Publisher’s version / Version de l'éditeur:
Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la
première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca.
Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at
PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information.
https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits
L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.
Internal Report (National Research Council of Canada. Division of Building
Research); no. DBR-IR-472, 1982-04-01
READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE.
https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright
NRC Publications Archive Record / Notice des Archives des publications du CNRC :
https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=e6dd2fe5-aa14-415b-b5e2-b31339b88f8a https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=e6dd2fe5-aa14-415b-b5e2-b31339b88f8a
NRC Publications Archive
Archives des publications du CNRC
For the publisher’s version, please access the DOI link below./ Pour consulter la version de l’éditeur, utilisez le lien DOI ci-dessous.
https://doi.org/10.4224/40001938
Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at
Measurement of underwater blast waves on Daniel Johnson Dam
Rainer, J. H.
NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL OF CANADA
DIVISION OF BUILDING RESEARCH
DBR INTERNAL REPORT NO.
472Measurement of Underwater Blast Waves
on Daniel Johnson
Dam
by
J.
H. Rainer
A N A L Y Z E D
Chockadby:
A.C.C.Warnock
~ p p m d b y :L.W.Gold
Das:April 1982
h J W d fa:
~ ~ d r o - ~ u g b e c
WEASlIRRMENl'
OF UNDERWATER
BLAST
WAVES
ON
DANIELJOHNSON
Dmby J.H. R a i n e r
I. INTRODUCTION
The measurements d e s c r i b e d h e r e i n were performed i n November 1981 a s p a r t of a n i n v e s t i g a t i o n of t h e e f f e c t s o f f u t u r e b l a s t i n g work on t h e Daniel Johnson Dam on t h e Manicouagan R i v e r , Quebec i n c o n n e c t i o n w i t h t h e A d d i t i o n a l Power p r o j e c t ( " P u i s s a n c e a d d i t i o n n e l l e " ) a t Manicouagan 5. ( F i g u r e 1 shows a view of t h e dam.)
The work d e s c r i b e d was planned i n c o n s u l t a t i o n w i t h s t a f f of Hydro-Qu6bec and w i t h t h e Board of C o n s u l t a n t s f o r t h e A d d i t i o n a l Power p r o j e c t . The measurements were c a r r i e d o u t w i t h t h e a c t i v e
p a r t i c i p a t i o n of members of t h e s t a f f ?f Hydro-Qu6bec under t h e d i r e c t i o n of D r . P a u l LeComte, Chef d l E t u d e , MBcanique d e s Roches, GBologie & G6o technique.
The purposes of t h e tests were:
1 ) t o measure t h e b l a s t waves a r r i v i n g a t t h e dam from e x p l o s i o n s o u r c e s i n t h e v i c i n i t y of f u t u r e rock b l a s t s i n o r n e a r t h e r e s e r v o i r ; 2) t o i n v e s t i g a t e t h e shadowing e f f e c t a t t h e dam f o r b l a s t s o r i g i n a t i n g a t v a r i o u s l o c a t i o n s n e a r t h e f u t u r e w a t e r i n t a k e channel ; 3) t o d e t e r m i n e t h e s u i t a b i l i t y of measurement i n s t r u m e n t a t i o n f o r f u t u r e w a t e r and rock t e s t b l a s t s and t h e f i n a l e x c a v a t i o n b l a s t ;
4) t o measure t h e response of t h e dam t o v a r i o u s w a t e r b l a s t s and ground t r a n s m i t t e d b l a s t waves.
This r e p o r t i s concerned mainly w i t h t h e f i r s t t h r e e i t e m s ; a s p e c t s of t h e r e s p o n s e of t h e dam w i l l be d e a l t w i t h i n a n o t h e r , l a t e r , r e p o r t .
11. EXPERIMENTAL
Procedure
1. Hydrophones: Four hydrophones manufactured by K i s t l e r I n s t r u m e n t C o r p o r a t i o n of Amherst, N.Y., model #202A5/623M123, w i t h a maximum range of 400 p s i (2756 kPa), were employed. C a l i b r a t i o n c o n s t a n t s f o r each i n s t r u m e n t were s u p p l i e d by t h e m a n u f a c t u r e r , a s shown i n Table 1 (A and B). These were checked i n t h e l a b o r a t o r y by
s u b j e c t i n g t h e t r a n s d u c e r s t o a known a c o u s t i c a l n o i s e s o u r c e i n a n a n e c h o i c chamber. Values s o o b t a i n e d were w i t h i n 10% of t h e
m a n u f a c t u r e r ' s v a l u e s . A s t h i s r e p r e s e n t e d a p p r o x i m a t e l y t h e p r e c i s i o n of t h e a c o u s t i c a l measurements, t h e c a l i b r a t i o n c o n s t a n t s from t h e m a n u f a c t u r e r were t a k e n t o be c o r r e c t .
A t t h e dam s i t e , e a c h hydrophone was mounted on a s t e e l H-
s e c t i o n a s shown i n F i g . 2. The s e n s i t i v e e l e m e n t was 7.6 c m (3.0 i n . ) from t h e f a c e of t h e dam. The H-section was lowered i n t o t h e w a t e r by means of two r o p e s f o r m i n g a "V" and g u i d e d a l o n g t h e s l o p i n g f a c e of t h e a r c h t o t h e a p p r o p r i a t e w a t e r d e p t h . The s i g n a l c a b l e from e a c h hydrophone was b r o u g h t t o a m o b i l e l a b o r a t o r y parked a t t h e t o p of t h e dam and passed t h r o u g h t h e power s u p p l y t o a seven-channel "Racal" FM
t a p e r e c o r d e r . I n a d d i t i o n t o t h e f o u r hydrophones, t h e 50 Hz low-pass f i l t e r e d a c c e l e r a t i o n s i g n a l from s t a t i o n C7, e l e v a t i o n 1168 f t ( s e e F i g . 3 ) , and a 100 m s t i m i n g p u l s e t r i g g e r e d manually a t t h e end of t h e b l a s t count-down were r e c o r d e d ; one c h a n n e l was l e f t empty f o r n o i s e r e d u c t i o n on p l a y b a c k . Recording s p e e d of 15 i n . / s p r o v i d e d a f r e q u e n c y c u t - o f f of 5000 Hz. A l l r e c o r d e r g a i n s f o r t h e w a t e r b l a s t s were set a t 1 , w i t h t h e e x c e p t i o n of Event 4 d u r i n g which t h e y were a t 0.5 f o r t h e f o u r hydrophones. These c o n s t a n t s e t t i n g s w e r e a d o p t e d i n o r d e r t o minimize t h e p o s s i b i l i t y of o v e r l o a d i n g t h e r a n g e of t h e t a p e r e c o r d e r , even though t h i s meant a p o t e n t i a l l o s s of d e f i n i t i o n of some very low s i g n a l s
.
