• Aucun résultat trouvé

Rural Development and Canadian Provinces:

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Rural Development and Canadian Provinces: "

Copied!
14
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Tri-National Agricultural Accord Rural Development Workshop

Overview of Canadian Provinces

April 14, 2005

Sacramento, California

Robert Greenwood, Ph.D.

Director, Leslie Harris Centre of Regional Policy and Development, Memorial University of Newfoundland

and

President, Canadian Rural Revitalization Foundation robg@mun.ca

(2)
(3)

Rural Development and Canadian Provinces:

Setting the Context (1)

† 10 provinces and 3 territories (northern)

† Agriculture as key rural sector varies by province, and regions within provinces

† Agriculture as source of employment declining, even where value of production maintained or increasing

† Forestry, fishing, mining mostly same trends

(4)

Rural Development and Canadian Provinces:

Setting the Context (2)

† Defining rural: many definitions; present purposes – outside Census Metropolitan Areas (CMAs) = urban centre with catchment of commuting area of 100,000

† 3 “rurals”

¾ Rural adjacent to urban

¾ Rural non-adjacent

¾ Rural remote (mostly northern areas of provinces)

(5)

Rural Development: Definitions

† Sectoral Development (agriculture, fishery, forestry, etc.)

† Diversification building on primary sectors:

capturing linkages (upstream and downstream)

† Diversification into new sectors (tourism, non- resource based manufacturing, “new-economy”)

† Capacity building

(6)

Rural Development:

Strategy vs. Structure

Strategies:

† Infrastructure

† Human resource development

† Investment attraction

† Entrepreneurship / SMEs

† Community/Regional Development: integrate

economic, social, and environmental; place based

(7)

Rural Development:

Strategy vs. Structure

Structures:

† Federal and provincial government organization

† Municipal / County

† Community / Regional “Third Sector” organizations

† “De-centralization” ≠ “De-concentration”

(8)

Political Power vs. Political Will

Political Power

Political Will Regional

Provincial Federal

Denzil Doyle

(9)

Organizational Structures for Local Development

† Fiscal Resources

† Human Resources

„ Leadership

„ Skilled Staff

„ Community Participation

† Legal Authority

† Local Democratic Accountability/Legitimacy

† Geographic Area

† Time

(10)

Provincial Government Structures for Rural Development (1)

Top-down:

† Government Departments /Ministries

¾ Only Saskatchewan with dedicated department

¾ Others in Agriculture Depts. (Alberta, Manitoba),

Municipal (Ont., Que.), Economic Development (NS, NB, NL), Community Development (BC, PEI)

¾ Rural Secretariat (NL)

† Regional Councils / Task Force / Action Committee (eg. Alberta, Sask., NL), with appointed members

(11)

Provincial Government Structures for Rural Development (2)

Bottom-up:

† Regional Development Boards / Corporations

¾ Sub-provincial regions / localities

¾ Some Multi-stakeholder; some Business representation only

¾ Regional Development Strategies to guide investments

¾ Volunteer Board; Paid Staff

¾ Multi-community collaboration

¾ Varying funding arrangements

† Municipalities / Municipal Development Corporations

† Third Sector (co-ops, social, economic, environmental)

† Other: Industry Associations; Regional Trusts (BC)

(12)

Rural Development Strategies

† Provincial Rural Strategies (most provinces); others with economic development and/or innovation strategies, with some rural components

† Many with Northern / Peripheral Community Strategies

† Strategies recognize need for integrated approach:

infrastructure, diversification, human resources, health, services, technology

† Challenges:

¾ Integrate across government dept. “silos”

¾ Meet needs within specific regions: “one size does not fit all”

¾ Continuity: “that was them, this is us” syndrome

(13)

Rural Development Trends / Emerging Strategies

† Inter-community Cooperation

† Rural-Urban Interaction

† Performance Contracts / Accountability Frameworks

† Business Retention and Expansion (BR&E) Programs

† Rural Immigration Strategies

† Eco-industrial Networks

† IT as enabler; necessary but not sufficient

† Web-based GIS / Community Profiles

† Social Economy

(14)

Concluding Remarks

† Provincial Governments as facilitators / enablers:

learn to “let go” in development activities best addressed within localities

† Rural Development ≠ Population Growth

† Integrate Economic, Social, Environmental in Strategies and Actions; clarify who does what

† Run with Champions; Celebrate Success

Références

Documents relatifs

Nowadays rural areas are facing two fundamental types of change, suggesting that there is no longer a dominant model: they are subject to increasingly strong in fl uence from cities

Associated with socio-economic factors, climate change can be a catalyst for cross-border and international migration, as the projected flows of internal climate migrants are

Immigrants can help communities restructure within the new rural economy, in which diverse communities are afforded more opportunity for prosperity. Immigrant entrepreneurs are a key

• Social Fields highlights innovation in cultural, social and territorial contexts.. Source: Floysand and

In this paper, we draw upon the Peace River region of northeastern British Columbia (BC), Canada, where the oil and gas industry has been well established for decades. We begin with

intended goals of the tourism project, the Gurung and Damai people, in general, referred to the enterprise as “a good thing.” Although Gurung community leaders frequently

either was modified to various other kinds of program such as area development or integraled rural development program or it got limited to the project level in various

The NEPAD Water and Sanitation Programme is promoting a strategy comprising a Medium to Long-term Strategic Framework (MLTSF) and a Short Term Action Plan (STAP). The implementation