• Aucun résultat trouvé

Indigenous peoples and local communities' water rights, international law and water security

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Indigenous peoples and local communities' water rights, international law and water security"

Copied!
13
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Book Chapter

Reference

Indigenous peoples and local communities' water rights, international law and water security

TIGNINO, Mara, et al.

TIGNINO, Mara, et al. Indigenous peoples and local communities' water rights, international law and water security. In: XVI World Water Congress. 2017.

Available at:

http://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:101273

Disclaimer: layout of this document may differ from the published version.

(2)

Alexan Blanca UNESC Mona P Darlen Mara T Law, U

1. The Freshw to disa living in of adeq the lar access countri At the climate develo alters r water q time, f pressu and so Poor r Cisnero

1“The c quality fo protectio and drou

Indig

nder Otte, I a Jiménez-C

CO

Polacca, C e Sanders Tignino, Pla University o

Abstract In this p scientific, expression Indigenous Nations d predomina examines connection sustainabl and to con

water situ water challe sters such n areas wi quate qual rgest hum s to safe

es, have n same tim e change

pment mo rainfall pat quality and floods and re on wat ciety. (IPC ural popul os et al. 20

apacity of a or sustaining on of life and ughts.” (UNE

genous pe inte nternation Cisneros, Co-Secreta son, Assista

atform for I of Geneva

aper conv geograph ns of Indi s declarat evelopmen antly conce example ns betwee

e future o ntribute to m

uation affe enges, fro h as floods th high wa ity and qu an health

drinking w no access t me, water

and oth odel (growt tterns, soil d also caus d droughts

er resourc CC 2014)

lations are 013). While

population to g human and

property ag ESCO-IHP 20

eoples and ernational

al Hydrolo Secretary riat, Indige ant Profes Internation

verge per hical and

genous w tions, inter nt agenda entrating o es of en that ap

f clean an meeting th

ecting Ind m water s and droug ater securit

antity alon problems water, som to improve

resources er global th), urbani moisture, ses chang s are risin ces, with t

e most affe e Indigeno o safeguard a

ecosystem ainst water r 012; Jiménez

d local com law and w gical Prog of the Inte enous Wor sor, Schoo nal Water L

rspectives indigenou worldviews

rnational w a with reg

on parts o instrument ppear usef nd safe wa he Sustaina

igenous p carcity, po ghts, affec ty1 threats.

ng with the s globally.

me 2.5 b ed sanitatio

are unde drivers, zation and humidity, ges to unde

g in frequ remendou

ected by t ous people

access to ad health on a w related hazar

z-Cisneros e

mmunities water secu ramme, UN rnational H rld Forum o ol of Nursin Law/Genev

of autho s backgro

enshrined water law

ard to wa of the Ame ts, imple ful to colle ater for com

able Devel

peoples oor quality, ct some 80 . The lack

lack of sa More tha illion, ove on facilities er increasin

such as d land-use

glacier-ma erground w uency and

s impact o

the lack o s account dequate quan

watershed ba rds — floods et al. 2013)

s' water ri urity

NESCO Hydrologica

on Water a ng, Thomp va Water H

ors from d ounds. Sp d in intern and the ater securi

ericas, the ementation ectively cr ming gene opment Go

lack of sa

% of the w of access fe sanitatio an 600 mi

rwhelming s.

ngly sever the prev e changes.

ass balanc water sour d intensity, on the nat

of water se for about ntities of wat asis, and to e s, landslides,

ghts,

al Program and Peace son Rivers Hub, Facult

diverse panning national United ity and e paper n and

reate a erations

oals.

anitation fa world’s pop to drinking on remain

llion peop gly in dev

re pressur valent ec . Climate c ce and rive rces. At the , exerting tural enviro

ecurity (Jim 5% of the er of accepta ensure efficie land subside

mme,

s ty of

acilities, pulation g water among ple lack

eloping

re from onomic change er flow, e same further onment

ménez- world’s able

ent ence

(3)

popula approx traditio includin commu Sustain The 20 conside pledge will be consult explicit founde sustain stated manag Indigen also wi

2. Indig It is str attentio techno even if and wo great d rather t For ins the wo stream sacred the hea rivers a Among adequa countri Despite environ many p policy d From t People sugges Indigen have n

tion, estim ximately 15 ns have o ng its wat unity now nable Deve 030 Agend er Indigeno of the Un e left beh

tation proc t reference ed on prin

nability”, as (UNPFII gement of w

nous peop ith regard t

genous va riking that on in intern

-scientific f using Eng

orldviews diversity a than distan stance, am orld, Elders ms are the

mat that l alth of all p are polluted g the billio

ate sanita es, Indige e proven s nment, the policies an developme their role a es have va

st alternati nous peop ot been int

mated over 5% of the ften mainta ter, for th

seeks to elopment”.

da, its Su ous people ited Nation hind” (Uni cess for the es to Indig nciples of

s the UN 2016). S water and le are refe to the Goa

alues and the views national w and even glish as a w

may differ and describ nt observat mong many s have sh arteries a inks all of people, pla d, and the ns of peop ation, man enous peo

sustainable e lived exp

d strategie ent and clim

as original luable insi ves to cu ples have

tegrated in

r 370 milli poor. Yet ained a su housands

reach by “

ustainable es among ns (UN) Ge ited Natio e 2030 Age

genous pe universalit Permanen SDG 6, a sanitation erred to in als’ implem

practices s of Indige water disco n financial widespread

from this bed often

tion or des y Indigeno hared that and veins

Life. Indige ants and an

Pacific Oc ple who liv ny are In

ples do no e cultural periences es for actio

mate chan l caretake ghts for su rrent wate

been usin n many loc

ion person , Indigeno ustainable

of years —

“Transform

Developm the vulner eneral Ass ons 2015) enda helpe eoples’ rig

ty, human nt Forum aims to e n for all (6

the SDGs entation.