Two l a y o u t s of hydrophones were used a s i s shown i n Fig. 3. C o n f i g u r a t i o n A c o n s i s t s of hydrophones A1
,
A2, A3 and A4, c o r r e s p o n d i n g t o l o c a t i o n s V4-5, V6-7, V7-8 and V9-10, r e s p e c t i v e l y , a t 15.2 m (50 f t ) w a t e r depth. C o n f i g u r a t i o n B i s d e s i g n a t e d by B1, B2, B3 and B4 on a r c h V7-8. B1 a t 61 m (20 f t ) d e p t h and B3 (same as A3) a t 15.2 m (50 f t ) w a t e r d e p t h a t t h e c e n t e r of t h e a r c h , whereas B2 i s n e a r C7 and B4 i s n e a r C8, a l s o a t 15.2 m (50 f t ) d e p t h .2. E x p l o s i v e Charges: The p o s i t i o n s of t h e c h a r g e s a r e shown i n F i g . 3 and a r e d e s i g n a t e d by L o c a t i o n s 1 t o 7 around t h e f u t u r e w a t e r i n t a k e c h a n n e l . L o c a t i o n s 1 t o 5 a r e a t 15.2 m (50 f t ) w a t e r d e p t h and
rest a g a i n s t t h e r o c k . L o c a t i o n - 6 i s a l s o a g a i n s t t h e r o c k a t 31.5 m (115 f t ) d e p t h i n l i n e w i t h t h e a x i s of t h e f u t u r e i n t a k e c h a n n e l . L o c a t i o n 7 r e p r e s e n t s t h e suspended c h a r g e d e t o n a t e d a t 15.2
m
(50 f t ) w a t e r d e p t h , l o c a t e d a few hundred metres from t h e o t h e r b l a s tl o c a t i o n s , a p p r o x i m a t e l y p a r a l l e l t o t h e l o n g a ' x i s of t h e dam.
A l l b l a s t s c o n s i s t e d of a 2 kg (4.4 l b ) s t i c k of dynamite; t h e count-down of t h e b l a s t e r was t r a n s m i t t e d by p o r t a b l e r a d i o t o t h e b l a s t c o o r d i n a t o r n e a r t h e mobile l a b o r a t o r y . From t h e r e , t h e count- down was p a s s e d t o t h e o t h e r r e c o r d i n g s t a t i o n s t h r o u g h o u t t h e dam by e x i s t i n g t e l e p h o n e network. The s e q u e n c e of e v e n t s and t h e i r
c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s a r e summarized i n T a b l e 2.
111. ANALYSIS
The r e c o r d e r s i g n a l s were played back a t a speed r e d u c t i o n of 1 6 t i m e s and d i s p l a y e d o n a g a l v a n o m e t e r r e c o r d e r . Records of some
e v e n t s showing t h e f o u r hydrophones and t h e a c c e l e r o m e t e r a t C7, 1168 f t a r e shown i n F i g s . 4 t o 9. I n o r d e r t o d e f i n e t h e i n i t i a l p u l s e b e t t e r , m a g n i f i e d p l o t s were produced w i t h t h e a i d of t h e d i g i t a l d i s p l a y of a F a s t F o u r i e r Transform (FFT) a n a l y z e r . With a t a p e speed-up of f o u r
t i m e s and a n a n a l y z e r f r e q u e n c y r a n g e of 1600 Hz, t h i s r e s u l t e d i n a n e f f e c t i v e low-pass f i l t e r of 6400 Hz. The r e s u l t i n g t i m e h i s t o r i e s f o r s e l e c t e d e v e n t s a r e shown i n F i g s . 10 t o 14. Peak p o s i t i v e and n e g a t i v e a m p l i t u d e s were d e t e r m i n e d from t h e c u r s o r of t h e FFT a n a l y z e r d i s p l a y a n d a r e t a b u l a t e d i n T a b l e s 1 (A and B ) . The f o r m e r p r e s e n t s t h e r e s u l t s i n ST. u n i t s , t h e l a t t e r i n i m p e r i a l u n i t s .
I V . RESULTS
1. P o s i t i v e and N e g a t i v e Wave F r o n t : The t i m e v a r i a t i o n s of t h e b l a s t s i g n a l s a t t h e dam ( F i g s . 4 t o 14) show a n i n i t i a l p o s i t i v e p u l s e f o l l o w e d v e r y s h o r t l y t h e r e a f t e r by a n e g a t i v e p u l s e u s u a l l y of s i m i l a r s h a p e and magnitude. T h i s n e g a t i v e p u l s e r e s u l t s from a
r e f l e c t i o n of t h e o r i g i n a l p u l s e o f f t h e f r e e w a t e r s u r f a c e a s d e p i c t e d i n F i g . 15. The c o n s t r u c t i o n of t h i s r e f l e c t i o n i s a i d e d by t h e
d e f i n i t i o n of a v i r t u a l image of t h e s o u r c e p o i n t a s shown i n F i g . 15; a s t r a i g h t l i n e between t h e image p o i n t and t h e p o i n t of r e c e p t i o n d e f i n e s
t h e p o i n t of r e f l e c t i o n . The d i f f e r e n c e i n t r a v e l t i m e between t h e d i r e c t and r e f l e c t e d p a t h a c c o u n t s f o r t h e time d e l a y between t h e p o s i t i v e and n e g a t i v e p u l s e .
