A NNALI DELLA
S CUOLA N ORMALE S UPERIORE DI P ISA Classe di Scienze
T AKAHIRO K AWAI
Holomorphic perturbation of a system of micro-differential equations
Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, Classe di Scienze 4
esérie, tome 5, n
o3 (1978), p. 581-586
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=ASNSP_1978_4_5_3_581_0>
© Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa, 1978, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, Classe di Scienze » (http://www.sns.it/it/edizioni/riviste/annaliscienze/) implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions). Toute utilisa- tion commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale.
Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
Holomorphic System
of Micro-Differential Equations (*).
TAKAHIRO KAWAI
(**)
dedicated to Hans
Lewy
The purpose of this paper is to
study
someinteresting phenomena
whichwe encounter when we
holomorphically change
the coefficients of asystem
of
(micro)-differential equations. Roughly speaking,
our results claim that solutions of thesystem
inquestion
cannotchange holomorphically
withrespect
toparameters t == (tl, ..., tN)
even when the coefficients of thesystem depend holomorphically
on t. Suchphenomena
were observedby
Zerner
[4]
for linear differentialoperators
with constant coefficients andby Lewy [2]
for a class of linear differentialoperators
of the first order. The methodemployed
in this article iscompletely
different from theirs and it reveals thegeneral
mechanism hidden behind their veryingenious
argu- ments. The results in this paper will also be of their own interest in connection with a recent result(Kawai [1])
on thestability
of the coho-mology
groups under the deformation ofelliptic systems. (See
Remark4 at the end of this
paper.)
The notations used in this article are the same as those used in Sato- Kawai-Kashiwara
[3] (1).
Micro-differentialoperators
were calledpseudo-
differential
operators
in that article.First we show a theorem to the effect that
holomorphic
character in somevariables of a solution of the
system
inquestion automatically
entails theanalyticity
in all variables. Its connection to a recent result ofLewy [2]
will be
explained
later as itscorollary.
In thesequel
t =(t1,
de-notes a
point
in an open setQ c CN I".J R2N,
l ==(tx,
...,tN),
r = ...,’fN) (*) Supported
inpart
NSF GP 36269.(**) Department
of Mathematics, HarvardUniversity
and Research Institute for MathematicalSciences, Kyoto University.
(1)
This article shall be referred to as S-K-K[3]
in thesequel
for short.Pervenuto alla Redazione il 23 Settembre 1977.
582
and s =
(s1, ... , s~,)
denote itscomplex conjugate,
realpart
andimaginary part, respectively.
Their dual variables are denotedf =
(fiy
..., = ...,eN)
and ar =(or,,
...,a~~), respectively.
We alsodenote
by at
theoperator
THEOREM 1. Let ~ be an adm2issible
system of micro- differential
equa- tionsde f ined
in aneighborhood of (r,
s, x ;(9 ,
a,q) 00)
=(0, 0,
0153o;(0, 0, rlo) oo)
where M is aneighborhood of (0, xo)
EE R2N xR-n. Assume that
system
~ commutes with theoperator it,
i.e. thecoefficients of
thedefining equations of
~ areindependent o f t.
Assume thatthere exists an
analytic function cp (t, i,
x; 7:,i~, ~ )
which ishomogeneous
withrespect
to(7:, f, 77)
anddefined
in acomplex neighborhood of p*
and whichsatisfies f ollo2ving
conditions :(1)
g~ = 0 on the(complex)
characteristicvariety
Vof
Then any
microfunction
solutionf of
JK, that isdefined
nearp*
and thatdepends holomorphically
on t isnecessarily
zero in aneighborhood of p*
PROOF. The
holomorphy
off
in timplies
thatf
shouldsatisfy
On the other
hand,
theassumption
on thecommutativity
of and81
tentails that we can find a well-defined
system Jt by adding equation (3)
to u1(,.
Clearly
the(complex)
characteristicvariety
W ofA
is contained in{~==0yf==0} by
condition(1).
Here z~ denotes apoint
in(R~ Q)c ^,
= "a. By
virtue ofassumption (2)
we may assume without loss of gen-erality
thatholds for some
l(l t N).
For the sake of
definiteness,
we assumeThen, choosing
apositive
constant Csufficiently large,
we findSince W is contained in
lp +
Of =0~ ,
we canapply
Theorem 2.3.8 of S-K-K[3]
to concludeholds. This is
equivalent
tosaying
that any microfunction solution ofA,
i.e. any microfunction solution of ~ that
depends holomorphically on t,
isinevitably
zero as a microfunction near This is therequired
result.Q.E.D.
COROLLARY 1
(Lewy [2]).
Consider a lineardifferential operator,
where al and a2 are
analytic
in(tl’ (2)
andholomorphic
in t,. AssumeLet
f (tl,
0153l,x2)
be a(hyper) f unetion de f ined
in aneighborhood of (tl,
0153l,x2)
=- (o, 0, 0).
Assume thatf satisfies
theequation Lf
= 0 and thatf depends holomorphically
on tla Thenf
isanalytic
near theorigin.
PROOF. It suffices to choose al?71
-f-
a2r¡2 as cp in Theorem 1. Actu-ally,
0 on the characteristicvariety
V associated with L underassumption (6).
