HAL Id: jpa-00246766
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00246766
Submitted on 1 Jan 1993
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
Dynamics of the commensurate-incommensurate phase transition in C2O4D ND4, 1/2 D2O: a polarized Raman
study under pressure
M. Krauzman, A. Colline, D. Kirin, R. Pick, N. Toupry
To cite this version:
M. Krauzman, A. Colline, D. Kirin, R. Pick, N. Toupry. Dynamics of the commensurate- incommensurate phase transition in C2O4D ND4, 1/2 D2O: a polarized Raman study under pressure.
Journal de Physique I, EDP Sciences, 1993, 3 (4), pp.1007-1029. �10.1051/jp1:1993180�. �jpa-00246766�
Classification
Physics
Abstracts33.20F 64,70R 64.60C
Dynamics of the commensurate-incommensurate phase
transition in C~04D ND4, 1/2 D~O
: apolarized Raman study
under pressure
M, Krauzman
(~),
A, Colline(~),
D, Kirin(2),
R, M. Pick(I)
and N,Toupry (~)
(~)
D6partement
de RecherchesPhysiques (*),
Universit6 P, et M, Curie, 75252 Paris Cedex 05, France(2) Institut Ruder Boskovic, 41000
Zagreb,
Croatia(Received 5 June J992,
accepted
infinal
form 28 October1992)
R6sum6. Les spec~es Rarnan
polaris6s
de bassefrdquence
de AHOD ont 6t6 d6terrr1n6s h 6,4 kbar dons lesphases
norrrale et incommensurable.L'analyse
des deuxpics
centraux visiblesdans les deux
phases,
et des troisphonons
acoustiques rendus visibles dons la distorsion incommensurable, corrobore les r£sultats obtenus r6cemment par diffusion de neutrons dons laphase
norrrale [10], et 6tend ceux-ci h laphase
incommensurable, Enparticulier,
l'dvolution du temps de r6sidence des ionsND(
dons cette demi~rephase,
ddterrr1n6e hpant
deplusieurs expdriences, indique
un accroissement notable de la bam~re depotentiel
par rapport h laphase
norrrale.
Abstract, Polarized low frequency Rarnan spectra of AHOD have been measured at 6,4 kbar both in the normal and in the incommensurate
phases,
The evolutions of two centralpeaks,
visible in the twophases,
and of the flwee acoustic modes made activeby
the incommensurate distortionhave been
analyzed.
The results are in good agreement with the values deduced from a recentneutron experiment in the normal
phase [10],
and extend them to the incommensurate one. Inparticular,
theND(
residence time is determinedthrough
various methods in the latterphase,
andprovides
evidence for an increase of the barrierheight
with respect to the disorderedphase.
1. Introduction.
Ammonium Oxalate
hemihydrated, NH~C~O~H, H~O (in
shortAHO)
and itsfully
deuterated 2analog (AHOD)
have beenrecently
thesubject
of severalinvestigations
motivatedby
their remarkablephase diagram,
Thisdiagram
has been constructed from Ramanexperiments [1-3]
up to 8 kbar and down to 80 K, The nature of the
phases
involved has been establishedthrough
(*) U-R-A- 71.
a series of X
Ray [4-5],
Brillouin[6]
and elastic neutron[7] scattering
measurements andfigure
Ireproduces
our presentknowledge
of thephases appearing
in AHOD, Phase Ibelongs
to theD(((Pmnb )
space group with Z=
8 formula units per cell, The
phase
I-II transition is
equitranslational,
and of the second order type, Phase IIbelongs
to theCl
~ PI ~~
l space group and the elastic constant
C55
tends to zero at thephase
transition.n
Phase I-III transition is also second order, while
phase
III-II transition is first order. It was established[3-7]
thatphase
III is incommensurate with wavevector qo =3c*,
where 3 is a function of pressureonly,
3increasing
from 0.04[8]
in thevicinity
of the critical pressureP~
toapproximately
0.23 at 8 kbar. Furthermore, from apolarization analysis
of the Ramanspectra [3],
it was concluded that the variable which freezes inphase
IIItransforms,
inphase I,
as the v~
representation [9]
of qo.These
experiments
havesuggested
that the two second-orderphase
transitions have the sameorigin
and can be understood in thefollowing
way. In thehigh
temperaturephase
I, the 8ND(
cations lie on a mirrorplane [4]
and thus form two distinct families, One of them is disordered[4],
and the twosymmetrical positions
of each cation with respect to this statistical mirrorplane
may berepresented by
the two values of apseudospin.
