HAL Id: jpa-00247045
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00247045
Submitted on 1 Jan 1995
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
Local Mean Field Dynamics of Ising Spin Glasses
Tran Hung, Mai Li, Marek Cieplak
To cite this version:
Tran Hung, Mai Li, Marek Cieplak. Local Mean Field Dynamics of Ising Spin Glasses. Journal de
Physique I, EDP Sciences, 1995, 5 (1), pp.71-83. �10.1051/jp1:1995115�. �jpa-00247045�
Classification
Physics
Abstracts75.10N 75.10H
Local Mean Field Dynamics of Ising Spin Glasses
Tran
Quang Hung(*),
Mai SuanLi(**)
and MarekCieplak
Institute of
Physics,
PolishAcademy
ofSciences,
02-668Warsaw,
Poland(Received
6 June 1994, revised 6 October,accepted
10October1994)
Abstract. The Glauber
dynamics
of three-dimensionalIsing spin glasses
are studied numer- ically m the local mean field approximation. The aging eifect is observed in both field cooled andzero field cooled regimes but the remanent
magnetization
never reaches trueequilibrium.
The dynamicsusceptiblity
behaves like in experiments. A doublepeak
structure in the real part of thesusceptibility plotted
as a function of temperature may appear fornon-symmetric
distribu-tions of the
exchauge couplings.
This, however, does not indicate reentrancy. The temperaturedependence
of thedynamic specific
heat is opposite to that foundtheoretically
in small clusters.l. Introduction
Intensive research on
Ising
spinglasses (SG)
has led to a basicunderstanding
of theirequi-
libriumproperties Ill. Theory
of thedynamic behavior, however,
is lessdeveloped.
Thusit seems worthwhile to
explore predictions
ofsimple approximations
which deal with thedy-
namics. An
approximation
which we focus on here is the local mean fieldapproach.
This method hasproved
to be anadequate
tool forstudying equilibrium properties
of short range three dimensional SG'S and random fieldsystems [2, 3].
This invites one toapply
it now todynamics
as definedby
the Glauber model [4] and descnbed in more details in Section 2. Westudy
the three dimensional Edwards-AndersonIsing
SG and consider thefollowing subjects:
the
phenomenon
of agmg(in
Sect.3),
behavior of thedynamic susceptibility (in
Sect.3),
thephenomenon
of reentrancy(in
Sect.4),
andfinally,
behavior of thedynamic specific
heat(m
Sect.
5).
The technical
advantage
of ourapproach
over Monte Carlo isthat,
inprinciple,
it allows for muchlarger system
sizes and time scales which mayhelp
to establish true trends. Ex- act results for thedynamic susceptibility là-?]
andspecific
heat [8] can be obtainedonly
for small clusters and the behavior of thesequantities
can be related to the structure of local energy(*)
On leave from Hanoi Technical University.(**)
On leave from Thai Nguyen Techuical Institute.©
Les Editions dePhysique
1995minima. The studies of clusters are
illuminating
but theproblem
with clusters is thatthey display
no finite criticaltemperature
so the cntical behavior cannot beinvestigated.
Dur basic results can be summarized as follows:
a)
Theaging
effect[9-13]
ispresent
within the local mean fieldapproach.
What it means isthat the remanant
magnetization depends
on howlong
amagnetic
field has beenapplied
beforeswitching
it off.However,
themagnetization
does notdecay
to zeromonotonically. Instead,
it reaches anon-equilibrium plateau reflecting shortcommgs
of the method.b)
Dur results on thedynamic susceptibility
in SG'S are m aqualitative agreement
with the experiments.c)
Fornon-symmetric
distributions of theexchange couplings
as studied in the context of theSG-ferromagnet
transitions the realpart
of triedynamic susceptibility displays
a two-peak
structure as a function oftemperature,
T. Wespeculate
that in expenments this couldbe taken as a manifestation of the
reentrancy phenomenon [14].
Weshow, however,
that thisinterpretation
is not correct.d)
Thefrequency dependence
of thedynaiuic specific
heat is shown to be similar to that found for thesix-spm
cluster [8]. Thetemperature dependence, however,
isopposite:
themaxima in the real and
imagmary
parts move towardshigher temperatures
ondecreasing
thefrequency.
Thedynamic specific
heat has been measured inglasses [15,
16] but notyet
in SG'S.It is
hoped
that this paper willtrigger
interest in suchexperiments.
2. Mortel and Metl~od
We consider the Hamiltonian
~ "
~ J>jS,Sj
H~S~, (1)
<q> ~
where S~ =
+1,
<ii
> denotes summation over nearestneighbors,
thecouphngs fg
areGaussian distributed with trie mean
Jo
and triedispersion
J. Triemagnetic
field considered bene is timedependent
andH =
Ho
+Hi
cosuJt.(2)
According
to Glauber [4],dynamics
of trieIsing system
may begovemed by
thefollowmg equation
(1+
To ~ <S~(t)
> = < tanhflhi
> +(1-
<Si
tanhflh~ >) tanh(flH)
,
(3)
where
hi
=
~j fg Sj
is the
exchange
fieldacting
on spmSi.
