• Aucun résultat trouvé

Net annual heat loss factor method for estimating heat requirements of buildings

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Net annual heat loss factor method for estimating heat requirements of buildings"

Copied!
24
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Publisher’s version / Version de l'éditeur:

Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca.

Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at

PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information.

https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits

L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.

Building Research Note, 1976-11

READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE. https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright

NRC Publications Archive Record / Notice des Archives des publications du CNRC :

https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=c039f4c1-81fe-4d0a-92f9-5e5279d9c93c https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=c039f4c1-81fe-4d0a-92f9-5e5279d9c93c

NRC Publications Archive

Archives des publications du CNRC

This publication could be one of several versions: author’s original, accepted manuscript or the publisher’s version. / La version de cette publication peut être l’une des suivantes : la version prépublication de l’auteur, la version acceptée du manuscrit ou la version de l’éditeur.

For the publisher’s version, please access the DOI link below./ Pour consulter la version de l’éditeur, utilisez le lien DOI ci-dessous.

https://doi.org/10.4224/40000593

Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at

Net annual heat loss factor method for estimating heat requirements of buildings

(2)

ISSN 0701-5232

NET

ANNUAL

HEAT LOSS FAC'SOR

METHOD

FOR

ESTIMATING E A T

REQUIREMENTS OF

BUILDINGS

G.P. Mitalas

Division of Building Research, National Research Council of Canada

(3)

NET ANNUAL HEAT LOSS FACTOR METHOD

FOR ESTIMATING HEAT REQUIREMENTS OF BUILDINGS

G.P. MitaXas

The development of energy budget standards for b u i l d i n g s makes it necessary f o r designers t o produce accurate estimates of t h e amount of energy required to heat a building. The most widely used

method of calculating annual h e a t i n g requirement is the ASHRAE degree-day procedure [Ref. 1, see p . 4 3 . 8 ) :

where

E = annual heating requirement

D = number of degree-days for heating season, calculated 'by summing the daily values o f the d i f f e r e n c e between

65°F and the mean of the maximum and minimum

temperatures for t h e days for which t h e mean is lower t h a n 65OF

HL = d e s i g n heat l o s s (including infiltration)

At = design temperature d i f f e r e n c e

CD = correction f a c t o r , which depends on the outdoor d e s i g n

tenrperatzrre

CF = part-load correction f a c t o r for fueled systems only; equals 1.0 fir electric resistance heating

v

= rated f u l l load e f f i c i e n c y , equals 1.0 for electric resistance heating

V = heating value of fuel, consistent with R and E; equals

(4)

Equation (1) ignores the fallowing building design features: orientation of windows and colour of exterior surfaces of t h e building envelope, variations of infiltration rate with wind and

stack effect. This Note presents a modification of the degree-day method to allow designers to take more accurate account o f :

-

solar r a d i a t i o n incident on a building surface,

-

variation of solar energy gained through windows (with orientation and type o f window),

-

variation of a i r i n f i l t r a t i o n rate with wind speed and difference between inside and outside a i r temperature,

-

heat generared by inside a c t i v i t y such as lights, people, etc., and its effect an building energy needs.

This m o d i f i e d degree-day method is called the "Net Annual Heat Loss Factor'' method of e s t i m a t i n g heat requirements of buildings. It is based on t h e fact t h a t the t o t a l annual building h e a t l o s s can be separated i n t o the following four components:

1 . window heat l o s s ,

2. opaque wall and ceiling heat l o s s ,

3 . air infiltration-ventilation heat l o s s , 4 . basement (below ground) heat loss. Expressed in equation form it is:

+

%all and c e i l i n g

+

'air infiltration

Each of these heat l o s s components can be calculated separately using Net Annual Heat Loss Factors (NAHLF). The following sections describe how these factors have been evaluated and how they can be

used to estimate net annual heating requirements for simple buildings.