Recall that thenullity
as a microfunction at everypoint
is
equivalent
to theanalyticity
of ahyperfunction. Q.E.D.
REMARK 1.
Lewy [2]
alsogives
another sufficient condition(7)
thatguarantees
the sameanalyticity property
off.
One can
easily verify
that condition(7)
isequivalent
to the claim the real locus of the characteristicvariety
of thefollowing system C
of differ-ential
equations
is void.584
Therefore,
in this case theanalyticity
off
follows from a less subtle theoremon the
regularity
ofsolutions,
i.e.regularity
of solutions of anelliptic system.
(See S-K-K [3], Chapter III,
Theorem2.1.1,
forexample.) Actually,
theoriginal argument
of Prof.Lewy
was also easier in this case.The next
corollary gives
an answer to thequestion
of Prof.Lewy
how togeneralize Corollary
1 to the case with severalparameters
t =(t1,
...,tN).
COROLLARY 2. Consider a linear
differential operator
where
(b1,
...,bN)
and(a1, ... , an)
areanalytic
in(t, x)
andholomorphic
in t.Assume
holds at the
origin.
Letf (t, x)
be ahyper f unction
solutionof
theequation
L f
= 0 that isde f ined
in aneighborhood of (t, x)
=(0, 0)
and thatdepends holomorphically
on t. Thenf
isanalytic
near theorigin.
The
proof
ofCorollary
2 is the same as that ofCorollary
1 and isomitted.
Theorem 1
suggests
that asystem
of micro-differentialequations
withholomorphic parameters might
not admit« plenty
of solutions with holo-morphic parameters
». This guess is mostneatly
embodiedby
thefollowing
theorem.
THEOREM 2. Consider a
micro-differential operator L(t,,
x,of
order mwhich is
defined
in aneighborhood of (t1,
x, =(0,
xo,P*
E Q XÝ -1 S* M
where Q is an open set inC,
and whichdepends
holo-morphically
on t,. Assumeholds. Here
.Lm
denotes theprincipal symbol of
L. Then theequation Lf
= g doesnot,
ingeneral,
admit amicro f unction
solutionf
nearp*
thatdepends
holomorphically
ont1,
evenz f
gdepends holomorphically
ontl.
PROOF. First consider
following system
L.The
holomorphic dependence
of L on txguarantees
that C. is a well-definedsystem
of micro-differentialequations.
Since theeigenvalues
of the gener- alized Levi-form associated with E(S-K-K [3], Chapter III,
Definition2.3.1)
are,
by
thedefinition,
the solutions of thefollowing equation:
Since # 0
by
theassumption, equation (12)
has onestrictly positive
solution and onestrictly negative
solution. Then Theorem 2.3.6 inS-K-K [3], Chapter III,
claims thatholds at
(
This is
equivalent
tosaying
thatis not
(even micro-locally)
solvable ingeneral.
This is therequired
result.Q.E.D.
REMARK 2. The
generalization
of Theorem 2 togeneral
overdeterminedsystems
shall be discussedelsewhere,
as it involves some technical com-plexity.
REMARK 3. Theorem 2
generalizes
a result of Zerner[4]
for lineardifferential
equations
with constant coefficients.Note, however,
that inthe case with constant
coefficients,
moreprecise
result related to thehigher
order derivatives ofLm
withrespect
to t1 can be obtained as Zerner[4]
586
did for
distibution
solutions. Since theargument
used to obtain such a moreprecise
result forequations
with constant coefficients iscompletely
differentfrom the one
employed here,
it shall be discussed elsewhere.REMARK 4.
Although
the results in this articlemight
havealready
con-vinced the reader that the
ellipticity
of theequation
under deformation should be crucial inobtaining
thestability
of thecohomology
groups, we indicate thefollowing system
~N’ of(micro-)differential equations
as anexample
which makes thispoint
clearer:It is clear that the
tangential system Xc
induced from JY’ onto~tl
=c}
isA(c) given by
On the other
hand,
it is known(S-K-K [3], Chapter III,
Theorem2.3.6)
that the structure of
cohomology
groupsC)
doesdepend
onthe
sign
of c. Thisimplies
that even micro-local structure ofcohomology
groups cannot be
preserved
under the deformation discussed in Kawai[1],
if the
ellipticity assumption
is omitted. Note also that JY’ may be con- sidered as anequation
onR,
X(R/2nZ)’
due to theperiodicity
of its coef- ficients.ACKNOWLEDGMENT. The author would like to express his heartiest thanks to Prof. H.
Lewy
for manyinteresting
andstimulating
discussions with him.REFERENCES
[1]
T. KAWAI, Invarianceof cohomology
groups under adeformation of
anelliptic
systemof
lineardifferential equations,
Proc.Japan Acad., 53 (1977)
pp. 144-145.[2]
H. LEWY, Onanalyticity in homogeneous first
orderpartial differential equations,
Ann. Scuola Norm.
Sup.
Pisa, serie IV, 3(1976), pp. 719-723.
[3]
M. SATO - T. KAWAI - M. KASHIWARA(referred
to as S-K-K[3]), Microfunctions
and