For each latticecell,
one2
can form four different linear combinations of these
pseudospins,
each of themtransforming
as a different irreduciblerepresentation
of thecrystal point
group. One of thesecombinations,
which will
play
themajor
rolehere,
transforms as theB~~ representation,
and we shall, in accordance with[10],
call~r)
this linear combination in theL~ cell,
and~r~(q)
its Fouriertransform
(up
tophase
factors[10]
which are irrelevant for thepresent discussion).
The bilinear interaction energy between twopseudospins
can be written in terms of these linearcombinations, Let us call
Jd(q)w k~ Td(q), (1)
(where k~
is the Boltzmannconstant)
the Fourier transform of this interaction energy between two ad variablesbelonging
to different cells. The modelproposed
in[3]
for the two second- order transitions offigure
I is that the same variable~r~(q
drives the two transitions, and that :a) Td(q) depends only
on pressure its maximumsimply
moves from q = 0 below the critical pressureP~,
to a wave vectoralong c*,
aboveP~.
b)
For all values of q, and inparticular
for q in thevicinity
of the direction ofc*,
there existsa strong linear
coupling
between~r~(q)
and apseudo
transverse acousticphonon
with normal mode coordinateQ(q),
the elastic limit of which for q -0, qflc*
is the e~~ shear(which
transforms,
in thislimit,
as theB~~ representation).
This model
agreed,
inter alia, with the Raman detection[3],
inphase
III, of two lowfrequency
excitations which were identified as two acousticphonons
with wave vectors qo. These two excitations weremostly
studied inAHO, though
some measurements were alsoperformed
on AHOD[I],
From thepolarization
in whichthey
weredetected,
and from theirfrequencies
which could be related to the known elastic constants of AHO inphase
I, one of these excitations was found to be the LAphonon,
whichappeared
in the acpolarization,
while the second one, abpolarized,
was identified as the bpolarized
TAphonon,
A weakersignal,
aapolarized,
at the samefrequency
as this TAphonon
was alsodetected,
and attributed to apolarization leakage
the absence of a lowerfrequency signal
in thatgeometry
led the auth6rs of[3]
toconjecture
that thecoupling
of ~r~(qo )
withQ (qo )
was so strong that thefrequency
of the apolarized
TAphonon
remained too low to be detected with theirequipment
in the wholetemperature
domain accessible inphase
III,Neutron inelastic
scattering experiments [10] (here
after referred to asI)
have beenrecently
performed
inphase
I ofAHOD,
at 0 kbar and 5 kbar at sometemperatures
above(including
close
to)
the second-orderphase
transition.They
confirmed thepredictions a)
andb)
of thepreceding
model but also showed that, at 5kbar,
the apolarized
TAphonon
branchessentially
did not
soften, except
in the immediatevicinity
of q =0,
contrary to thehypothesis
made in[3].
Thisimplied
that, if w~~ is thefrequency
of aphonon
on this TA branch, and v is themean residence time of an individual
ND(
ion in one of its two orientationalwells,
therelationship
w~~ v ~ l is fulfilled for most of thephonons
of that branch in the wholephase
I ; values of v(T)
consistent with thisinequality
were in fact deduced from the 5 kbarexperiment.
The purpose of this Raman paper is twofold. First, we wish to confirm the value of this mean residence
time,
which can be deduced from thestudy
of a centralpeak,
as was shown in[2],
This centralpeak
is related to the individualpseudospin dynamics,
and appears in two differentpolarizations,
whichprobe
thedynamics
of two different collectivevariables, ~r~(q)
and~r~(q) [10],
in the q =0 limit. Due to
improvements
of our Ramanequipment,
and to the construction of a new pressure cell[I Ii,
such measurements, which wereformerly possible only
at zero pressure and for strongsignals [2]
are nowfeasible,
under pressure, With an increased accuracy, whatever thepolarization
geometry, and can be made both inphases
I and III.They
willprovide
us with information on v(T)
in bothphases
on an AHODcrystal
of thesame
origin
andquality
as that used in[10].
We also wish toclarify
theorigin
of the weak lowfrequency signal
with aapolarization
obtained in[3]
at the samefrequency
as the bpolarized
TA
phonon,
It was found in[10]
that the two bare elastic constantsC44
andC~5
haveapproximately
the same value ; thissuggested
that the aapolarized signal
could be due to the apolarized
TAphonon
and not to apolarization leakage
of the other TAphonon,
With theimproved quality
of ourequipment,
it is alsopossible
to check thispoint,
and this will also represent anindependent
way ofmeasuring v(T)
inphase
III,In order to illustrate the various aspects of this
work,
our paper isorganized
as follows, In section2,
webriefly
discuss thedynamics
of all the lowfrequency
excitations which could be visible in a Ramanscattering experiment,
first inphase I,
and second inphase III,
where thenew
couplings provided by
thefreezing
of an incommensurate distortion lead to a much morecomplex
discussion. Section 3 is devoted to thedescription
of the Ramanexperiments performed
at 6.4 kbar and of thetecllniques
used to extract numerical information on thevarious spectra we are interested in. The
qualitative
thermal behaviour of these spectra is discussed in section 4 and found to agree with thepredictions
of section 2. Thequantitative analysis performed
in section 5 and the discussion of these results show that a coherentpicture
of the
phase
I-III transition and of thedynamics
of the relevant excitations canpresently
bemade.
