C OMPOSITIO M ATHEMATICA
J OHANN C IGLER
Some applications of the individual ergodic theorem to problems in number theory
Compositio Mathematica, tome 16 (1964), p. 35-43
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=CM_1964__16__35_0>
© Foundation Compositio Mathematica, 1964, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Compositio Mathematica » (http:
//http://www.compositio.nl/) implique l’accord avec les conditions gé- nérales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions). Toute utili- sation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit conte- nir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
35
to
problems
in numbertheory
*by
Johann
Cigler
In this paper we shall
give
someapplications
of the individualergodic
theorem toproblems
which have theirorigin
in numbertheory,
such as thetheory
of normal numbers andcompletely uniformly
distributed sequences. It will be seen that theconcept
of normal number admits a very natural
generalization
to com-pact topological
groups, and we shall show that most of the known theorems on normal numbers remain true in thisgeneral
case.First of all we state some
general
results which will be used in thesequel.
Let X be a
compact topological
Hausdorff space with a coun- table base. On X we consider the Banach spaceC(X)
of all real- valued continuous functionsf
with the usualnorm 11/11
= supx~X11(x)l.
LetM(X)
be the set of allpositive
normed measures 03BC onX,
that is to say, the set of all continuous linear functionals ,u on
C(X)
whichsatisfy p(f)
> 0 for everynonnegative
functionf
and03BC(1)
= 1.In M(X)
we introduce the weak startopology.
Thismeans that a sequence Pn converges to ,u if and
only
if for everyf
eC(X)
the sequence03BCn(f)
converges to03BC(f).
Let furtherL03BC(X)
denote the space of all functions
integrable
withrespect
to ,u.Let T be a
mapping
of X onto itself.We denote the set of measures invariant with
respect
to Tby IT.
This means
Jl Elp
if andonly
iffx i(Tx)dlÀ(x)
=fx f(x)d03BC(x)
for
alliE C(X).
We say that
p-almost
all x E X have a certainproperty
if theset of x which do not possess this
property
has 03BC-measure zero.We call T
ergodic
withrespect top (,u
eET )
if for each measurable invariant set E( T-1 E
=E03BC-almost everywhere)
we havefl( E)
=0 or 1.
A measure v is said to be
absolutely
continuous withrespect
to* Nijenrode lecture
36
a
measure 03BC(v ,u),
ifp(f)
= 0 for anarbitrary
functionf
EL03BC(X) implies v(f)
= 0.Our main tool will be the individual
ergodic theorem,
which may be stated in thefollowing
form:1 f ,u
eET
andf
eL03BC(X),
thenfor p-almost
all x E X the relationholds.
Another theorem which we shall
frequently
use is thefollowing
one 1:
Il
v eIT, 03BC
eET
and 03BD ~ 03BC, then v = ,u.The
proof
isquite
easy and runs as follows:Let
1,.(x)
denote forbrevity f(Tnx).
Let A be the set of x e X which do notsatisfy (1 ).
Then,u(A )
= 0 and thereforeby
absolutecontinuity
alsov(A )
= 0. From the invariance of v it follows that..
Therefore
An easy consequence of this theorem is the
following
one:(Cf. [2]).
Let F be a set
o f nonnegative functions f
such that every continuousfunction
may beapproximated uniformly by
linear combinationsof functions
in F.Il
there exists a measure fl eET
and a constantC ~ 1, such that
(2)
lim- 1 f(Tnx) ~ C03BC(f), f
e Ffor
allf
eC(X).
For the
proof
we note that the set of measures{03BBN} given by
1 Cf. [1], [15],
is
compact.
If n denotes anarbitrary
limit measure, then itfollows
immediately
that ne IT
and that furthermore03C0(f) ~ Cy (t)
for all
f
e F. Therefore isabsolutely
continuous withrespect
to fl, and from our theorem we conclude that n = Il.We now consider the
following
situation: Let X be acompact
Abeliantopological
group with countable base and let T bea continuous
endomorphism
of X which isergodic
withrespect
toHaar measure  on X. The
ergodicity
of T may be stated in thefollowing purely algebraic way: 2
T isergodic
if andonly
if foreach nontrivial continuous
character X
of X all functionsx(Tnx) (n
= 0, 1, 2, 3,... )
are different.We mention some
special
cases:Let X be the one-dimensional torus, i.e. the additive group of real numbers reduced mod 1 in its natural
topology
and letTx = ax-
[ax],
where a > 1 is aninteger.
