HAL Id: hal-00894046
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00894046
Submitted on 1 Jan 1994
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
Interindividual and intercellular polymorphisms of Ag-NOR pattern in mink embryo siblings
Gk Isakova
To cite this version:
Gk Isakova. Interindividual and intercellular polymorphisms of Ag-NOR pattern in mink embryo
siblings. Genetics Selection Evolution, BioMed Central, 1994, 26 (6), pp.475-484. �hal-00894046�
Original article
Interindividual and intercellular
polymorphisms of Ag-NOR pattern
in mink embryo siblings
GK Isakova
Institute
of Cytology
andGenetics,
RussianAcademy of Sciences,
Siberian
Branch,
630090Novosibirsk,
Russia(Received
24February
1993;accepted
19May 1994)
Summary - The
variability
of thesilver-staining
pattern of the nucleolusorganizing regions (Ag-NOR pattern)
was studied inhepatocytes
from 9 minkembryo siblings, including
apair
of monochorionic(presumably monozygotic)
co-twins. Both the number ofAg-NORs
and the mean size ofAg-spots
per cell were found to be identical in monochorionic twins. All other sibs had patterns different from each other and from co-twins. Intercellular variation of both the number and size ofAg-stained regions,
asmeasured
by
the coefficient of variation, was similaronly
in monochorionic twins. The data indicate that both the interindividual and intercellular variations of theAg-NOR
patternare
highly
heritable. The mechanismsunderlying
theAg-NOR
patternpolymorphisms
arediscussed. It is
proposed
that at least 2independently
inherited routes for the variableexpression
of the ribosomal gene system exist:1) polymorphism
for rDNA array; and2) polymorphism
for rRNA geneexpression.
mink
/
embryo/
chromosome/
nucleolus organizing region/
silver stainingRésumé - Polymorphisme interindividuel et intercellulaire de la coloration à l’argent
des régions des organisateurs nucléolaires chez des embryons de vison. La variabilité de la coloration à
l’argent
desrégions
desorganisateurs
nucléolaires(Ag-NOR)
a été étudiéesur des
hépatocytes
de 9embryons
devison,
germains deportée
et incluant une paire de jumeauxmonochorioniques, présumés
monozygotes.À
lafois
le nombre desAg-NOR
etla taille moyenne des taches
d’argent
par cellule se sont trouvés êtreidentiques
chez lesjumeaux monochorioniques.
Les autresgermains
avaient tous des patronsdifférents
entreeux et
différents
desjumeaux.
La variation intercellulaire du nombre et de la taille desrégions
colorées àl’argent,
mesurée par lecoefficient
de variation, n’était similaire que chez lesjumeaux.
Les donnéesindiquent
que les variations interindividuelles et intercellulaires du typed’Ag-NOR
sont hautement héritables. Les mécanismesgénétiques sous-jacents
sontdiscutés. Il est
suggéré qu’au
moins 2 voiesgénétiques indépendantes
peuventexpliquer l’expression
variable dusystème
desgènes ribosomiques : i) polymorphisme
des structuresde l’ADN
ribosomique; ii) polymorphisme
del’expression
desgènes
de l’ARNribosomique.
vison
/
embryon/
chromosome/
organisateur nucléolaire/
coloration à l’argentINTRODUCTION
Nucleolus
organizing regions (NORs)
are some of the mostintensely
studiedchromosome sites. The number of NORs in the normal
karyotype
isspecies- specific
and constant.Goodpasture
and Bloom(1975) developed
the method to reveal NORs inmetaphase
cells with silver nitrate.Only
those NORs that aretranscriptionally
active in thepreceding interphase
are stained(for
areview,
seeHubbell, 1985).
Now we canvisually distinguish
active NORs from inactive ones.The
Ag-NOR pattern,
ie the number ofAg-stained
NORs and the size ofAg-spots
per
cell,
can be used tostudy
the differentialexpression
of rRNA gene clusters inontogenesis
andphylogenesis.