Finally
a summary of this work, as well as someconcluding
remarks are done insection 6.
2. Low
frequency
excitations visibleby
Ramanspectroscopy.
A review.This section is devoted to a brief review of the effects which have been detected in our Raman
experiments
on AHOD under pressure,performed
both inphase
I and inphase III,
in the lowfrequency region.
For temperatures above thetransition, light couples only
to excitations at q =0, and,
in thefrequency regime studied,
nodynamics
other than thepseudospin
one is accessible, Below thetransition,
on top of the samedynamics, light couples primarily
to the excitations at ± qo, and the lattercomprise
both thespin dynamics
and the acousticphonons.
Except
for onespecial scattering
geometry, in the incommensuratephase,
thesedynamics
arenot
linearly coupled,
so that the situation will tum out to berelatively simple,
On the other hand,through
the incommensurate modulation, thepseudospins
at q = qo arecoupled,
inphase III,
to other lowfrequency excitations,
and we shall have toexplain why
these spectracan nevertheless be understood in terms as
simple
as in thehigh temperature phase.
2.I THE PHASE I SftUATION. As recalled in the
Introduction,
in thehigh
temperaturephase,
in eachelementary cell,
4ND(
ions exhibit orientational disorder,They
allbelong
to the samefamily,
and, inside oneprimitive cell,
one can form four different linear combinations of thecorresponding pseudospins,
which transformrespectively
as theB~~, A~, Big
andB~~ representations
of thecrystal point
group[2]
; these combinations have been labeledrespectively
~r~, ~r~, ~r~ and ~r~ in I.Only
the last two are Raman active and we shall discuss in tum theirspectra.
2,I.I The
B~~ pseudospin.
The free energy related to the ~r~pseudospins
and to thetransverse acoustic
phonons, Q (q ),
to whichthey
arelinearly coupled
has been discussed in I.When
specialized
to wave vectors qparallel
toc*,
this free energy, limited to its harmonicpart,
reads :Fd
=
z ik~ (T
Td(q)) ~r~(q) ~r~(-
q)
+idq iQ (q)
~r(- q)
c-c-i
+o] q2 Q (q) Q (-
q)1~
(2)
where :~r~(q)
is the Fourier transform of~r).
Q(q)
is the normal coordinate of the apolarized
TAphonon
with soundvelocity
ilo.
d is a constant which
couples
these twovariables, while,
in theapproximation
used inI, T~(q) reads,
forqflc
:T~(q)=
-A(B-c)cos~j~-Kcosq.c (3)
where
A, B, C,
K are interaction energy constants related to different ty1Jes ofneighbours
of agiven pseudospin. d,
as well as the coefficients ofT~(q ) depend
on pressureonly,
and d islarge enough
to increase the transitiontemperature
fromT~(0 )
= 65 K to
Tf
=
160 K at 0 kbar and from
T~(qo )
= 57 K to
T(
= 137.5 K at 5 kbar for instance.
Writing
for theequations
of motion of these two variablesQ
and ~r~.~
~F
= w
2
Q (q )
~
~~
=
i w
k~
Tv ~r~(q ) (4)
where v is an individual
pseudospin
mean residence time, one obtains for thepseudospin dynamics
:lad (q,
w)
ad(q,
W) *>
=(I
+ n(w ) )
3ml~
~ ~
(5)
kB(T T~(q)) iwkB
TV~~~~
*o
q W ~For q -
0,
as thespectrum
is studiedonly
in afrequency
range for which w »do
q, the last term in the denominator ofequation (5)
isnegligible,
and the latter reduces to its first two terms, which leads to a Lorentzian centralpeak
for the response function.2.1.2 The
Bi
~
pseudospin.
