Institut Mines-Télécomavril@emse.fravril@emse.fr
Mechanical characterization of arterial wall
Prof. Stéphane AVRIL
Basics of arterial mechanics
Humphrey JD (2002) Cardiovascular Solid Mechanics: Cells, Tissues, and Organs, Springer-Verlag, NY
Institut Mines-Télécomavril@emse.fr
Functional biomechanical behavior
3
Material characterization and
constitutive modeling
Institut Mines-Télécomavril@emse.fr 5
Application to the prediction of AA index of rupture?
dissection
Context
More and more aneurysms are detected at an early stage (incidence >8% for males >65 years old).
An intervention is recommended if the aneurysm grows more >1cm/year or it is >5.5cm. This represents >90000 interventions per year in Europe and USA
BUT:
• 25% aneurysms <5.5cm rupture : 15000 deaths ** !
• 60% of aneurysms >5.5 cm never experience rupture!
In summary: very high rate of inappropriate decisions and misprogramed surgical interventions!!
** Pape et al, Aortic Diameter ≥5.5 cm Is Not a Good Predictor of Type A Aortic Dissection Observations From the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD), Circulation, 2007
Institut Mines-Télécomavril@emse.fr
Methodology
7
40 Patients with ATAA
Preoperative dynamic imaging
Dynamic CT Scanner
4D MRI
Collection of intraoperative aortic segment
Mechanical inflation tests
Histological Analysis
2014
2017
Methodology
40 Patients with ATAA
Preoperative dynamic imaging
Dynamic CT Scanner
4D MRI
Collection of intraoperative aortic segment
Mechanical inflation tests
Histological Analysis
2014
2017
Institut Mines-Télécomavril@emse.fr 9
Collection of the samples
PREPARATION
Institut Mines-Télécomavril@emse.fravril@emse.fr
Bulge inflation test
11
III) Inflation test device. Speckle pattern is made before starting the
inflation test Circumferential
A x ia l
Romo et al. Journal of Biomechanics -2014.
Undeformed Deformed
x y
Full-field measurements using
sDIC
Institut Mines-Télécomavril@emse.fr 13
Rupture profiles
50% of aortas r uptured wi th an angle θ equal to 90 ° Bl ood flow
Rupture risk estimation
Physiological Stress
Stretch Stretch/Stress Curve
Rupture Stress
E
in-vitro= Tangent elastic modulus
Cauch y Stress (MP a)
1 1.1 1.2 1.3
Physiological Stretch
1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7
Rupture Stretch
γ stress = Physiological stress Rupture stress γ stretch = Physiological stretch
Rupture stretch
Institut Mines-Télécomavril@emse.fr 15
Correlation between the stretch-based rupture risk and the tangent elastic
modulus
Duprey A, et al. Biaxial rupture properties of ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms. Acta Biomaterialia 2016.
E in-vitro (MPa)
Ru pture ris k
SAINT-ETIENNE PROTOCOL
40 Patients with ATAA
Preoperative dynamic imaging
Dynamic CT Scanner
4D MRI
Collection of intraoperative aortic segment
Mechanical inflation tests
Histological Analysis
2014
2017
Institut Mines-Télécomavril@emse.fr
Measurement of aortic DISTENSIBILITY
Gated CT – acquisition and segmentation
17
13 patients: Dynamic preoperative scanners during cardiac cycle ( 0.92 s) = 10 phases.
CT: (resolution 512x512, slice thickness of 0.5 mm)
1 phase superposition of 10 phases
Aorta
Systole
Diastole
Measurement of aortic DISTENSIBILITY
Aortic wall - 3D reconstruction from gated CT
13 patients: Dynamic preoperative scanners during cardiac cycle ( 0.92 s) = 10 phases.
CT: (resolution 512x512, slice thickness of 0.5 mm)
Aasc
Adesc
Institut Mines-Télécomavril@emse.fr 19
Aortic wall - 3D reconstruction from gated CT
Vasc
Measurement of aortic DISTENSIBILITY
13 patients: Dynamic preoperative scanners during cardiac cycle ( 0.92 s) = 10 phases.
CT: (resolution 512x512, slice thickness of 0.5 mm)
The tangent elastic modulus can be derived using:
𝐸 𝒊𝒏−𝒗𝒊𝒗𝒐 = ∅
ℎ𝐷 where
𝒉 : thickness of the aortic wall.
∅: Maximal diameter of aneurysm.
D: Distensibility.
Access the in vivo thickness?
𝒉 = 𝒉 𝟎
𝝀 𝟏 ∗ 𝝀 𝟐 𝒉 𝟎 𝝀 𝒊𝒏 𝒗𝒊𝒗𝒐
Measurement of aortic circumferential
STIFFNESS
Institut Mines-Télécomavril@emse.fr 21
Results: stretch-based rupture risk vs E in-vivo
E in -v iv o (MPa )
Rupture risk
Summary
2 ways of defining rupture:
PWS – but unknown patient-specific strength
γ stretch correlated with in vivo circumferential stiffness
Higher distensibility less risk because the aneurysm can more easily withstand volume variation
C. Martin et al., Acta Biomater. 9 (2013) 9392–9400
Institut Mines-Télécomavril@emse.fr 23