In all
cytogenetic
studies of different mammalianspecies including human,
an interindividualvariability
ofAg-NOR pattern
has been noted. The nature of thevariability
has beenintensely
studied. From studies of human families(Mikelsaar
et
al, 1977;
Markovic etal, 1978), sheep (Henderson
andBruere, 1980),
rabbits(Arruga
andMonteagudo, 1989)
’andpigs (Vishnevskaya
andVsevolodov, 1986),
it is
apparent
that thesilver-staining property
of eachNOR-bearing
chromosomeis
genetically
determined and inherited in asimple
Mendelian fashion. Further work hassupported
this conclusion. In studies of cell clones derived from a human fibroblastculture,
theAg-NOR pattern
remained similar to that in theparental
cell line
(Ferraro
etal, 1981). Taylor
and Martin-DeLeon(1981) analyzed
thekaryotypes
of the members of 2monozygotic (MZ)
twinpairs
and found nosignificant
differences for the number or size ofAg-NORs.
Zakharov et al(1982)
studied
lymphocytes
from 20 MZ and 20dizygotic (DZ)
twinpairs. Analysis
ofintrapair
variance as well asintrapair
concordance of the number ofAg-NORs
andthe size of
Ag-deposits
indicated that theAg-NOR pattern
ishighly
heritable.Variation of the
Ag-NOR pattern
among cells from the same individualhas, however,
been noted in culturedlymphocytes
from humansubjects (Mikelsaar
andSchwarzacher, 1978; Taylor
andMartin-DeLeon, 1981;
Zakharov etal, 1982;
deCapoa
etal, 1985; Sozansky
etal, 1985; Liapunova
etal, 1988), pigs (Stefanova, 1983;
Troshina andGustavsson, 1984; Vishnevskaya
andVsevolodov, 1986;
Mellinket
al, 1991),
cattle(Di
Berardino etal, 1981; Mayr
etal, 1987)
and also in fibroblast cultures from humansubjects (Mikelsaar
andSchwarzacher, 1978;
deCapoa
etal, 1985; Sozansky
etal, 1985)
and rabbits(Martin-DeLeon
etal, 1978).
Mikelsaar and Schwarzacher(1984) reported
thatvariability
can even occur within 1 cell clone.Zakharov et al
(1982)
andSozansky
et al(1985) suggested
that the intercellularvariability
isgenetically
determined.This conclusion can be
supported by accumulating
data from different animalspecies,
tissues and celltypes.
Litters ofmultiparous
animalscontaining
MZ twinsamong sibs can be used as one of the most suitable models to reveal the
possible genetic
determination of the characters. In this paper, data on theAg-NOR pattern variability
in minkembryo siblings
arepresented.
Two of the sibs weremonochorionic
(MCh) co-twins,
which are considered to be MZ twins. A ratherhigh (1-2%)
incidence of MCh twinembryos
is a characteristic feature of domestic mink(Hansson, 1947; Belyaev
etal, 1983).
The location of NORs in the mink
karyotype (2n
=30) corresponds
toregions
of
secondary
constrictions in chromosomes 2 and8,
which can be identified withoutapplication
ofbanding techniques (fig 1) (Isakova, 1989).
The normaldiploid
minkkaryotype
contains 4 NORs.MATERIALS AND METHODS
The
embryos
studied were from2-year-old
Standard Dark mink bred at theexperimental
farm(Novosibirsk).
The dam was mated once to a Dark male onMarch 7 and
autopsied
onApril
19 in 1991.Among
8implantation sites,
7 containedsingle embryos,
and in 1 fetal camera 2embryos
were found that shared a commonchorion but had
separate
amnions andplacentas. Single implanted embryos
inmultiparous
animals should be considered as DZtwins;
the MCh co-twins canonly
be derived from a
single zygote,
and are therefore MZ twins.Embryos
wereremoved, separated
from their membranes andweighed.
Table Icontains the date of the
development
of theembryos.
One had a normalbody weight
but was dead. Another
embryo,
which was alive and of normalbody weight,
wasfound to have an abundant microbial infection of unknown nature in
preparations
from its liver. Both MCh co-twins were alive but had a low
body weight
incomparison
with otherembryos.
All sibs had a normaldiploid karyotype.
