R ENDICONTI
del
S EMINARIO M ATEMATICO
della
U NIVERSITÀ DI P ADOVA
E LENA M ANTOVAN
Additive extensions of a Barsotti-Tate group
Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova, tome 99 (1998), p. 161-185
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=RSMUP_1998__99__161_0>
© Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova, 1998, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova » (http://rendiconti.math.unipd.it/) implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions).
Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit conte- nir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
ELENA
MANTOVAN(*)
ABSTRACT - In this paper we
classify
up toisomorphism
the additive extensions ofa Barsotti-Tate group, in
positive
characteristic p over aperfect
field k and incharacteristic 0 over W( k ) the
ring
of Witt vectors with coefficients in k. The extensions arise as group functors associated to suitable submodules of the Dieudonn6 module. Inparticular
wegive
anexplicit description
of the univer- sal additive extension in both cases.1. -
Preliminary.
In this section we fix notations
(for
those we do not mentionexplicitly
we refer to
[3]),
recall the main definitions and some known results.1.1. Let p be a
prime
number and k aperfect
field with characteristic p. Put A =W( k )
thering
of Witt vectors with coefficients ink,
K == frac (A)
itsquotient
field and denoteby D~
the Dieudonn6ring
of k .Let G be a Barsotti-Tate group over A and
Gk
itsspecial
fibre. Let R be the affinealgebra
ofG ,
P thecoproduct
on R and E thecoidentity; put
I~ + = ker E and denoteby Rx
thering Q9AK, by Rk
= Rl5A k
the affinealgebra
ofG~
andby
a: the naturalprojection.
DEFINITION 1. An element h E
RK
is anintegral of
Gif
dh is a one-form of R.
An
integral
hof G
is normalizedif
= 0 .An
integral of
thefirst
kindof
G is anintegral
h such that(*) Indirizzo dell’A.:
Dipartimento
di Matematica, Universita di Padova, Via Belzoni 7, 35131 Padova.An
integral of
the second kindof
G is a normalizedintegral h
suchthat
The
integrals
of the first and the second kind form two sub-A-mod- ules of the A-moduleI(G)
of theintegrals
ofG ,
which we denoteby h (G)
and
I2 ( G ), respectively.
Let us define also the
following
sub-A-module ofI2 (G):
We now recall the definition of the Dieudonn6 module of
Gk
and someresults we need later on.
DEFINITION 2. Let E be
a formal
group overk,
the Dieudonng mod- uleof E is M(E)
=Hom (E, CWk),
the groupof homomorphisms of
k-formal
groupsfrom
E toCWk,
the covectorsformal
group over k(see [3]
ch.
III,
par.1.2).
If we denote
by B
the affinealgebra
of E andby PB
itscoproduct,
then
by
the Yoneda’s lemma we obtain:thus
M(E)
isnaturally
asub-Dk-Module
ofCWk(B).
Moreover we have the
following
result.THEOREM 3. Let E be a
formal
p-group over k(i. e.
aformal
group over k such that anddenote by M(E)
its Dieudonn6 rrLOdule. ThenE(S)
=HomDk (M(E), CWk (,S) ) , for
eachfinite ring
S over1~
([3]
ch.III,
Thm.1).
For each A-module T and each
homomorphism
of A-modulesf :
T--~ P, put
=T ©AA
=f ®A lA,
where the A-structure on A is de- finedby
the i-th power of the Frobenius map.Let M be the Dieudonn6 module of
Gk
and denoteby
V:M -~ M ~ 1 ~
itsVerschiebung.
THEOREM 4.
(1)
There exists anisomor~phism of
A-modules+ 00
which is
defined by 12
pmod pR,
where e~ isn=O a
lifting of
a - n,for
each n E N.(2)
There exists anisomorphism of
A-moduleswhich is
defined by ( a _ n )n E ~ H [ ~ ~ - ~n + 1 ) ~ p ~+ 1 ~
n=0 mod R .(3)
The restrictions wo: + and V 0: +of wand 1/J, respectively, satisfy
the relationwhere c : is the
homomor~phism
inducedby
theinclusion
of
inI2 ( G ).
(4)
Let us assume p ~ 2 . Put L =h ( G )
and denoteby j:
L -~the
homomorphism
inducedby
the inclusionof I1 ( G )
inI p ( G ),
let (2: L ~ M be thecomposed
mapwj 1 o j ;
then:- the
homomorphism Ki: LIPL - MIFM,
inducedby
~o , is anisomor~phism;
-
for
eachp-adic ring
,S over A :i.e. we can
identify
eachhomomorphism of topological rings
overA,
with the
pair cp 2 ),
where 99 and cp 2 = whichsatisfies
the relation([3]
ch.
II, Prop. 5.5;
ch.III, Prop. 6.5;
ch.IV,
Thm.1; [4]
ch.V,
par.5.5).
We introduce now the Barsotti
algebra
ofGk .
