• Aucun résultat trouvé

Uniform distribution of sequences from direct products of groups

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Uniform distribution of sequences from direct products of groups"

Copied!
9
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

A NNALI DELLA

S CUOLA N ORMALE S UPERIORE DI P ISA Classe di Scienze

L. K UIPERS

P. A. J. S CHEELBEEK

Uniform distribution of sequences from direct products of groups

Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, Classe di Scienze 3

e

série, tome 22, n

o

4 (1968), p. 599-606

<

http://www.numdam.org/item?id=ASNSP_1968_3_22_4_599_0

>

© Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa, 1968, tous droits réservés.

L’accès aux archives de la revue « Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, Classe di Scienze » (

http://www.sns.it/it/edizioni/riviste/annaliscienze/

) implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (

http://www.numdam.org/conditions

). Toute utilisa- tion commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale.

Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright.

Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques

http://www.numdam.org/

(2)

DIRECT PRODUCTS OF GROUPS

L. KUIPERS and P. A. J. SCHEELBEEK

Introduction.

The

present

paper deals with some

aspects

of the

theory

of uniform

distribution of sequences from

compact topological (infinite)

groups

(Part I)

and from finite groups as well

(Part II).

Part I is based upon the

theory developed by

B. EOKMANN

[1],

who

proved

the

classical

result:

if g

is

a

compact topological

group, the sequence

(~~(~==1~2,...) from g

is uni-

formly

distributed

in q

if and

only

if for each non-trivial irreducible repre- sentation

fD of q

If in

addition g

is

abelian,

then

(D

in

(1)

stands for a non-trivial character

of 9.

In order to

apply

this

theory

to groups which are direct

products

of

compact topological

groups we make use of the

Pontrjagin

construction of the

representations

of such groups. See

[2],

p. 115. Let F be the direct

product

of two

compact topological groups

and H. An element z E F is

a

pair (x, y)

with x

and y

E H.

Let g

and h be irreducible

representa-

tions and .1~ resp. and of order m and n resp.

Let g (x)

= and

h

(y)

=

(hkl (y)).

Form a matrix

f

of order mn

by defining

the elements

Pervenuto alla Redazione il 2

Laglio

1968.

(3)

600

and the array

where stands for the matrix

Now

(z))

is a

representation

of F. One observes that the trace of F is

equal

to the

product

of the traces of G and H. Moreover F is irredu- cible. All irreducible

representations

of F

(except

for

equivalence)

can be

found in this way. Theorems 1 and 2 are

applications.

L. A. RUBEL

[3] recently

showed that Eckmann’s

theory

also

applies

in the case of uniform distribution of sequences from

~’/~o, where ~’

is a

locally compact

group

and go

is a closed normal

subgroup of fl

such that

fJ/fJo is compact.

He

applies

his result to a

problem posed by

I. NIVEN

[4],

who introduced the

concept

of uniform distribution of a sequence of ratio- nal

integers

reduced modulo m

(where

m is a

non-negative integer ) l )

in

the class of residues mod m. We remark however that in the case of Niven’s

theory

and its

subsequent developments

sequences are considered

containing

elements which assume a finite number of distinct values

only.

In all these

cases the criterion for uniform distribution reduces to a very

simple

useful

lemma

(theorem 3)

which can be shown

by applying properties

of characters of finite additive abelian groups

(Part II).

PART I

THEOREM 1.

Let 19

and H be two

compact topological

groups. Let a E

g

be

fixedpointfree

under all non-trivial

represenations oJ’ (j.

Let b E H. Then the sequence

of

elements

(a, b), (a, b2), (a2, b), (a, b3), (a3, b), (a2, b2), (a2, b3), (a3, b2),

(a, (a4, b), ...

is

uniformly

distributed in

F,

the direct

product o y

H.

PROOF. Since a

E q

is

fixedpointfree

under all non-trivial

representa-

tions

of q,

the powers of a are dense

(see [1],

th.

1) and ~

is abe-

lian. If

~

is a non-trivial character

of 91

and h is an irreducible represen-

(4)

tation of

H,

then

is a non-trivial irreducible

representation

of F. Consider the first N elements

of the sequence defined in the theorem. We want to show that

where the

integer n

is de6ned

by

goes to

zero if Now

Since all function values

(b~)

are

uniformly bounded,

it suffices to show that

Now

replacing ~n (a) by S¥ (all)

and

observing

that N

= (~ (n2)

we see that

the last

expression

-+ 0 as Y --* oo

(n

-~

oo).

