Theories of action, speech, natural language, and discourse

In Pierpaolo Basile, Franco Cutugno, Malvina Nissim, Viviana Patti, and Rachele Sprugnoli, editors, Proceedings of the 5th Evaluation Campaign of Natural Language Processing and

In Pierpaolo Basile, Anna Corazza, Franco Cutugno, Simonetta Montemagni, Malvina Nissim, Viviana Patti, Giovanni Semeraro, and Rachele Sprugnoli, editors, Proceedings of Third

This study considers the similarity between the papers of each individual source and the complete set of papers in the whole corpus, according to four different types of relationship

Faithful encodings enjoy the coverage and precision results (as stated in Definition 15), which ensure that both positive and negative outcomes of reachability analysis performed

Since evidential and intensional readings only differ by the way the matrix clause and the embedded content are related, one simple solution is to postpone attachment of the

On the other hand, the reasoning processes used by the two systems are very different: the former uses dynamic neural fields to perform goal inference and action selection

These different approaches to language contact lead us to distinguish two different stages of the description of linguistic dynamics: Firstly, the elaboration of social

In this chapter, we presented experiments toward a better integration be- tween automatic speech recognition and natural language processing tech- niques in order to improve