T a b l e 3 shows a comparison between t h e measured and c a l c u l a t e d d e l a y s f o r t h e two p u l s e s . The c a l c u l a t i o n employed d i s t a n c e s measured from s i t e p l a n s and a r e t h e r e f o r e somewhat a p p r o x i m a t e . E l e m e n t a r y geometry was used t o d e t e r m i n e t r a v e l p a t h d i f f e r e n c e s . A c o u s t i c wave v e l o c i t y i n w a t e r was t a k e n t o be 1435 m / s (4708 f t / s ) a t 9°C. The measured t i m e d i f f e r e n c e s a r e t h e times between t h e p o s i t i v e and t h e n e g a t i v e peaks a s i n d i c a t e d i n F i g s . 10 t o 14. For Event 12, t h e suspended c h a r g e , t h e t h e o r e t i c a l time d i f f e r e n c e i s n o t c a l c u l a t e d s i n c e t h e l o c a t i o n of t h e d e t o n a t i o n i s n o t a c c u r a t e l y known. T a b l e 3
shows t h a t t h e c a l c u l a t e d and measured d i f f e r e n c e s i n t r a v e l t i m e s a g r e e r e a s o n a b l y w e l l f o r E v e n t s 4 t o 8 , conf i r m i n g t h e r e f l e c t i o n model
d e s c r i b e d above. The agreement i s somewhat l e s s s a t i s f a c t o r y f o r E v e n t s 11 and 15.
2. Amplitudes of P o s i t i v e and N e g a t i v e Peaks: T a b l e 1 shows t h a t f o r E v e n t s 4 t o 7 ( L o c a t i o n s 1 and 2) r e a s o n a b l y c l o s e agreement e x i s t s i n a m p l i t u d e s of p o s i t i v e and n e g a t i v e p e a k s f o r a l l f o u r hydrophone l o c a t i o n s . A s n o s u b s t a n t i a l d i f f e r e n c e s a r e e v i d e n t among t h e s e f o u r e v e n t s , t h e i r peak p r e s s u r e v a l u e s have b e e n a v e r a g e d , d e s i g n a t e d a s "Average of 4 , 5 , 6 , 7" i n T a b l e 1. T h e s e r e s u l t s show t h a t t h e n e g a t i v e peaks a r e of s i m i l a r a m p l i t u d e t o t h e p o s i t i v e o n e s ; t h i s would b e e x p e c t e d from t h e r e f l e c t i o n model d e s c r i b e d above.
3. Comparison Between Charges A g a i n s t Rock and Suspended Charge: For p u l s e s h a p e s i n F i g s . 10 and 13 and a m p l i t u d e s of p o s i t i v e and n e g a t i v e p u l s e i n T a b l e 1, a c l o s e c o r r e s p o n d e n c e i s s e e n between c h a r g e s a g a i n s t t h e r o c k , E v e n t s 4 t o 7 , and t h e suspended one,
d i f f e r e n t d i s t a n c e s a r e i n v o l v e d , b u t i n e s s e n c e t h e y a r e comparable i n c h a r a c t e r .
For c h a r g e s d e t o n a t e d a g a i n s t t h e s h o r e , t h e p r e s s u r e s emanating from t h e c h a r g e a r e i n c r e a s e d d u e t o r e f l e c t i o n s from t h e rock. For a p e r f e c t r e f l e c t o r , d o u b l i n g of t h e p r e s s u r e would o c c u r a s compared t o a f r e e l y suspended charge. However, changes i n impedance from w a t e r w i t h rock change t h i s somewhat. For a n o r m 1 a n g l e of
i n c i d e n c e , t h e r a t i o of r e f l e c t e d t o t h e i n c i d e n t a m p l i t u d e s , &/A1 i s g i v e n by Kolsky (1963) : where: p = d e n s i t y ; c = bulk v e l o c i t y ; w = s u b s c r i p t f o r w a t e r ; r = s u b s c r i p t f o r rock.
The t r a n s m i t t e d wave r a t i o A ~ / A I i s g i v e n by:
3 3
For p r a 3000 kg/m
,
c r = 4000 m / s , pw = 1000 kg/m,
= 1435 m / s , t h er e f l e c t e d wave r a t i o A2/A1= 0.80. I t i s p o s s i b l e t h a t n o n l i n e a r b e h a v i o u r of t h e rock immediately a d j a c e n t t o t h e d e t o n a t i o n would r e s u l t i n a f u r t h e r r e d u c t i o n of t h i s r e f l e c t i o n c o e f f i c i e n t . A d d i t i o n a l r e f l e c t i o n s from more d i s t a n t c o n t o u r f e a t u r e s of t h e r e s e r v o i r and i t s s h o r e l i n e c a n a l s o b e e x p e c t e d , b u t t h e s e w i l l n o t a f f e c t t h e wave f r o n t s i n c e t h e t r a v e l t i m e t o t h e dam i s l o n g e r . Some i d e n t i f i a b l e a r r i v a l s of r e f l e c t e d p u l s e s h a v i n g a c o n s t a n t t i m e d e l a y a t e a c h of t h e f o u r hydrophone s t a t i o n s f o r E v e n t s 4 , 12 and 1 5 a r e shown i n F i g s . 4 , 8 and 9 , r e s p e c t i v e l y , where some a r e i n d i c a t e d by arrows b e s i d e t h e t r a c e s . The peak a m p l i t u d e s of t h e s e p u l s e s is from 0.5 t o 0.2 t i m e s t h e i n i t i a l peak p r e s s u r e s ; u n f o r t u n a t e l y , i t was n o t p o s s i b l e t o t r a c e t h e t r a v e l p a t h s of t h e s e s e c o n d a r y p u l s e s . An e x a m i n a t i o n of t h e t i m e h i s t o r y of p r e s s u r e s , F i g s . 4 t o 9 , shows t h a t t h e i n i t i a l p o s i t i v e and n e g a t i v e i m p u l s e i s f o l l o w e d by a lower l e v e l d i s t u r b a n c e of random c h a r a c t e r , n o t u n l i k e t h a t of a n e a r t h q u a k e , l a s t i n g from 100 t o 150 m s . F o r t h e p a r t i a l l y s h i e l d e d c h a r g e s , E v e n t s 8 and 11, low f r e q u e n c y components of 20 Hz and l e s s can be d i s c e r n e d i n F i g s .
