• Aucun résultat trouvé

The moving light clock: which way the photon goes?

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "The moving light clock: which way the photon goes?"

Copied!
3
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-02912534

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02912534v1

Submitted on 6 Aug 2020 (v1), last revised 3 Jun 2021 (v2)

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

The moving light clock: which way the photon goes?

Pavle Premovic

To cite this version:

Pavle Premovic. The moving light clock: which way the photon goes?. The General Science Journal, The General Science Journal, 2015. �hal-02912534v1�

(2)

 

The moving light clock: which way the photon goes?

Pavle I. Premović

Laboratory for Geochemistry, Cosmochemistry and Astrochemistry, University of Niš, P.O. Box 224, 18000 Niš, Serbia

Time dilation and length contraction are two important effects of the Special relativity (SR).

These two effects depend upon the second postulate of this theory that the speed of light c (=2.99792×108 m s-1)is the same in all inertial frames of reference [1].

Many physics textbooks deal with the subject of time dilation. This phenomenon can be demonstrated using a device known as the light clock [1]. The light clock consists of two plane parallel mirrors M1 and M2 facing each other at a distance d apart as in Fig. 1a.

M1 d

a)

x M1

M2

M1

D

b)

x

α v

M1 M2

M1

v M2

x c)

v TΔ vΔT

Fig. 1. The SR description of the photon path of the light clock: (a) at rest and (b) traveling along the positive x-axis at the speed v; and, (c) the photon path independent from motion of the light clock (or from the inertial frames of reference).

The lower mirror M1 has a light source at the center that emits a photon at 90 degrees in the direction of mirror M2. For the sake of simplicity, we will consider timefor the photon to travel from mirror M1 to mirror M2. Of course, you may find all following derivations in many elementary physics texts.

For the light clock at rest the (proper) time interval is then ΔT0 = d/c. Now allow the same light clock to be moving with a certain relative speed v horizontally in the direction of positive x-axis, Fig. 1b. Clearly, a photon will now travel the larger distance D and thus it will take a longer (improper) time interval ΔT = D/c. According to SR, ΔT0 and ΔT are related by the relativistic time dilation expression ΔT = ΔT0 /√1-v2/c2. Thus, the effects of time dilation only start to become measurable at speeds close to the speed of light c, i. e. at so-called relativistic speeds.

(3)

 

It is important to note here that the angle α between the photon path and the direction of motion of the light clock depends on the v/c ratio, in particular cos (α) = v/c. In other words, α depends of the light clock speed v (or the speed of inertial reference frame) and appears also only measurable at relativistic speeds.

In this derivation, one assumes that the photon travels from M1 to M2 when the light clock frame is moving. It appears, virtually, that this assumption is valid when we are dealing a light clock at non-relativistic speeds. In this case, the clock distance vΔT is very small compared with the photon distance cΔT, i.e. α → 90 degrees. However, for a light clock traveling at relativistic speeds this assumption is ambiguous since these speeds for a man-made object will be unattainable even for the very distant future. Indeed, at present the fastest rocket system in the world can only reach speeds of up to about 2000 m s-1. According to SR, a stationary observer would observe that the direction of the photon motion is affected by the relativistically fast light clock, being at the angle α relative to this direction, Fig. 1b. Or she/he could observe that the photon is traveling perpendicular to the direction of motion and it is not affected by the moving light clock (or by the moving inertial frame of reference), Fig. 1c. If the later is correct then the traditional light clock experiments are meaningless.

Finally, it should noted that SR states that “the velocity c of light in vacuum is the same in all inertial frames of reference in all directions and depends neither on the velocity of the source nor on the velocity of the observer” [Einstein, 1905]. It appears then rather peculiar that the direction of the photon motion would depend of the speed of the inertial frame of reference.

Reference

1. W. Rindler, Introduction to Special Relativity, 2nd ed. Oxford University Press, 1991.

Références

Documents relatifs

The differences are that : (i) the cross section d a , or da,, is replaced by the real photon cross section ; (ii) in evaluating this cross section, the kinematics

(( scaling )) A angle fixe, ainsi que pour le facteur de forme de transition du no. hadrons)) can determine the important C = + hadronic states and resonances, and

Both the ATLAS 4 and CMS 5 Collaborations have performed measurements of the differential cross section of isolated prompt photon, photon-jet and di-photon production with

We initialize the field in |0〉 by first absorbing thermal photons with ∼10 atoms prepared in g and tuned to resonance with the cavity mode (residual photon number ∼

conguration, where the photon is in the barrel region and the two electrons stay at small angle, hence describing background events, and a single electron conguration where one

The following uncertainties were assumed to be fully correlated between differ- ent years: generator theoretical error; trigger efficiency for background; and uncertainties

The photon is generally expected to be massless, but a num- ber of theorists have challenged this assumption, starting from de Broglie and nowadays considering models with

The stationary observer determines that the light signal angle of incidence α I is greater than zero but its angle of reflection α R is zero degree, Fig.. Of course,