Let us call~r~(q)
the Fourier transform of thecorresponding pseudospin
variable. Forqfc*,
them exists no acousticphonon
which transformsas
~r~(q)
and theonly
relevantpart
of the free energy issimply
:F~
=
z ik~(T Tc (q)) ~rc(q) ~rc(- q)1 (6)
q
where
k~ T~(q
is thecorresponding
interaction energy.Calculating
this interaction energyby taking
into account the samepseudospin
interactions as those used to obtainT~(q),
onefinds,
forqflc*
T~(q)=
-A+(B-C)cos~'~-Kcosq.c, (7)
2
Making
use of anequation
of motion similar toequation (4) yields,
for thispseudospin
response function :
(«c(q, W) «c(q, W)*)
=
(i
+n(w ))
am~
~~
~~
~ ~
(8)
I,e, to another central
peak,
with anexpression
identical to thesimplified equation (5) except
for thechange
ofT~(q)
intoT~(q),
2.2 THE PHASE III INCOMMENSURATE CASE. The situation in the incommensurate
phase
ismore
complex,
as one can detect excitations both at q = qo and at q =0, Let us start with the first ones, As was shown e,g, in
[12],
the Raman tensors whichcouple
an excitation at q = qo with the incidentlight
areproportional
to the orderparameter
~ =(~r~(q~))
and the Ramanintensities,
at anyfrequency,
of the excitations detectedthrough
this mechanism will beproportional
to~~,
Let usdiscuss,
in tum, the variousspectra
which can be detected inAHOD.
2,2,1 The LA
phonon
and the bpolarized
TAphonon. Along
c*,
thepseudospins
transformrespectively
as the v~representation
of the group of q~ for the twopseudospin
variables~r~(q )
and~r~(q )
and as the r~representation
for~r~(q
and ~r~(q ),
The LAphonon
transformsas v~ and the b
polarized
TAphonon
as v~[9],
These twophonons
are thus notcoupled
to anypseudospin
:then,
oneexpects
theirfrequency
to betemperature independent,
and their linewidthquite
narrow as for any acousticalphonon, Furthermore,
as shown in[3],
the LAphonon
must appear in the acpolaTization,
and the bpolarized
TAphonon
in the abpolarization,
2,2,2 The a
polarized
TAphonon
and the ~r~(q ) dynamics.
In order to obtain thedynamics
of these two variables at ± q~, the usual Landau type treatment
[13]
of the statics and of thedynamics
of soft variables close to an incommensuratephase
transition must beperformed, Stating
that thedriving
mechanism of thisphase
transition is the ad(q)
variable andadding
to the free energy(Eq, (2))
a fourth order term in this variable, the latter can be written as ;F~
=
z
kB(T Td(q)) "d(q) "d(- q)
+q
+
Z ( "d(qi ) "d(q2) "d(q3 ) "d(q4)
3(qi
+ q2 + q3 +
q4)
qt.q~.q3.q4
+
j z q(Q (q)
«
(- q)
c.c.)
+z *# q~ Q (q) Q (I q) (9)
where b is a
coupling
constant whichdepends
on the four q~ vectors andwhich,
in this subsection, will be usedonly
for qi, q~, q~ and q~ in thevicirdty
of ± qo,Writing
that the transition which takesplace
at qo leads to anequilibrium
stateyields
:'7~ =
("d(qo))
~=
~
kB lTd(qo) Tj
+
~~
m~/ [Tt Tj (ioa)
I
*o
iQ(qo)j
=
j i"d(qo)j (lob)
with :
bi
« b(qo,
qo, qo,qo). (i i)
In the mean field
approximation,
below thistransition,
two of the fourspin
variablesappearing
in the second term of
equation (9)
must be taken at theirequilibrium value,
while the otherspin
or
phonon
variables are taken as the fluctuations around theirequilibrium
values. Thebi
terms, then,couple
q= qo + h to q = qo +
h,
whatever h,through
a termproportional
to~ ~, while
«~(q)
andQ (q)
are stillcoupled by
the d term. There are thus four variables whichare
linearly coupled,
thedynamics
of which aredegenerate
inpair
for h=
0,
in the absence of the ~~coupling,
To understand the solutions of thedynamical equations
for q= qo, it is useful to
study them,
first for h x0,
and then to let h tend to zero.Let us make use of this classical
method, choosing
forsimplicity
h to beparallel
toc*,
and let us take thepseudospin amplitude
andphase
mode variables asdynamical variables,
Q~(h)
=
fi j«d(q0
+h)
e~'~«d(~
q0 +h) e~~j (12b)
2 where :
(~r~(qo))
= ~ e~~(13)
with similar
expressions
for thephonon amplitude
andphase
mode variables,Using
equation (4)
andpostulating
that a part of the response function is located in thevicinity
ofw =
0,
while the other part appears in thevicinity
of too=
do
qo, oneobtains, through
acalculation which is
briefly
sketched in theAppendix,
thefollowing
results.Vicinity of
too =do
qo, Two excitations have their spectrum in thevicinity
of theunperturbed
TAphonon frequency
in the h- 0 limit. One is of the
amplitudon
type, and its spectrum isproportional
to :~~~~~°
~~ ~~~~°
~~ ~~l~
~
2
~°
~°
~2
k~
(T~T)
+k~
(T~T~(qo))
Iwk~
Tv~°
(14)
The
intensity
of this spectrum isproportional
to ~~. It represents thedynamics
of an acousticphonon coupled
to a diffusivepseudospin,
thiscoupling becoming
smaller as Tdecreases,
because the real part of thepseudospin dynamics
increases with T~ T, while itsimaginary
part increasesexponentially through
the temperaturedependence
of v. It is Raman active in any of the threediagonal polarizations.