6
and 7 e s p e c i a l l y f o r Hydrophone A l . These low f r e q u e n c y components a r e , however, of small magnitude, l e s s t h a n 7 kPa ( 1 p s i ) peak t o peak. 4. S h i e l d i n g E f f e c t of T e r r a i n : S h i e l d i n g r e f e r s t o a r e d u c t i o n of p r e s s u r e s when a n o b s t r u c t i o n i s n e a r t o o r d i r e c t l y i n t e r s e c t s t h e s t r a i g h t l i n e j o i n i n g t h e s o u r c e and p o i n t o f o b s e r v a t i o n . Because t h e p r e c i s e d e t a i l s of t h e r o c k c o n t o u r s n e x t t o t h e b l a s t l o c a t i o n a r e not known, a q u a n t i t a t i v e p r e d i c t i o n of t h es h i e l d i n g e f f e c t i s n o t f e a s i b l e . However, q u a l i t a t i v e l y , t h e
phenomenon i s w e l l i l l u s t r a t e d by t h e r e s u l t s o b t a i n e d . A s e x p e c t e d , t h e peak p r e s s u r e s i n T a b l e 1 f o r E v e n t s 4 t o 7 a t L o c a t i o n s 1 and 2 ( s e e F i g . 3) show no e f f e c t of s h i e l d i n g . Event 8 a t L o c a t i o n 3 r e p r e s e n t s a p p r o x i m a t e l y a t a n g e n t i a l l i n e of s i g h t from t h e r o c k t o p o r t i o n s of t h e dam and c l e a r l y d i s p l a y s a d e c r e a s e i n peak p r e s s u r e of t h e c l o s e s t hydrophone, A l , from a b o u t 15 p s i ( 1 0 3 kPa) t o 1.8 p s i (12 k P a ) , and a lesser d e c r e a s e f o r t h e r e m a i n i n g t h r e e hydrophones. T h i s i s i l l u s t r a t e d by t h e f i g u r e s i n T a b l e 1 and t h e p l o t i n Fig. 16. The n a t u r e of t h e p r e s s u r e wave a l s o changes. The i n i t i a l peak p o s i t i v e and n e g a t i v e p r e s s u r e s a r e n o t t h e l a r g e s t anymore, b u t s u b s e q u e n t
p u l s e s exceed t h e f i r s t o n e s . T h i s i s a l s o t h e c a s e i n Event 11
a l t h o u g h , b e c a u s e of c h a n g i n g l o c a t i o n s , o t h e r v a r i a b l e s a r e i n t r o d u c e d which may a f f e c t t h e time h i s t o r y of t h e p r e s s u r e s . F i n a l l y , f o r
E v e n t s 9 and 10, which a r e l o c a t e d away from t h e d i r e c t l i n e of s i g h t of t h e hydrophones, t h e s h i e l d i n g i s a l m o s t t o t a l and less t h a n 1% of t h e p r e v i o u s d i r e c t p r e s s u r e s i s r e c o r d e d .
The s h i e l d i n g e f f e c t is i l l u s t r a t e d i n F i g . 16 which shows peak p r e s s u r e s a t t h e f o u r hydrophone l o c a t i o n s f o r t h e v a r i o u s e v e n t s . For Event 8 t h e l a r g e s t d e c r e a s e i n p r e s s u r e a s compared w i t h t h e a v e r a g e of E v e n t s 4 t o 7 i s s e e n t o o c c u r a t Hydrophone A1 n e a r e s t t h e b l a s t . The d e c r e a s e s become p r o g r e s s i v e l y l e s s f o r t h e o t h e r hydrophones i n t h e e a s t e r l y d i r e c t i o n of t h e dam. T h i s d e m o n s t r a t e s t h a t a t t h e l o c a t i o n s t e s t e d , s h i e l d i n g d o e s n o t produce a s h a r p d e m a r c a t i o n between d i r e c t b l a s t e f f e c t s and t h e s h i e l d e d r e g i o n s , b u t r e s u l t s i n a g r a d u a l r e d u c t i o n i n p r e s s u r e o v e r a wide t a r g e t a r e a . The peak p r e s s u r e s f o r Event 11 a t L o c a t i o n 6 a r e s e e n t o b e e v e n lower t h a n t h o s e coming from t h e s h a l l o w e r L o c a t i o n 3 , most p r o b a b l y b e c a u s e of g r e a t e r t o p o g r a p h i c a l s h i e l d i n g r a t h e r t h a n a s a d i r e c t r e s u l t of t h e d e e p e r w a t e r d e p t h . T h e o r e t i c a l p r e d i c t i o n of t h e e f f e c t of s h i e l d i n g f o r p r e s s u r e wave p r o p a g a t i o n i n w a t e r f o l l o w s t h e same p r i n c i p l e s a s t h o s e u s e d i n p r o p a g a t i o n of sound i n a i r . The q u a n t i t a t i v e e s t i m a t i o n of s h i e l d i n g d u e t o a b a r r i e r c a n be a c h i e v e d by means of t h e d i a g r a m i n Fig. 17 ( t a k e n from Delany, 1972). I t s h o u l d be n o t e d t h a t t h e h i g h e r f r e q u e n c y components a r e s u b j e c t t o g r e a t e r d i f f r a c t i o n l o s s e s a s governed by t h e p a r a m e t e r 2d/X, and t h a t f o r a g r a z i n g b a r r i e r a n g l e , i.e., 2d/X = 0 , t h e s i g n a l r e d u c t i o n amounts t o 5 dB, o r 0.56 t i m e s what t h e p r e s s u r e would have been w i t h o u t t h e b a r r i e r .
