author proved the following generalization of the J o r d a n - v o n Neumann result: If B satisfies

~ a~l]b,u+c, v11~=O

f o r a n

u, veB,

(2)

~=1

where a~ :# O, b~, c,, v = 1 . . . m, are real numbers such t h a t (b,, c~) and (b~, %) are linearly independent for v * / x , then B is a Euehdean space. The proof of this depended on the theory of F-series. The purpose of the present note is to give a quite elementary proof of the fact t h a t condition (2) remains characteristic for Euclidean spaces if the sign of equality is replaced b y ~> (and then also if it is replaced b y ~< ). However, we now have to assume explicitly t h a t

m

a~b~= ~, a,,b~c, = ~ arc, = 0. (3)

v = l v = l v ~ l

More precisely, we are going to prove the following theorem:

Theorem:

Let a~ # O, b~, c~, v = 1 . . . m, be a fixed collection o] real numbers satis- /ying (3) and such that (b,,C~) and (b,,%) are linearly independent /or v:#g. I f B is a real normed linear space satis/ying the condition

a llb n+c,v[l > O

/or all u, v e B

(4)

then B is a Euclidean space.

The proof of the theorem depends on two lemmas.

~-~- 9 327

(2)

S. O. CARLSSON, Characteristic property of Euclidean spaces

, L e m m a 1. I / B satis/ies (4) then B also satisfies a condition o/ the /orm

m

Zp ll +q vll >o /o, U ,veB, (5)

where

p ~ # O /or v = l . . . m, q ~ # q , /or v * / ~ , ~ p , = ~ p ~ q , = p~q~=O (6)

v = l v = l v = l

and ~ p~q~ > 0 . (7)

%>0

Proof o/ Lemma 1. R e p l a c e v in (4) b y X u + v , w h e r e 2 is so c h o s e n t h a t b:=b~+c~X#O for v = l . . . m. T h e n we see t h a t (4) is e q u i v a l e n t t o t h e con- d i t i o n

~a~Hb'~u+c~vHZ>~O for a l l u, v E B , (8)

V = I

w h e r e b:4=O for v = l . . . m. W e n o w w r i t e c o n d i t i o n (8) in t h e f o r m

r llu+ vll > O

for all u, v E B , (9)

V = I

w h e r e we h a v e p u t

r~=a~b~2, s~=c~/b'~ for v = l , . . . , m . (10) F r o m t h e p r o p e r t i e s of a , b , c~ a n d t h e choice of Jl i t follows t h a t

r , # O for v = l . . . m, s~4=s~, for v 4 : / x , ~ r ~ = ~ r ~ s , = r~s~=O.~ (11)

F o r s o m e ~, 1 ~< T ~< m, we h a v e r~ > 0. Choose e > 0 so t h a t I s~ - s~ ] > e for v # v.

N o w r e p l a c e u a n d v in (9) b y ( t - s ~ ) u + @ + s ~ ) v a n d u - v r e s p e c t i v e l y . T h e n (9) gives

r, for all u, v e B

o r ~p~l[u+q~v]]Z>~O for all u, v E B ,

/=1

w h e r e

p~ = r~(e - s~ + s~) ~, q~ = (e + s~ - s~) (e - s3 + s~) -1, v = 1 . . . m.

I f we use (11) i t is e a s y t o v e r i f y t h a t t h e n u m b e r s p , q~ s a t i s f y r e l a t i o n s (6).

M o r e o v e r , we h a v e b y t h e choice of e t h a t 328

(3)

ARKIV F6R MATEMATIK. B d 5 nr 23

q~<O for v # z , q~>O.

Hence we have p~q~ = p~q~ = r~e ~ > O, qv>O

so t h a t the inequality (7) is fulfilled. This completes the proof of L e m m a 1.

NOw suppose t h a t B is two-dimensional a n d p u t C = {u [u e B, i] u In = 1}. Then C i s a closed convex curve, symmetrical a b o u t the origin. I t is a well-known fact t h a t there exists a unique ellipse E (with its center a t the o r i g i n ) o f maxi- m a l area inside C and t h a t this ellipse touches C in a t least four different points (see for instance D a y [2], pp. 117-118). L e t u 0 a n d v 0 be two of these points such t h a t u 0~= + % . We denote b y II" 111 the n o r m in B for which E is the unit circle, t h a t is E = { u l u e B , i l u ] ] l = l }. Because E is inside C we h a v e ]] u [I ~< [] u ]1, for all u E B, a n d because E is an ellipse I] ~u0 + # % 1112 = 43 + 2a~u + #2 for all 4, # (a is a constant).