(5)

EVALUATING NAHLF FOR HOUSES

The values of the NAHLF given in this Note were determined by using a computer program ( 2 ) to evaluate the annual heating

requirements o f a "standard" and a m o d i f i e d bungalow exposed to " t e s t " year weather cycles for several locations across Canada. The various factoxs were obtained by making the annual heating

r e q u i ~ e m e n t calculation f i r s t for the standard house and then for a similar, m o d i f i e d house (for example, increased area of wall or window facing a particular d i r e c t i o n ) . The NAHLF value was obtained

by taking t h e d i f f e r e n c e between the standard case and t h e modified

case and d i v i d i n g the difference by the numerical value o f modification ( f o r example, extra area for wall. o r window). The standard house is assumed to be well insulated and

relatively tight - representative of the type o f construction t h a t

will probably be needed t o meet f u t u r e energy standards. It is a bungalow with the following features :

- length, 11.3 m

-

width, 8.5 m

- gross floor area, 90 m 2

-

opaque exterior wall area, 71 m 2

-

glazed area, 21 rn 2

- basement wall above grade level, 19 m 2

2

- opaque wall thermal resistance, 4 . 2 rn -K/W

2

-

ceiling thermal resistance, 6 . 2 m . K / W

- exposed basement wall thermal resistance 1 .S

~*.K/w

- occupancy, family af four persons

-

appliances (television, stove, lights,

refrigerator, etc.) approx. average, 1.4

kW

-

air leakage characteristics - infiltration x a t e of

125 rn3/h at 30 K temperature d i f f e r e n c e and 4 m/r,

wind speed. Note t h a t this low leakage c h a r a c t e r i s t i c is possible with a " t i g h t " house w i t h o u t a chimney.

(6)

NAHLF were calculated f o r a range of degree-day values by

u s i n g test year (3) weather c y c l e s f o ~ Vancouver, Lethbridge, Saskatoon, Winnipeg, Toronto, Montreal, Fredericton, Halifax, and

St. John's. They are p l o t t e d a g a i n s t the degree-day value so that factors f o r any o t h e r locations in Canada can be estimated simply

by t a k i n g the heating degree-day value for the location in question (43 and reading the values of t h e NAHLF from the graphs. It should

be noted t h a t the h e a t i n g degree-days given in Supplement No. 4 to the National Building Code of Canada (43 are for temperature in F deg. They can be converted to metric equivalents and a base of

1 8 " ~ by a procedure given by Boyd (5). Window Heat Lass

Meat is t r a n s f e r r e d t h r o u g h windows by two d i f f e r e n t mechanisms:

- solar radiation through the window,

- heat transfer by the combined mechanisms of convection, conduction and long-wave r a d i a t i o n .

Heat loss by air leakage through cracks around t h e windoy frame is

t a k e n into account along with t h e rest o f the a i r leakage. It should be noted t h a t n e t annual heat loss through a window depends on

window orientation because o f the solar radiation admitted through it.

The value of t h e conduction/convection/long-wave radiation component, on t h e other hand, is independent o f direction: it is t h e product of window "Ut' value (where U is over-all window

conductance) and inside-outside temperature difference. The annual n e t heat l o s s through u n i t area o f windows, called Window Heat Loss

Factors, has been p l o t t e d a g a i n s t number o f degree-days f o r each of

eight o r i e n t a t i o n s ( F i g u r e s 1 to 3). The values used are for s i n g l e , double and triple glazing, respectively. The window f a c t o r s

correlate q u i t e well with t h e number o f degree-days f o r the v a r i o u s

localities, although the localities have d i f f e r e n t latitudes and d i f f e r e n t t y p e s of climate, It is possible, t h e r e f o r e , to use these graphs lo obtain window f a c t o r s f o r any l o c a l i t y where t h e number of h e a t i n g degree-days is known.

The Window Heat Loss Factor for an orientatjon that does not correspond e x a c t l y to one of the eight t h a t are p l o t t e d can be

obtained by interpolation of the given values. Once the Window Heat

Loss Factors, HLFWind,,, for all orientations and a l l windows in question have been determined, t h e annual heat l o s s through a l l the windows i n a b u i l d i n g can be calculated by:

Q*indow = sum of a l l

''Awindow

*

HLFwindow " p r o d u c t s f o r a l l windows i n the building

(7)

where

HLFwindow = window Heat Loss Factor obtained from Figures 1, 2 or 3

*window = glazed area of t h e window.