5. T h e o r e t i c a l C a l c u l a t i o n s of B l a s t P r e s s u r e : F o l l o w i n g t h e e m p i r i c a l r e l a t i o n s h i p p r e s e n t e d by Henrych (1979) and n e g l e c t i n g h i g h e r o r d e r t e r m s , t h e peak o v e r p r e s s u r e Ap of a suspended c h a r g e is:
where: R = R / w ' / ~ ( ~ n - k ~ l / ~ ) ; R = r a d i a l d i s t a n c e (m);
w
= t r i n i t r o t o l u e n e (TNT) e q u i v a l e n t c h a r g e mass ( k g ) ; kp = k i l o g r a m f o r c e .C o l e (1948) p r e s e n t s a s l i g h t l y d i f f e r e n t r e l a t i o n s h i p :
where: W = w e i g h t , l b of TNT; R = d i s t a n c e , f t .
These r e l a t i o n s h i p s f o l l o w c l o s e l y t h e g r a p h s p r e s e n t e d by Langefors and K i h l s t r ' k (1963) which i n t u r n a r e a c o l l e c t i o n of d a t a m o s t l y by
Enhamre (1954). Applying t h e d i s t a n c e s from t h e s o u r c e t o t h e hydrophones g i v e n i n T a b l e 3 , and a c h a r g e mass of 2 kg, t h e peak
p r e s s u r e s a s c a l c u l a t e d by b o t h r e l a t i o n s h i p s a r e t a b u l a t e d i n Table
4.
Note t h a t i n a l l c a s e s t h e l i m i t of
R
<
50 i n Eq. ( 3 ) i s exceeded. No range l i m i t a t i o n s a r e g i v e n w i t h Eq. ( 4 ) . To a c c o u n t f o r t h e r e f l e c t i o n a t t h e dam s u r f a c e , Eqs. ( 1 ) and ( 2 ) can a l s o be u t i l i z e d . Taking f o r c o n c r e t e p, = 2500 kg/m3, and cc = 3000 m / s , t h e r e f l e c t i o n r a t i o of A2/A1 = 0.67 i . e . , 67% of t h e incoming wave i s r e f l e c t e d back, w h i l efrom Eq. ( 2 ) , 1
-
0.67 = 0.33, o r 33% i s t r a n s m i t t e d i n t o t h e c o n c r e t e of t h e dam.The c a l c u l a t e d and e x p e r i m e n t a l peak p r e s s u r e s i n T a b l e
4
s h o u l d n o t be compared d i r e c t l y , s i n c e t h e former a r e free-f i e l d
p r e s s u r e s ' and need t o be a d j u s t e d f o r r e f l e c t i o n phenomena. T h i s w i l l b e d e a l t w i t h l a t e r .
DISCUSSION
1. P o s i t i v e and N e g a t i v e P u l s e s a t Wave F r o n t : The
r e f l e c t i o n model shown i n Fig. 15 e x p l a i n s t h e p r e s e n c e of t h e n e g a t i v e p u l s e i n t h e wave f r o n t and t h e t i m e d e l a y s measured. It c a n be
e x p e c t e d t h e n t h a t t h e p r e s s u r e f l u c t u a t i o n s behind t h e wave f r o n t a r e t h e r e s u l t of v a r i o u s r e f l e c t i o n s , b o t h from t h e w a t e r s u r f a c e and t h e r e s e r v o i r bottom. I n g e n e r a l t h e n , b o t h a p o s i t i v e and a n e g a t i v e p u l s e of e q u a l magnitude can be e x p e c t e d whenever t h e d i f f e r e n c e i n t r a v e l time between t h e d i r e c t p a t h and t h e s u r f a c e - r e f l e c t e d p a t h i s l o n g e r t h a n t h e p u l s e d u r a t i o n . T h i s r e p r e s e n t s a c o n d i t i o n d i f f e r e n t t o t h a t p r e s e n t e d i n L a n g e f o r s and Kihlstr-&n (1963) which d e s c r i b e s measurements a t c l o s e r a n g e , f o r which c a s e o n l y a p o s i t i v e wave f r o n t i s
o b t a i n e d .
2. E f f e c t of D i s t a n c e of Hydrophone from D a m S u r f a c e : The incoming p r e s s u r e waves a r e r e f l e c t e d a t t h e dam s u r f a c e . I f t h e hydrophone i s mounted a t some d i s t a n c e from t h i s s u r f a c e , a complex i n t e r a c t i o n of incoming and r e f l e c t e d waves w i l l be monitored. S i n c e p r a c t i c a l c o n s i d e r a t i o n s p r e c l u d e l o c a t i n g t h e s e n s i n g element of t h e hydrophone f l u s h w i t h t h e s u r f a c e , t h e p o t e n t i a l e r r o r i n t r o d u c e d by l o c a t i n g t h e hydrophone away from t h e s u r f a c e needs t o be c o n s i d e r e d .
The t r a v e l time f o r t w i c e t h e 7.6 c m ( 3 i n . ) d i s t a n c e from t h e dam s u r f a c e t o t h e hydrophone i s 0.10 ms. For a s h a r p l y r i s i n g
i n c i d e n t p u l s e , a r e f l e c t e d p u l s e of t h e same shape b u t 0.67 times i n a m p l i t u d e would t h e n a p p e a r a t 0.10 ms l a t e r , superimposed on t h e
i n c i d e n t one. T h i s would g i v e r i s e t o a s e c o n d a r y peak and a
l e n g t h e n i n g of t h e r e c o r d e d p u l s e by 0.10 m s as compared w i t h t h e p u l s e t h a t a c t u a l l y e x i s t s a t t h e s u r f a c e o f t h e dam. I f t h e i n c i d e n t wave h a s a v e r y s h a r p peak and w i t h i n 0.1 m s d r o p s t o 0.33 o r less of i t s peak a m p l i t u d e A1, t h e n t h e r e f l e c t e d p u l s e of . a m p l i t u d e 0.67 A1 w i l l n o t be r e g i s t e r e d by t h e h y d r o p h o n e s as b e i n g l a r g e r t h a n t h e peak i n c i d e n t wave. The measured peak a m p l i t u d e s would t h e n a c t u a l l y
r e p r e s e n t t h e f r e e - f i e l d p r e s s u r e s and n o t t h e r e f l e c t e d p r e s s u r e a t t h e dam s u r f a c e .
Every e f f o r t s h o u l d t h e r e f o r e be made t o r e d u c e t h e d i s t a n c e f r o m hydrophone t o t h e dam s u r f a c e and t o i n c r e a s e t h e f r e q u e n c y c o n t e n t of t h e r e c o r d i n g p r o c e s s i n f u t u r e tests.