In what follows we willadopt
theJ
local mean field
approximation
m which <tanhflh~
> isreplaced by tanh(fl
< h~>).
Thisbrings equation (3)
into the form(i+To))m~(t)
=tanin(fl~fjmj)
J
+
tanin(flH) Il
m~tanh(fl ~j fg
mg )]
,
(4)
J
where
titi " < S~ >
(5)
In the static
limit, equation (4)
reduces to the standard local mean fieldequation [2],
1-e- to the TAPequation
without theOnsager
reaction termII?I.
It should be noted that inclusion of the reaction term insystems
with short rangecouplings
would lead tounphysical
results(the
field cooled state, forexample,
mayacquire negative
entropy at lowT) [2, 18].
To solveequation (4)
we will use the fourth-orderRunge-Kutta
method with thestep
size control[19].
3.
Aging
EoEectThere have been several
phenomenological attempts
to descnbe thephysical
mechanism of agmg[20-25]. Recently,
it bas been shown that a mean-fielddynamical
model(a spherical
SG withmulti-spin interaction)
can exhibitaging
effect in triethermodynamic
limit[26].
Monte Carlostudy
of the 3D Edwards-Anderson mortel[27, 28] gives quantitative agreement
withexperiments.
In this section we deal with the standard SG
(Jo
#
o,
J# o)
and ask what would be thepredictions
of the local mean fieldapproximation.
We first consider field cooled(FC)
and thenzero filed cooled
(ZFC) regimes.
FC REGIME. In a
typical experiment [9, loi
in which the FCaging
effect is observed one first cools the system down below thefreezing temperature, Tg,
andkeeps
themagnetic
fieldconstant. After a certain
waiting time, tw,
the field is switched off and the thermc-remanentmagnetization, Mrm (t),
is measured as a function of t. Theasymptotic
timedecay
of this quan-tity,
well belowTg,
is found to follow analgebraic
law. This isfound,
forinstance,
in the short range SGFeo ômno ôTi03 (II,
12] and in anamorphous
metallic SG(Fe~Niji-~~)76P16B6Al~
[13].
We consider several ways of
cooling.
In the first way, thesystem
iscooled, using
the static local mean fieldequation,
from T=
7J/kB (T
>Tg
m5J/kB)
down to T=
2.5J/kB (the temperature step
iso.o5J/kB)
andHo
# 0.5J. The field is then
kept
fixed for awaiting
time tw and triedynamic equations
are used. The field issubsequently
switched off. Trie remanentmagnetization Mrm(t)
is calculated as a function of time t(from
the moment when the field is switchedoff).
We find that if thecoohng
is done m the static way the agmg effect is absent:Mrm(t)
reaches the sameplateau
atlong
time scales for differentwaiting times,
1-e- there is nodependence
on tw.In the second way, we cool the
system
_in the field from above to belowTg
veryqmckly.
In this case aspin configuration
alter triecoohng
isessentially
random(spins
take values of +1randomly)
with a zeromagnetization.
Thisconfiguration
is used as astarting configuration
to solveequation (4).
A similarapproach
has been used in trie Monte Carlo simulations ofRieger [28].
We can show that within the local mean fieldapproximation
trieaging
effect is absent insystems
with L < 4 but forlarger
L's it is more and morepronounced.
The timedependence
of
Mrm(t)
obtained for vanouswaiting
times is shown mFigures
1 and 2 for L= 10 and L
= là
systems respectively. Clearly,
theaging
effect ispresent
butMrm(t)
reaches aplateau
instead ofgoing
to zeromonotonously.
We have considered times up to105To
and saw nochanges
mMrm(t).
We now consider the third way of
coohng
when thecoohng
rate is finite. One starts fromhigh temperatures
and then decreases Tlinearly
with t,1e.,
T(t)
=Tst ~~ ~~~t
tcooi ,
where T~t and
Tend
arestarting
and finaltemperatures respectively.
tc~~j is acoohng
time. At T =2.5J/kB
the field iskept
for somewaiting
time and then it is swiched off.Figure
3 shows0.4 0.4
3D SG, L=la 3D SG, L=15
,',
0.3 RANDOM CONFIGURATION 0.3 ' RANDOM CONFIGURATION
'.,
',
'
',
a÷ a÷
Î
_f~ ~=100 _f~ ' ~=100
0.2 ~=10 0.2
(
~"10ZÎ ~"~
ZÎ ',
~~~',
"
o-i ai
o-o O.O
-1 0 2 3 4 5 -1 0 2 3 4 5
log
tlog
tFig.
lFig.
2Fig.
l. The timedependence
ofMrm(t)
for the L= 10 system
(Ho
= 0.5J, T
=
2.5J/kB)
for diiferentwaiting
times as indicated. The initialspin configuration
is random(tca~i
-0)
but it is identical for each of the waiting times.Mrm(t)
reaches a plateau at long time scales.Fig.
2. Same as inFigure
1 but for L = là.results for the L = 10 system and tc~~j = To. The agmg effect is present but it
gets
weakercompared
to the case of the veryquick cooling.
