• Aucun résultat trouvé

the main diagonal or, in another words, AT must be upper triangular.) Problem 2

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "the main diagonal or, in another words, AT must be upper triangular.) Problem 2"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

NMAI057 – Linear algebra 1 Tutorial 5

Date: October 27, 2021 TA: Denys Bulavka

Problem 1. Establish sufficient conditions for a triangular matrix to be regular.

(Recall that an upper triangular matrixAhas arbitrary values on and above the main diagonal, but it is all zero below the diagonal. Formally, for all i > j it holds that aij = 0. Any lower triangular matrix Amust satisfy the same condition in the reverse order w.r.t. the main diagonal or, in another words, AT must be upper triangular.) Problem 2. Consider the block matrix

A=

α aT

b C

,

whereα6= 0,a, b∈Rn−1 andC ∈R(n−1)×(n−1). Apply to Aone iteration of Gaussian elimination and use it to derive a recursive test of regularity.

Problem 3. Find the inverse to the matrix

A=

1 2 3 2 3 5 3 5 10

.

Problem 4. Invert the matrices of the elementary row operations.

Recall that the matrices representing the elementary row operations are:

(a) Multiplying the i-th row with α6= 0:

Ei(α) =

1 0 . . . 0 0 . .. ... ... ... . .. α . .. ...

... . .. ... 0 0 . . . 0 1

 .

(b) Adding the α-multiple of thej-th row to thei-th row fori6=j:

Eij(α) =

1 0 . . . 0 . .. ... ... 1 . .. ...

α

i . .. 0

j 1

 .

(c) Swapping the i-th andj-th row:

Eij =

i 0 1

j 1 0

i j

 .

1

(2)

Problem 5. Forn∈N, invert the matrix

A=

1 1 1 . . . 1 1 2 2 . . . 2 1 2 3 . . . 3 ... ... ... . .. ...

1 2 3 . . . n

 .

Problem 6. Simplify the following expression assumingA, Bare regular matrices of the same order:

(I−BTA−1)A+ (ATB)TA−1.

Problem 7. (a) Prove that for all A, B∈Rn×n, if A is regular then (ABA−1)k =ABkA−1.

(b) LetA∈Rn×nbe a regular matrix. Find the limit (in case you are not familiar with the formal definition, use the intuitive notion) for

k→∞lim ADkA−1, where D=

1 0 . . . 0 0 12 . .. ...

... . .. ... 0 0 . . . 0 1n

 ,

and compute its rank.

(c) Apply the above result to compute the limit for any matrixA with the first column equal e1= (1,0, . . . ,0)T and the first row equaleT1 = (1,0, . . . ,0).

2

Références

Documents relatifs

meager plus rapide de statue. qui s ' app wie seen lo

Stability of representation with respect to increasing lim- its of Newtonian and Riesz potentials is established in ([16], Theorem 1.26, Theorem 3.9).. Convergence properties

For the first time, we endow a family of realizations of the associahedra (the Loday realizations) with a topological and cellular operad structure; it is shown to be compatible

Motivated by recent work of Au, C´ ebron, Dahlqvist, Gabriel, and Male, we study regularity properties of the distribution of a sum of two selfad- joint random variables in a

The main advantage of the new method presented in this paper is that being not based on a differential equation, it directly leads to a formal exact diagonal representation for

(It is true that Dirichlet’s theorem can be regarded as a special case of Schinzel’s Hypothesis, but its use does not involve anything analogous to the Schinzel primes.)

Conversely, a typrix A is called acceptable, if there is a (necessarily unique) system of partitions T which induces the matrix A.. In

For the first time, we endow a family of realizations of the associahedra (the Loday realizations) with a topological and cellular operad structure; it is shown to be compatible with