Then the sequence{Tnx}
becomes the sequence{anx}
mod 1. It is well-known(cf.
e.g.
[10])
that the sequence{an x}
isuniformly
distributed if andonly
if x is normal to base a.As another
example
let X be the k-dimensional torus and let T denote thetransformation t - Aï
mod 1, where A is a k x k- matrix withnonvanishing
determinant all of whose entries areintegers
such that noeigenvalue
is a root ofunity.
Inanalogy
with the one-dimensional case we
call
normal withrespect
to A if the sequence
{An}
isuniformly
distributed mod 1.3 We now turn to thegeneral
case. We call an element x e Xnormal with
respect
to theendomorphism T,
if the sequence{Tnx}
isuniformly
distributed withrespect
to Haar measure Â. 4It
follôws immediately
from the individualergodic
theorem that A-almost all x e X are normal withrespect
to T. For all onehas to show is that for almost all x e X and all nontrivial charac-
ters X
of XThe individual
ergodic
theoremimplies
this relation for each fixed character Z. From this our theorem follows because the set of characters is denumerable.Another consequence of the above theorems is that if x is normal with
respect
to T, then x is also normal withrespect
to2 This theorem is due to Rochlin [18].
3 A special case has been considered by lklaxfield [9].
4 Cf. [3].
38
every power of T. From the
algebraic
characterization ofergodi- city
we conclude that A EEpk
for every k. For everynonnegative
function
f
eC(X)
we have theinequality
Here the
right
hand side converges tok03BB(f) by assumption,
therefore we have
and this
together
with our theoremimplies
The converse assertion is
trivial,
viz. if x is normal withrespect
to apower of
T,
then it is normal withrespect
to T. For we then havefor every continuous function
f.
Consider the functions
/(Ti x) for j
= 1, 2, ..., k-1 and add theseequations.
Then onegets
i.e. x is normal with
respect
to T.A
special
case is e.g. the well-known fact that if x is normal tobase a,
then it is normal to base ak(k
= 1, 2, 3,...)
andconversely.
In the k-dimensional case weget
thecorollary:
Let Abe a
nonsingular
k X k-matrix withintegral entries,
none of whoseeigenvalues
is a root ofunity,
then the uniform distribution mod 1 of the sequence{An} implies
the uniform distribution of the sequences{Akn+p }
mod 1(l
> 1,0 p 1).
Let A denote amatrix of the above form. Then a sufficient condition for the uniform distribution of the sequence
{An} is
that for every k-dimensional cube V which lies in the unit cube the relationholds. Here
A(N,V)
denotes the number of vectors{An},
1 n
N,
whichbelong
to Vand IVI
denotes the volume of v. 5.Let now S be a continuous
measure-preserving endomorphism
of X. Let H be the set of all h E X with Sh = e. We assume that H is a finite group of order k. Then the
following
theorem holds:Let T be an
ergodic endomorphism
which commutes withS,
TS =ST. Then
from
theuniform
distributionof
the sequence{Tnx} follows
the
uniform
distributionof
the sequence{Tn yl for
each y E S-1 x.PROOF: We first note that if the sequence
{xn}
isuniformly
distributed in
X,
then the sequence{(S-1xn)}*6
isuniformly
distributed in the
factor-group XfH.
It is sufficient to show 7 that for each closed set M* in
XfH
whose
boundary
has measure zero the relationholds. Now let M be a measurable set in X. If x e
M,
then(S-lx)*
E(S-1M)*
andconversely. By assumption
we have03BB(M) = Â(S-’M)
=03BB*((S-1M)*).
The last relation follows from the fact that S-1M contains with each element x the whole residue class xH.Let now M be an
arbitrary
closed subset of X whoseboundary
is a null set. Then also the
boundary
of(S-1M)*
is a null set andwe have
Now each set
M* C XIH
may berepresented
in the form M* ==(S-1M1)*
with someM1 X;
take forexample Ml
= SM*.This proves
(3).