3. Agreement Between C a l c u l a t e d and Measured P r e s s u r e s : The f r e e - f i e l d and t h e measured p r e s s u r e s n e e d t o b e a d j u s t e d b e f o r e a q u a n t i t a t i v e c o m p a r i s o n c a n be made. U n f o r t u n a t e l y , b e c a u s e of t h e f o l l o w i n g u n c e r t a i n t i e s , t h i s c a n o n l y b e d o n e i n a v e r y a p p r o x i m a t e manner.
a ) The measured p r e s s u r e s are p r o b a b l y t o o low d u e t o t h e 5000 Hz f r e q u e n c y l i m i t a t i o n o f t h e r e c o r d i n g p r o c e s s .
b) A s w a s p o i n t e d o u t a b o v e , t h e p o s i t i o n i n g of t h e hydrophones was s u c h t h a t p r e s s u r e s somewhere b e t w e e n t h e f r e e - f i e l d c o n d i t i o n and t h e r e f l e c t e d p r e s s u r e s a t t h e dam s u r f a c e were measured, a m o u n t i n g t o a maximum o f 1.67 t i m e s t h e i n c i d e n t wave
a m p l i t u d e .
c ) The c a l c u l a t e d p r e s s u r e s need t o be r a i s e d by a maximum of 8 0 % t o a c c o u n t f o r t h e r e f l e c t i o n a t t h e r o c k s u r f a c e .
The a d j u s t m e n t s b) and c ) r e s u l t i n a n u p p e r bound m u l t i p l i e r of (1.67) (1.80) = 3.0, t o b e a p p l i e d t o t h e c a l c u l a t e d r e s u l t s i n T a b l e 4.
T h i s t h e n p l a c e s t h e measured r e s u l t s w i t h i n 113 t o 112 o f a n u p p e r bound of t h e c a l c u l a t e d o n e s . The r a t i o o f measured t o c a l c u l a t e d v a l u e s i s a l s o s e e n t o i n c r e a s e w i t h d i s t a n c e ; however, no p l a u s i b l e e x p l a n a t i o n f o r t h i s t r e n d c o u l d b e found.
4. I m p l i c a t i o n s on D a m Response: , I n i t i a l c o m p a r i s o n s o f t h e a c c e l e r a t i o n r e s p o n s e o f E v e n t s 5 , 6 , 7 and E v e n t 11 show t h a t
comparable peak a c c e l e r a t i o n r e s p o n s e s are o b t a i n e d f o r g r e a t l y
d i f f e r e n t peak p r e s s u r e s . T h i s i n d i c a t e s t h a t t h e r e s p o n s e i s n o t w e l l c o r r e l a t e d w i t h t h e a m p l i t u d e of t h e p r e s s u r e wave f r o n t . By way of e x p l a n a t i o n , t h i s c a n b e r a t i o n a l i z e d by r e f e r e n c e t o a n o s c i l l a t o r s u b j e c t e d t o t h e p o s i t i v e and f o l l o w i n g n e g a t i v e p u l s e . F o r
o s c i l l a t o r s h a v i n g n a t u r a l p e r i o d s s u b s t a n t i a l l y g r e a t e r t h a n t h e t i m e
d e l a y between t h e p u l s e s , t h e r e s p o n s e from t h e p o s i t i v e i m p u l s e would b e s u b s t a n t i a l l y c a n c e l l e d o u t by t h e r e s p o n s e o f t h e s u c c e e d i n g
n e g a t i v e p u l s e . The p r e s s u r e f l u c t u a t i o n s b e h i n d t h e wave f r o n t t h u s become more i n f l u e n t i a l .
A d d i t i o n a l q u a n t i t a t i v e s t u d i e s on t h e dam r e s p o n s e w i l l be c a r r i e d o u t i n o r d e r t o a r r i v e a t more d e f i n i t i v e c o r r e l a t i o n s between t h e c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of t h e b l a s t wave and t h e r e s p o n s e of t h e dam.
V I . PERFORMANCE OF INSTRUMENTATION
The hydrophones and a s s o c i a t e d c a b l e s and e l e c t r o n i c s performed w e l l u n d e r f i e l d c o n d i t i o n s . F u t u r e measurements, however, should c o n s i d e r t h e f o l l o w i n g changes o r improvements:
1) mounting t h e s e n s i n g element of t h e hydrophone c l o s e t o t h e dam s u r f a c e , from
7.6
cm (3.0 i n . ) t o p r e f e r a b l y 2 t o 3 cm ( a p p r o x i m a t e l y 1 i n . ) ; 2 ) i n c r e a s i n g t h e r e c o r d e r g a i n s f o r a s m a l l e x p e c t e d p r e s s u r e l e v e l s o a s t o improve t h e s i g n a l - t o - n o i s e r a t i o of t h e measurements. F u r t h e r a t t e m p t s s h o u l d a l s o be made t o r e d u c e t h e h i g h f r e q u e n c y n o i s e from t h e hydrophones t h a t c a n be s e e n i n Fig. 12 i n o r d e r t o improve t h e d e f i n i t i o n of low p r e s s u r e s i g n a l s ; 3 ) a n a u t o m a t i c t r i g g e r i n g d e v i c e s h o u l d be d e v i s e d t o produce a common t i m i n g p u l s e on a l l t a p e r e c o r d e r s t h a t a r e employed i n a common e x p e r i m e n t a l set-up. T h i s d e v i c e s h o u l d be a c t i v a t e d by t h e p l u n g e r of t h e b l a s t e r a t o r s l i g h t l y ahead of t h e t i m e of d e t o n a t i o n ;4 ) one o r more a c c e l e r o m e t e r s i g n a l s d i r e c t l y o p p o s i t e a hydrophone s h o u l d be r e c o r d e d w i t h low p a s s f i l t e r s e t t i n g s s u b s t a n t i a l l y h i g h e r t h a n 50 Hz i n o r d e r t o d e t e c t any p o s s i b l e c o r r e l a t i o n between h i g h f r e q u e n c y a c c e l e r a t i o n s and t h e hydrophone
p r e s s u r e s .