Let us denote
by Rk---3-Rk
thehomomorphism
ofk-bialgebras
which
corresponds
to themultiplication by p
onGk,
andput R0 =
- lim endowed with the direct limit
topology.
For each
neN,
let run : be the naturalhomomorphism
fromthe n-th element of the direct sistem into the direct limit
(let
us remarkthat,
since isinjective,
i n is aninjective homomorphism
oftopologi-
cal
k-rings,
for each we define acoproduct over R0 by
for each x
E=- 91’
such that xE z n (Rk ).
DEFINITION 5. The Barsotti
algebra of Gk
is thepair (ffi, r),
where 91 is thetopological completion offfio
and r : is theinjective
ho-momor~phism of k-bialgebras
inducedby
-r 0(see [1]
ch.IV,
par.33-37).
We consider now
W(N)
thering
of Witt vectors with coefficients in 91 and denoteby
ç:W(9i)
theprojection
on the0-component;
there is anaturally
definedbialgebra
structure on viaLet biv
(fi)
be the module of bivectors with coefficients in 91(we
recallthat,
for eachring
S over1~ ,
theDk-module
of bivectors with coefficients in ,S isbivk (S)
= lim(CWk (,S)~ - i~ , [3]
ch.V,
par.1.3); by
thedefinition of
bivectors, W(91)
isnaturally
a sub-A-module of biv(ffi).
THEOREM 6.
(1)
There exists anunique injective homomorphism of A-algebras j :
R ~W(91)
such that( j
P = andç 0 j
==íoa.
(2)
Thehomomorphism j
can be extended to anembedding of
A-modules j ’ : I(G)
- biv(N) ([2]
Thm.4.3.2; Prop. 4.3.1, part 3).
1.2. Let A be a
pseudocompact
commutativering
and G a smooth for- mal group over A .Let us denote
by c~a
the additive formal group overA,
i . e .= (S, + ),
for each finitering
S over A .DEFINITION 7. An additive extension
of G
is apair (H, n)
consist-ing of
aformal
group H over Atogether
with aepimorphism of formal A-groups
H -~ G such that ker n isisomorphic
toG’, for
somen which is called the
degree of
the extension.A
homomorphismf:(H1’ ,~ 1 ) -~ (H2 , ~ 2 ) of
additive extensionsof G
is a
homomorphism f: of formal
such thatn2of=
= n1.
Since G is a smooth formal group, any additive extension
(H,
of Gadmits a section o : G - H of 7r. It is then easy to check that the set of
isomorphism
classes of additive extensions ofdegree
n can be identifiedwith Ext
( G , G’),
the group ofisomorphism
classes of extensions of Gby
with
Ext1(G,
and withH 2 ( G , ~ a )s ,
the A-module of classes ofsymmetric
factor sets modulo trivial ones.DEFINITION 8. An additive extension
(H, 7r) of
G isdecomposable, if
there exists an additive extension(H’, .7r’)
and aninteger
n ~1,
such that(H, n)
isisomorphic
to n’ X0).
DEFINITION 9. An additive extension
(H, n) of
G is universalif, for
each n thehomomorphisms
which arises
from
the exact sequence 0 is anisomor~phism (see [5]
ch.1,
par.1, probl. B).
It follows from the definition that if
Ext ( G ,
is not a free A-mod- ule of finite rank there are no universal additive extensions ofG;
more-over, if we suppose that
Hom ( G , = 0 ,
then if an universal additive extension of Gexists,
it isunique
up to aunique isomorphism.
DEFINITION 10. A
rigidified
additive extensionof
G is apair
con-sisting of
an additive extension(H, n) of
Gtogether
with a A-linearsection 1
of tn(A): tH (A) --~ tG (A),
thecorresponding tangent
map over A . Ahomomor~phism f: ((H, 7r), 1)
~((H’, n ’), L’ ) of rigidified
addi-tive extensions
of
G is ahomomor~phism f : (H, 7r)
-(H’, n’) of
addi-tive extensions
of
G such thattf(A) 0
1 = l’ .Since G is a smooth formal group, its
tangent
space over A is a free A-module,
then any additive extension of G admits arigidification,
which isdeterminated up to an element of
HomA (tG (A), (let
us remarkthat
HomA (tG (A), tkern(A»
= if n is thedegree
of theextension).
As before the set of
isomorphism
classes ofrigidified
additive exten-sions of
degree n
can be identified withExt"g ( G ,
the group of iso-morphism
classes ofrigidified
extensions of Gby Gna.
1.3. Let us maintain the notations of 1.1 and consider a Barsotti-Tate group G over A =
W(k).
REMARK 11. To each set
of integrals of
the second kindof G,
~ hl , ... , hn ~, is
associated arigidified
additive extensionof G , of
de-gree n.
In fact
... , hn} c I2(G)
andchoose {U1,
9Un I
a set of inde-terminates over
1~ ; then,
fori = 1, ... , n, y i =
Q9 1 - 1Q9 hi
is asymmetric 2-cocycle
of G and thehomomorphism
defined onby
for allx E R ,
andUi
+ 1Q9Ui+yü
for i =
1,
... , n , is acoproduct.