ZFC REGIME. The
aging
elfect may be aise observed in the ZFCexpenments:
thesample
is
rapidly
cooled from above to belowTg
m zero field andthen,
after a timetw,
a small fieldis
applied. Then,
the increase inM(t
+tw)
is measured as a function of t.Consider the second way of
coohng:
thesystem
is cooled down veryquickly
to T=
2.5J/kB
but without the field. After
tw,
the field H= 0.5J is switched on. The agmg effect in the ZFC
regime
of the L= la system is shown in
Figure
4.Again M(t)
has aplateau
atlarge
t. Theaging
effect for othercooling
ways is shown to be similar to that for the FCregime.
We have considered various values of
Ho
The results arequalitatively
the same as thosepresented
inFigures
1-4. Thus within the local mean fieldapproximation
one con observe theaging
effect but thisapproximation
is not sufficient to monitor any further evolution towardsequilibrium.
The fluctuations are smoothed out and thesystem
stays frozen in a local minimum.These results are not
changed
when animproved
mean field method isadopted,
as shown in theAppendix.
It should be noted that morecomphcated
agmg scenanosinvolving
"tem-perature jumps"
in the manner ofexpenments
of reference [29] have been also studiedby
the Monte Carlo simulations[30].
4. AC
Susceptibility
of tl~e Standard SGThe
experimental
literature on ACsusceptibility
of SG is qmte substantial(see,
e-g-,Iii ).
The basicfinding
is that when one fixes uJ andplots x'
as a function of T then onegets
a curvewith a maximum. For
large
uJ's the maximum is rather broad. Ondecreasing
uJ theposition,
04 0.3
3D SG, L=10
3D SG, L"10
°.~ tcoai~Î
o-z
àÎ
~=100 'J0 2 ~"10
à
~~~ ~-~=5
0.1 ~"10
~=io0 0. i
ZFC
regime,
H=o.5JO.O O.O
-1 0 2 3 4 5 -1 0 2 3 4 5
~°~ log
tFig.
3Fig.
4Fig.
3. The aging eifect for the L= 10 system and icaai " TO
(Ho
" 0.5J, T=
2.5J/kB).
The system is cooled down from T=
8J/kB
to T=
2.5J/kB.
The temperature varies with tlinearly.
Fig.
4. The agiug eifect in ZFCregime
at T=
2.5J/kB (H
= 0.5J, L
=
10).
The resultscorrepond
to the very
quick cooling
regime(icaai
-0).
o-z o-z
improved
LMF~=ioo
z~ z~ LMF
~
~-zoo ~
S o i ~UIOO S
o i
~j
~=20~j
à à
improved LMF
O.O o_o
0 2 3 4 5 o 2 3 4 5
Îog
tiog
tFig.
5Fig.
6Fig. 5. The time
dependence
ofMrrr(t)
obtained in theimproved
localmean field
approximation
for the L
= 10 system
(Ho
= 0.5J, T=
2.5J/kB)
for diflerent waiting times. The solid, dotted and dashed curvescorrespond
to tw = 20To,100To and 200Torespectively.
The initial spinconfiguration
israndom.
Mrrr(t)
reaches aplateau
atlong
times.Fig.
6. The timedependence
ofMrrr(t)
for tw = 100To, T =2.5J/kB,
and Ho = 0.5J. The solid and dashed curvescorrespond
to trieimproved
local mean field and local mean fieldapproximations respectively.
The asterisk marks the value of tp(tp
cs 155To and 485To in the local mean field and improved localmean field
approximations respectively).
Tw,
of tue maximum moves towards lowertemperatures
alrd itsharpens
up. In tue DC limit tue maximumacquires
acusp-like
appearance and Tw -Tg.
Tueabsorptive susceptibility x",
on tue otherhand,
bas a small but distinctanomaly
aroundTw.
Thisanomaly
looks like a skewedpeak
or a kink. In order to calculate tuedynamic susceptibility
for a state as close to tueequilibrium
aspossible,
weadopt
tuefollowing procedure.
Tue system is cooled downstatically
to atemperature
under consideration and then a small AC field(Ho
=0)
isswitched on, and tue Glauber
dynamics
areimplemented.
Thus for a given T tuestarting spin configuration
is obtained from tue static solution of tue local mean fieldequations.
Tue AC field is switched on at t= 0. We start to monitor tue
magnetization
after some time to, chosenso that ail transient
exponentials
can be consideredextinct,
and we fit it toM(t)
=Hi IX' sin(uJt)
X"cos(uJt)j (6)
In our case one needs to about
3To,
where To is aperiod (To
"
27r/w),
and tue average is donetypically
over 7periods
which bas been found to be more than suflicient. We takeHi
to beequal
to 0.01J: smaller values ofHi
leave tue result almostunchanged.
Figure
7 shows tuetemperature dependence
of tuesusceptibility
for selected values of wand for
Jo
" 0. Tue results areaveraged
over 10samples.