L e m m a 2. P u t q ( x ) = l i u o + x v o l l ~ - liuo+~voll~ T h e n

cp(x)=O(x~), when x-+O, (12)

~(x) = 0(1), when x--> + c~. (13)

Proo[ o[ L e m m a 2. L e t w be a vector lying along the common t a n g e n t line to C a n d E a t u 0. Then we h a v e

1 ~< [lUo+

xwll~<~

Iluo+ zwll~ = 1 + x~ll w I1~

from which it follows t h a t

IlUo+XWll ~ - I l u o + x w l l ~ = o ( z ~ ) , when x-->O. (14) Writing Vo=,~Uo+#W a n d using (14) we get

II % + = o J J ' - H % + ~%l]~ = II % + ~(~uo + ~w)71 ' - H n + ~(~% + ~w)tl~

= (1 + 4~) *Ill uo + ~ ( 1 + 4T)-lw ][2 _ [[,/~0 -~ ~(1-1- ~x)-lw[[21] = O(x2), when x-+0 so t h a t (12) is proved. F o r s y m m e t r y reasons we also h a v e

II vo + x n I1 ~ - II vo + ~Uoll~ =

O(x~),

when x ~ O .

Hence it follows t h a t

II Uo + ~voil ~ -

]]uo+xVol]~-x2(]lvo+x-luo]] ~ -

I] vo + x-~uo [[~)

= x~O(x -z) = 0(1), when x--> • c~

a n d L e m m a 2 is proved.

3 2 9

(4)

S. O. CARLSSON,

Characteristic property of Euclidean spaces

Proo[ o[ the theorem.

I t is sufficient to p r o v e t h e t h e o r e m i n t h e case t h a t B is t w o - d i m e n s i o n a l . L e t u 0 a n d v o be t h e e l e m e n t s i n t r o d u c e d a b o v e . Accord- i n g t o L e m m a 1 we h a v e

p lluo+q =911' >0 for

F r o m r e l a t i o n s (6) i t follows t h a t

p, II u. + q xvoll = o

for - o o < x < + ~ .

H e n c e t h e f u n c t i o n ~(x) satisfies

t n

for - ~ < x < + ~ . (15)

I f we use L e m m a 2 we see t h a t

x-~cp(x)

is i n t e g r a b l e over t h e i n t e r v a l ( - c~, + ~ ) . T h u s we m a y d i v i d e t h e i n e q u a l i t y (15) b y x ~ a n d i n t e g r a t e from - to + oo. T h e n we get

0 <

~lp, cf(q,x)x-~dx= ~ p,q~- ~ p~q~ 9 x-~cf(x)dx

- r \qv>O qv<0 / J - o o

=2 ~ p,q~ f ~ x-2qD(x)dx.

qu>0

B u t since ~q,>oP, q, > 0 a n d ~(x)~<0 for all x i t follows t h a t

~ ( x ) = 0 for - c o < x < + c o

or

Iluo+xvoll=lluo+xvoH1

for - o o < x < + o o .

This m e a n s t h a t C a n d E coincide or t h a t B is a E u c l i d e a n space, which was to be p r o v e d .

R E F E R E N C E S

1. CARLSSON, S. O., O r t h o g o n a l i t y in n o r m e d l i n e a r s p a c e s . A r k i v M a t . 4, 2 9 7 - 3 1 8 (1961).

2. DAY, ~M. lVI., N o r m e d l i n e a r s p a c e s . E r g e b n . d. M a t h . S p r i n g e r - V e r l a g , 1958.

3. SCHOENBERG, I. J . , A r e m a r k o n M. M. D a y ' s c h a r a c t e r i z a t i o n of i n n e r - p r o d u c t s p a c e s a n d a c o n j e c t u r e of L. M. B l u m e n t h a l . P r o e . A m e r . M a t h . Soc. 3, 9 6 1 - 9 6 4 (1952).

330

Tryckt den 25 juni 1964

Uppsala 1964. Almqvist & Wiksells Boktryckeri AB

Références

Documents relatifs

We show that if K is a compact metrizable space, then the Banach space CpKq has the so-called Blum-Hanson property exactly when K has finitely many accumulation points.. On the

It would be interesting to generalize Theorem 8 to general semisimple Lie groups without compact factors, and Theorem 7 to semisimple groups without compact factors and with

In the spirit of the Nash program, we propose characterizing all small irreducible components of X ∞ Sing in terms of birational morphisms Y → X, or in terms of the various

Resolution of the indeterminacy using double oriented blowings-up In this section we prove Lemma 1.8, that is: we can make regular each regulous function (or even each locally

Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré-Section B.. -- Let E have bounded approximation property. in the topology generated by ch. f’s of all symmetric Gaussian

To show that the exotic isometry flow of W 2 ( R ) is exceptional, let us consider the higher-dimensional case : there are isometries of W 2 ( R n ) that fix pointwise the set of

WHITEHEAD has given an example of a three-dimensional manifold W which is not (homeomorphic to) E'\ Euclidean 3-space [3]. We prove the follow- ing theorem about W', the first

We also focus on spaces of open sets, on which one can take advantage of the lattice structure to give a very neat characterization of the fixed-point property and again prove