The
rigidified
additive extension of G associated... , hn ~
is
((H, x), 1),
where ... ,Un ],
x is thehomomorphism
of
A-groups corresponding
to the inclusion ofA-bialgebras
9 ... ,
Un ]
and 1 is thetangent
map over Acorresponding
tothe
homomorphism
ofA-algebras
definedby
for all
and Ui - 0,
for i =1,
... , n .Let us remark that from the construction it follows that
In
particular, by
means of theprevious construction,
we have defineda natural map, which we denote
by
fromI2 ( G )
to the set ofrigidified
additive extensions of G of
degree
1.We conclude this section
by recalling
thefollowing result,
which de-scribes the relations
existing
among the A-modules ofintegrals
of G andits additive extensions.
THEOREM 12. Notations as
before.
Let us consider thefollowing diagram,:
where:
- a is the restriction to
I1 ( G ) of
thedifferential
map;is the
homomor~phism
induced on thequotients by ~3 ;
- ~ is the map that
forgets
therigidifications;
- y is the
identification of
COG with ker6 ;
- j
is thehomomor~phism
inducedby
the inclusionof I, (G)
inI2(G).
The
diagram
iscommutative,
with exact rows and vertical isomor-phisms ([4]
ch.5,
Thm.5.2.1,
par.5.3).
Let us remark
that,
from thesurjectivity
of{3
assertedby
theprevi-
ous
theorem,
it follows that the map, which associates to eachh E I2 (G)
the
2-cocycle
Ph - 1 - 1 issurj ective.
2. - Additive extensions of a Barsotti-Tate group over
W(k).
In this section we
classify
up toisomorphism
the additive extensions of a Barsotti-Tate group G over A =W(k).
2.1. Let us maintain the notations of 1.1 and assume p # 2
(the
casep = 2 must be treated
distinctly-see
Thm.4, part 4).
PROPOSITION 13. To each additive extension
(H, n) of G
there is acanonically
associatedNH of M ~ 1 ~ ,
which contains_
PROOF. Let
(H, n)
be an additive extension ofG,
ofdegree
n.Let us choose a
symmetric
factor set y : G xG G ,
associated to(H, n)
via anisomorphism
of kerjr withG~
and a section of x .Then,
ifwe denote
by y * : A [ T 1,
... , thehomomorphism of A-alge-
bras
corresponding
to y, the set ofsymmetric 2-cocycles
associated to yis {Yi~...)7~})
where/~=y*(7~).
Fori = 1, ... , n
let us choosesuch that
Q9hi=Yi
i(see
Thm.12)
andput
where we denote
by [ hi ]
theimage of hi
inM ~ 1 ~
via the mapyo
Now it is
straightforward
toverify
that the sub-A-moduleNH
is inde-pendent
of the construction.Let us remark
that,
sinceVQL
is a direct summand ofM(1)
and is a free A-module of finiterank,
for each sub-A-module N ofM(1),
con-taining VgL ,
thequotient NIVOL
is a free A-module of finite rank.Thus the
following
definition makes sense.DEFINITION 14. The rank
of
an additive extension(H, 7r) of
G isthe rank
of
thefree
A-moduleAn additive extension
of
G isnon-degenerate if
itsdegree
isequal
toits rank.
From the construction of the sub-A-module associated to an additive extension of G it follows that the
degree
of an additive extension(H, x)
isalways greater
than orequal
to its rank.We now prove that each
degenerate
additive extension isdecompos-
able.
PROPOSITION 15. Let
(H, x)
be an additive extensionof G, of degre
n and rank r. Then
(H, Jt) is isomorphic
to(H nd
X0),
where
J’l nd)
is anon-degenerate
additive extensionof G , of degree
r, which is called the
non-degenerate component of (H, jr).
PROOF. Let us choose an
isomorphism
of ker.7r withG~
and a sectionof .7r, then we obtain an
isomorphism (of
formal schemes overA)
of H withGxG~,
i . e . anisomorphism (of topological A-algebras)
of... , Tn ]
withE,
the affinealgebra
of H.Let Ul ,
... ,Un
bethe images
of 10?’!,
... , 1by
con-struction {y
i =O Ui| i = 1, ... n}
is a set ofsymmetric 2-cocycles
of(H, Jt) (actually
this set is the same we introduced in theprevious proposition).
If we consider the set ofintegrals
of the second kind of... , hn ~,
such that i(for
i==1, ...n),
then we deduce thatII (H) 1,
... ,n).
Thus the associated sub-A-module
NH
inM ~ 1 ~
isNH = VoL + N’ ,
where =
1, ... , n ~ (we
denoteby
L the A-moduleIl ( G ) ) .