The second excitation is of the
phason type,
in the h- 0
limit,
boththrough
itseigenvector,
which is a linear combination of the two
phase
modevariables,
andthrough
thealgebraic expression
of its spectrum which reads~~~~~~
~~ ~~~~~~
~~~j(
~j_
~
~2
~~~~
k~(T(qo)
T~) Iwk~
TvIndeed,
as for anyphase mode,
the real part of the term ind~
does notdepend
ontemperature (compare Eqs. (14)
and(15)).
As this mode is not Ramanactive,
it will be of no interest here.Vicinity of
w= 0. It was shown in I that the
pseudospin dynamics
becomescritical,
I-e-gives
rise to a centralpeak
with HWHMtending
to zero, in thevicinity
of the normal- incommensuratephase transition,
for q in thevicinity
of qo. Below T~, in the same manner as for the excitations in thevicinity
of the barephonon frequency
discussed above, the twocorresponding
diffusive modes at ± qocouple
into anamplitudon
type centralpeak,
and aphason
type centralpeak
; this is shown in theAppendix,
and wasbriefly discussed, recently,
in
[14].
Theamplitudon
type centralpeak
has anintensity proportional
to :'l~SA«(W)
=
'l~il
+n(w)13m
~
hi
'liWkBTT (16)
Its
integrated intensity
is thusproportional
tok~ T,
I-e- non critical close to T= T~ while its linewidth is
proportional
to T T~similarly
to thephonon
typeamplitudon (Eq. (14)),
thisspectrum
has adiagonal polarization,
and couldthus,
be detected apriori,
in any of thesepolarizations.
Infact,
we have not detectedit, and,
as will be shown in section6,
this is due to its too smallHWHM,
in the whole temperature range studied.As for the
phason
type central mode(Eq. (A7),
secondline)
it has, in alight scattering experiment,
a linewidth much narrower than the centralpeak
ofequation (16).
This excitation is thus not detectableby
Raman spectroscopy even if its Ramanactivity
is notidentically equal
to zero, as is
presumably
the case if one makes use of arguments similar to those used for thedisplacive phason [12].
2.2.3 The
Bi~ pseudospin
variable spectrum. Thespectrum
of the~r~(q)
variable in thevicinity
of q = 0 wasalready discussed,
above thephase
transition, in subsection 2.1.2. We must reconsider the situation below thephase transition,
because thefreezing
of thepseudospin
at ± qocouples
this variable topseudospins
in thevicinity
of ± 2 qo.Indeed, taking
into account
only
the terms which lead to such acoupling,
andlimiting
thepseudospin
wavevectors to be
along
the c*axis,
the relevant part of the free energy reads :F~
=
zkB(T- T~(q)) ~r~(q) «~(- q)
+ q~c
+
Z
~ "c(qi "c(q2) "d(q3) "d(q4)
3(qi
+ q2 + q3 +q4) (1?)
q; q2. q3. q4
where b~ is a function of the four wave vectors. In the mean field harmonic
approximation,
below T~,
~r~(q~)
and~r~(q~)
will bereplaced by
their thermal mean value, withamplitude
~. If one takes q~ = q~ = ± qo this term
simply
renormalizes thek~ (T T~(q ))
term,adding
to it a term
equal
tob[
~ ~, which in view ofequations (6)
to(8),
modifies the thermal evolution of thecorresponding
centralpeak.
If,
on the otherhand,
oneconsiders,
forinstance,
q~ = q~ = qo, thecorresponding
termcouples
thedynamics
of~r~(q)
with that of~r~(q
2qo) through
a termproportional
tob[
~~; a similarcoupling
exists with~r~(q
+ 2qo)
for q~ = q4 " qo. Nevertheless, if q is in thevicinity
of the Brillouin zone center, T~(q )
xT~(q
+ 2qo)
m
T~(q
2qo).
This means thatthe bare
dynamics
of~r~(q)
is notdegenerate
with that of~r~(q
± 2qo).
In a
perturbative approach,
thisgives only
a correction in~~
to thedynamics
of~r~(q),
an effect which can beneglected
withrespect
to theb[
~ ~ correction described above.Thus
equation (7) yields
:(«c (q,
W)
«c(q,
W)*)
=
Ii
+ n(w )j
am~ ~
(18)
with :
bi
m bc«c(q) «c(- q) «d(qo) «d(- qo)
q - o.(19)
In the mean field
approximation
usedhere,
~ ~ isproportional
to T~ Tbut,
since the value ofb[
isunknown,
one canonly predict
the appearance of a second term linear in T in the realpart
of the denominator ofequation (18).