BothMCh co-twins had a male chromosome
complement (2n, XY).
About half of the liver was taken from each
embryo
andplaced
in aglass
tubecontaining
2 ml medium RPMI1640, supplemented
with10%
fetal calf serum and colchicine in the usual concentration. Cells weredispersed
andsuspended
with apipette,
and incubated at 38°C for 1 h.Then, using
the standardhypotonic
andfixative solutions
(Isakova, 1989),
chromosomepreparations
were made. To reveal theNORs,
thetechnique suggested by
Howell and Black(1980)
was used. From 15 to 25metaphase spreads
wereanalyzed
from eachembryo.
TheAg-NOR pattern
wascharacterized
using
4 criteria for eachNOR-bearing
chromosome:1)
the number ofAg-stained
NORs in the cell and theirproportion
relative to the maximumpossible
number of
4; 2)
the size ofAg-NOR spots,
estimatedvisually
inarbitrary
units ona scale from 0
(no staining)
to 3(maximum size);
the score for eachNOR-bearing
chromosome was counted as the sum of both
homologues;
the mean values werecalculated
by dividing
the sum obtained from all the cellsanalyzed by
the numberof
cells; 3)
intercellularvariability
of both the number and size ofAg-stained NORs,
estimated
by
the coefficient of variation(C!);
and4)
thefrequency
ofNOR-bearing
chromosome associations.
RESULTS
Individual
Ag-NOR patterns
The mean scores of the
frequency
with which theparticular
NORs werestained,
andthe size of
Ag-spots
per cell in each of 9embryos
aregien
in table II. All 4(100%)
NORs were stained in
only
3embryos.
Chromosome8,
which possesses alonger secondary
constriction than chromosome2,
had bothhomologous
NORs stained in allembryos except
the MCh co-twins andembryo
7 which haddevelopmental
deviations
(table II).
Particular NORsdisplayed
different mean sizes ofAg-spots
and,
as arule,
differences betweenhomologous
NORs also existed. Eachembryo
differed from all others either for the
frequency
ofstaining
ofAg-NORs,
or forthe
Ag-spot sizes,
or for both criteria. MCh co-twins however hadnearly
identicalAg-NOR pattern
scores.Intercellular
Ag-NOR pattern variability
Diagrams showing
the distribution of cells for the number ofAg-NORs
arepresented
in
figure
2. MCh twins had similarprofiles
for eachNOR-bearing
chromosome and for the total number per cell.Embryos 2,
3 and 5 revealed a constant maximalfrequency
ofstaining,
and so theirprofiles
appear identical in theimage.
All otherembryos
differed from each other and from the MCh twins. Both number and size ofAg-NORs
on both chromosomes 2 and 8 were found to vary from cell to cell in all theembryos except
forembryo 3,
whichonly
showed a variableexpression
ofAg-
spot
sizes for chromosome 8. MCh co-twins had similar coefficients of intercellularvariability except
for a difference in the size ofAg-stained
NORs on chromosome 2(table III).
All other sibs differed from each other and from the MCh twins. Inembryos
with bothvarying
number and size of stainedregions,
the correlation coefficient between the 2 scores washighly significant (Table IV). Therefore,
themean number of
Ag-NORs
can be considered to be a reasonable indicator of NORactivity.
Associations
NOR-bearing
chromosomesAssociations between
NOR-bearing chromosomes,
iejuxtapositions
of 2 or moresuch chromosomes and the connection between them
by
anAg-bridge,
wererarely
seen. In each
embryo except
numbers4,
6 and7, only
one cell with an associationwas observed.
Only
associations between chromosomes 2 and 8(2-8),
and nonebetween
homologues
occurred.DISCUSSION
Genetic determination of interindividual
Ag-NOR pattern polymorphism
If the
Ag-staining property
of eachNOR-bearing
chromosome ishereditary,
each individual may inherit a set of NORs that are different for suchcharacteristics,
andmay then be
unique
for itsAg-NOR pattern. Only genetically
identicalorganisms
would
display
identicalAg-NOR patterns.