s and hege nous peop urse. Inde

approach d means of discourse in a man scription.

us people Water ha of Mother enous peo nimals. Tod cean has a

ve without ndigenous

ot have a practices of Indigen on, the scie ge adaptat rs and gu ustainable er manage

ng sustain al, regiona

ns (UNPFI us people balance w

— a capa ming our w

ment Goals rable group sembly’s R ). Their p ed “designi hts and d n rights, e for Indige ensure av .b). Howev s as much

emonic int ples often eed, the lat

h. Languag f expressio e. Worldvie nner displa

s of the A as its own r Earth, an oples know day, most an ongoing t access to

commun ccess to s

that respe nous comm entific world tion strateg ardians of

water prac ment and nable prac al or interna

II no date s’ knowled with their liv

acity that world: the 2

s (SDG) a ps, include Resolution

participatio ing a frame developme equality an enous Issu

vailability ver, it may

as they sh

ternationa receive co tter is prim ge of Indi on and in a ews and p aying perso

Americas a n life force nd that the w that wate

of Mother leak of rad o clean dr

ities. Eve safe, clean ect and ho munities ar d is looked gies.

f Mother E ctices that governan ctices for s

ational pro

), they co dge system ving enviro

the intern 2030 Age

and relate ed in the re

70/1 “that n in the ework that nt concern nd environ ues (UNPF and sust y be questi hould have

al discours omparative marily drive igenous p academic c

erceptions onal involv

and other p e, that rive e oceans a

r is necess Earth’s lak dioactive w rinking wat en in dev n drinking onour the

re overloo d to for both

Earth, Indig could info ce system sanitation.

grammes

nstitute ms and onment,

national nda for

d texts epeated

no one global makes ns, […]

nmental FII) has

ainable ioned if e been,

se ely little en by a eoples, context, s are of vement

parts of ers and are the sary for kes and waste.

ter and veloped

water.

natural ked. In h water

genous orm and ms. E.g.

These as they

(4)

do not unknow and ma A grow are uni at the was is Indigen Peace interna Since t (Kyoto interna New Y agenci and Pe their fin Simulta commu of their

3. Cas global The is Engine In the constru without reques proces pipeline SRST’s their hu Basica Indigen calling rights o of inte particip quality An imp

2 http://m

t receive wn or are a ay not refle wing comm

ifying to ad World Ind ssued to nous-led c (IWFWP) ational wate

then, there , Japan, 2 ational Indi York (2007

es concern eace. The nal report.

aneously to unity, Indig r rights.

es of reco contexts ssue Stand eers

USA, th uction of h

t including sting a full E

s taking o e leaking, s cultural unting and lly, this ca nous Peop

upon gove of Indigeno ernationally pation in d and quant portant po

media.knet.ca

proper tec assessed u ect a given

unity of Ind ddress the

igenous P Indigenous conference

) in view er agenda.

e have bee 003; Mexi igenous D 7, 2008, 2 ned with w

Secretaria

o these att genous peo

ognition of ding Rock

ere is a hazardous g the trib

Environme n board th spills co resources fishing rig ase raises ples around ernments w ous People

y defined decision-m tity of wate int the Ind a/node/1952

chnical ac using tech

system’s digenous l imbalance Peoples Co s peoples e on water to increas .

en similar co City, 20 Declaration

2009 and water, to su

at of the 2

tempts to in oples strug

f Indigeno k Sioux Tr long histo

projects es in the ental Impac he Tribe's ontaminatin

along the ghts.

s the sam d the world worldwide es, includin d rights w making on

er that affec digenous P

2

cknowledg no-scientif value in its eaders fro e in human onference s to addre

r: an Indig se the we

calls at the 0062; and

s. Interve 2011), ur upport an In

2007 UNP

nfluence th ggled in ve

ous people ribe (SRS

ory in the through tr e decision ct Study th concerns ng the Mi e pipeline

me concern d (cf. sectio and their ng their rig would giv developm cting them Peoples pu

ement, be fic standard s specific c om across t nity’s relati on Educa ess water genous W eight of In

e 3rd, 4th, Istanbul, T ntions we rging all n

ndigenous PFII include

he discours ery concret

es water r T) vs. Un e federal ribal lands

-making p hat would a

and issues ssouri Riv corridor, a

n/issue co on 5.3 and water min ght to wate ve Indigen ents that .

ut forward

ecause the ds that are context.

the regions ionship wit ation in Hil issues b World Forum

ndigenous

and 5th W Turkey 200 re submitt nations’ st s-led World

ed this rec

se of the in te cases fo

rights in n nited State governme , waters a process. S allow a form s regarding ver, and t as well as

onsistently d 5.4 below isters to fu er. The pra

nous Peo could hav

is for the

ey either e culturally

s of Mothe th water. In

o, Hawai’i by organiz m on Wat peoples

World Wate 09), in res ted at UN ates and d Forum on commenda

nternationa or the reco

ational an es Army C

ent’s gran and cultura SRST has mal govern g the risks the protec other imp

raised by w) who hav ully recogn actical reco oples mea ve impact

e governm

remain biased

er Earth n 1999, , a call zing an

ter and on the

er Fora spective PFII in

all UN n Water

ation in

al water ognition

nd Corp of nting of al sites s been nmental s of the ction of pacts to

y many ve been nize the ognition aningful on the

ents to

(5)

recogn minimu People should cover develo UNDR 12, the culture practic which Article Indigen langua Sander a right develo to heal Preserv life and Bolivia Bolivia Perma recogn in the land (A Aotear and th Whang Agreem entity”.