Tue maxima ofx'
andx"
movetoward lower
temperatures shghtly
as w is decreasedindicating
that tue effectiveparamagnet-
SG transitiontemperature Tg(w)
decreases withdecreasing
w. It should be noted that tuecorresponding
maximum of tue staticsusceptibility x(w
=
0)
is located at T m 3.8J. Within tue local mean fieldapproximation
thisposition
does not coincide with tueparamagnet-SG
transition
temperature Tg
m 5J which may be determinedby
other criteria: from tue maxi-mum of tue nonhnear
susceptibility
or from tue condition that tue Edwards-Anderson orderparameter
vanishes [31](Monte
Carlo calculationsgive
an estimate ofTg
m Jiii ).
Tue resultspresented
inFigure
7 are very similar to those obtained for the standard SGAui-~Mn~
withx = o.0298
[32]
and forEuo.2Sro.85
[33] and also to whathappens
in tue clustersystems except
that in small clusters tuew - 0 limit
corresponds
to a curve with no cusp.In
Figure
8X'
and X" areplotted
versuslogw
for T=
2.5J/kB
and3.5J/kB.
At lowfrequencies X' depends
onlog
w veryweakly.
As w goes to zero tueabsorption
partx"
vanishes.This part of tue
susceptibility
appears tosatisfy
anapproximate
relationX"(uJ)
m-bôX'(uJ)/ôlnuJ (7)
with b
= 1.23 + 0.05. Tue
right-hand
ofequation (II)
is also shown inFigure
8.Lundgren
et ai. [34] derived a b of
7r/2
which dilfers from our result. Tue value of7r/2 depends
on tueassumption
oflog-uniform
relaxation times which does not seem to be accurate in tue localmean field
approximation.
Figure
9 shows tue Cole-Coleplot
forX'
andx"
for two selected values of T belowTg.
Thesecurves bave a
shape
of a semicircle.5.
'Reentrancy'
One of tue
interesting problems
of tue SGphysics
is aquestion
of tuereentrancy:
is therea transition from tue
ferromagnetic phase
to tue SGphase
onlowering temperature.
Sofar,
theoreticalstudies
of staticproperties
ofshort-range Ising
SG'Sgive
no evidence ioT the reen-trancy phenomenon [14].
One maysuggest
that the reentrancy may bedynamical
in nature,i e.
resulting
fromconsidering
finite observation times. In order to checkthis,
we bave stud- ied tuetemperature dependence
ofx(w)
insystems
withasymmetrically
distributedexchange
couplings
for variousfrequencies.
0A ,-,
°'~
,'p~,
'~
~~°0.3
T=2.5J/kB
~ o oi
T=3.5J/kB
0.3 ~ ---,
~ . 0.05 o_z
~ Ù-1
o-z o-i
o-o o-1
0-10 ,~'
' '
o io ~fh
z
~ ~,' (
g~,1
~ '
g ~ ,'
~~ ii 0 05 ~
'r ''
~*~ ô
~~ ô '
~~
~ , ~
~
~~" &~~
~
~/~l
jÎ
0.00 " ~
o.05 '* * 1
/*
é * Â~
~ ~ ~
Il
~~ ~'~~~4
~3 ~2 ~l 0 2
"
logio
lù°'°°
~ z 4 6 8 la
kBT/J ~ig
8Fig.
7Fig.
7. Temperaturedependence
of trie acsusceptibility
of trie standard spinglass. Open triangles,
closedtriangles
and starscorrespond
to wTo= o-1, 0.05 and 0.01
respectively.
Trie maximum ofx'
and x"
slightly
moves towards lower temperatures. Trie dashed curvecorresponds
to trie static case of w = 0. Results areaveraged
over 10samples.
Fig.
8. Plot ofx'
andx"
~ersusloguJ
for T=
2.5J/kB (dashed litre)
and T=
3.5J/kB (solid fine).
Closed
triangles corresponds
to-box'(w)/ôInw
for T =3.5J/kB,
where b= 1.23 + 0.05. Within trie
error bars b is trie same for both temperatures.
o.15
.
T=2.5J/kB
.
T=3.5J/kB
o.io
o.05
o.oo
Ù-o o-1 o-Z 0.3 0.4
X'
Fig.
9. Trie Cole-Coleplot,
le-, x" w.x'
for T=
2.5J/kB (closed triangles)
and T =3.5J/kB
(closed circles).
1.i
Jo=o.9J Jo=i.iJ
0.5
LJTO"o.05 LJTO "o.i
O.g
0.4 0.7
0.5 0.3
o.7
~
o-fi
~
o.5
0.3
o-o o-1
6 7 6 7 8 9 io
k~T/J k~T/J
Fig.
10Fig.
IlFig.
10. Temperaturedependence
ofx'
and x" for Jo" 0.9J and wTo
" 0.05 for 3
samples (L
=
10).
For each
sample x'
bas twopeaks
whichprobably correspond
to trieparamagnet-ferromagnet
and trie reentrant transitions.Fig.
ii. Trie same as inFigure
8 but for Jo # I.lJ and wTo# Ù-1.
It appears that the
theory
ofshort-range Ising
SG'S gives no evidence for thereentrancy
in the staticregime [14].