Onaaue Wall H e a t Loss

Heat is lost through opaque segments of a building envelope by

conduction and air leakage. In this section only conduction heat

l o s s will be considered. (Heat loss by air leakage through all parts of the building enclosure is the subject o f the next section.)

Heat t r a n s f e r by conduction through a wall is proportional to t h e average temperature d i f f e r e n c e between the two surfaces of the wall. Surface temperatures, i n t u r n , are f u n c t i o n s of t h e air temperatures adjacent to the surfaces and the long- and short-wave radiation incident on t h e surfaces. The heat flux through an

opaque building envelope segment is, therefore, related t o the following basic parameters:

- inside and outside air temperatures,

-

wall conductance, i . e . , U value of the wall,

-

solar r a d i a t i o n incident on the outer surface,

- exterior surface solar absorptivity, i.e., colour of t h e

surface,

-

emissivity and absorptivity, e, of the surfaces for long-wave radiation ( e = 0.95 is typical for all types o f building enveloge surface except m e t a l ) .

To facilitate the selection o f Wall H e a t Loss Factors for a given s e t of parameters the factors a r e plotted against degree-day values (see Figures 4 to 7) and normalized with respect to wall over-all conductance; t h i s , in turn, is t h e reciprocal of over-all thermal resistance.

The factors for specific wall exterior surface colour are given for only l i g h t , medrum and dark shades because t h e factors are n o t

particularly sensittve to this parameter. Tn the ceiling-roof system the colour of t h e roof has very little effect if the ceiling is reasonably well i n s u l a t e d . The effect of roof colour on ceiling heat loss factor can t h e r e f o r e be neglected. It should also be noted t h a t c e i l i n g factors p l a t t e d i n Figure 7 are normalized using

(8)

the conductance value of the ceiling because ceiling conductance is

the p r i n c i p a l factor governing heat loss through ceiling-roof

systems when the c e i l i n g is well insulated, Factors f o r o r i e n t a t i o n

o t h e r than one af the cardinal directions can be obtained by

interpolating the platted values.

The annual h e a t loss through a l l the opaque segments of a

b u i l d i n g can be calculated by:

Qopaque = sum of all the products "HLFWd 1 A W a l ~ / R W a l ~ ~ O T

all opaque segments of the building envelope (41 where

HLFwal 1 = wall heat lass factor t h a t is derived from Figures 4 ,

5, 6 or 7 ,

Rwal 1 = resistance of the element in question which includes inside and outside surface resistances,

*wall = area of the element in question,

Sensible Heat Loss by Air Infiltration

One of t h e major components of t h e annual heating requirement for most buildings is the energy needed to heat infiltration and v e n t i l a t i o n a i r . The crucial data f a r calculating this energy are the appropriate average rases o f infiltration f o r a whole heating

season. Reliable infiltration values are scarce, but some have been given b y Tamura and Wilson 16). h c c this infiltration has been established it is very simple to calculate the annual heat

loss by infiltration:

where

H L F i n f i 1 t

.

= infiltration heat loss factor given in F i g u r e 8 TR = building average infiltration rate over heating

season. Basement Heat Loss

The prediction of the annual h e a t loss from a basement depends on the thermal characteristics of t h e surrounding ground, w e a t h e r ,

and the thermal characteristics of the building. These calculatians

(9)

SAMPLE CALCULATION

Calculate annual heat loss of a house located in Pine Falls,

Manitoba. The p e r t i n e n t house construction data are given in

Table 1.

The heating degree-days given in Supplement No. 1 t o the

National Building Code (4) f o r Pine Falls, Manitoba, is 11,000

Fahrenheit degree-days. Thus, in metric units and based on IsOC,

the number is 6011 ( 5 ) .