people Indigen aforem and a r

4. Exis Throug sacred agricult interco trade-o produc The In relation have r

nize and re um standa es (UNDR

go beyon the amou pment of c IP also art e 147 sign

, spirituali e this cult leads to th 13 defines nous childr

ge is our rson). Artic

to full part p water po lth: the nee ving the pr d sound ba has includ

’s Preside nent Forum nized that t

world to re Article 71 oa (New Z his knowle ganui Iwi ment (2012 In many I , plants an nous wor mentioned d

right for he

sting claim ghout Indig . Besides ture, it is nnectedne offs betwe ction, and e ndigenous

nship that reserved w

spect the s ard reflecte IP) (UN 2 nd quantitie

unt of wa communitie iculates th natories re

ty and tha ture. Wate he right to s the right ren how to r law” (H.

cle 18 defin icipation in olicies that

ed for clea rerequisite asis for sus ded Indige ent Evo Mo

m on Indig he planet E ecognize t

of the E Zealand), h edge and and the 2) carried t

ndigenous nd animals rld views

documents er waters to

ms by Indig genous lan

being used used in ce ess of all lif een the u economic d

peoples o was esta water righ

standards ed in the 2007). Mor

es to be u ater that es and to e

e right to w ecognize t at free pri er is funda

fully partic ts to distin

care for w . Waikere nes the rig n decisions

t are guide an water to e for good h stainable d

nous peop orales call genous Iss Earth has the legal r Ecuadorian have asse

practice Crown, those decis s communi s with ever and th s, the Eart o be protec

genous pe nds and te

d for drinki eremonies

fe. Nearly se of wa developme of the Un

blished ea hts recogn

of free, pri UN Decla reover, the sed for dri

would be ensure the water and o

that Indige ior and in amental to cipate in a nct languag water, in the puru, 200 ht to decis s that affec ed by their

o have hea health will

evelopmen ples’ rights led for a U sues (2007

rights. In 2 rights of na n Constitu

rted that th is enshrin 2012). Th sions forth ties, Elder rything we

e sovere th has an cted and su

eoples an erritories of

ing, sanitat and in pr all Indigen ater for cu

ent.

ited State arly in the

ized by t

ior and info aration on

e recognit inkable pu e necessa welfare of other hum enous peo

formed co o Indigeno any decisio ge and ed

eir respect 01 persona sion-making ct their wate traditions.

althy tradit mean a he nt practice

in its Con UN Conve 7). Moreov 2008, Ecua ature — o ution). Riv he Whang ned by N he Bolivia h to state th

s teach tha need to s eign decis

inherent r ustainably

d internat f North Am

tion and fo rayer and nous tribal ultural, dri

s have a county’s he Congre

ormed con the Righ tion of the urposes an

ary to pro f their envir

an rights.

oples have onsent def ous people ons that af

ucation sy tive langua al commu g: Indigeno ers (as in A Article 24 tional food ealthy envi

.

stitution (In ention on W

ver, severa ador becam f its moun ers have ganui River

ew Zeala an Cocha hat “Mothe at Mother E ustain life.

sions exp right to be managed.

tional law merica, wa or tribal-ba

serves as communiti inking, ag

unique le history. I ess of the

nsent (FPIC hts of Indig eir right to nd basic ne omote ec ronment.

In Articles e a right t fines the r es spiritua ffect their w ystems tha age, becau unication w

ous people Article 11), 4 defines th

s and med ironment fo

nc. O.U.P.

Water at t al countrie me the first ntains, rive

rights: M r is a living

nd law (T bamba P er Earth is Earth prov According pressed

free of po .

ater is cons sed livesto s a symbol ies are fac griculture,

egal and p Indigenous e United

C), as a genous o water

eeds to onomic

11 and to their right to al lives, waters.

at teach use “our with D.

es have , and to he right dicines.

or all of

2009).

the UN es have t nation rs, and Maori in

g being Tutohu, Peoples’

a living vides all g to the in the ollution,

sidered ock and l of the ced with energy

political s tribes

States.

(6)

Indigen rights, Winters implied reserva At inte Indigen standa rights Indigen and 15 Inter-A respec Americ decent Inter-A consum are con togethe been v relation be dep approp under subject case, 2 Relying African on Hu Develo Welfare informa resourc concer Minorit behalf

5. Curr Indige 5.1 Co The law protect Conven (UN W Interna contain

nous Treat an issue s v. United dly reserve

ation.

ernational nous peop rd of living systems h nous group 51; African American h

ct. In its dec can Court

t existence American C mption, tog nsidered th er, led to t violated. S n to Article prived of th priate mea

their oblig t to their 2010, para g heavily o n Commiss uman and opment (Ke re Council

ation and p ces. The v rned Indige ty Rights D

of Endoroi

rent intern nous peo nventions w of trans tion of wa ntion on th Watercours

ational Law n provision

ties with th which the d States, ed water

level, it les live pro g and a d have gran ps. (Inter-A n Commiss human rig

cision Xák spoke of t e. In the c Court found gether with he basics the aforem Specifically e 1(1) of th heir life arb sures to p ation to en

jurisdiction . 187) on the juris

sion linked Peoples’

enya) and v. Kenya public part violation of enous com Developme is Welfare

national te ples wate s

boundary ater resour

he Law of ses Conve w Commiss ns that refe

e US gove U.S. Sup 207 U.S.

rights ne

has been ovides the dignified lif nted on se

American C sion on Hu

hts bodie kmok Kásek

the right to case of th d that the l h a lack of for protect mentioned j y, the Cou he America bitrarily (ne protect and nsure the n” (Xákmo

sprudence the land Rights.