Thequestion
we ask in this section is whetherreentrancy phenomenon
ispossible
on short time scales. To answer thisquestion
one bas to calculate tue ACsusceptibility
for various values of tue mean,
Jo,
of tuecouplings.
Within tue local mean fieldapproximation
tue
ferromagnetically
orderedphase
exists at low T's forJo
> 0.6J[31]. Figure
10 shows tue Tdependence
ofX'
andx" (Jo
=
0.9J,
wTo "0.05)
for 3 dilferentsamples
with L= 10. A
similar
plot
forJo
" I.IJ and wTo
= o-1 is shown in
Figure
Il. For each of thesesamples
we observe two
peaks
inx'
as a function of T. Tuetemperatures corresponding
to tue twopeaks
will be denotedby TÙ/~
andTù/~
where tue latter is lower. We calculatedTÙÎ~
andTÎÎ/x
in each of tue 10
samples
and took their average. Tue results are shown inFigure
12.The dilference between
Tù/x
andTùàx
is found to decreaseon
lowering
w and the twopeaks
comcide at wTo < 0.008. Apossible interpretation
of the two maxima structure could be thatTÙ/x corresponds
to transition betweenparamagnet
andferromagnet,
andTflx
to tuetransition between
ferromagnet
and SG. It ispossible
that this is how tueexperiments
bave beeninterpreted
when tue reentrancy was involved.However,
it appears that suchinterpretation
would bemisleading
for several reasons.First,
tueJo-dependence
ofTÎÎ/x
is not at ail likepredicted by
tue mean field theories(infinite
rangesystems)
ofreentrancy iii TÎÎÎ~
increaseswith
Jo
instead ofdecreasing. Second,
tue twopeaks
appear also in tueequilibrium
SGregime.
ù~i~
8 o.i p~
o.05 o.coi
à
~É
~
FM
SG
0
O.O O.5 1-O
Jo/J
Fig.
12. The T Jophase diagram.
Trie solid finecorresponds
to trieequilibrium
case(trie
curveis obtained from maximum of trie
susceptibility). PM,
FM and SG denote trie paramagnet,spin glass
and
ferromagnetic phases respectively.
Triedotted,
dashed andlong-dashed
fines correspond to TÙÎX andTflx
obtained forwTo = 0.1, 0.05 and 0.01
respectively.
Trie diflerence between two temperaturesis found to decrease on
lowering
w. For wT < 0.008 TÙÎX andTflx
coincide.Thus origins of any true
reentrancy
in short rangesystems
remain misterious or are a result of mistakeninterpretation
ofexperimental
data. Inaddition,
tuepuysics
of tuetwo-peak
structure remains to be elucidated. Most
likely
it relates to some cluster excitations.6.
Dynamic Specific
HeatTue
specific-ueat spectroscopy
bas been demonstrated to be a useful tool forstudying
relaxation processes insupercooled liquids [15, 16].
In atypical experiment [15]
one immerses a ueater into tueliquid
andapphes
a sinusoidal current atfrequency
w. Tue powerdissipated
containsa DC
component
and an ACcomponent
atfrequency
w,ranging
between 0.2 Hz and 6 kHz.Tue AC
component,
results inpuase-suifted temperature
oscillations and defines tuecomplex specific
ueat. Tue DC component, on tue otueruand,
is notrelevant, provided
the thermalresponse is measured
locally.
Birge
andNagel
[15]pointed
out tuat in unfrustrated materials and standardhquids
tue real part of tuespecific
ueatc'(w)
does notpractically depend
on w and tueimaginary part
is almost zero. In tue case ofSG'S, uowever,
andpresumably
of otuersystems
witu many modes ofconfigurational relaxation,
tuedynamic specific
ueat may be used as anotuerprobe
of SGdynamics [8].
Indeed tuedynamic specific
ueatcouples
to tue time evolution of even-spin correlations wuereas tuedynamic susceptibility
is given in terms ofodd-spin
correlations.By working
witu asix-spin
clusterCieplak
and Szamel demonstrated [8] tuat tuetemperature
andfrequency dependence
of tuedynamic specific
ueat is similar to tuat of tuedynamic
susceptibility
except tuat tue former is not alfectedby
processescoupled
to tue verylongest
relaxation time in tue
system.
Wuen one fixes w andplots
c' and c" as a function of T tuen onegets
a curve witu a maximum. Ondecreasing
w tueposition
of tue maximum moves towardsjower
temperatures
and itsuarpens
up. For a fixedT,
one can show tuat in tue w - 0limit,
c' reacues aplateau
wuereas c" vanisues [8].Tue
question
we ask now is wuat is tue beuavior of tuedynamic specific
ueat of tuesystem
undergoing
tue transition to tue SGphase
at T#
0? In order to answer tuis one suould find tue time evolution of tue internai energy because tuis is tuequantity
wuicu defines tuedynamic specific
ueat. In tue local mean fieldapproacu,
tue energy is determined not fromtwo-spin
correlations but from tue localmagnetizations.