Determination of Heat Loss Factors f o r House in $estion Meat loss factors for 6011 K 0 d value are:

Windows (Figures 2 and 3):

Orientation Triple Glazed Double Glazed

180° -145 kW-hJ(m .yr?- 2 -55 k~-h/(rn~.yr)

Walls (Figures 5 and 6) :

O r i e n t a t i o n Co 1 our

Medium Dark

130 kh-K 128 kh.X

Ceiling (Figure 7 ) : 9 4 . 5 kh K

2 3

Infiltration heat loss factor (Figure 83 = 49 kW-h /m

The factors for the s p e c i f i e d orientations are obtained b y

interpolation. Thus, the heat loss factor for a double-glazed window o r i e n t e d 15 degrees W cf S (i.e., wall azimuth angle o f 19S0] is:

(10)

The f a c t o r s f o r o t h e r specified window and wall orientations

obtained in a similar way a r e given in Table TI.

Calculation of Mouse Heat Loss

Window, wall, c e i l i n g and i n f i l t r a t i o n heat losses a r e calculated by Equations (33 (43 and (5), r e s p e c t i v e l y . The summary o f data and results are given in Table 111.

DISCUSSION

T o t a l house heat loss (except f o r basement below g r a d e )

calculated by the ASHRAE degree-day method [i.e., Equation (I]) is 1 4 , 8 8 0 kWmh/yr

w h e r e

3

H L / A t = 178 W/K (based on infiltration r a t e of 170 m J h

at design temperature of - 3 3 O C and 4 m / s wind speed*, i , e . , 0 . 3 3 air changes per hour]

CD = 0.57 (see Reference 1 : Table 11, p . 43.8)

C F , 0 and V = 1.0 (since f u e l fired equipment is not considered

in this sample problem).

3

* T h i s 170 m /h infiltration r a t e at d e s i g n c o n d i t i o n s of - 3 3 " ~ and 4 m / s wind speed is consistent with the average infiltration r a t e

(11)

This compares well with the t o t a l heat l o s s calculated by t h e Heat 1,oss Factor method. The agreement of house h e a t loss components

calculated by the t w o methods, however, is not so good as the comparison of the total losses (Table IV] where t h e highest

d i f f e r e n c e is in window and infiltration components, Thus, the good agreement of the total house heat loss values calculated by the two methods is due to compensating error in window and

i n f i l t r a t i o n h e a t loss components calculated by t h e ASHRAE degree-day method,

REFERENCES

1. A S H W Handbook; 1976 Systems Volume. American S o c i e t y of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers.

2. Larsen, B.T. D i g i t a l Simulation of Energy Consamption in Residential Buildings. Presented at I n t e r n a t i o n a l C I B

Symposium on Energy Conservation in t h e Built Environment. Building Research Station, Garston, 6-8 A p r i l 1976.

3. Boyd, D. Procedure for Selecting a T e s t Year of Weather Data.

Private communicati~n.

4. Climatic Information f o ~ Building Design

in Canada,

1975. Supplement No. 1 to the National Building Code of Canada. 5. Boyd, D. Converting Heating Degree-Days from Below 6 5 O ~ to

Below 18'~. National Research Council of Canada, Division o f

Building Research, Building Research Note 98, 1975. 6 Tamura, G.T. and A.G. Wilson. A i r Leakage and Pressure

Measurements on Two Occupied Houses. ASHRAE Journal, V01. 5 , No. 12, Dec. 1963.

7 . Shirtliffe, C.J. and W.C. Brown. Basement Heat Loss.

(12)

TABLE

T

EXAMPLE PROBLEM: HOUSE CONSTRUCTTON DATA

rom North, degree

Opaque Exterior Walls

* M = ?qledium

(13)

TABLE 11

HEAT LOSS FACTORS FOR THE HOUSE OF EXAMPLE PROBLEM

Angle Measured

,

Wall Meat Loss Factor, kh- K Ceiling, kh- K 2 3 Infiltration,

kW-h

$m Medium Colour Dark Colour 94.5 49 128 115 101 116

(14)

TABLE IT1

SUMMARY OF HOUSE CONSTRUCTION DATA AND CALCULATED HOUSE HEAT LOSS COFIPONENTS

Orientation, Wall T o t a l

:lz imuth Angle Measured 15 105 195 285 f o r A 1 1

from North, degree Orientations

Windows - - - -Area, m 2 3 3 10 4 20 Heat Loss Factor k ~ . h/mZ Heat Loss k W - h J ~ x 501 477 -233 428 1 , 1 7 3 - - Walls -- Area, m 2 Resistance, m2