Minority R case, the ticipation a f this right mmunity, an

ent (Kenya Council v.

exts and d r issues

water reso rces throu

the Non-N ention) – sion’s Draft er to huma

ernment typ preme Cou

564 (1908 ecessary

n recogniz water reso fe. The Int everal occ Court of H uman and s have re k Indigeno o use natu he Xákmok lack of acc f access to ting the rig

judgment’s urt stated an Conven egative obl d preserve full and fr ok Kásek

of the Inte and water In the la Rights Grou

African Co are means

includes th nd not hav

a) and Mi Kenya, 20 declaration

ources inc gh the len Navigationa entered in ft Articles o an needs. W

pically did urt address 8). The Co to meet

zed that t ources ind ter-Americ casion coll uman Righ

People’s endered im ous Commu

ural resour k Kásek In cess to wa

o food, he ght to a life

s conclusio that com tion, requi igation), bu e the right

ree exercis Indigenous

er-America r rights wit ndmark C up Internat ommission s for exerc he failure ing obtaine inority Rig 010, paras

ns particu

creasingly ns of hum al Uses of nto force on the Law

While thes

not specify sed in its ourt held t

the purpo

the enviro ispensable an and th lective rig hts 2001 p

Rights 20 mportant d unity v. Pa rces as pa ndigenous ater that w ealth, and

e with dign on that the mpliance “w res not on ut also tha to life (po se of the r s Commu

n human r h the 198 Centre for

tional on b n considere

ising the r to properly ed their co hts Group . 266-268)

larly relev

sees the m man needs

Internation in 2014 – w of Transb

se instrume

y the tribes 1908 deci hat tribal t ose of a

onment in e for an ad

e African hts protec para.140 (B

02, para.6 decisions araguay, th art of a rig Commun as apt for education nity and an e right to l with Article nly that no at States ad ositive oblig rights of al

nity v. Pa

rights syste 1 African C r Minority behalf of En

ed that acc right to use y consult w onsent (Ce p Internatio

).

vant to

manageme s. Both the nal Waterc

– and the boundary A ents do no

s’ water ision in treaties

tribe’s

which dequate human ction to

B), 149 63) The in this e Inter- ght to a nity, the human , which nalyzed

life had e 4, in person dopt all gation), ll those araguay em, the Charter Rights ndorois cess to e water with the ntre for onal on

ent and e 1997 courses

e 2008 Aquifers ot make

(7)

explicit Human aquifer and rea of notif for the The 19 uses o require on Wat needs”

immed water n this de as the not cov right to these c justice Water:

have a interna para.55 Waterc guaran The im interna accoun which Conven factors the UN manne needs”

whethe

“conse promot

“presen Article accoun factor t human reason The pro instrum

t reference n needs, in rs, are to b asonable u fication of

potentially 997 UN W of a water ements of v

ter Resour

”. In Article iate huma needed for

finition onl water req vered. Larg o water, red cases, the

and reme

“Any pers access to e ational leve

5). In this courses C ntee access mplementa ational wate

nt their spe might sign ntion.” (Lo which are N Waterco er, which in

” of the rip er future n rvation, m tion of the nt and futu

5 (2) of t nt vital hu to be cons n needs ar nable utiliza otection of ments. This

e to the hum n particula be taken in

use and the planned m y affected r atercourse course mu vital huma rces (Berlin e 3 (20), it i

n survival, r the imme y covers th uired for e ge energy ducing the e State ha edies. As sons or gr effective ju els” (Gene s context, Convention s to judicia ation of th

ercourse m ecial needs nificantly ha ures, Rieu e relevant ourses dem

nvolves th parian popu

eeds are managemen

e optimal ure generat

he 2008 D man need sidered in t re an inte ation.

f vital huma s is the c

man right t ar those o to conside e obligatio measures, riparian po es Conven ust be res an needs”.

n Rules) of s provided including ediate sust he require economic a

or mining quantity o as the obli noted in t roups who udicial or o eral Comm , it shoul n stating al or other m

he princip may affect

s. It has b arm huma u-Clarke &

to equitab mands that he taking i

ulations co covered, t nt and pro

and sust tions.”

Draft Articl ds, but wit the equita gral part o

an needs i case of the

to water, th f populatio eration in a

n not to ca human ne pulations ( ntion states solved “wit The 2004 ffer a rathe d that “vital

drinking, c tenance of ments for activities a

projects m of water an

gation to the Genera o have bee other appro ment No.

d also b the oblig mechanism ple of equ the rights een asser n health a Vercambr ble and rea

t water is nto consid oncerned.

he preamb otection of

tainable u

les on Tra th a differe

ble and re of the det

s also ack e Protoco

hey do prom ons that d applying bo ause a sign eds may a (Boisson d s in Article th special 4 Internatio er compreh human ne cooking and f a househ

basic hum and the pro may affect b

d polluting ensure to al Comme en denied opriate rem

15 on th e reminde gation for ms without uitable an

of Indigeno rted that “a and safety

re 2009, 1 asonable u

distributed deration of

While this ble of the f internatio utilization”

ansbounda ent focus, easonable termination

knowledged l on Wate

mote wate epend on oth the prin

nificant dam also be a m e Chazour e 10 that a regard be onal Law A hensive de

eeds” mea d sanitary hold. Howe man needs.