In thepresent study,
each of 7single implanted embryos (ie
twins of differentzygosity)
was found to have a differentAg-NOR pattern,
either for the number ofAg-NORs
per cell or forAg-spot sizes,
or for both criteria. MCh co-twins
(presumably
MZones)
were identical for all the scores. Thissignifies
that theAg-stainability
of NORs in the minkembryonic hepatocytes
is astrongly
inheritedproperty,
and theAg-NOR pattern
can be usedas a reliable
genetic
marker todiagnose
twinzygosity.
A similar conclusion wasdrawn
by
Zakharov et al(1982)
from studies of humanlymphocytes.
It isprobable
that the
Ag-NOR pattern
istissue-specific (Martin-DeLeon
etal, 1978;
Mikelsaarand
Schwarzacher, 1978;
deCapoa
etal, 1985; Sozansky
etal, 1985). Therefore,
cellsof same cell
type
should be used to test theAg-NOR pattern identity. Moreover,
the
unique
feature ofAg-staining
of the NORssignifies
aunique
character of rRNAmultigene
familiesexpression
in each individual.Unique karyotypic
features forsome chromosome
regions
revealedby
the differentbanding techniques
was notedin man
(Van Dyke
etal, 1977)
and inpigs (Troshina
andGustavsson, 1984).
Genetic determination of intercellular
Ag-NOR pattern polymorphism
Evidence in
support
of ahypothesis
forgenetic
intercellularAg-NOR variability
was
presented
in 2reports.
Zakharov et al(1982)
observed the distribution of both the number and size ofAg-NORs
inlymphocytes
from human MZ twins to besimilar; Sozansky
et al(1985)
found a similar ratio of stained to unstained NORs inparental
and clone human fibroblast cultures. In thepresent
minkstudy,
the coefficient of variation is similar in MChco-twins,
both for number and size ofAg-spots
on eachNOR-bearing chromosome,
and differs from those characteristic of other sibs. Thefindings support
thehypothesis
forgenetic
control ofAg-staining
intercellular
variability.
The intercellular
variability
was noted to be different inlymphocytes
andfibroblasts from the same
individual,
and the difference isprobably
due to differentstainability
ofparticular
NORs(Mikelsaar
andSchwarzacher, 1978;
deCapoa
etal,
1985).
Mechanisms
underlying
theAg-NOR pattern polymorphisms
It is known that the
underlying
basis for the NORstaining
with silver is the acidic nonhistoneargentophilic proteins
associated withtranscriptions
of rRNA genes(for
reviews see: Schwarzacher and
Wachtler, 1983; Hubbel, 1985; Dyban
etal, 1990).
There is not a
strong
correlation between the number of rRNA genecopies
andstaining intensity;
NORshaving
a small number of the genes can express more intensestaining
than NORscontaining
many rRNA genes(de Capoa
etal, 1988).
Furthermore,
thetranscriptionally
active NORs(Ag-NORs)
were shown to be moresensitive to the DNase treatment and
hypomethylated
ascompared
to inactiveones
(Ferraro
andPrantera, 1988).
Thesefindings
indicate that the role ofAg- proteins might
be to maintain a different NOR chromatinconformation,
whichthen facilitates different levels of rDNA
transcription.
The
origin
ofAg-NOR proteins
inontogenesis
is aquestion
ofspecial
interest.Dyban
et al(1990)
detectedargentophilic proteins
in thepronucleoli
of 1-cell mouseembryos,
ie beforetranscription
of rRNA genes started. It wassuggested
that theproteins (or
theirprecursors)
are inheritedthrough
theoocyte cytoplasm.
Theresults of the
present
minkstudy
indicate that the program of itsexpression during ontogenesis
is alsoprobably
inherited.The
Ag-staining intensity
of the NORs is considered to be an indicator of the level of nucleolusactivity.
The nucleolar size is alsowidely
used to indicate itsactivity. Delany
et al(1991), using
theirexperimental
model of chickens trisomic for theNOR-bearing chromosome,
have shown that inheritedpolymorphisms
forthe number and size of nucleoli were caused
by
alterations of the rDNA array; it wasalso noted that the
variability
was notdependent
on tissuetype
ordevelopmental stage.