As will be seen in section
4,
in thepresent
case, I-e- for AHOD at 6.4kbar,
it will reverse thesign
of the coefficient of T. Let usfinally
notethat,
as thisspectrum
wasalready
visibleabove the
phase transition,
in the abpolarization,
it will remain visiblethrough
the same mechanism below T~.2.2.4 The
B~~ pseudospin
variable at q = 0. Inprinciple,
the situation isquite complex
asone must combine the difficulties met in subsections 2.2. I and 2.2.3
(I.e.
the linearcoupling
between
phonons
andpseudospins)
on the onehand,
thecoupling
between the excitations at q, q + 2 qo and q 2 qo and the renormalization of the coefficientk~(T T~(q)),
on the otherhand. The
analysis
is rather cumbersome but shows that theonly significant
effect is the last one, as wasalready
the case for the«~(q) dynamics,
both thecoupling
with the acousticphonons (as
in subsection 2.I-I)
and thecoupling
with thepseudospins
at q ± 2 qo(as
in subsection2.2.3) being negligible.
One thus
obtains,
inanalogy
withequation (18)
:("d(q, W) "d(q,
W)*)
=
Ii
+n(w)]
am~ ~
(20) kB(T Td(q))
+b2
'l iwkB
Trwith :
b(
m b(q,
q, qo,qo)
q- ° ~~~~
b(qi,
q~, q~,q~) being
definedby equations (9)
and(
II).
Comparing equations (5)
and(20),
as well asequations (8)
and(18),
one sees that the effect of thephase
transition on the spectra related to thedynamics
of the«~(q)
and«~(q)
pseudospins
at q =0 is
absolutely
similar. Itsimply changes
theslope
of the coefficient in Tin the realpart
of adenominator,
thuschanges
the thermal behaviour of the HWHM of thecorresponding
centralpeak.
It does notchange
itspolarization properties
so that the«~(q) dynamics
will still appear in the acpolarization.
3.
Experiments.
3.I EXPERIMENTAL DEVICE. The present
experiments
have beenperformed
with a8 x 7 x 7
mm~ crystal
of AHOD obtainedby
theevaporation technique
in the same bath as forthe neutron
experiment
of I. Thesample
was oriented with its a axisperpendicular
to thescattering plane,
theincoming
beambeing parallel
to c and the scattered beamparallel
to b. A helium pressure cell with threesaphire
windowscontaining
thecrystal
wasplaced
in a vacuum cryostat with silica windows. Pressure was measured within ± 5 barby
amanganin
resistor in asecondary
cell, at room temperature, and the temperature of thecrystal
wasprobed by
aChromel Alumel
thermo-couple
at room pressure inside a 3 mm in diameterpipe penetrating
the
sample cavity.
Ramanspectra,
excitedby
the 514.5 nanometer line emitted with a power of 0.I to 0.2 Wby
aSpectra Physics Argon
ionlaser,
were recorded with aCoderg
T800triple spectrometer
modified in order to be drivenby
an IBM AT3 PersonalComputer
which collected and stored thesignal
from a cooled RCA 31034-06photomultiplier.
Data were takenduring
onesecond,
every 0.125 cm~ ~, and theorigin
of thefrequency
scale was checked andoccasionally
shifted within half a step aftercomparing
the Stokes and the antistokes part of thespectra.
All the
experiments
discussed below wereperformed
at 6.4kbar,
between roomtemperature
and 78 Kalthough
somepreliminary
tests wereperformed
at a lower pressure to ascertain theposition
of thephase
II-HI transition forfully
deuterated AHOD.Taking
this information into account, thegeneral
form of thephase diagram,
as well as the other transitiontemperatures
shown infigure I,
the 6.4 kbar pressure was chosen as acompromise
between twoopposite points
of view :The pressure must be as close as
possible
to 5kbar,
in order to allow for a fruitfulcomparison
with the neutronexperiment
of I.The first order
phase
II-m transition must takeplace
below 78K,
so that thephase
IIIdynamics
can be studied in aslarge
a temperature interval aspossible.
iii
i
Z
r0
f
IiT
140
~
T K ~
Fig.
1. Phase diagram of fully deuterated AHOD. The transition points have been obtained fromneutron data (round [8] and square [10] dots) and Rarnan data obtained
during
the present set ofexperiments
(crosses). Phase III exists only aboveP~
= 2,4 kbar and below T~ = 147 K [10].
