• Aucun résultat trouvé

Comparative evaluation of two commercial rapid tests able to detect Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) antibody: Flavicheck HCV versus ImmunoComb® HCV II

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Comparative evaluation of two commercial rapid tests able to detect Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) antibody: Flavicheck HCV versus ImmunoComb® HCV II"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

CENTRE

HOSPITALIER UNIVERSITAIRE ANGERS

Comparative evaluation of two commercial rapid tests able to detect

Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) antibody: Flavicheck HCV versus ImmunoComb®

HCV II

A.Pivert, H. LeGuillou-Guillemette, A. Ducancelle, F. Lunel-Fabiani

Laboratoire de Virologie, Département des Agents Infectieux et Pharmaco-toxicologie, Pôle de Biologie CHU Angers, 4 rue Larrey, 49933 Angers Cedex 9.

INTRODUCTION

PATIENTS

RESULTS

Rapid test for HCV antibody (HCV-Ab) detection are useful in emergency case like blood exposure, and in developing country. However, such tests have to be as sensitive as routine automated immunoassays. In this study, we have compared two rapid tests: Flavicheck HCV (Qualpro Diagnostics) and ImmunoComb® II HCV (Inverness Medical Innovations).

METHODS

During this comparative evaluation, 100 samples were tested. Using the VITROS® anti-HCV assay (Ortho Clinical Diagnostics), 7 samples were negative, 2samples were in the grey zone and 91 samples were reactive (conclusions as recommended by the manufacturer). Among the HCV-Ab positive samples, 15 patients had documented chronic HCV infection and presented a detectable HCV RNA and 4 patients had documented acute infection (sero-conversion).

Both tests were negative in 20 samples (20%: orange). Among them, 6 samples were VITROS® anti-HCV negative and 14 samples were VITROS® anti-HCV reactive (ratio<10). Both tests were positive in 47 samples

(47%: purple): 1 sample was negative with the reference assay,2 samples were VITROS®

anti-HCV weakly reactive (ratio<10) and 44 samples were VITROS® anti-HCV reactive (ratio>10).

Discrepant results were observed in 33 samples (33%: green): 20

samples were HCV RNA undetectable and 13 were

HCV RNA detectable. Among

them, 13 and 6 samples respectively were reactive using immunoblot.

This study shows that Flavicheck HCV has a major

lack of sensitivity. In view of such results, the French Agency (AFSSAPS) withdrew it from the French

market. Our results show that careful and accurate evaluation of rapid tests is needed before CE mark approval.

CONCLUSIONS

ImmunoComb® II HCV

Flavicheck HCV

ImmunoBlot assay were performed using Inno-LIA™ HCV Score

(Innogenetics) and RIBA™ HCV 3.0 SIA (Chiron™). Viral RNA was detected by in-house real time PCR or by RealTime HCV assay (Abbott Molecular Diagnostics).

6

14 6

7

13

7

44

2 1

P.004

Références

Documents relatifs

Comme au trimestre précé- dent, cet arrêt de la dégradation de l'emploi total est impulsé par la progression de l'emploi marchand mais s'appuie également sur une dégradation

Technical Specifications Series for submission to WHO Prequalification – Diagnostic Assessment: Immunoassays to detect HCV antibody and/or antigen.. Geneva: World

Using dihydroethidium (DHE) as a marker for intracellular ROS, we found that hepatocyte-specific ROS levels were significantly higher in frozen liver sections from

Before the development of a cell culture system for HCV (HCVcc) in 2005 [2–4], selectable replicon systems [5] and retrovirus-based pseudotyped particles (HCVpp) [6–8] were major

cytosolic domain required for HCV infection and OCLN cell surface expression. Moreover, it emphasizes the specific involvement of the distal C-terminus domain of

Patients randomly assigned to group 2 (response-guided therapy) received peginterferon–ribavirin plus bo- ceprevir for a total of 24 weeks after the lead-in period; if HCV RNA

Patients were random- ly assigned to one of four treatment groups: the T12PR24 group, which received telaprevir (VX-950, Vertex Pharmaceuticals), peginterferon alfa-2a

direct sequence analysis of a portion of the nonstructural (NS) 5B-coding gene followed by phylogenetic analysis. The ability of the following commercial assays to correctly