otection of basic huma g rivers, aq

affected p ent No. 15

their right medies at b

he Right ed Article

watercou discrimina nd reason

ous people any form o

would be 7) Interest utilization, d in a fair f the “soci provision

Conventio onal water should ta

ary Aquifer understan balancing n of what

d in region er and He

r access.

watercou nciple of eq

mage. In th matter of c

rnes, 2013 a conflict b

eing given Association

finition of “ ns water u needs, as ever, the sc

Other use f ecosyste an needs a

uifers or la people acc 5 on the R t to water both nation to Water,

32 of th urses Sta ation.

able use es, not tak of water uti

a violation tingly, amo Article 6.1 r and reas al and ec

does not on points o

rcourses a ake into a

rs also tak nding them

of interest is equitab

al and rive ealth to the

rses or quitable he case concern 3).

etween to the n Rules

“human used for well as cope of es such ems are and the akes. In cess to Right to should nal and 2002, he UN ates to

of an ing into ilization n of the ong the 1 (b) of sonable onomic specify out that and the account

kes into m as a ts. Vital ble and

er basin e 1992

(8)

UNECE Interna resourc Charte prioritiz 5.2 Inte The int people UNPFI the UN Labor O Certain range o The 20 vulnera reflecte 23). W life-lon opportu of the A Develo and oth the priv

“Agend SDG in issue in SDG 2 to Indig agricult women through Given t produc mentio The afo manag needs access equitab reducin restorin aquifer people in impr The rev

E Convent ational Lak

ces. At the er of Water zes vital hu ernationa ternational s and rece I considers N Declaratio Organizatio n texts spe

of subjects 030 Agenda

able must b ed by this p hile Indige g learning unities and Agenda, bu opment Go

her interna vate sector da of the pe nterwoven

nterlinking (end hung genous peo

tural produ n, Indigeno h secure a the widesp ction, aimin ned stakeh oremention gement of w of […] thos s to safe an ble sanitati ng the num ng water-re rs and lake

s, and also roving wate view of pro

tion on the kes, whic e basin lev r for the L uman need

l Developm developm ent texts ca

s that 73 o on on the R on (ILO) In ecifically ad

s.

a for Susta be empow provision, i enous peop opportunit d to particip

ut embarki oals, alongs ational insti

r, the scien eople, by t

guidance f the SDGs ger and ac oples. Loo uctivity and ous people and equal a

pread cons ng at “secu holders’ rig ned eleme water and s

se in vulne nd affordab

on and hyg mber of peo

elated ecos es. All relat

o 6.b, “Sup er and san ogress in im

e Protection ch address vel, the Se

ake Chad ds, in addit ment Age ment agend

all upon sta out of the 1

Rights of In ndigenous ddress wat

ainable De wered” and

including In ples are am ties to acqu pate fully in ing as acto side “Gove itutions, loc ntific and a the people for develop s, insepara chieve food oking here

d incomes s, family fa access to la sideration o re and equ ghts.

nts tie in w sanitation erable situa

ble drinking giene; 6.4 ople sufferi

systems, in te closely t pport and s

itation man mplementin

n and Use ses both negal and

Basin, ha tion to proc

nda da explicitly

ate parties 69 SDG ta ndigenous

and Tribal er issues;

velopment defines sp ndigenous mong the g uire the kn n society” ( ors on the j ernments a cal authori academic c , and for th pment acti ble from de d security)

at SDG 2, of small-sc armers, pa

and, other of water as ual access with SDG6, for all”. Se ations”, e.g

g water; 6.

on addres ing from w ncluding m to the living strengthen

nagement”

ng SDG at

of Transb national Niger Wa ave clearly claiming th

y recognize and partn argets can

Peoples ( Peoples C others incl

t declares pecific grou s peoples ( groups that nowledge a (ibid., Art. 2 journey to as well as P

ties […] civ community

he people”

on until 20 evelopmen and 4 (edu its target 2 cale food p astoralists a productive s a key pro s” to it, is a

, “Ensure a everal of its g. 6.1 on un

2 on acces ssing water water scarc

mountains, g condition

the partici

” reinforce t national le

boundary W and trans ter Charte

followed a e right to w

es the right ers to impl be linked t UNDRIP) Convention

lude them

that “peop ups whose

United Nat t “should h and skills n

25), they a the 2030 S Parliament

vil society, – and all p (ibid., Art.

030. Water nt.

ucation for 2.3 aims to producers, and fishers e resource oductive res

strong rec availability s targets re niversal an ssing adeq r scarcity a ity; 6.6 on forests, we ns of many

pation of lo Indigenou evel “shou

Watercours sboundary

rs, as well an approa water.

ts of Indige lement the to provisio and Intern n No. 169.

within a br

le who are needs are tions 2015 ave acces needed to e

are not sub Sustainable ts, the UN

business people”. Th

52) define is seen as all) directl o “double th

in particul s, including

s and inpu source for cognition o

and susta efer to “all”

nd equitabl quate and and substa protecting etlands, riv Indigenou ocal comm s peoples’

ld also dra

ses and y water

l as the ach that

enous em.

ns in ational roader

e e 5, Art.

s to exploit bjects

e system and he es in 17 s an

y refer he

ar g uts”.

food f the inable

or “the le antially

and vers, us munities

rights.