5 ) The hydrophone s i g n a l s s h o u l d be r e c o r d e d a t a h i g h e r speed t o p r o v i d e a h i g h e r f r e q u e n c y r e s p o n s e , p r e f e r a b l y 10,000 Hz o r above.
V I I . CONCLUSIONS
These r e s u l t s p e r m i t t h e f o l l o w i n g c o n c l u s i o n s .
1) A wave f r o n t having a p o s i t i v e and n e g a t i v e p o r t i o n of
a p p r o x i m a t e l y e q u a l s h a p e and a m p l i t u d e h a s been measured. T h i s i s e x p l a i n e d by a w a t e r - s u r f a c e r e f l e c t i o n model. The d e l a y between t h e two p o r t i o n s of t h e p u l s e i s shown t o be a f u n c t i o n of t h e d i f f e r e n c e i n t r a v e l t i m e between t h e d i r e c t and t h e s u r f a c e - r e f l e c t e d p r o p a g a t i o n p a t h .
2 ) The s h i e l d i n g e f f e c t of t e r r a i n on t h e b l a s t wave i s w e l l
d e m o n s t r a t e d by t h e r e s u l t s , v a r y i n g from t h e d i r e c t b l a s t p r e s s u r e s t o a v i r t u a l a b s e n c e of o v e r - p r e s s u r e when t h e s o u r c e i s h i d d e n from t h e t a r g e t . The d e g r e e of s h i e l d i n g from d i r e c t
t o h i d d e n s o u r c e s i s g r a d u a l and i s n o t accompanied by sudden changes f n t h e p r e s s u r e d i s t r i b u t i o n on t h e t a r g e t .
3 ) The hydrophones and a s s o c i a t e d equipment performed w e l l d u r i n g t h e t e s t s . Some improvements i n n o i s e r e d u c t i o n , r e c o r d i n g t e c h n i q u e and placement of hydrophones a r e i n d i c a t e d f o r f u t u r e t e s t s , however.
4 ) P r e l i m i n a r y r e s u l t s show t h a t t h e maximum dam r e s p o n s e d o e s n o t depend d i r e c t l y o n t h e a m p l i t u d e of t h e b l a s t wave f r o n t , b u t i s
l i k e l y t o depend more on t h e random p r e s s u r e v a r i a t i o n s behind t h e f r o n t . T h i s w i l l b e f u r t h e r i n v e s t i g a t e d i n c o n n e c t i o n w i t h a d d i t i o n a l dam r e s p o n s e s t u d i e s .
5 ) The measured peak p r e s s u r e s a r e from 113 t o 1 / 2 of t h e u p p e r bound p r e s s u r e s a t t h e dam s u r f a c e a s p r e d i c t e d f r o m two
e m p i r i c a l r e l a t i o n s h i p s . The measured p r e s s u r e s i n c r e a s e w i t h d i s t a n c e r e l a t i v e t o t h e p r e d i c t e d ones. U n c e r t a i n t i e s i n
comparisons between measured and c a l c u l a t e d r e s u l t s i n c l u d e f r e q u e n c y r e s p o n s e l i m i t a t i o n s of t h e r e c o r d i n g s y s t e m ,
a s s e s s m e n t of t h e r e f l e c t i o n s o f f t h e r o c k and t h e dam s u r f a c e , and e x c e e d a n c e of t h e r a n g e of v a l i d i t y of t h e e m p i r i c a l
r e l a t i o n s h i p s .
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The work d e s c r i b e d was c a r r i e d o u t i n c o l l a b o r a t i o n w i t h D r . P a u l Lecomte of Hydro Quebec. The c o o p e r a t i o n and a s s i s t a n c e of D r . Lecomte and of h i s co-workers i s g r e a t l y a p p r e c i a t e d . The Board of C o n s u l t a n t s f o r t h e A d d i t i o n a l Power p r o j e c t a t Manic 5 a r e D r . W. Chadwick of Los Angeles, C a l i f o r n i a , D r . R.W. Clough of B e r k e l e y , C a l i f o r n i a , D r . A.J. Hendron of Urbana, I l l i n o i s , and M r . B. Kihlstrijrn of Stockholm, Sweden. The a s s i s t a n c e of E. L u c t k a r and R. G l a z e r , t e c h n i c a l o f f i c e r s i n t h e D i v i s i o n of B u i l d i n g R e s e a r c h , i n p r e p a r i n g t h e i n s t r u m e n t a t i o n and i n c a r r y i n g o u t t h e measurements i s g r a t e f u l l y acknowledged. I X . REFERENCES 1 ) C o l e , R.H. (1948) Underwater E x p l o s i o n s , P r i n c e t o n U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s , P r i n c e t o n , N.J.
2 ) Delany,
M.E.
(1972) "A P r a c t i c a l Scheme f o r P r e d i c t i n g Noise L e v e l s (L10) A r i s i n g f r o m Road T r a f f i c , " NPL A c o u s t i c s R e p o r t AC 57,N a t i o n a l P h y s i c a l L a b o r a t o r y , U n i t e d Kingdom.
3) Enhamre, E. (1954) " E f f e c t s of Underwater E x p l o s i o n on E l a s t i c S t r u c t u r e s i n Water," T r a n s . Royal I n s t i t . of Technology, B u l l . 42 of t h e I n s t i t u t i o n H y d r a u l i c s , Stockholm.
4 ) Henrych, J. (1979) The Dynamics of E x p l o s i o n s and i t s U s e ,
Developments i n C i v i l E n g i n e e r i n g , 1 ; E l s e v i e r S c i e n t i f i c P u b l i s h i n g Co., New York, N.Y.
NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL CANADA DIVISION OF BUILDING RESEARCH
ERRATA
MEASUREMENT OF UNDERWATER BLAST WAVES ON DANIEL JOHNSON DAM
by
J.H.