Let us choose now
[ fl ], ... , [ fr ]
E N’lifting
an A-basis ofthen From this
decomposition
ofNH
it follows that there exist
Vl , ... , Vn E E lifting (for
i =
1,
... ,r),
suchthat E = R[V1,
... ,Vn ]
andIn fact let B x
n )
and D xr)
such that[ f ] = B [ h ]
and[ h ] = D [ , f I
moduloVQL.
Then we deduce thatBD = lr
andthat
( ln - DB) h = g_ + a,
for some suitableg1, ... , gn E L
anda,, > ...
We obtain the
previous
relationsby defining t( fi , ... , fr ) _
= B
t(h1,
9... , hn ), ... , Vr ) = B
9 ... , IUn )
andchoosing IVr, 1,
... , ... ,Y,t ~
a maximallinearly indipendent
sistemof rank r
(we
definet( Yl , ... , Yn ) _ ( ln - DB ) t( Ul , ... , Un ) - -t(al,
...,an)).
From the
construction,
it follows that thecoproduct
on E is de-fined
by
Thus
E = R [V1, ... , Vr] ®A A [Vr + 1,
... ,Vn],
whereR [Vl ,
... ,Vr]
is theaffine
algebra
of anon-degenerate
additive extension of G andA[Vr + 1,
... ,Vn]
isisomorphic
to the affinealgebra
ofG~,
and that de- scribes the desiredisomorphism.
2.2. In view of the
previous proposition
we can consideronly
non-de-generate
additive extensions of G. Now weproceed by associating
toeach sub-A-module N of
M ~ 1 ~ , containing VOL,
anon-degenerate
addi-tive extension of
G,
which we denoteby (HN,
Let S be a
p-adic ring
overA ,
we denoteby SK
itsgeneric fibre, by Sk
its
special
fibre andby a: S - Sk
the reduction modulo p. Let t : and c : be the naturalprojections
of A-modules.PROPOSITION 16. Let N be a sub A-module
of M ~ 1 ~ , containing VoL ,
and denoteby
r : L - N thefactorization of
V 0 (}: L -through
N.Let
HN
be theformal defined by
for
eachp-adic ring
S’ overA ,
and .7r N:HN -~
G thehomomor~phism of formal defined by (95, cp)
~(Ø 0
í,cp).
Then
(HN, n N )
is an additive extensionof G , of degree
r ==
rkANlrL.
PROOF. Let S’ be a
p-adic ring
over A and consider thefollowing diagram:
By
definition apoint of HN (,S )
is apair of homomorphisms ( cp 1, cp 2 )
suchthat the
diagram commutes,
i. e.Let us consider the formal
A-group HomA(N/rL , .);
since N/zL is afree A-module of finite
rank r,
it isisomorphic
toG~.
Let us define a
homorphism
of formalA-groups
by 0 - 0),
for eachp-adic ring S
overA ,
where we denoteby
pr the canonicalprojection
from N to N/zL . It is easy to check thatactually
thus we obtain the
following
sequence of formal A- groups :Now we have to check that the sequence is exact. The
surjectivity
of.7rN follows from the
surjectivity
of c o t and the facts that N isa
free A- module and rL a direct summand ofN;
the rest isstraightfor-
ward.
THEOREM 17. Let N be a
of
which containsVQL.
Each
non-degenerate
additive extension(H, Jl) of
G such thatNH
== N is
isomorphic
to(HN, -r N)-
PROOF. Let
(H, Jt)
be anon-degenerate
additive extension ofG,
ofdegree r,
such thatNH
=N,
and let E be the affinealgebra
of H . With the notations of theprevious proofs
we have:-
E = R[ Ul ,
... ,Ur],
whereUl ,
... ,Ur
arealgebraically indepen-
dent over
R ;
-
... , [ hr ] ~, ... , [ hr ] ~
is a set of linear-ly independent
elements over A.Let us define e :
h (H) -
N forall 9
EII ( G )
=L , and hi - - Ui
H[ hi],
for i =1,
..., n ; then E is anisomorphism of A-modules,
since(H, jr)
isnon-degenerate.
For each
p-adic ring
S overA ,
apoint
ofH(,S)
is ahomomorphism
cp : E - S of
topological rings
over A and is determinatedby
its im-age in
G(S), together
with the valuescp( Ui ),
for i =1,
... , r.Let us define a
homomorphism
by (/1 ( ~P ) ~ ê -1, IR Q9A 1k)IM),
for eachp-adic ring
S over A.Since
cp( Ui) E,S,
for i= 1,
... , r, we deduce thatactually
moreover, from Theorem 4
(part (2)),
it follows thatNow let S be a
p-adic ring
over A and(cp 1, cp 2 )
be apoint
ofHN(S).
Let us consider the
pair
it identifies a homomor-phism f :
R -~ S’ oftopological rings
over A such that T 1 our =I, ( f )
and(see
Thm.4, part 4).
Moreover,
for i =1, ... ,
r,I2 ( f )( hi ) - cp 1 ( [ hi J ) E ,S ,
thus we can de-fine a
homomorphism by - cp 1 ( [ hi ) ), for i = 1, ... , r .