In otherwork, however,
theAg-NOR pattern
was shown to beindependent
of the number of rRNA genes
(de Capoa
etal, 1988),
butdependent
on tissue andcell
type (Martin-DeLeon
etal, 1978;
Mikelsaar andSchwarzacher, 1978;
deCapoa
et
al, 1985),
andstage
ofdevelopment (Martin-DeLeon
etal, 1978;
deCapoa
etal, 1983;
Patkin andSorokin, 1983; King
etal, 1988).
Inplants, particular
NORsranked
differently
when studiedby
the 2 tests(for
areview,
see Mukai etal, 1991).
Therefore,
at least 2 bases for the variableexpression
of the ribosomal genesystem
may be
proposed. First, polymorphisms
for rDNA array cause adiversity
of thenucleolar
morphology,
and secondpolymorphisms
for theAg-NOR pattern,
ie for rRNA geneexpression
may also causevariability
of nucleolarmorphology.
Bothroutes are
genetically determined,
and each seems to be inheritedindependently.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The author is
grateful
to NS Fechheimer for critical review of themanuscript
andhelp
intranslating
it intoEnglish.
REFERENCES
Arruga MV, Monteagudo
LV(1989)
Evidence of Mendelian inheritance of the nucleolarorganizer regions
in theSpanish
common rabbit. J Hered 80, 85-86Belyaev DK,
IsakovaGK,
Fechheimer NS(1983)
Chimerism andtwinning
in the minkand chicken. Dokl Akad Nauk SSSR
270,
230-232Capoa
deA,
PelliciaF, Marlekaj P,
ClofiluzzatoAR,
Nardelli MB(1983)
Silverpositivity
of the NORs
during embryonic development
ofXenopus
Laevis.Exp
Cell Res147,
472-478
Capoa
deA, Marlekaj P,
BaldiniA,
RocchiM,
Archidiacono N(1985) Cytologic
demon-stration of different
activity
of rRNA gene clusters in different human tissues. Hum Genet 69, 212-217Capoa
deA,
FelliMP,
Baldini A et al(1988) Relationship
between the number and function of human ribosomal genes. Hum Genet79, 301-304
Delany ME,
MuscarellaDE,
Bloom SE(1991)
Formation of nucleolarpolymorphisms
intrisomic chickens and
subsequent
microevolution of rRNA gene clusters indipoloids.
J Hered 82, 213-220
Di Berardino
D,
lanuzzi L, Bettini TM, Matassino D(1981) Ag-NOR
variation andbanding homologues
in twospecies
of Bovidae: Bubalis bubalis and Bos taurus. Can J GenetCytol 23,
89-99Dyban AP,
SeverovaEL, Zatsepina OL,
Chentsov S(1990)
Thesilver-stained
NOR andargentophilic
nuclear proteins inearly
mouseembryogenesis:
acytological study.
CellDiff Devel 29,
1-15Ferraro
M,
Prantera G(1988)
Human NORs show correlation betweentranscriptional activity,
DNase Isensitivity,
andhypomethylation. Cytogenet
Cell Genet47,
58-61Ferraro M, Lavia P, Pellicia
F, Capoa
de A(1981)
Clonal inheritance of rRNA geneactivity; cytological
evidence in human cells. Chromosoma84,
345-351Goodpasture C,
Bloom SE(1975)
Visualization of NORs in mammalian chromosomesusing
silverstaining.
Chromosoma53,
37-50Hansson A
(1947)
Thephysiology
ofreproduction
in mink(Mv,stela vison)
withspecial
reference to
delayed implantation.
ActaZool 28,
1-136Henderson
LM,
Bruere AN(1980)
Inheritanceof Ag-stainability
of the nucleolusorganizer regions
in domesticsheep,
Ovis aries.Cytogenet
Cell Genet26,
1-6Howell
WM,
Black DA(1980)
Controlledsilver-staining
of nucleolusorganizer regions
with a
protective
colloidaldeveloper:
a 1-step method.Experientia
36, 1014Hubbell HR
(1985)
Silverstaining
as an indicator of active ribosomal genes. Stain Technol60,
285-294Isakova GK
(1989) Cytogenetics
of domestic mink(Mustela vison).