aw on

(9)

contrib recogn the lev Agenda 5.3 Ind Indigen people the Sup Indigen their tra The Na Indigen Canad Interior water l govern surface and flo concer water q In Artic affairs Nations Constit suprem treaties the fed United for form tribes, 518 of quality ecolog nations 5.4 Ind Since t water m At the 3 of Actio the Ind was ag Develo comply interna such a

utions from nition of Ind

el of the in a’s implem digenous p

nous peop s’ Original preme Cou nous laws aditional la adleh Whu nous water a ruling tha r was cited

aws, requi nment. (Ho e waters so

w” that inc rns with ea quality and cle I, the U

stating tha s, and amo tution state me Law of t s with diffe deral gover States. Tr mal recogn 29 settlem the Clean standards ical well-be s.

digenous p the beginn made refer 3rd World on, stated digenous P greed upon opment in S

y with their ational instr s the Cove

m […] Indig digenous p ndicators cu mentation.

peoples’ la les laws ar Instruction urt of Cana (Governme aws regard

t’en and th r laws in B at granted d by the Na ring highe ekstra, 20 o they will cludes a sy ach surface d cultural us

nited State at only Con ong the se es that all t the Land.”

erent Indian rnment’s tre ribal groups nition of the ments have

Water Act s that aim t eing and re

peoples’ d ing of the m rence to int

Water For (Item17): “ Peoples’ Pla

n in Johann September r human rig ruments to enant on C

genous peo peoples in g urrently un

aws, decla re informed ns (Cajete ada recogn

ent of Can ding water (

he Stella’te ritish Colum

a Tsilhqot adleh Whut r levels of 16). Their w

remain “su ystematic e e water sys

se.

es Constitu ngress has

veral State treaties ent In 1789, th n tribes. Th

eaties with s in the Un eir water rig

resulted in t recognize to protect w

egulatory a

declaration millennium ternational rum, in Kyo

“We endor an of Imple nesburg du r 2002. Item ghts obliga o which the Civil and Po

oples”, inte goals and nder constr

arations a d by the law , 2000). Th nizes and e nada, 1998

(Tsilhqot’in en Nations mbia. The t’in Nation t’en and th consultatio water man ubstantially evaluation stem, inclu

ution exclud the power es, and wit tered by th he United his provisio h Indian trib nited State

ghts. By 20 n Congres es the right water for h authority w

ns and rec m, several c

l texts.

oto, Japan, se and reit ementation uring the W m 29 of the tions and c ey are signa olitical Righ

er alia (ibid targets see ruction to m

and recom ws of natu he landmar enacts the 8). In 2014, n National were the f historic 20 title to thei he Stella’te on respons nagement p y unaltered

of environm ding collec

des states r “To regul th the India he United S

States had on of the U

bes are the s are conti 011, of the sional Acts t of tribes t

uman heal within the le

commend collective I

, 2003, the terate the ‘ n on Susta World Summ

e documen commitme atories to, hts, the Co

d., Art. 79).

ems not to monitor the

mmendatio re, and Ind rk Delgam

Gitxsan pe the Tsilhq Governme first to asse 014 Suprem

ir traditiona n leaders t sibilities fro policy aims d in terms o mental issu cting data o

and indivi ate Comm an Tribes..

States “sha d already e .S. Constit e supreme

inuing to id e 566 feder s. Furtherm

o adopt ind lth, cultura egal bound

dations ndigenous

e Indigenou

‘Kimberley inable Dev mit on Sus nts calls ‘on

nts to lega including b ovenant on

However o be reflect e progress

ons digenous

uukw decis eoples’

qot’in asser ent, 2014).

ert their me Court o al territory

to enact th om the

s to protec of water qu

ues and on historica

duals from merce with f .” Article V all be the entered nin

tution state law of the dentify and rally recogn more, Sect

dependent l practices daries of th

s declaratio

us Peoples y Declaratio velopment”

stainable n the State ally binding but not lim Economic

r, the ed at of the

sion at rted

of in the he

t uality

al

m Indian foreign VI of the

ne es that e

d calling nized

ion t water s and

eir

ons on

s’ Plan on and

” which es to g

ited to, c,

(10)

Cultura of Raci environ and Co At the reaffirm laws, th autono human The 20 to the h implem Howev 6. Ben water d The int conflict Interna willingn nationa sustain sustain develo fosterin addres about w 7. Con Althoug needs their un of wate agenda and qu immed needed human

REFER African Social Rights Boisso Univers

al and Soc ial Discrim nment, suc onvention t World Wa med the Ky he right of omy in the n right.”

030 Agenda human righ mentation o

ver, it obvio efits of int discourse tegration o ts. An appr ational instr ness and im al authoritie nable living nable polic

pment. IW ng tradition ssing clima

water, and nclusions

gh there is and rights niversally e er to ensur

a up to the uality for cu iate needs d to protec nity.

RENCES n Commiss

and Econo v. Nigeria, n de Chaz sity Press.

ial Rights, ination; as ch as the C to Combat ater Forum yoto declar

self determ use and en

a can resp ht to water of Indigeno ously depe tegration e and prac of indigenou

roach base ruments m mplementa es. Recogn g with and

ies and to WFWP cont nal knowled ate change

promoting

s evidence for Indigen equal and j re that (1) I e level of th urrent and f s, enable th ct the ecosy

sion on Hum omic Right

, Decision zournes, L.