It is easy to check that the map g:
HN - H,
definedby ( cp 1, cp 2 )
is the inverse
homomorphism of ..
2.3. We conclude this section
by studying
the affinealgebras
of thenon-degenerate
additive extensionHN,
for each sub-A-moduleN of M(’)
which contains
VQL.
Let j : and j ’ :
be as in Theorem6,
so wecan consider R as a
sub-A-bialgebra
of andI(G)
as a sub-A-module of bivWe recall that there exists a canonical
embedding
‘~ :M- biv (9l),
which is defined
by mapping
each x E M to theunique
element p EE biv such
that p j
i = xi , for alli 0,
and®,u ( [ 1 ],
ch.
IV,
Thm.4.31).
Since the
Verschiebung
map onbiv (R)
is anisomorphism,
we can ex-tend ’6 to an
embedding by putting
‘~’ h == for
each h E M ~ 1 ~.
ThusM (1)
can becanonically
identifiedwith a sub-A-module of
Let us remark
that, by construction,
foreach
THEOREM 18. Let N be a
containing VQL,
and
(HN,
the associated additive extensionof
G . There exists oneand
only
onesub-A-bialgebra EN of W(91), containing R ,
such that its moduleof integrals of
thefirst
kind is N.The
bialgebra EN represents HN,
i. e.HN(S)
=Hom;into(EN, S), for
each
p-adic ring
,S overA ;
thus theaffine algebra of HN
can be identi-fied
with thecompletion of EN for
theprofinite topology.
PROOF. Let us choose
hl , ... , hr
E N which lift a basis ofN/VoL ;
foreach
i E ~ 1, ... , r I
we denoteby
p ji the
additive bivectorl3’ hj
andby
a
lifting of hi .
For each i
E ~ 1, ... , rl
let us consider the2-cocycles
y i , associated tohi*, and put ki = h*i - ui ; thus ki E W(R) and yi = W(PRk)ki - ki O 1-
- 1
15£ I,
since p ji is
additive.Moreover,
sinceW(9l)
does not contain any additiveelements,
£j
i is theunique
element of which satisfies theprevious
cond-ition.
Let us define
EN
=R[~,1, ... , ~, r ].
It isstraightforward
toverify
thatEN
is asub-A-bialgebra
ofW(9l)
whichdepends only
onN,
not on thechoice of
hl , ... , hr E N .
Now let us denote
by EN
thecompletion
ofEN
for theprofinite topol-
ogy, it follows from the construction that
Then the
homomorphism
which extends the
identity
on Rby i( Ui ) _
£ ji for
i =1,
... , r, induces anisomorphism
on the modules ofintegrals
of the firstkind; thus,
in view ofthe Jacobian
criterion,
we conclude that i is anisomorphism.
3. - The universal additive extension of a Barsotti-Tate group over
W(k).
In this section we deduce from the
previous
results the existence andan
explicit description
of the universal additive extension of a Barsotti- Tate group G over A =W(k).
3.1. Let us maintain the notations of section 2.
THEOREM 19. The additive extension
(HM c 1 > , of
G is univer- sal.PROOF.
By
Definition 9 we must provethat,
for each themap
which associates to each the
isomorphism
class of the
amalgamated
whose structural
homomorphisms
are theembedding
of > inHm(l)
andf,
is anisomorphism.
In view of Theorem17,
to prove thesurjectivity
it suffices to showthat,
for each sub-A-module N ofcontaining VoL ,
there exists ahomomorphism
,7rN such that the additive extension
(HN,
isisomorphic
to&( eN).
Let S be a
p-adic ring
over A and consider thefollowing
commutativediagram:
where
(0 1, 82) E=- Hm (1) (S).
We define the
homomorphism
of formalA-groups
o j , where 1
is the inclusion ofNIVQL
inThen the desired
isomorphism
with is the map in- duced on theamalgamated
sumby
thehomomorphism
fromEÐ HomA (NNgL, .) to HN which maps «01, e 2 ), o j + ~ o ~r, 0 2) (we
denoteby j
the inclusion andby pr :
the pro-jection
onto thequotient).
Finally
from the theorem ofelementary divisors,
since[8]
is asurjec-
tive
homomorphism
between free A-modules of the samerank,
it followsthat
[8]
is anisomorphism.
Actually
it ispossible
togive
a moretransparent description
of theuniversal additive extension of
G, namely
that stated withoutproof by
Fontaine in
[3] (ch. V,
par.3.7).
This is done in Theorem23,
but we first need to prove some lemmas.Let us maintain the notations of the
previous theorem,
moreoverput CWA (S) - CWk (Sk)
and define+ 00
by I E
p-’ a P’ n I (see [3]
ch.11,
prop.5. 1),
then 16 is a homo-n=O
morphism
of A-modules and it is easy to check that tow = W 0 q.Let us remark
that,
from the definitions ofCWA (S)
and([3]
ch.IV,
par.1.3),
it follows that the twohomomorphisms
are
injective. Moreover,
if we denoteby
II thehomomorphism they satisfy
the conditionH o ) = 5 0 q
and
ker II c Im C (see [1]
ch.I, Prop. 1.9, Prop. 1.10).