In:Cytogenetics of
Animals
(CRE Halnan, ed), Oxon/CAB International,
133-149King WA,
NiarA,
ChartrainI, Betteridge KJ, Guay
P(1988)
Nucleolusorganizer regions
and nucleoli in
preattachment
bovineembryos.
JReprod
Fert82,
87-95Liapunova NA, Egolina NA,
MkhitarovaEV,
Victorov VV(1988)
Interindividual and intercellular differences in ribosomal genes totalactivity
detectedby Ag-staining
ofnucleolar
organizing regions
of acrocentric human chromosomes. Genetika(USSR) 24,
1282-1287
Markovic
VD,
WortonRG, Berg
JM(1978)
Evidence for the inheritance of silver-stained nucleolusorganizer regions.
Hum Genet 41, 181-187Martin-DeLeon
PA, Fleming ME, Petrosky
DL(1978)
Patterns of silverstaining
in cellsof
six-day blastocyst
andkidney
fibroblast in the domestic rabbit. Chromosoma67,
245-252
Mayr
B,Schleger W,
Auer H(1987) Frequency
ofAg-stained
nucleolusorganizer regions
in the chromosomes of cattle. J Hered
78,
206-207Mellink
CHM,
BosmaA,
de HaanNA, Wiegant
J(1991)
Distribution of rRNA genes in breeds of domesticpig
studiedby
non-radioactive in situhybridization
and selective silverstaining.
Genet Sel Evol 23Suppl
168s-172sMikelsaar
AV,
Schwarzacher HG(1978) Comparison
of silverstaining
of nucleolus organ- izerregions
in humanlymphocytes
and fibroblasts. Hum Genet42,
291-299Mikelsaar
AV,
Schwarzacher HG(1984)
Clonal inheritance versusvariability
of rRNA geneactivity
in human fibroblasts. Hum Genet 66, 372Mikelsaar
AV,
SchwarzacherHG,
Schnedl W,Wagenbichler
P(1977)
Inheritance ofAg- stainability
of nucleolusorganizer regions. Investigations
in seven families withtrisomy
21. Hum Genet
38,
183-188Mukai
Y,
EndoTR,
Gill BS(1991) Physical mapping
of the 18S.26S rRNAmultigene family
in common wheat: identification of a new locus. Chromosoma 100, 71-78 PatkinEL,
Sorokin AV(1983)
Nucleolarorganizing regions
of chromosomes inearly
mouseembryogenesis.
BullExp
Biol Med(USSR) 96,
92-94Schwarzacher
HG,
Wachtler F(1983)
Nucleolusorganizer regions
and nucleoli. Hum Genet 63, 89-99Sozansky OA,
ZakharovAF,
Terekhov SM(1985)
IntercellularAG-NOR-variability
inman. II. Search for
determining factors,
clonalanalysis.
Hum Genet 69, 151-156 Stefanova VN(1983) Polymorphism
of nucleolusorganizing regions
in domesticpig.
Cytologia (USSR) 25,
189-193Taylor EF,
Martin-DeLeon PA(1981)
Familial silverstaining
patterns of human nucleolusorganizer regions (NORs).
Am J Hum Genet33, 67-76
Troshina
AI,
Gustavsson I(1984)
The use of differentbanding techniques
in thestudy
ofchromosome
polymorphism
in Landrace x wild boarhybrids.
In: Proc 6thEuropean Colloquium
onCytogenetics of
DomesticAnimals, Zurich,
1985, 177-188Van
Dyke DL,
PalmerCG,
NanceWE,
Yu Pao-Lo(1977)
Chromosomepolymorphisms
and twin
zygosity.
Am J Hum Genet29, 431-447
Vishnevskaya SS,
Vsevolodov EB(1986)
Individualvariability
and inheritance of the number and size of the nucleolusorganizer regions
of the domesticpig
chromosomes.Genetika
(USSR) 22,
690-698Zakharov