• Aucun résultat trouvé

Entropy production in nonequilibrium steady states A different approach and an exactly solvable canonical model

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Entropy production in nonequilibrium steady states A different approach and an exactly solvable canonical model"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Entropy production in nonequilibrium steady states

A different approach and an exactly solvable canonical model

Sven Dorosz in collaboration with

Daniel ben-Avraham (Clarkson University) and Michel Pleimling (Virginia Tech)

University of Luxembourg

Theory of Soft Condensed Matter,

[email protected]

D. ben-Avraham, S. Dorosz, and M. Pleimling, Phys. Rev. E 84, 011115 (2011).

Entropy production in nonequilibrium steady states is discussed by focusing on paths obtained by sampling at regular (small) intervals τ , instead of sampling on each change of the system’s state.

P (X) = ρ(X0) · ω(X0|X1; τ ) · ω(X1|X2; τ )... · ω(XM −1|XM; τ ) The total measurement time is T = M · τ

The fluctuation relation holds also for the novel paths [1].

Interval sampling allows direct analysis of systems with microscopic irreversibility, and is more easily implemented in experiments.

We were able to identify universal features of entropy production.

The kink at zero entropy production arises from the irreversibility alone.

3 State Model

stationary probabilities ρ(A) = ρ(B) = ρ(C)

A

C

B

ω

ω

ω

A

B

C

1

1

1

elementary transitions

rates as a function of time

+

o

ωo ≡ ω(A, A; τ) = ω(B, B; τ) = ω(C, C; τ), ω+ ≡ ω(A, B; τ) = ω(B, C; τ) = ω(C, A; τ), ω ≡ ω(A, C; τ) = ω(B, A; τ) = ω(C, B; τ). ωo = 1 3 + 2 3e −3τ/2 cos √ 3 2 τ ! ωo = 1 − τ + τ2/2 + o(τ3) (1) ω+ = 1 3 + 1 3e−3τ/2 " − cos √ 3 2 τ ! + √3 sin √ 3 2 τ !# ω+ = τ − τ2 + o(τ3) (2) ω = 1 3 + 1 3e −3τ/2 " − cos √ 3 2 τ ! − √3 sin √ 3 2 τ !# ω = τ2/2 − τ3/2 + +o(τ4) (3)

The ratio ω+ ≈ τ/2, for the “forbidden” reverse direction, vanishes as τ → 0.

Probability Distribution of Entropy Production

The total entropy production, in the steady state, is given by [2] stot = ln ρ(X0) ρ(XM) + ln Y i ω(Xi−1, Xi; τ ) ω(Xi, Xi−1; τ ) := ∆s + s = s , (4) ω(X, Y ; τ ) denotes the conditional probability for finding the system in state Y after time τ ,

having started at state X.

The generating function of the stochastic process is

hexp(−µs)i = ω0 + ω+1−µωµ + ω+µω1−µM . (5) M is the number of measurements at constant time intervals τ .

-60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 m 0 5000 10000 15000 - ln(p m )/(M τ ) M=8 M=16 M=32 M=64

m is the net number of forward transitions sampled over M intervals of length τ = 0.001.

Long time behaviour

The lowest EV of the time evolution operator:

ν(µ) = −τ−1 ln ω0 + ω+1−µωµ + ω+µω1−µ , (6) τ << 1 ν(µ) ≈ 1 − (τ/2)µ − (τ/2)1−µ. (7) Both expressions satisfy the fluctuation relation [3],

ν(µ) = ν(1 − µ). (8) -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5

µ

-20 -10 0

ν(µ)

The eigenvalue ν(µ) is plotted for τ = 0.001.

Rate Function for Entropy

The mean rate of entropy change is

h ˙si = dν/dµ|µ=0 = τ−1(ω+ − ω) ln(ω+/ω) ≈ ln(2/τ). (9)

The rate function, χ(σ): σ = s/h ˙stotiT is the scaled entropy χ(σ) = max µ {ν(µ) − h ˙siσµ} . (10) ⇒ χ(σ) = 1 − pσ2 + 2τ + σ ln σ + √ σ2 + 2τ 2 ! . (11)

The limiting form of χ(σ) is universal:

τ → 0 σ > 0 χ(σ) −→ 1 − σ + σ ln σ, (12)

τ → 0 σ < 0 χ(σ) → ∞. (13)

Origin of the kink [4]

χ′(σ) = ln σ + √ σ2 + 2τ 2 ! , χ′′(σ) = 1 σ2 + 2τ −→ τ →0 |σ|−1 , (14) . For finite τ : χ′(1) − χ′(−1) → ln(2/τ). -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3

σ

0 5 10 15

χ(σ)

-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3

σ

-20 -15 -10 -5 0

χ

’(

σ

)

(a)

(b)

τ = 10−7. The kink is more pronounced the smaller the value of τ .

References

[1] D. ben-Avraham, S. Dorosz, and M. Pleimling, Phys. Rev. E. 83, 041129 (2011). [2] U. Seifert, Eur. Phys. J. B 64, 423 (2008).

[3] J. L. Lebowitz and H. Spohn, J. Stat. Phys. 95, 333 (1999).

Références

Documents relatifs

My research activities were then focused on the study of strain in quantum wells of semiconducting materials and the relationships between structural and magnetic

The main goal of this section is to show how the generalized oscillator algebra A κ is relevant for the study of one-dimensional exactly solvable potentials in the context

If the neutrons and protons occupy different shells, so that the bosons are defined in different shells, then any IBM-2 hamiltonian has eigenstates that correspond to shell-model

In summary, we have studied reaction-diffusion systems and showed that the absence of microscopic reversibility can lead for transient fluctuation ratios for the observable ␦␾

Thanks to the invariance under spatial translations, we can apply the Bloch theorem to the subsystem density matrix and exactly diagonalize the time evolution superop- erator to

- Ziegler’s principle does not imply the onset of steady states (Section 4).. Also, in Section 4.2, we compare MaxEP and MinEP, showing that they have completely different

an initially flat interface trie steady state properties of the system suggest that for p &gt; p~ the interface remains flat for all times except in a finite region close to

The current study aimed to identify the correlative relationship between every type of types of personality (A, B) and entrepreneurial intention and to detect the relationship