LEMMA 20. Let D be a
A[V]-module,
S ap-adic ring
over A andSk
the
special fibre of
S . Then thehomomorphisms
defined by
W 0 V, anddefined by
areinjective.
PROOF. Let be a
homomorphism
ofA[ V]-modules
and assume = 0 .Recalling
that we deduce that 0 =(w o 1jJ) 0
V,= (w o
1jJ, for each ne N; then t -
y = 0 and so, from theinjectivity of ~,
it followsthat y
= 0.In the same way one can also prove that e is
injective. 8
LEMMA 21. Let D be a
A[V]-module,
S ap-adic ring
over A andSk
the
special fibre of
,S . ThenPROOF. Let us consider the
following
commutativediagram
and define the
homomorphism
by y - (16 o y~ ).
It is easy to check thatactually
moreover, from Lemma
20,
it followsthat p
isinjective.
We prove now that p is also
surjective
onto the fibreproduct.
Let
(Y1, Y2)
EHomA(D, SK)
x HomA(D, SKIps)HomA[V] (D, CWk(Sk) )
and consider the E9 From
_
n -
we deduce that and then since ker 17 c Im
t.
_Put W=
(~I 1m ~ ) -1
1 0 W:D ~ CWA (S ),
it follows from the construction that W is ahomomorphism
ofA[ V]-modules
and W = 1/J 1, moreoverthen,
thanks to Lemma20,
we concludethat q o
LEMMA 22. Let M be the Dieudonne module
of Gk .
Then the homo-morphism of formal k-groups,
defined by V,
issurjective.
PROOF. Let S be a finite
ring
over and 1jJ: a homo-morphism
ofA[ V]-modules.
Since( y o V) 0
F = F 0(1jJ 0 ~, d (S)( y~ )
is anelement of
H omDk (M , CWk ( S ) ) .
Let us recall that M is a free A-module and its
Verschiebung
V: M--~ M ~ 1 ~
isinj ective;
then from the inclusion inVM , by
the theorem ofelementary divisors,
there exist twoA-bases q e ~
of M andM ~ 1 ~,
re-spectively,
such that thecorresponding
matrix of V is1d 0
,where h =
rkA M
and d =dimk M/FM .
Now let and define an A-linear homomor-
phism
y : on theA-basis ~
in thefollowing
way:(let
us recall that theVerschiebung
map onCWk (,S)
issurjective).
Thenfrom our
construction,
it followsthat i7i
=F ç j, for j
= d +1, ... , h,
thus1/J is
A[ V]-linear
andcp
= y o V .THEOREM 23. Let
U(G)
be theforn2al A-group defined by
for
eachp-adic ring
S overA ,
and denoteby f3: U(G) -
G the homomor-phism of formal A-groups
which maps e to(w o
e 0 V 0 o , q 0 O o~.
Then
(U(G), ~3)
is the universal additive extensionof
G.PROOF. Let S be a
p-adic ring
over A and consider thefollowing
commutative
diagram,
where e E(M ~ 1 ~ , CWA (S)).
Let us remark
that,
for each e EU(G)(,S),
thepair (íù 0 O o Vo o,
q o
(9 o V)
satisfies thecondition t o (w o H o V o p) = w o (q o H o V) o p
andthe
homomorphism q
o O o V isDk-linear;
therefore isactually
anelement of
G(S).
Let us define a
homomorphism
of formalA-groups:
by
0 ->(w 0 0, q,
0 -V).
Since q ,
0 , V is ahomomorphism
ofDk-Modules
andsatisfies the two conditions:
q induces a
homomorphism
fromU(G)
toHM(1) (see Prop. 16),
which wedenote
by ~.
Since it is easy to checkthat p
satisfies the condition/3 ,
we limit ourselves toproving that j
is anisomorphism.
Inview of Lemma
20,
it follows from the definitionthat j
isinjective,
so weneed
only
prove that it issurjective.
Let
( cp 1,
and choose anA[ V]-linear homomorphism
8 :
M (1)
- such that 0 - V = cp 2(see
Lemma22).
Then the homo-is an element of such
that 0 - Vo g
= 0 and =0,
orequivalently
such thatO(M (1»
c,Sk
and~(VM) = 0 (let
us recall that It follows that the map definedby .r~(..0~.,~~),
isa
homomorphism
ofA[ V]-modules,
inparticular
Then the
pair ( cp 1, B + ~ ),
is an element ofX HomA(M(1), SKIPS)
(M ~ 1 ~, CWk(Sk))
and so, thanks to Lemma21,
there exists ahomomorphism of A[ V]-modules
O : such that woe = q 1 = 0 +0,
which is the same as woe = cp 1 andso that
r~(O) _ (cp 1, cp 2).