3.2 EXPERIMENTAL TECHNIQUE. At each temperature, the four different
spectra
withrespective polarizations
aa,ab,
ac and bc wererecorded,
from 150 to 150 cm~ as well as(he
aapolarized
spectrum from 840 to 910cm~~
which contains asharp
line near8~ficm~
~, theintegrated intensity
of which was used as an intemalintensity
standard. In thishigh frequency
range, there alsoexists,
in the bcpolarization
a line whosefrequency (851
cm~ ~) istemperature independent
inphase I,
and whichsplits
into two lines inphase
III.The transition
temperature
wasaccurately
determinedby recording
the 851 cmintensity
as afunction of temperature : due to this
splitting,
the 851 cm~intensity drops rapidly
below thetransition and the same
result,
T~ =135.5 K ± 0.3K,
was found eitherby cooling
orby
warming
thesample,
in agood agreement
with theextrapolation
of the neutron results(Fig.
I).
Careful
setting
of thepolarizers
resulted in correctpolarizations
as can be checked infigure
2 which represents, at the temperature T = 78.3 K, far below T~, the Stokes part of the four recorded spectra up to I IO cm~ :indeed, leakages
from strong lines do not appear inunallowed
polarizations.
Asexpected,
Lorentzianpeaks
appearonly
in the ac and abpolarizations.
Nevertheless, extemal modes of thecrystal
are located above 50 cm~ ~, andthey
are broad
enough
toproduce
a substantial(and frequency dependent)
contribution 15 to 20 cm~ below their maximum,especially
inphase
I. In order to obtain the purepseudospin
dynamics,
it is necessary to subtract thisfrequency dependent
«background
». This wasperformed by representing
thecorresponding
extemal modesby damped oscillators,
charac- terizedby
theirfrequency,
linewidth andintensity
evaluatedby
a fit of thespectra
above 50 cm~78.3K 6.Skbar
[
~ ab~
-
bc
aa
50 ioo
w
(cm-') Fig.
2. Rarnan spectra at T=
78.3 K and P
=
6.4 kbar in the aa, ac, bc and ab
polarizations.
3.3 AcousTic PHONONS.
IySTRUMENTAL
LINEWIDTH DEcoNvoLuTioN. In order tostudy
indetail the thermal evolution of the acoustic
phonon
lines, it was necessary to deconvolute the latter from the instrumental linewidth ; this deconvolutionplays
no role for the continuous spectra discussed above. Itis,
of course, the deconvoluted values of the linewidths and thefrequencies
of these acousticphonons
which arereported
infigures
5 to 7.4.
Qualitative
discussion~4,I AcousTlc PHONONS.
Figure
3 represents, for the same temperature as infigure 2,
T
=
78.3
K~T~,
aportion
of the same spectra,represented
on anexpanded
scale andarbitrarily
normalized at the same 885 cm~peak integrated intensity.
Threespectra
show theLA,
the apolarized
and the bpolarized
TAphonons respectively
at q = qo. Due to the verygood polarization quality
of ourexperimental setting,
there is nopolarization leakage,
while our detection accuracy allows for a resolution of about 1.7 cm ~. Infigure 3,
it appears that theaa and ab spectra have maxima at different
frequencies. Furthermore,
as can be seen infigure
4 which shows similar spectra recorded at ahigher
temperature, the two lines have differentlinewidths, indicating clearly
that these two spectra do notcorrespond
to the sameexcitation,
and are thus the two TA modes.~
~
i
" ~
§
~d ~
ac
6.Skbar
l17K20 50 20 30
w
(cm-')
W(cm-<
F~g. 3. Fig. 4.
Fig.
3. Enlargement of the low frequency part of figure 2 (presented in a different order). Note the excellentpolarization
of the four spectra.Fig.
4.Comparison
of the b and apolarized
TAphonons
at 117 K. The latter is broadened by the interaction with the «~pseudospin.
The
meaningful
results of fits of each line with asimple damped
oscillator above a linearbackground,
convoluted with thespectrometer
function arerepresented
infigures
5 and 6. Infigure
5, the thermal variation of the threefrequencies
inphase
III, from 78K up toT~, is
represented
as~
for each of the threephonons.