Tuis could be a reasonwuy
our results will be found dilferent from tuose obtained for clusters. Tue otuer reason could be tue existence of a finite critical temperature.In tue
experiments
onliquids,
anoscillatory
ueat causestemperature
oscillations. For a tueoreticalstudy
of SG'S it is more convenient to define tue samedynamic specific
ueatby inverting
tue situation. We thus propose tuat tuetemperature
of tuespin
system variesperiodically
witu time:T(t)
= T +ôTsin(wt)
,
(8)
wuere ôT is assumed to be small relative to T.
Tue
perturbation
in T results in aoscillatory
evolution of tue internai energy. Tueoscillatory part
of the averageHamiltonian,
< H >, will be denotedby
à < H >. When transients die out one can define c' and c" as followsà < H >
IN
= ôT[c'(w) sin(wt) c"(w) cos(wt) (9)
Tue time evolution of à < H > bas to be tuen determined and we use
equation (4)
witu H= 0
for tuis purpose.
Tue initial
configuration
for tue time evolution bas been obtained in anequilibrium
way for eacu T. We monitor à < H > and fit it to(9)
after some timeto,
cuosen so tuat ail transientexponentials
can be considered extinct. In our case one needs ta of about5To,
wuereTa
is aperiod
of thetemperature
oscillation. Dur calculations have been carried eut for the 3Dsystem
of size L = 10. A suflicientaveraging
ofc'(w)
andc"(w)
isaccomphshed
over 10periods.
Theamplitude
ôT is taken to beequal
to0.01J/kB (the
results remain almost the same for smallerôT).
Figure
13 shows thetemperature dependence
of thedynamic specific
heat for selected values of w. The maxima of c' and c"move toward
higher temperatures
as w is decreased. It should be noted that anopposite tendency
has been observed bathexperimentally
and within thedynamic
local mean fieldapproximation
for thedynamic magnetic susceptibility.
It is aiseopposite
to what has been observed for the6-spin
cluster. Thelonger
theperiod
ofoscillations,
the doser c' resembles the
equilibrium specific
heat. Theplots
of c" versus T are similar to those of c'exept
that the w= 0 limit
corresponds
to c"= 0. Thus the smaller w, the smaller
is the maximum.
We now tutu to the discussion of the
frequency dependence
of thedynamic specific
heat.Figures
14 and 15 show c' and c" versuslogiow, respectively.
These curves resemble those for thedynamic susceptibility.
At lowfrequencies
c' becomes saturated. The dilference betweenour results and the results obtained for the
toy
model [8] is observed for c". In the case of thesix-spin cluster,
c" may have two maxima at lowtemperatures
which reflect the elfect of twoseparated long
relaxation modes. In our case one hasonly
one maximum This may beexplained by
tue fact tuat oursystem
bas manylong
relaxation times and tue elfect ofindividual modes is smootued eut. From
Figures
14 and 15 it is clear tuat any maximumin
c" is bound to be located at a
frequency
wituin aregion
of increase of c'.Figure
16 shows tue Cale-Caleplots
on wuicu c" is drawn as a function of c'. For ailtemperatures
tueplot
bas a circularsuape.
In tue case of tue six-spin cluster tue curve cari consist of twooverlapping
semicircles [8]. Dur results for tue Cale-Caleplots
are similar to tuose for tuedynamic susceptibility (see Fig. 9).
It would be
interesting
to confront tue results ondynamic specific
ueat wituexperiments.
ù-fi ù.3
,-,~
L~i~ L~i~', 0
-- D.I
' -- D,1
~-~- 0.25
ù.4 --- 0.25 Ù-Z 0.5
, -- 0.5
r i,
o-z o-i
ù-ù ù-ù
ù 2 4 6 8 ù 2 4 6 8
kBT/J kBT/J
a) b)
Fig.
13. Trie real andimaginary
parts of triedynamic specific
heat for trie 3D system(L =10)
asa function of T. Trie dasued fine
corresponds
to theequilibrium specific
heat obtained in trie localmean field
approximation.
Trie stars, open and closedtriangles
correspond to wTo" Ù-1, 0.25 and Ù-à,
respectively.
ù.3
~
~
~~~
0.4
ù-Z
~ l 75
C1,
~ 2.5
o-z
o-i
ù-ù ù-ù
-3 -2 -1 ù 1 2 -3 -2 -1 ù 1 2
logio
~ùlogio
lùFig.
14Fig.
15Fig.
14. Trie real part of triedynamic specific
heat w.Îogio
w for T=
2.5J/kB,1.75J/kB
andI.oJlkB
as indicated. At low frequencies c' reaches aplateau.
Fig. 15. Same as in
Figure
14 but for the imaginary part of thedynamic specific
heat. It goes tozero in the
w - 0 limit.
Acknowledgments
We
acknowledge partial support
from the Polish agency KBN(grant
number 2P302 12707).
ù.3
2.5J/kB
ù-Z C
1.75J/kB
o-i
I,ùJlkB
o-ù
ù-ù o-Z ù.4 ù-fi
C~
Fig.
16. The Cole-Coleplot,
i-e-, c" vs, c' for selected T ilrdicated lrext to thecurves. For ail
temperatures considered these curves have a semicircular
shape.
