External Monetary Incentive Policies for Community Volunteers in the Far North
Province of Cameroon
ff"K
Short preliminary results (Nov. 2006)
By
Z. NjoumemiJ. Atedjieu
For
African Programme for Onchocerciasis Control
(APoc)
TABLE OF'CONTENTS
Abstract 1. Introduction
2. Purpose and scope 3. Methodology
4. Summary of preliminary results
1. Introduction
The African Programme
for
Onchocerciasis Control (APOC) provided fundingto
study the external monetary incentive policies for community volunteers in the Far North Provinceof
Cameroon. This study is part of APOC's interest in identifying the external monetary incentive policies
for
community volunteers through a multi-country protocolin
four African countries:Cameroon, Ethiopia, Nigeria and Uganda. The APOC's interest reflects the challenges for the durability of public health progralnmes in Africa which are increasingly relying on community involvement and the use of volunteers to help provide these services. The incentive policies are
key
to
explaining and understanding volunteerism, effectivenessof
community involvement, coverage and sustainability of most public health programmes. However, there is a dare lackof
information on incentive policies and practices across and within African countries. These issues are particularly relevant to the Far North Province of Cameroon, where many externally-firnded public health progralnmes are
not yet
integrated, thereby implementing different monetary incentive policiesfor
community volunteers. Since the introductionof
community-directed treatment strategyin which
communities are responsiblefor
managing and implementing activitiesof
health programmes through their own selected community-dtected distributors (CDDs), both monetary and in kind incentives for community volunteers become a cornerstoneof
community-based health programmes in the Far North.
2. Purpose and objectives
The purpose
of
the first phaseof
this multi country study sets out to document the external monetary incentive policiesfor
community volunteersby
different health programmes, the determinants of these policies and to what extent they overlap at the district level. The findingsof
this study areto
inform policies on incentivesfor
community-based programmes. They alsohighlight
a
second phase study whichwill be
carriedout to
determinethe
practices andperceptions at the community level with respect to external monetary incentives.
Specifically, the study aims to:
To document any general policy at the national level (states/provinces) on external monetary incentives for community volunteers in the health, HIV/AIDS, agriculture and water sectors.
To document the external monetary incentive policies
of
the different health programmes for community volunteers, including the type, monetary value and frequencyof the
incentive provided, as well as the involvement of communities in setting these incentives.To determine the rationale for the above policies and the role
of
donorsin
influencing these policies.To determine the current and potentiaUfuture overlap of these health programmes in the different districts/LGAs.
To determine whether programmes have policies on using volunteers selected for other health programmes and how they deal with incentives in such cases.
To document any coordinationlharmonisation of incentive policies and practices alnong different health programmes at national and state/provincial levels'
To compare external monetary incentive policies
in
different countries (existence; range; and uniformity of donors' and programmes' policies)'3. Methodology
This study relied extensively on secondary sources of datq available from existing policy documents, pronouncements,
MoU,
minutesof
meeting, technicalor
financial reports,budgets,
etc-
and checklists. Thefield
research team composedof
a health economist, a pubiic health specialist andtwo fieldwork
assistants, conductedall
checklist intervievnand
document reviews.The
datacollection did
coverthe both
national/central andprovincial
levels. The Far North Province was chosenfor
the French language zone. This provinceis
chosen based on the resultsof
overlap at the national level(it is
the anglophone provincewith
the most overlapping programmes). Two checklist instruments and documentievie*
guide were pre-tested beforetheir
usefor
data collection.The
checklistI
wasadministired to appropriate technocrats at MoH, Mo Water, Mo Agriculture, Mo Environment and other relevant agency at national level as well as to the equivalent of director of public health at state/provincial level. The checklist
2
was administered to headsof
health programmes atnational level (MoH, NGOs, and agencies) as
well
asto
headsof
health programmes at state/provincial ievel. Data were entered using Epi Info and were transferredto
Stata for data analysis. A document review guide was used for the content analysis of the relevant documents.4. Summary of results
Objective 1: to document any general policy at the national level (states/provinces) on external moietary incentives for community volunteers in the health, HIV/AIDS, agriculture and water
sectors.
Results .. the general policy exists in all sectors ofien as a practice rather than a fotmal written polrcy.
Objective
2: to
document the external monetary incentive policiesof the
different healthpro!**-".
for community volunteers, including the t1pe, monetary value and frequency of the incJntive provided, as well as the involvement of communities in setting these incentives.Health
programmes Results Onchocerciasiscontrol
programme
Transport:2000frs per day during the training once per year.
Perdiem:25frs per person treated in average each CDD treated more than 100 persons per year (>2500
frs CDD er
Malaria
control
programmePerdiem:280 frs per household visited per CDD
for
amaximumof
579 householdPerYearBicycle (in
kind):
a bicycle of about 68000 frs per CDD once per project life.Tuberculosis and
LeProsYcontrol
programmeTraruport:500fis
per CDD per month about 6000 frs per year monitoring of TB patients.Perdicm:2000 frs per CDD per month about 24000fis er
lmmunisation
programme Transport:500frs per day during the immunisation days trvice per year.Perdiem:2000 frs per day per CDD during the immunisation days twice peryear.
Guinea Worm
control
programmeTransport:500frs per day per CDD during the training sessions once per year.