Internation s well as th Convention Desertifica in Mexico ration and mination an

njoyment o

pond to a c , the need ous legal sy

nds on its of Indigen ctice

us rights in ed on mutu may pave th ation of inte

nizing the maintainin implement ributes to i dge and ad , implemen g clean and

that progre nous peop just treatm ndigenous he indicator futures nee he expansi

ystems inh

man and P ts Action C

of 27 May (2013). Fr

nal Conven heir obligat n on Biolog

ation.’

(2006), th asserted “ nd the reco of our natu

certain exte for self-de ystems, cu implement nous peop n national p ual and sha he way in t

ernational experience g water an ting vital o implement ddressing w nting tradit d renewab

ess has be ple, we are ment. Effort s peoples’

rs; (2) wate eds of Indi ion of activ habited, inc

People’s Ri Centre and

2002.

resh Wate

ntion on th ions to con

ical Divers

e Indigeno in all the n ognition of ral resourc

ent to the a eterminatio ustomary la

tation by M ples’ wate

policies wil ared benef his directio commitme e of Indige nd natural s

bligations t ing the SD water issu ional know le energy t

een made still far fro s have to b concerns a er is provid genous co vities if des cluding the

ights, (200 the Centre

r in Interna

e Eliminati nventions o sity, Climat

ous People ational and

our territo ces such a

appeal of th on and the

aws regard Member Sta

r rights in ll prevent t fits should on. Howeve ents remain nous peop systems ca towards su DGs by dra

es in a hol wledge and technologi

in the reco om full impl be sustaine are reflecte ded in suffi ommunities sired and e eir function

02). Decisio e for Econo

ational Law

ion of all F on the te Convent

es Declarat d internatio ries [and]

s water, as

hese decla recognition ding water.

ates.

n mainstre the risks of be promot er, the n in the ha ples in

an deliver ustainable wing on an listic way, w d ancient la

es.

ognition of lementatio ed in the d ed at the 2 icient quan s: to satisfy ensure the

s vital to a

on 155/96, omic and S

w, Oxford, O orms tion,

tion onal s a

arations n and

eam f

ted.

nds of keys to nd

while aws

the n of domain

030 ntity

y water ll

The Social

Oxford

(11)

By, P.

Sheper https://

Februa Cajete Publish Comm http://w 08_Up Declara from: h 4_decl Goldin Indigen the com religion conten 2017].

Govern Decisio http://w Hoekst B.C.’s f http://v leaders Inc, O.

https://

Februa Indigen http://in Februa Inter-A Paragu No. 214 Inter-A Comm IPCC ( Groups

et al. (2004 rd family w /www.trent ary 2017].

, G. (2000) hers.

anda, W. ( www.circleo

date.html [ ation of the http://contra aration-ne

Institute fo nous peop mmon elem ns. Availab

t/uploads/2 nment of C on in Delga www.lop.pa tra, G. (201 first aborig vancouvers s-proclaim- U.P. (2009 /www.cons ary 2017).

nous decla nternationa ary 2017].

American C uay. Merits

4.

American C unity v. Nic 2014): Clim s I, II and I

4) Simply w workshop. A

u.ca/iws/do

) Native Sc

(2008). Old ofallnations [Accessed e peoples w attoacqua.

w-dehli.pd or Internati les presen ment ’ pres ble from : h 2013/07/W Canada. (19

amuukw v.

arl.gc.ca/co 16). Nadle ginal water sun.com/bu -b-c-s-first- 9) Constitu stituteproje

aration at 4 alfunders.o

Court (2010 s, Reparatio

Court of Hu caragua, J mate Chan

II to the Fif

water? Wh Available f

ocuments/

cience: Na

d Can Blog s.ca/OLD_

: 11 Febru world wate it/public/up f [Accesse ional Partn ntation on t sented to th

ttps://citize Water-the-C 998) Abori

British Co ontent/lop/R

h Whut’en laws. The usiness/en -aboriginal teproject.o ct.org/cons

4th World W org/images

0). Case of on and Co

man Right udgement nge 2014: S

fth Assess

ho owns it?

from:

/Simply_W

tural Laws

g. Weblog.

_CAN_BLO uary 2017].

er moveme pload/1/2/ta ed: 11 Feb nership and

he topic of he council ensleague.

Common-E ginal Title:

olumbia. Av ResearchP and Stella Vancouve nergy/nadle l-water-law org. Availa

stitution/Bo

Water Foru s2/Indigeno

f the Xákm osts. Judgm

ts, (2001).

t of 31 Aug Synthesis sment Repo

? Can you Water_Repo

s of Interde

Available OGS/Entrie

ent New De ab_elms_d ruary 2017 d Peace (2 f: ‘Spiritual for a parlia .org/wp- Element.pd

: The Supr vailable at:

Publication at’en hered er Sun, Ma eh-whuten- ws

ble at:

olivia_2009

um (2006).

ousDeclara

ok Kásek ment of Aug

The Maya gust 2001

Report. Co ort of the I

trust it? Is ort.pdf [Acc

ependence

from:

es/2008/10

elhi, India ( docs/13278 7].