Appendix
Improved
Local Mean FieldApproximation
Here we discuss the aging elfect wituin the
improved
local mean fieldapproximation [35].
Tuis
approacu
isequivalent
to anapproximate
evaluation of <tanu(h,)
> witu a factorized statisticalweigut P(S)
=fl~ (l+
< S~ >S,)
or toexpanding tanu(h,)
as a sum over ailpossible products
ofSj (up
to tue fiftu order in D =3), taking
into account tuatS)
= 1.
Adopting
tue first way we cari writeequation (3)
in tue form(i +To()mi(t)
=11 fli(i
+SJmJ)/21tanh(fI~JIJSJ)
ls, j j j
+
(1-
mi£ fl[(1+ Sjmj)/2] tanu(fl£ J,jsj)) tanu(flH) (10)
ls, j j j
Using
tue lastequation
we bave considered tue aging elfect in tue FC regime.Figure
5 shows tue timedependence
ofMrm(t)
for selectedwaiting
times at T=
2.5J/kB (the cooling
down to thistemperature
is assumed to be tocquick
so that one can use the randomspin configu-
ration as a
starting configuration). Clearly,
similar to tue results obtained in tue local mean fieldapproximation, Mrm(t)
reacues aplateau
atlong
times. Tue time scaletp required
toreacu a
plateau
in tueimproved
local mean fieldapproximation
is,uowever, larger
tuan tuecorresponding
time scale obtained in tuesimpler approximation.
Tuis can be seen inFigure
6 wuere
Mrr~z(t)
calculatedby
tue two metuods is suown for tw =l0oTo,
T=
2.5J/kB
and L = 10. In tuis case tue local mean fieldapproximation
givestp
m155To
wuereas tueimproved
local mean field leads to
tp
m485To.
Thus tue time scales are enuanced but tueapproacu
to a trueequilibrium
is still absent.References
iii
Binder K. andYoung
A. P., Rm. Med.Phys.
58(1986)
801.[2] Soukoulis C.
M.,
Levin K. and Grest G.S., Phys.
Re~. Lett. 48(1982)
1756;Phys.
Rev. B 28(1983)
1495.[3] Soukouhs C.
M.,
Grest G.S.,
RD C, and Levin K., J.Appt. Phys.
57(1985)
3300;RD
C.,
Grest G.S.,
Soukouhs C. M, and Levin K., Phys. Rev. B 31(1985)
1682;Grest G.
S.,
Soukouhs C. M, and LevinK., Phys.
Rev. B 33(1986)
7659.[4] Glauber R. J., J. Math.
Phys.
4(1963)
294.[5] Banavar J. R.,
Cieplak
M. and Muthukumar M., J.Phys.
C18(1985) L157;
Cieplak
M. and LusakowskiJ.,
J.Phys.
C19(1986)
5253.[6]
Cieplak M., Cieplak
M. Z. and LusakowskiJ., Phys.
Rev. B 36(1987)
620 and references therein.[7] Kinzel
W., Phys.
Rev. B 26(1982)
6303;Reger
J. D. and Binder K., Z.Phys.
B 60(1985)
137.[8]
Cieplak
M. and Szamel G.,Phys.
Rev. B 37(1988)
1790.[9]
Lundgren
L., Svedlindh R., Nordblad P. and Beckman O.,Phys.
Rev. Lent. 51(1983)
911.[loi
Chamberlin R.V.,
Mozurkevich G. and Orbach R., Phys. Rev. Lent. 52(1984)
867;Ledermann
M.,
OrbachR.,
Hammann J.M.,
Ocio M. and VincentE., Phys.
Rev. B 44(1991)
7403.
[iii
Ito A.,Aruga H.,
Torikai E., KikuchiM., Syono
Y. and Takei H.,Phys.
Rev. Lent. 57(1986)
483.[12] Gunnarson K., Svedlindh P., Nordblad P.,
Lundgren
L.,Agura
H. and Ito A.,Phys.
Rev. Lent.61
(1988)
754.[13]
Granberg
P., Svedlindh P., Nordblad P.,Lundgren
L. and Chen H. S.,Phys.
Rev. B 35(1987)
2075.
[14j Southem B. W. and
Young
A. P., J.Phys.
C10(1977)
2179jZaluska-Kotur M. A.,
Cieplak
M. and Cieplak P., J. Phys. C 20(1987)
37441;Reger
J. D. andYoung
A. P., J.Phys.:
Condens. Marrer1(1989)
915;Gingras M. J. P. and Sorensen E. S., Phys. Rev. B 46
(1992)
3441.[15]
Birge
N. O. andNagel
S. R.,Phys.
Rev. Lent. 54(1985)
2674;Birge
N. O.,Phys.
Rev. B 34(1986)
1631.[16] Christensen
T.,
J.Phys. Colloq.
France 46(1985)
C8-635.[17] Thouless D.
J.,
Anderson P. W. and Palmer R.G.,
Philos.Mag.
35(1977)
593.[18]
Ling D.,
Bowman D. R. and LevinK., Phys.
