Prof. Stéphane AVRIL

(1)

Institut Mines-Télé[email protected]@emse.fr

Mechanical characterization of arterial wall

Prof. Stéphane AVRIL

(2)

Basics of arterial mechanics

Humphrey JD (2002) Cardiovascular Solid Mechanics: Cells, Tissues, and Organs, Springer-Verlag, NY

(3)

Institut Mines-Télé[email protected]

Functional biomechanical behavior

3

(4)

Material characterization and

constitutive modeling

(5)

Institut Mines-Télé[email protected] 5

Application to the prediction of AA index of rupture?

dissection

(6)

Context

 More and more aneurysms are detected at an early stage (incidence >8% for males >65 years old).

 An intervention is recommended if the aneurysm grows more >1cm/year or it is >5.5cm. This represents >90000 interventions per year in Europe and USA

 BUT:

• 25% aneurysms <5.5cm rupture : 15000 deaths ^** !

• 60% of aneurysms >5.5 cm never experience rupture!

 In summary: very high rate of inappropriate decisions and misprogramed surgical interventions!!

** Pape et al, Aortic Diameter ≥5.5 cm Is Not a Good Predictor of Type A Aortic Dissection Observations From the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD), Circulation, 2007

(7)

Methodology

7

40 Patients with ATAA

Preoperative dynamic imaging

Dynamic CT Scanner

4D MRI

Collection of intraoperative aortic segment

Mechanical inflation tests

Histological Analysis

2014

2017

(8)

Methodology

40 Patients with ATAA

Preoperative dynamic imaging

Dynamic CT Scanner

4D MRI

Collection of intraoperative aortic segment

Mechanical inflation tests

Histological Analysis

2014

2017

(9)

Collection of the samples

(10)

PREPARATION

(11)

Institut Mines-Télé[email protected]@emse.fr

Bulge inflation test

11

III) Inflation test device. Speckle pattern is made before starting the

inflation test Circumferential

A x ia l

Romo et al. Journal of Biomechanics -2014.

(12)

Undeformed Deformed

x y

Full-field measurements using

sDIC

(13)

Rupture profiles

50% of aortas r uptured wi th an angle θ equal to 90 ° Bl ood flow

(14)

Rupture risk estimation

Physiological Stress

Stretch Stretch/Stress Curve

Rupture Stress

E

_in-vitro

= Tangent elastic modulus

Cauch y Stress (MP a)

1 1.1 1.2 1.3

Physiological Stretch

1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7

Rupture Stretch

γ _stress = Physiological stress Rupture stress γ _stretch = Physiological stretch

Rupture stretch

(15)

Correlation between the stretch-based rupture risk and the tangent elastic

modulus

Duprey A, et al. Biaxial rupture properties of ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms. Acta Biomaterialia 2016.

E _in-vitro (MPa)

Ru pture ris k

(16)

SAINT-ETIENNE PROTOCOL

40 Patients with ATAA

Preoperative dynamic imaging

Dynamic CT Scanner

4D MRI

Collection of intraoperative aortic segment

Mechanical inflation tests

Histological Analysis

2014

2017

(17)

Measurement of aortic DISTENSIBILITY

 Gated CT – acquisition and segmentation

17

13 patients: Dynamic preoperative scanners during cardiac cycle ( 0.92 s) = 10 phases.

CT: (resolution 512x512, slice thickness of 0.5 mm)

1 phase superposition of 10 phases

Aorta

Systole

Diastole

(18)

Measurement of aortic DISTENSIBILITY

 Aortic wall - 3D reconstruction from gated CT

13 patients: Dynamic preoperative scanners during cardiac cycle ( 0.92 s) = 10 phases.

CT: (resolution 512x512, slice thickness of 0.5 mm)

 Aasc

 Adesc

(19)

 Aortic wall - 3D reconstruction from gated CT

 Vasc

Measurement of aortic DISTENSIBILITY

13 patients: Dynamic preoperative scanners during cardiac cycle ( 0.92 s) = 10 phases.

CT: (resolution 512x512, slice thickness of 0.5 mm)

(20)

 The tangent elastic modulus can be derived using:

𝐸 _{𝒊𝒏−𝒗𝒊𝒗𝒐} = ^∅

ℎ𝐷 where

𝒉 : thickness of the aortic wall.

∅: Maximal diameter of aneurysm.

D: Distensibility.

 Access the in vivo thickness?

𝒉 = 𝒉 _𝟎

𝝀 _𝟏 ∗ 𝝀 _𝟐  𝒉 _𝟎 𝝀 _{𝒊𝒏 𝒗𝒊𝒗𝒐}

Measurement of aortic circumferential

STIFFNESS

(21)

Results: stretch-based rupture risk vs E _in-vivo

E in -v iv o (MPa )

Rupture risk

(22)

Summary

 2 ways of defining rupture:

 PWS – but unknown patient-specific strength

 γ _stretch correlated with in vivo circumferential stiffness

Higher distensibility  less risk because the aneurysm can more easily withstand volume variation

C. Martin et al., Acta Biomater. 9 (2013) 9392–9400

(23)

Illustrative

Clinical applications

Development of

mechanobiological models

TOWARDS ATAA GROWTH

PREDICTIONS

(24)

Prof. Stéphane AVRIL

Mechanical characterization of arterial wall