2004). A re ity and sus ament of th f [Accesse reme Court

:

ns/bp459-e ditary leade arch 30, 20

-and-stella

9.pdf (Acce

Available ation.pdf [A

Indigenous gust 24, 20

agna (Sumo

ontribution ntergovern

there enou cessed: 11

. Clear Lig

0/19_Octob

(2004). Av 829213foru

port of the stainability he world’s ed: 11 Febr

t of Canad e.htm

ers proclaim 016. Availa aten-heredi

essed: 13

form:

Accessed:

s Commun 010. Series

o) Awas Ti

of Workin nmental Pa

ugh?

ght

ber_20

vailable um-

e

-water,

ruary a

m ble at:

itary-

11

nity v.

s C

Tingni

g anel on

(12)

Climate Genev Jiméne cooper Coope http://u 2017]

Loures About t Slatter from:

http://w Agreem Tarlock Rights, Tsilqoh http://w United United Issues Water Reque Perma United Sacred United Rights United 25 Sep Develo UNESC Hydrolo UNPFI review https://

um%20 UNPFI

e Change a, Switzerl ez-Cisnero ration: UNE

ration, UN unesdoc.un

s, F., Rieu- the UN Wa , W. (2012 www.harmo

ment--.pdf k, A. D. (19 , 22(2) LAN htin Nation www.tsilhqo

Nations (1 Nations (2 – Land, T is Fundam sting Sup nent Forum

Nations (2 d; A Collec

Nations (2 of Indigen Nations (2 ptember 20 opment.

CO-IHP, 20 ogical Prog I (2016). S

of the 203 /sustainabl 0on%20Ind

I (no date)

[Core Writ land os, B. et al.

ESCO’s IH ESCO and nesco.org/i

Clarke, A., atercourse

). Whanga onywithnat [Accessed 987), One ND & WAT

al Governm otin.ca/PD 1982). Unit 2007). Per Territories mental: Pla pport and

m

2008a) Item tive Interve 2008b): A/6 ous Peopl 2015). A/R 015. Transf

012. (Draft gramme (I Substantive 30 Agenda edevelopm digenous%

), Factshee

ing Team,

(2013). W HP. Free Fl

d Tudor Ro images/00

, Vercamb s Convent anui Iwi and

tureun.org/

d: 11 Febru River, Thre TER L. REV ment (2014 Fs/2014_0 ted Nations

manent Fo and Natu anning A W

Participat

m 9: Future ention from 61/L.67 an

e.

ES/70/1, R forming ou

t) Strategic HP-VIII, 20 e Inputs to

for Sustai ment.un.org

%20Issues%

et Who are

R.K. Pach

Water secur ow – Reac ose, 12-17

22/002228

re, M.-L. (2 tion, Gland

d the Crow /content/do uary 2017]

ee Sovere V. 631 (19 4). Availab 07_03_Sum

s Convent orum on In ral Resour World Indig

tion of th

e Work of t m the World nd Add.1, U

Resolution ur world: th

c Plan of th 014-2021).

the 2016 H nable Dev g/content/d

%20(PFII).

e Indigenou

hauri and L

rity through ching Wate . Available 8/222893e.

2009). Eve d, World W wn Tūtohu

ocuments/

.

igns: India 87).

ble at mmary_SC

ion on the digenous rces.“Wate genous Fo e UNPFII

the Perma d Indigeno United Nati

adopted b he 2030 Ag

he Eighth P . Paris, Fra High Level

elopment, documents .pdf [Acces us peoples

L.A. Meyer

h science-b er Security e from:

.pdf [Acces

erything yo ildlife Foun Whakatup 193Wanga

an and Inte

CC_Decisio Law of the Issues. Ind er is Sacre orum on W . 6th Ses

nent Forum ous Water C ons Decla

by the Gen genda for S

Phase of th ance: UNE

l Political F ECOSOC s/10314Pe ssed 7 Feb s? Availabl

r (eds.)]. IP

based y Through

ssed 8 Feb

u Need to ndation.

ua. Availab anui%20Ri

rstate Wat

on.pdf e Sea.

digenous P ed, Water Water and ssion of t

m, Water is Caucus

ration on t

eral Assem Sustainable

he Internat ESCO-IHP.

Forum, The . Available rmanent%

bruary 201 e from:

PCC,

bruary

Know

ble ver-

ter

Peoples is Life, Peace, he UN

s

he

mbly on e

tional

ematic e from:

%20For 7]

(13)

http://w 7 Febru Wilson https://

Februa Xavier Availab http://w g.pdf [A

www.un.org uary 2017]

, C.R. (201 /pwccc.wor ary 2017].

(2012). Ind ble at:

www.silene Accessed:

g/esa/socd ]

10) People rdpress.co

digenous p e.es/docum 11 Februa

dev/unpfii/d

e’s agreem om/2010/04

peoples’ Ky mentos/Indi

ary 2017].

documents

ment of Coc 4/24/people

yoto water igenous_P

s/5session_

chabamba.

es-agreem

r declaratio Peoples_W

_factsheet

. Available ment/ [Acce

on relations Water_Decla

1.pdf [Acce

at:

essed: 11

ship to wat aration_20

essed

ter.

003_en

Références

Documents relatifs

All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, speci fi cally the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of

Translating our experimental results into water terminology, our findings suggest that the differentiated sys- tem offers interesting opportunities in terms of risk

The central role they can play in this regard has been noted by several United Nations bodies and mechanisms, including the Human Rights Council, 6 the United Nations Permanent

Considering also that treaties, agreements and other constructive arrangements, and the relationship they represent, are the basis for a strengthened partnership

– Central and Eastern Asia Central and Eastern Asia (Aral Sea basin States Cambodia China (Aral Sea basin States, Cambodia, China, Laos, Nepal, Thailand, Vietnam);. – Middle

With regard to water resources, their preservation and use, indigenous communities must be able to integrate the legal developments that are theoretically favorable to them

While the duty to offer prior notification and consultation about projects that risk causing transboundary harm to riparian states is a customary norm and must be implemented by

Those are the issues to be discussed in this paper that highlights major policy issues in the management of agriculturally used water resources as well as addresses the