Rev. B 28(1982)
262.[19] Press W. H., Flannery B. P.,
Teukolsky
S. A. andVetterling
W.T.,
"NumericalRecipes" (Cam- bridge
Univ. Press,1986).
[20] Palmer R. G., Stein D. L., Abrahams E. and Anderson P.
W., Phys.
Rev. Lent. 53(1984)
958.[21] Koper G. J. and Hilhorst H.
J.,
J.Phys.
France 49(1988)
429.[22] Fisher D. S. and Huse D.,
Phys.
Rev. B 38(1988)
373.[23] Sibani P., Phys. Rev. B 35
(1987)
8572;Hoflmann K. H. and Sibani
P.,
Z.Phys.
B 80(1990)
429.[24] Bouchaud J.
P.,
J.Phys.
France 2(1992)1705.
[25]
Ginzburg
S.L.,"Irreversible
Phenomena mSpin
Glass"(in Russian) (Moscow:
Nauka,1989).
[26]
Cugliandolo
L, F. and Kurchan J.,Phys.
Rev. Lent. 71(1993)
1.[27] Andersson J. -O., Mattsson J. and Svedlindh P.,
Phys.
Rev. B 46(1992)
8297.[28] Rieger H., J.
Phys.
A 26(1993)
L615.[29]
Granberg
P., Sandlund L., Nordblad P., Svendlidh P., andLundgren
L.,Phys.
Rev. B 38(1988)
7097.
[30]
Rieger
H., J.Phys.
I France 4(1994)883;
Cughandolo
L. F., Kurchan J. and RitortF., Phys.
Rev. B 49(1994)
6331.[31] Hung T. Q., Li M. S. and
Cieplak
M., J. Magn.Magn.
Mater.(in press).
[32] Mulder C. A.
M.,
vanDuyneveldt
A. J. andMydosh
J.A., Phys.
Rev. B 25(1992)
515.[33] Huser D. L.
E., Wenger
A. J., vanDuyneveldt
A. J. andMydosh
J. A.,Phys.
Rev. B 27(1983)
3100.
[34]
Lundgren
L., Svedlindh P. and BeckmanO.,
J.Magn. Magn.
Mater. 25(1981)
33.[35] Netz R. R. and Berker A. N., Phys. Rev. Lent. 67
(1991)
1808;Banavar J.
R., Cieplak
M. and Maritan A.,Phys.
Rev. Lent. 67(1991)
1807.Classification
Physics
Abstracts02.00 05.00 64.00
The B.A.M. Storage Capacity
H.
Engliscu(1),
V.Mastropietro(~)
and B.Tirozzi(3)
(~) Universitàt
Leipzig,
Inst. fürInformatik,
D-04109Leipzig, Germany
(~) Dipartimento di Fisica, Università diPisa,
56100 Pisa, Italia(~)
Dipartimento
diMatematica,
Universita' di Roma "LaSapien2a",
00185 Italia(Received
22February
1994, revised 23September 1994, accepted
4 October1994)
Abstract. Trie Bidirectional Associative
Memory (B.A.M.)
isa neural network which can
store and associate
pairs
of data in trie form of two patterns using an ilrput network of Mneurons and
an outputlretwork with Nlreurolrs.
Despite
its ilrterest thereare no theoretical
investigations
about this model. We obtailr trieequatiolrs
of state in arigorous
way usilrg olrly trieassumption
that trie Edwards-Alrderson parameters associated to trie two networksare
self-averaging:
thisimportant
propertycorresponds
to triereplica
symmetryhypothesis
in triereplica
calculations. A comparison between trie methods used in trie hterature is made and trie connection of our derivation with Peretto's method is shown. Trie storagecapacity
of theB-A-M- is
computed
whelr N= M alrd a boulrd
on it is denved when N
# M,
in contrast with triestrongly
diluted case in which trie critical capacity is unbounded forN/M
- 0 or - ce.l. Introduction
Recently
some models bave beenproposed
in order to recover remarkableproperties
of tue uumanbrain,
inparticular
tuecapacity
ofremembering sometuing starting
from anincomplete
or
approximate
information. TheHopfield
model is for instance one of such models. In this model the state of the braincorresponds
to a set of variablesa,(t)
= +1 which describe the
state of tue1-tu neuron, E
1, N,
at the time t. Somebiological considerations,
for which werefer to
(10), suggest
tuat tuea~(t) obey
tuefollowing dynamics:
ai(t +1)
=sign(£ J, jaj(t))
J
wuere
f,j
=(1IN) £(_~ gfg(
and tue gH are ppatterns,
/J E1,
p and(gH)~
egf
e +1. Each of these patterns is a piece of information to store into tuesystem.
Since we want to makea mortel
storing
any kind of information we assume that thegf
areindependent, identically distributed,
random variables withprobability
distributionP(g$
=
1)
=P(gf
=
-1)
=
1/2.
We say that the
system
recognizes someapproximate
informationif,
choosenai(0)
=e,g)
wuere e, is a random
variable
such tuatPie,
= 1) = 1- q, tuer