For ye S-lx,
it is obviousthat, Tn y
E Mimplies (S-1Tnx )* ~ M
= S-ISM. Therefore we have for each closed set M whoseboundary
is a null set6 Special cases are considered in [16], [13], [12].
6 x* denotes the image of x under the natural homomorphism from X to X/H.
7 Cf. [5], § 12. In the following formula A* denotes Haar measure on XIH and 99. the characteristic function of the set M.
40
The last
inequality
follows from the fact thatM S-1 SM UhEx
Mh. Therefore each limit measure of the sequence{Tny}
is invariant with
respect
to T andabsolutely
continuous withrespect
to 03BB. Thisimplies
that the sequence{Tny}
isuniformly
distributed in
X, q.e.d.
A
particular
case is the well-known result(cf. [10])
that ifx is normal to base a, then also rx is normal to base a, where
r ~ 0 denotes an
arbitrary
rational number. Another consequence is that the uniform distribution of the sequence{An}8 implies
the uniform distribution of the sequence
{AnB-1}
for each non-singular integral
matrix B which commutes with A.We now consider another situation:
Let X be a
compact
Hausdorff space with countable base. LetX03C9,
denote theproduct
spaceX.
=03A0~i=1Xi,
where allX
= X.X.
may be identified with the space of all sequences (j) =
{xn}
withxn E X. In the usual
product topology X(J)
isagain
acompact
Hausdorff space with countable base. A set
C X03C9,
of the form C =(m
={xn}: xkl
EA1, ..., Xki
E Ai},
wherek1,
...,ki
i are arbi-trary positive integers
andA1, ..., Au
arecompact
subsetsof X,
iscalled a
cylinder
set. For a measure p in X let ¡,t(J) denote the associ- atedproduct
measure inX,
i.e. IÀ. is defined on the leastsigma- algebra containing
allcylinder
sets and03BC03C9(C) = 03BC(A1)
...03BC(A 1).
In
X(J)
we define a transformationT,
called the shift transfor- mationby
T03C9 =T{xn} = {xn+1}.
It iseasily
checked that T is measurepreserving
andergodic
withrespect
to eachproduct
measure 03BC03C9. Therefore
03BC03C9-almost
all sequences{xn} satisfy
for every
f
EC(X(aeI).
If a sequence cv fulfills
(4)
it is calledcompletely
distributed withrespect
to the measure ,u.Of course our
general
theorems areapplicable
also in this case.For
instance,
if(2)
holds on a set ofnonnegative
functionsf
which is
uniformly
dense inC(X),
then the sequence co ={xn}
is
completely
distributed withrespect
to y. 9.The most
important special
case is X =[0, 1 ]
and p =Lebesgue
measure. It is easy to see that the sequence
{xn}
iscompletely
8 Here A denotes as above an integral matrix with det A ~ 0, which has no root of unity as eigenvalue.
9 In the special case X = . [0, 1 ] this has been proved by Postnikow [14].
uniformly
distributed if andonly
if foreach k ~
1 the sequences{(xn,
xn+1, ... ,xn+k-1)}
areuniformly
distributed in the k-dimen- sional unit cube.Let now x
= l xnlan
be therepresentation
of x to base a > 1 and let x be normal to this base. Then it is well known that the sequence{xn} (which obviously belongs
toIIX;,
where eachXi
= X ={0,
i, ...,a-1})
iscompletely
distributed with re-spect
to the measure p on X definedby p(1)
=1/a (i
= 0, 1, ...,a-1)
andconversely.
This shows the close relation between theconcepts
of normal number andcomplete
distribution of a sequence.This connection has been studied in
greater
detailby
E. Hlawka[7].
It is
perhaps interesting
to note that if a > 1 is a transcendental number, then for almost all x the sequence{anx}
iscompletely uniformly
distributed mod 1 lo.The last theorem cannot be obtained with the aid of the individual
ergodic theorem,
because fornonintegral
a the expres- sion a"x is notrepresentable
in the formT"x,
where T denotes amapping
of the unit interval into itself. It is of course animportant question
to consider the transformation Tx =~x-[~x],
whereà > 1 is not an
integer
and tostudy
theasymptotic
behavior of the sequence{Tnx}.