THEOREM 2. Let

g

and H be two

compact topological

groups

satisfying

the second

countability

axiom and let

( ), y( .1) ) (n = 1, 2, .;.)

be two se-

quences

of

elements

from g,

and let

( ), ( (n = 1, 2, ...)

be two sequen-

ces

from

H. Let

( &#x3E;, xn2~ )

be

uniformly

distributed

in

and

H,

resp.

Furthermore it is assumed that lim

(yn)-1

= e(l) and lim

(y(2))-l

=

e(2)

1~ - 00

’~

n -· o0

e(l) and e(2) are unit elements

in 0

and

H,

re8p. Then the sequence

y(2) &#x3E;

is

uniforully

distributed in the direct

product

F

of q

and

H.

PROOF. First we notice that

C yn’~ )

is

uniformly

distributed in

q,

as

is

(

in

H, according

to D. HLA WKA

[5],

whose result is a

generaliza-

tion of a theorem of J. G. VAN DFR CORPUT

[6].

Now

using

Eckmann’s

(5)

602

criterion and the above notation we

get

from which the theorem follows.

PART II

THEOREM 3.

If g

is an abelian group, and H is a normal

subgroup of finite index,

then the

sequence ( x?~ ) (n = 1, 2, ...) from ~’

is

uniformly

dis-

tributed in the cosets

of ~’

mod H

if

and

only ~if fo~~

every non-trivial cha- racter

f of q

which is trivial on

H,

PROOF. Let

xn )

be

uniformly

distributed in the cosets X

of 9

mod

H,

that

is,

let

We

always

have

for every character

f

of

g.

For every non-trivial character

f

we have the

property

Because of our

assumption (3), (4)

can be written in the from

(6)

(o (N) depends

on

X).

Now

(5), (6)

and

(3) imply (2)

for every non-trivial character.

Conversely,

suppose that

(2)

is satisfied for every non-trivial character

f (but

trivial on

H).

Then we start from the

identity

where X is any coset

of g mod H,

and where the summation on the

right

of

(7)

is

performed

over all characters involved. That

(7)

is true follows

easily

from the

orthogonality properties

of the

fl

Because of our

assumption (2), (7)

can be written in the form

(o (1) depends

on

j). Letting

we find

(3).’

APPLICATION. Let m, s and

t E Z (the

rational

integers) and 1 -

Let

92 ==== 92 (m, x~ y]

be the

ring

of

polynomials

in x

and y

over the

ring (or

the class of residues mod

m).

Let I =

yt)

be the ideal

generated

and

yt,

or let

where fp

and 1f are

arbitrary

elements

of R

[m, x, y].

Now consider the set

R jI

of residues of elements of R modulo

I,

that

is the set of elements of R of the form

Obviously

the number of these residues is 1n’t. These elements form an

additive group

isomorphic

with the direct

product G

of st additive abelian

groups each of them

consisting

of the elements

0, 1,..., m - 1 :

It is well-known that each of the characters

of q

is determined

by

an ordered set of gt

integers mod m,

say the vector

(7)

604

and that its value assumed at the element

is

given by

the

expression

or e

(A C, m),

say.

Let

( A" ) (n=1, 2, ...)

be a sequence of

polynomials

from R

[m,

x,

y].

Then

the

question

how these

polynomials (reduced

mod

I)

are distributed over the elements of

.R/I

is

equivalent

to the

question

how the sequence of vectors of coefficients is distributed over the elements of where

Z8t

is the direct

product

of st

rings Z. Obiously

is a

subgroup

of finite index

(namely mat)

of Theorem 3

applies

in this case. With the notations al-

ready

used we have the

following

result.

THEOREM 4. The

An ) (~~=1~ 2,...) from R y]

is

uniformly

distributed mod I

if

and

only if for

every element

C = (0, 0,

...,

0)

REMARK 1. Let 8

=1,

t =1. Then we have the case dealt with

by

I. NIVEN

[4]

and S. UOHIYAMA

[7],

and we find the criterion: a sequence

ale ) (k = 1, 2, ...)

of

integers

is

unif’ormly

distributed mod tit if and

only

if for

every j =1, 2, ... , m -1

REMARK 2. Let

Zp

be the

ring

of

p-adic integers ( p being

a

prime

num-

ber),

let I be the ideal

generated by pk (k

an

integer ~ 1 ).