-

K/W Heat Loss Factor, kh.K Heat Loss, kW0h/yr 1097 559 664 530 2 , 8 5 0

Basement Walls Area, m2 7 4 7 4 2 2

Above Ground Resistance,

m2 K/W 1 . 8 1.8 1 . 8 1.8 Heat Less F a c t o r , 128 115 101 116 kh* K Heat Loss, kW* h / y r 498 2 5 6 393 258 1,405 - - - E x t e r i o r Doors Area, m 2 Resistance, r n 2 v ~ / ~ 0.7 0.7 Heat Loss Fact or, kh- K 128 101 Heat Loss k W m h/yr 366 289

(15)

TABLE IIT (Cent' d) Ceiling Area, m 2 112 Resistance, m2 K/W Heat Loss Factor, kh'K 9 4 . 5 Heat Loss, kW . h / y r lg90 I n f f l t r a t i m Average Inf iltrqtion 150 Rate, m.'/h Heat Loss F a c t o r , 4 9 k~

-

h2/m3 Heat Loss, kW- hJyr 7350

T o t a l House Heat Loss" = 15,324 kW-h/yr

(16)

TABLE

IV

HOUSE HEAT LOSS COMPONENTS CALCULATED BY

HEAT

LOSS FACTOR AND DEGREE-DAY METHODS

Heat Loss Degree-Day

House Heat Factor Method Method Difference

Loss Component MW- h / p MW-h/yr MIV* h/ yr

Windows 1.17 E x t e r i o r Walls 2.85 Basement Walls Above Ground 1 . 4 1 Exterior Doors 0.65 0.48 - 0 . 1 7 Ceiling 1.89 1.67 - 0 . 2 2 Infiltration 7.35 4.73 -2.62 Total 15.32 1 4 -88 -0.44

(17)

F I G U R E

1

W I N D O W

H E A T

L O S S

F A C T O R S

(18)

F I G U R E

2

W I N D O W

H E A T L O S S

F A C T O R S

(19)

F I G U R E

3

W I N D O W

H E A T L O S S F A C T O R S

(20)

D E G R E E

D A Y S ,

K - d

x l o 3

F I G U R E

4

W A L L H E A T L O S S F A C T O R S

(21)

F I G U R E

5

W A L L H E A T L O S S F A C T O R S

(22)

F I G U R E

6

W A L L

H E A T L O S S F A C T O R S

(23)

D E G R E E

D A Y S ,

K - d

x

l o 3

(24)

F I G U R E

8

Figure

TABLE  IT1
TABLE IIT  (Cent'  d)  Ceiling  Area,  m  2  112  Resistance,  m2  K/W  Heat  Loss  Factor,  kh'K  9 4
TABLE  IV

Références

Documents relatifs

(2013) Length-weight relationship and seasonal effects of the Summer Monsoon on condition factor of Terapon jarbua (Forsskål, 1775) from the wider Gulf of Aden including

Identification and detection of a novel point mutation in the Chitin Synthase gene of Culex pipiens associated with diflubenzuron resistance...

These depend on which actor controls the trait (the vector or the parasite) and, when there is manipulation, whether it is realised via infected hosts (to attract vectors) or

Brennan TP, Woods JO, Sedaghat AR, Siliciano JD, Siliciano RF, Wilke CO: Analysis of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 viremia and provirus in resting CD4+ T cells reveals a

The newly employed reactive magnetron co-sputtering technique has allowed us to enhance the absorption coefficient from the MLs owing to the high density of Si-ncs achieved and/or the

Market and communication schemes have taken a noticeable place in temples and some of them can be regarded as types of “mega-temples.” 2 This article describes the

Altogether, these results indicate that expression of the endogenous DRP1 protein is important for maintaining normal mitochondrial morphology in NHEK and that loss of this

sour rot symptoms in the field and in the laboratory (n = 5 bunches), ‘Post-harvest mild rot’ indicates fruit that were collected without rot symptoms but showed mild rot in