This has first been doneby
A.Rényi [17],
whoproved
that for almost all x the sequence T"x has a distributionmeasure. The
explicit
form of this distribution measure has been obtainedindependently by
Gelfond[6]
andParry [11].
Anotherproof
isgiven
in[4].
This distribution measure isabsolutely
continuous with
respect
toLebesgue
measure in[0, 1]
and itsdensity att)
isgiven by
1
might
concludeby stating
the famous theorem of Gausz and Kusmin: Let x =[x1,
xz, ..., aen,...]
be the continued fractionexpansion
of the number x e[0, 1].
Let Tx =1/x- [1/x],
i.e.Tx =
[x2,
x3,...]
Then for almost all x the sequence{Tnx}
has adistribution measure which is
absolutely
continuous withrespect
to
Lebesgue
measure and whosedensity p(x)
isgiven by 1/log
2 -1/1+x.
A
proof
of this theorembelonging
toergodic theory
has beengiven by
C.Ryll-Nardzewski [19].
10 This follows in an easy way from a general theorem of Koksma hBJ, cf. also [2].
1
42
BIBLIOGRAPHY J. R. BLUM and D. L. HANSON
[1] On invariant probability measures I, Pacific J. Math. 10, 1125 -1129 (1960).
J. CIGLER
[2] Der individuelle Ergodensatz in der Theorie der Gleichverteilung mod 1, J. reine angew. Math. 205, 91-100 (1960).
J. CIGLER
[3] Ein gruppentheoretisches Analogon zum Begriff der normalen Zahl, J. reine angew. Math. 206, 5 - 8 (1961).
J. CIGLER
[4] Ziffernverteilung in v-adischen Brüchen, Math. Zeitschr. 75, 8-13 (1961).
J. CIGLER und G. HELMBERG
[5] Neuere Entwicklungen der Theorie der Gleichverteilung, Jahresber. DMV 64, 1-50 (1961).
A. O. GELFOND
[6] Über eine allgemeine Eigenschaft von Zahlsystemen, (russ.), Izvest. Akad.
Nauk SSSR, Ser. mat. 23, 809 - 814 (1959).
E. HLAWKA
[7] Folgen auf kompakten Räumen II, Math. Nachr. 18, 188-202 (1958).
J. F. KOKSMA
[8] Ein mengentheoretischer Satz über die Gleichverteilung mod. Eins, Compositio
math. 2, 250 - 258 (1935).
J. E. MAXFIELD
[9] Normal k-tuples, Pacific J. Math. 3, 189 -196 (1953).
I. NIVEN
[10] Irrational Numbers, New York 1956.
W. PARRY
[11] On the 03B2-expansion of real numbers, Acta math. (hung. ) 11, 401-416 (1960).
A. M. POLOSUEV
[12] On the uniformity of the distribution of a system of functions forming the
solution of a system of linear finite-difference equations of first order. Dokl.
Akad. Nauk SSSR 123, 405-406 (1958).
A. G. POSTNIKOW
[13] A criterion for the uniform distribution of an exponential function in the complex domain, Vestn. Leningr. Univ. 13, 812014 88 (1957).
A. G. POSTNIKOW
[14] A criterion for a completely uniformly distributed sequence, Dokl. Akad.
Nauk SSSR 120, 973-975 (1958).
A. G. POSTNIKOW and I. I. PYATECKII
[15] Markov-sequence of symbols and continued fractions, Izvest. Akad. Nauk SSSR 21, 729-746 (1957).
I. I. PYATECKII
[16] On the distribution functions of the fractional parts of an exponential function, Izvest. Akad. Nauk SSSR 15, 47-52 (1951).
A. RÉNYI
[17] Representations for real numbers and their ergodic properties, Acta math.
(hung.) 8, 477-493 (1957).
W. A. ROCHLIN
[18] On endomorphisms of compact Abelian groups, Izvest. Akad. Nauk SSSR 13, 329 - 340 (1949).
C. RYLL-NARDZEWSKI
[19] On the ergodic theorems II, Studia math. 12, 74-79 (1951).
(Oblatum 29-5-63)