Then for an element yrx in we have the canonical

representation

Let be a sequence in

Zp.

Since the non-trivial characters of

are

given by

the

expression

(8)

we find the criterion for the uniform distribution of

for

every h = 1, 2,

...,

pk -1.

See J. CHAUVINEAU

[8].

REMARK 3.

Finally

we comment on J. H. HODGES’ paper

[9]. Hodges

considers a sequence

( Ak )

of

polynomials

from the

ring

where

q = pr,

p a

prime

and with

r &#x3E; 1.

If denotes a monic

polynomial

of

degree

m ~

1,

then the

problem

is how

Ay )

reduced mod M distributes.

In

fact,

a residue of a

polynomial A

mod M is an

expression

of the form where the ex, are of the form with

and p

is a zero of an irreducible

polynomial

of

degree

r from

Now define

e (A, M) = exp (21liat/p). Hodges

shows that the condition

is necessary for the uniform distribution of

Ak )

mod M over the elements

ai

-~

...

-~-

am. We claim that the condition

(for

every

polynomial C ~

0

(mod M))

is necessary and sufficient for the uniform distribution of

Ak )

and we state that the

present

case is an ap-

plication

of theorem 4. Take in theorem

4,

m = p, s = r, t = in, and notice

N

that Z

(see (10))

is an

expression

of the

type (9). For,

let

k=1

then the coefficient of in the

product Ak

0 is of the form

y~ -f - ... +all, Y1,

and

by expressing

each and

7,

in terms of p~ we find that the coef ficient of

,ur-1

in this sum is

exactly

of the form

(9).

Hence the criterion

is the same as stated

by

theorem 4.

Southern Illinois University Cal’bo1,dale, Illinois f University of Technology Delft, Netherlands

(9)

606

[1]

B. ECKMANN, Ueber monothetische Gruppen, Comm. Math. Helv., 16 (1943-44), 249-263.

[2]

L. PONTRJAGIN, Topological Groups.

[3]

L. A. RUBEL, Uniform distribution in locally compact groups, Comm. Math. Helv., 39 (1965), 253-258.

[4]

I. NIVEN, Uniform distribution of sequences of integers, Trans. Am. M. S., 98

(1961).

52-62.

[5]

E. HLAWKA, Zur formalen Theorie der Gleichverteilung in kompakten Gruppen, Rend. Circ.

Mat. Palermo, 4 (1953), 33-47.

[6]

J. G. VAN DER CORPUT, Diophantische Ungleichungen I. Zur Gleichuerteilung modulo Eins,

Acta Math., 56 (1931), 373-456.

[7]

S. UCHIYAMA, On the uniform distribution of sequences of integers, Proc. Japan Ac., 37 (1961), 605-609.

[8]

J. CHAUVINEAU, Complément au théorème métrique de Koksma dans R et dans

Qp,

C. R.

Acad. Sci. Paris, 260 (1965), 6252-6255.

[9]

J. H. HODGES, Uniform distribution in

(F[q, x],

Acta Arithmetica XII (1966), 55-75.

Références

Documents relatifs

is finitely generated, abelian-by-finite and centralized by a finite index subgroup of Out (Γ). The case of a general polycyclic-by-finite group. — In this subsection, we ex- plain

Distribution-free consistency results in nonparametric discrimination and regression function estimation.. Strong universal consistency of neural

Therefore we can consider the CA of an arbitrary normal sequence of measures and obtain the above results as a consequence of the corresponding theorems for

The theory of uniform measures is applied to the problem of uniqueness of invariant means on topological groups.. The result:

DEFINITION 1.2.. everywhere defined, linear) transformations of S is called a von Neumann algebra, if 21 is closed in the weak topology for operators.. Denote by Fthe

one dimensional sequences ro(h) = (xkh&amp;#x3E;), h integral vector, then the sequence ro is uniformly distributed if and only if the sequences.. w(h) are for each h

distributed modulo 1; note that in the definition of uniform distri- bution of a sequence of integers the modulus is greater than

element in the compact semigroup SB we obtain the following propo- sition : a summable sequence (xn) in X is uniformly distributed if for every summable sequence (Yn)