R a i n e rDBR I n t e r n a l Report 472, A p r i l 1982.
p.3: below middle of page, change "(20 i t ) " t o "(200 i t ) "
-p.5: Eq. (2) s h o u l d r e a d :
p.6: F o u r t h l i n e from bottom of page s h o u l d r e a d :
-
1 / 3 1 / 3where: R = R/W (m-kg
)
;p.7: l a s t p a r t of f i r s t p a r a g r a p h s h o u l d r e a d :
". . .
,
w h i l e from Eq. ( 2 ) , 1+
0.67 = 1.67, o r 1.67 t i m e s t h e incoming wave i s t r a n s m i t t e d i n t o t h e c o n c r e t e of t h e dam."5)
Kolsky,
H.
(1963) Stress Waves in Solids, Dover Publications,
New York, N.Y.,
213
p .6) Langefors,
U.and KihlstrGm, B.
(1963) The Modern Technique of Rock
Blasting, John Wiley
&Sons, Inc.
,
New York, N.Y.
hl
.
0 4 CO rr) U h.
9 rn \O.
d U 0.
h U h= ;
rr) u.
6 ln rr, rr) U hl.
ln 4 rr) ln 4 h h l O 0 4 6. 4 0 I lnh n m m 3 u D n CO v PO8
1 UJ t.l PC Q) b rl U Q3
m Q) b 9 m Q) b 04 d cb d U d c H4
a 04 n W l n r r ) l d l n h 0 3 l n h V2
h h I u h l - 4 - 3 0 W l n b??'?'?'?
?
".
0.
r r ) U \ O h l W hl h hl m l n l n u r r ) 4 \O 9 a?02"2"0.'4
?'?
h u o o w r n h l u 0 \ O \ O b h U 4 CO b*
m h l - ~ u m. . . * .
? ?
rr).
r r ) h l n U h OI Cl hl 9 h h h h l h h d m h l ? O r h l * f n. .
CO42rr) Q).
.
h 4 O C O l n d c \ O O U bCOOICOrr) cd h CO b J= 0 U"24"."?".,
,024
"0.
COuuCOo * m \ O r r ) h h 0 m r r ) d Q ) CO CO d d"."2"."0.=?
m. .
ln hl.
\O \O h h C O \ D h l m 9 C O l n d m h h U*2
9 h. .
e4".4
m o r r ) e \ O rr) y.) 0 o o l n h l **
2
rr) 4 d d d 44"0."0.".?
?=?
m h \ o u h l U h u O Q \ O O 4*
OI 0 d d d * 4 C v h l h l h l h l h l h l d h l. . .
hl l n m l n l n l n m m r r , l nz
d d d d 4 d d C n 4 I+
I+
I + I+
a U m a c c U . . O 0 h O b U.;:
rr) P d (d Q) u a b o h 03 I h U 3 m w aw
u rn h CO I h 3 V rr) C9 a h CO I h U 3 V a J hl rn h a? I h V 4 a..
g
d U lu hl 4 d d h l r r ) + l n \ O h rC) 4 a -M l n O a u l n \ o h a o m O d h l d d d2
'8
\o"
a~ M5 %
a s
8 Q ) U w 0w
h ln H 4 I u U d l n rl a d u 0 a 0 b d d a b d haJ (dx
rn U c)3
aJ a 0s
a 0 b az
PO 0 PC2
d n'8
t.l 9 u c a 0 3 2 W V O . ln h2
..
(d 04 A \'e
a UJ..
Un n n n n n n n n
S S S S S S S S S
* e * * * * * e *
Table
3
Carparison of Measured and Calculated Differences
in
Arrival Tires
iktrrren Initial Positive
.adBegatire Pulses
1 2 3 4
Hyd rop hone
- - -- - - - - - - - -
D i s tance Calcu- Distance Calcu- Distance Calcu- Distance Ca 1 cu-
t o Gauge Measured l a t e d t o Gauge Measured lated t o Gauge Measured l a t e d t o Gauge Measured l a t e d
Event
m
~ 1 6 ms mm s
m s m I~LSms
mm
m6Table 4
Measured and Calculated Peak P o s i t i v e P r e s s u r e s
Hydrophone S t a t i o n
1A a tV4-5
2A
a t V6-7
3A
a tV7-8
4A
a tV9-10
Approximate D i s t a n c e From Charge t o Gauge,
m ( f
t )
315 (1033)
425 (1395)
525 (1722)
665 (2182)
Measured
Average of E v e n t s 4, 5, 6, 7
Peak P r e s s u r e :
kPa ( p s i )
104
(15.1)
77.2
(11.2)
84.7
(12.3)
71.7
(10.4)
- - - -- - pp --- - - -
C a l c u l a t e d
Eq. 3
-
Henrych (1979)
Peak
Ap, kPa ( p s i )
115
(16.7)
88.6
(12.9)
69.3
(10.1)
54.7
(7.9)
P r e s s u r e :
*
Eq.4
-
Cole (1948)
A P ,
kPa ( p s i )
102
(14.8)
73.0
(10.6)
57.3
(8.3)
43.9
(6.4)
*These p r e s s u r e s a r e f r e e - f i e l d p r e s s u r e s a s p r e d i c t e d by t h e e m p i r i c a l r e l a t i o n s h i p s and do n o t account
f o r t h e r e f l e c t e d waves a t t h e dam s u r f a c e o r
a tt h e r o c k f a c e .
Fig. 1 Daniel Johnson Dam (Manic/
5)on
Manicouagan River, Quebec.
CHARGE LOCATIONS 1
-
7 I T U R E T A K E A N N E L--
-
D R A I N A G E A N D S E R V I C E G A L L E R I E S\
b L O C A T I O N S O F H Y D R O P H O N E S R E S E R V O I R M A N I C O U A G A N 5 EL. 3 5 6 . 2 m f P L A N-
E L E V A T I O N F I G U R E 3 L O C A T I O N O F C H A R G E S A N D H Y D R O P H O N E S T A T I O N SIMAGE POINT OF SOURCE WATER SURFACE
REFLECTED PATHS BLAST
LOCAT l OP ? h l C C . . F I G U R E 1 5 S C H E M A T I C F O R P A T H S O F D I R E C T A N D R E F L E C T E D B L A S T F R O N T S CHARGE EVENT LOCAT l ON
-
CHARGE DEPTH SYMBOLrn ft