One seesthat,
while thefrequencies
w
(78 )
of the LA and the b
polarized
TAphonons practically
do notchange
withtemperature,
thefrequency
of the apolarized
TAphonon
decreases whenapproaching
T~ from below. Aparallel
type of behaviour can be seen infigure 6,
where thecorresponding
deconvoluted linewidthsare
plotted
: for the first twophonons,
the linewidths remain, in the wholephase III,
smaller than the instrumentresolution,
while this linewidth islarger
for the apolarized
TAphonon,
and increases
notably
whenapproaching
the transition temperature.All these results agree with the
predictions
of subsections 2.2,I and 2.2.2 : the LAphonon
and the b
polarized
TAphonon, decoupled
from thepseudospins,
must be very narrow and havefrequencies essentially
temperatureindependent. Conversely,
thecoupling
of the apolarized
TAphonon
with«~(q)
wasexpected
toslightly
decrease thephonon frequency
and to increasenotably
its linewidth. This increase of the linewidthis,
in fact, solarge
that it wasalready
noticed in I : in PhaseI, along
the whole c*direction,
the bpolarized
TAphonon
wasfound to be much narrower at 0 kbar and 300
K,
than the apolarized
TAphonon
which was measured at various temperatures both at 0 kbar and 5 kbar.On the contrary, at 5
kbar,
thefrequency change
of the apolarized
TAphonon
with temperature was too small to have been detectedby
neutronscattering
inphase
I : one needs the accuracy of Raman spectroscopy to evidence it inphase
III.~
~x>
~
~ TAb
-
LA
~
-
T4
3
d80 loo
Tt
T(K)
Fig.
5. Thermal variation of thefrequencies
of the three acousticphonons
relative to theirrespective frequency
at 78 K.TAb
80 loo 120 Tt
T K
Fig.
6. Deconvoluted linewidth r(T) for the three acousticplionons.
The small linewidths of the LA andTA~
phonons are evaluated with a poorprecision
due to the instrumental resolution ( 1.5 cm- ~).4.2 THE PSEUDOSPIN DYNAMICS. The evolution of the
pseudospin dynamics
withtemperature
is shown infigures
7 and 8. Inphase I,
the linewidth of these spectra decreases withtemperature
down to T~, while theintensity
at w = 0 increases whenapproaching
thephase
I-III transition. Below thistransition,
on both spectra,opposite
effects are seen for theac
loo Tt
T(K)
Fig.
7. Thermal variation of the width (left scale) andintensity (fight
scale) of the «~pseudospin dynamics
as fitted to the ac spectrum.ab
i-
~
-
5
~
E d
U ~j
~'
-
~
fi
~
loo
T
(
K )Fig.
8. Same asfigure
7 for the «~pseudospin dynamics
as fitted to ab spectrum.intensities : when still
decreasing
thetemperature,
theintensity
decreasesagain.
But the linewidth still decreases below T~, and saturates, orslightly
increasesagain
near 78 K.The
high
temperature behaviour wasanticipated
from subsection 2,I. Forinstance,
thespectral
response of the ac spectrum waspredicted,
fromequation (5),
to beequal
to~~~
~~
~~~~~~j~(0 )
2~
~ 2
~~~~
T ~
j~~(o)
T where R~~ is the
corresponding
Raman tensor.The individual relaxation time increases when the
temperature
decreases while~~/~
decreases for
T~T~ >T~(0).
This results in an increase ofI~(0)
and a decrease of theHWHM,
and the sameis,
of course, true for the ab spectrum.On the contrary, below T~, the thermal evolution of the HWHM and
of1(0)
could not beanticipated
from the soleanalysis
of the discussionperformed
in subsections 2.2.3 and 2.2.4.For
instance,
fromequations (10a), (20)
and(21),
thespectral
response of the ac spectrum isgiven
below T~by
:~~~
~~
~~~~Mac (T)j~
~ W
T ~
~ ~
c
~~~~(T)
with :
2
b(
j 2b(
fa~(T)
=
I + T~
T~(0) (24a)
hi
Tbi
It is the thermal evolution both of
fa~(T)
and of r which fixes the thermal evolution ofIa~(0)
and of the HWHM. Asb(
isexpected
to be of the same order ofmagnitude
asbi, fa~ (T
isexpected
to increase withdecreasing
temperature, as well as r. The present results indicate that rincreases,
close to T~, faster thanf~~(T)
but slower thanlf~~ (T)]~,
and similarconsiderations must hold for the
Bi
~
where
f~~(T)
isreplaced by
12b[
j2b[
fab(T)
~
i
~
+y ~
TtTc(o) (24b)
One may
simply
note, at thispoint,
that we find here for AHOD at 6.4kbar,
an evolution of1(0)
and of theHWHM,
below as well as above T~, very similar to the results wereported
in[2]
at normal pressure for AHO. Inparticular,
in theseearly experiments,
below thephase
I-II transition temperature,1(0)
decreased withdecreasing
temperature while the HWHM still decreased in some temperature range beforeincreasing again.
In section 5, we shallshow,
thatwe find for v
(T),
a thermal evolution similar to the evolution of this residence time in AHO at normal pressure, an evolution whichexplains
the behaviourof1(0)
and of the HWHM.5.
Quantitative analysis
and discussion.All our
experimental
resultsbeing
inqualitative
agreement with the theoreticalpredictions,
wehave