Let us remark that from the
previous
theorem it follows that the uni- versal additive extension of a Barsotti-Tate group G over Adepends only
on its
special
fibreGk .
3.2. From the
knowledge
of the universal additive extension of G we can deduce thefollowing
result whichcompletes
what is asserted inProposition
15.PROPOSITION 24. An additive extension
of
G isdecomposable if
and
only if
it isdegenerate.
~
PROOF. In view of
Proposition
15 and Theorem 17 we needjust
toprove that
(HN; 7lN)
isnon-decomposable,
for each sub-A-module N of which containsVoL .
We recall
that,
in theproof
of Theorem19,
we have shown thatHN
== U( G ) I_IkerB ker nN,
where the structuralhomomorphisms
of the amal-gamated
sum are theembedding
ofker 13
inU(G)
and(we
denoteby (U(G), /3)
the universal additive extensionof G) .
Let us assume that
(HN, :rl N)
isdecomposable,
for any N asbefore;
then there exists an
isomorphism
W:(HN,
~(H
Jt x0),
for asuitable additive extension
(H, Jt)
of G.By
the universalproperty
of(U(G), B),
there exists a map E :ker B - ker n
such thate N
==to£
( c : ker n - Ga X ker n
denotes the naturalembedding);
thenthe map induces a
homomorphism
3 : on the
quotients.
SinceV’lker11:N
issurjective
so isd ,
but this is
impossible
because coker0 N
is ap-torsion
group(this
fact fol- lows from the theorem ofelementary divisors);
thus ourassumption
isfalse.
4. - Additive extensions of a Barsotti-Tate group over k.
In this section we
classify
up toisomorphism
the additive extensions of a Barsotti-Tate group G over1~ ,
aperfect
field withcharacteristic p.
In
particular
we consider thespecial
fibres of the additive extensions of anylifting
of G overW(k), noting
that the universal additive extension of G is thespecial
fibre of the universal additive extension of its lift-ings.
4.1. Let
GL
be thelifting
of G over A =W(k)
associated to(L, Q) (see
Thm.
4, part (4)).
The
following proposition
describes the relation between the additive extensions ofGL
and the additive extensions of G.PROPOSITION 25. The map that to each additive extension
(H, of GL
associates itsspecial fibre (Hk, 7rk)
induces anepimorphism
PROOF. Via the
isomorphisms Ext (G , Ga,A) ==M(1)NeL (see
Thm.4, part (3)
and Thm.12)
andExt ( G , ([6]
ch.IV,
par.1 ),
ycorresponds
to the naturalprojection
--~ M ~ 1 ~
/1/M. Since VM =VjoL
+pM (1) , g
is the map of the reduction modu- lo p, thus y issurjective. -
The
previous proposition
tells us that each additive extension of G isisomorphic
to thespecial
fibre of an additive extension ofGL .
Now we
give
anexplicit description
of thespecial
fibre of the additive extension ofGL
associated to a sub-A-modulescontaining VoL ,
which we denote
by (HN, L , 7CN,L).
PROPOSITION 26. Let N be a sub A-module
containing VoL ,
and let
(HN, L , 7r N, L)
be the associated additive extensionof GL . Them for
eachfinite ring
,S over k :acnd
(
In
particular
thespecial fibre of
the universal additive extensionPROOF. In view of Theorem 19 we know that
then for each finite
ring S
overk,
ifby
we denote S with the struc- ture ofA-ring
inducedby
the reduction map c:A - k,
we obtain:It follows from the definitions that =
CWk (,S)
asA[ V]-mod-
ules.Thus in view of Theorem 23
Moreover
and
Finally
it isstraightforward
to check the assertionregarding
the homo-morphism
4.2. In view of the results obtained in the
previous
sections we cannow
easily
prove that the universal additive extension of G is thespecial
fibre of the universal additive extension of any
lifting
of G over A.THEOREM 27. With the
previous notations, (U(GL)k,(f3L)k)
is theuniversal additive extension
of
G.PROOF. Let
(H, a) be
an additive extension ofG,
then there existsan additive extension
(H, 5i)
ofGL
such that(Hk, (H, n).
From the universalproperty
of( U( GL ),
it follows that(H, 5i)
isisomorphic
to(U(GL) I_Iker¡3Lkeric,
for a suitable andunique
homomor-phism f : Then,
if we consider thespecial fibres,
we ob-tain that
(H, n)
isisomorphic
to(U(GL)k
where the structural
homomorphism
isfk
which isunique
becausef
isunique.
4.3. Let us introduce the
following
additive extensions of G.Let N be a sub-A-module which contains
VM,
and denoteby (U(G), fl)
the universal additive extension of G.We define the
following
formal group over k:I I
where the
amalgamated
sum is definedby
theembedding
ofker f3
inU( G )
and thehomomorphism
which
corresponds
to the inclusion ofN/VM
inLet be the
homomorphism
of formalk-groups {3 I_Ikerpo.