Perdiem:1000 frs per day per CDD during the sessron once
STI and HIV/AIDS
control
programmeTransport: 12000fis per month per CDD
for
motorcycle maintenance, repairs and fuels about 180000frs per yearPerdicm:50.000 frs per month per CDD about 600000frs per year
Motocycle (in
kirul):
a motocycle of about 280000 frs per CDD once per project life.Reproductive
Health (Child and Maternal Health, FamilyPlanning, Population
activities)
programmeTran^sport:2000frs per CDD during the trainmg once per year.
Perdiem:5000frs per CDD per day during the training sessions per year
Sales revenae.' 1500frs per CDD in average per year Bicycle:65000 frs Per CDD once per life.
SUMMARY TABLE OF RESULTS
1SITE NAME
Cameroon Francophone (Site 8)Indicators related to Specific study objectives
S/N
VARIABLES
Yes NoNumber
o//oI Availability
of general policy on external incentives375 625
8 1001.a.
Availabitity
of general policy on external incentives atMOH
66.7 33.3 3 37
1.b.
Availability
of general policy on external incentives atMO Aqriculture
333
67.7 3 381.c.
Availability
of general policy on external incentives atMO Water
0 0 0 0
1.d.
Availabitity
of general policy on external incentives atMO Environment
0 100 2 25
2 No. of health programmes using community volunteers
100 0 7 100
3 No. of health programmes
that
have policies to give
external
monetary incentives100 0 7 100
4 No. of health programmes
that
give cash incentives
86 14 7 100
3 No. of health programmes
that
give inkind
incentives(with
monetara value)57 43 7 100
6 No. of health programmes
that
give both cash and
in kind
incentives(with
monetary value)43 57 7 100
7 No. of health programmes
that
have a policy to involve
communities
in
setting external incentives57 43 7 100
8 No of health programme where donors influenced incentive policy
100 0 7 100
I Number
ofdistricts/LGAs with
overlapping health pro grammes25 0 100 100
10 Average
number
of overlaPPing health programmesper
districULGA
7 0 100 100
tl Number
ofdistricts/LGAs with
potential overlapping health programmes28 0 100 100
12 Average
number
ofpotential
overlapping health pro grammes perdistricULc[
10 0
1()0
10013 No. of health programmes
with
policy of using existingco volunteers
7t
29 7 10014 No. of health programmes
with ioint
external incentive policies43 57 7 100
15 No of heallh programmes
with
policy on coordinationl
harmonisation of
external
incentive policies43 57 7 100
CROD( rouge nationale ASBFLS/LC CCDICOMIT E DIOCSAIN ACDEV GAPFEN INADES Formation GIC rapideS.
CAPROPRAF COPRE-SA AUPRAES ACEEN- Action 21
ASEN AJED.MIR AGIR AFSU-EN.
6r J
Reproductive health programm.
OFSAP CAMNAFAW
UNFPA UNFPA 1,2,6
?J
GuineaWormProgram
wHo wHo
SUMMARY TABLE
4SITE NAME
8List of Agriculture programmes using community volunteers
SECTOR:
AGRICULTURE
s/F{ Name of PROGRAMME
national de ,le
1
2 national de securit6 alimentaire
SUMMARY TABLE
5SITE NAME
List of Water programmes using community volunteers
SECTOR:WATER
8
S/N Name of PROGRAMME
1 de 1'
2
SUMMARY TABLE
2SITE NAME
8Type of External Monetary Incentives
SA{ Incentive No
of
programmes
o/"
I
Cash 7 100la.
Per diem 7 1001b.
Travel
allowance 6 861c Stipend 3 43
1d. Sales revenue 3 43
1e Other cash
I t4
2
In-kind
4 572a. Bicycles 4 57
2b.
Motorcycles 3 432c. Radio 0 0
2d
ITN
1 142e. Others
In-kind
1t4
SUMMARY TABLE
3SITE NAME
List of health programmes (including HMAIDS) using community volunteers, their implementing partnersr financial donors and types of
external monetary incentives provided
Type of
External Monetary
Incentives Legend:tlier Diem, z:Travel Allowance, 3:Stipend, 4:Sales
Revenue,5:Other Type of Extemal Cash Incentive, 6= Bicycle, 7: Motorcycle, 8:Radio, 9:ITN,
lO=Other Extemal kr-kind lncentivesSECTOR:
HEALTH, including HMAIDS
I
s/
N
Name
of
PROGRAMM EImplementing partner X'inancial DONOR
TYPE
of
External Incentive
@nter from 1-10 which is
applicable )
National NGO
Int.
NGO
UN agency
l.
J
Onchocercosis programm.
HKI
wHo
HKI,LCIF,APOC, MOH, PIPON FOI.JNDATIO N
1,3
2J
Malaria progr:rmm.ACDEV CARE,
APRICOM
wHo
GB, OMS, MOH, HIPPIC3,6
,J
Tuperculosis and Laprosis programm.wHo
GF, OMS,MOH HIPPIC
ol
Expandedprogramm
of
immunisation.
ACDEV OCALPAS AGADJAS SALAMA
Programm e d'appui aux huit districts ( cooperatio n Belge)
wHo
UNICE F
MOH HIPPIC GAVI UNICEF OMS
I
5'J
HTV programmAIDS SALAMCEFAADRESAEC OCALPAS AGADJAS
CARE-EN
owHo
GW, [DA, GF HIPPIC MOH1,2,3,7 I