PROPOSITION 28. With the
previous notations, for
each sub-A-moduLe N
containing VM, (FN,
an additive extensionof G , of degree dimk
NIVM -PROOF. It follows from the definition that the sequence of formal
k-groups
is exact. We conclude
by observing
that.)
=G~,
wheres =
dimkN/VM.
Let us recall the notations of
4.1;
letGL
be thelifting
of G over A as-sociated to
(L , Q)
and(HN, L , :rl N L)
the additive extension ofGL
associ-ated to a sub-A-module N of which contains
VQL.
THEOREM 29. For each a sub-A-module N
of containing VQL,
where r and s are the
degrees of (HN, L ,
and(FN+VM, r N I VM), respectively.
~
PROOF. From the definition of
(FN, r N)
and the characterization of(HN, L , Proposition 26,
it follows thatwhere the
amalgamated
sum is definedby
theembedding
of=
Homk ((N
+VM) IVM, .)
inFN
+ vM and thehomomorphism 0 N
fromHomk ((N
+VM)
toHomk
+pN), .),
whichcorresponds
to the map induced on thequotients by
the inclusion of N in N+VM.By considering
the canonicalisomorphism (of k-spaces)
ofN j(V(2L
++
pN)
with(N
f1VM) I(VQL
+(N
+VM) IVM,
we obtain an iso-morphism
ofHomk (NI(VQL
+pN),.)
withHomk ((N
f1VM) j(V(2L
++
pN), .)
xHomk ((N
+VM) /VM, .)
suchthat 0 N corresponds
to the nat-ural
embedding
into theproduct.
Then we deduce thatwhere
Finally
we canrecognize
thedecomposable
additive extensions of G.PROPOSITION 30. Let N be a
If N D VM,
thenthe additive extension
(FN,rN)
isnon-decomposable.
Let L be the associated to a
lifting of
G overA ; if N D V()L,
then the
special fibre of (HN, L ,
isnon-decomposable if
andonly if
~ ’
PROOF. Let N be a sub-A-module of
M ~1~, containing VM,
thenwhere the
amalgamated
sum is definedby
thehomomorphism
which
corresponds
to the inclusion of N/VM inLet us assume that
(FN, r N)
isdecomposable,
then there exists anadditive extension
(H, jr)
of G and anisomorphism O N : (FN, i N )
-- (Ga X H, 0 X n).
From the universal
property
of( U( G ), /3)
we know that there exists ahomomorphism
a: ker{3
~ ker:Jl such that loa = where we de- noteby ON:
x kerJt the restriction ofO N
on the kernels andby t
the natural inclusion of ker n in~a
xNote that is
surjective
becauseON and E N
are, while t - a isnot,
which isimpossible.
Now let us assume that then
where q = n
VM) /(VeL
+pN) (see
Thm.29).
Sinceis
non-decomposable, (HN, L ,
isnon-decompos-
able if and
only
if(N n VM) /(VeL
+pN)
= 0 .It is easy to check that the last condition is
equivalent
to N n == pN .
Infact,
if we assume that N n VM =VoL
+pN, recalling
thatpM (1)
cc VM and n
VQL = p(VeL) (see
Thm.4, part 4),
we obtain:On the other
hand, recalling
that VM =VQL
+ frompN
= N nwe deduce:
4.4. We conclude
by proving
that eachnon-decomposable
additiveextension of G is
represented by
asub-k-bialgebra
of the Barsottialge-
bra 91 of
G ,
which contains R .THEOREM 31. Let N be a sub-A-module
of M ~ 1 ~ , containing VM,
and
(FN, iN)
be the associated additive extensionof
G.Then there exists one and
only
onesub-k-bialgebra DN of ffi,
con-taining R ,
such that its moduleof
invariantone-forms
can be identi-fied
withThe
bialgebra DN represents FN,
i.e.FN(,S)
=S), for
each
finite ring
S overk;
thus theaffine algebra of FN
can beidentified
with the
completion of DN for
theprofinite topology.
PROOF. Let N be a sub-A-module of
M ~ 1 ~ ,
which contains VM.We
organize
theproof
in 3steps.
1 ) Definition of DN .
Let
GL
be alifting
of G over A and fix anembedding
of its affinealge-
bra
RL
inW(91),
as in Theorem 6. In view ofProposition 25,
there exists asub-A-module T of
M ~ 1 ~ , containing VgL,
such that(FN, iN) =
=
(HT, L ,
T satisfies the two conditions: N = T += T n
~roM ~ 1 ~ (see Prop. 30). Moreover, by
Theorem18,
we know that there exists asub-A-algebra ET
ofW(91),
which containsRL ,
such that its mod- ule of invariant one-forms can be identified with T.Let us denote
by
g:W(91)
theprojection
on the0-component
and
put DN
=ç(ET).
ThenDN
is asub-k-bialgebra of 91 ,
which containsR ,
and it is not difficult to check that itdepends only
onN,
not on thechoice of T and L .