• Aucun résultat trouvé

Variation in competitive ability with mating system, ploidy and range expansion in four Capsella species

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Variation in competitive ability with mating system, ploidy and range expansion in four Capsella species"

Copied!
36
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-01852075

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01852075

Preprint submitted on 31 Jul 2018

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-entific research documents, whether they are pub-lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires

To cite this version:

(2)

Open Access

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Variation in competitive ability with

mating system, ploidy and range

expansion in four Capsella species

Xuyue Yang, Martin Lascoux, Sylvain Glémin

Cite as:

Yang X, Lascoux M, and Glémin S. (2018). Variation in competitive ability with mating system, ploidy and range expansion in four Capsella species. bioRxiv, 214866.DOI: 10.1101/214866

Peer-reviewed and recommended by Peer Community in Evolutionary Biology

Recommendation DOI: 10.24072/pci.evolbiol.100054 Recommenders: Sylvain Billiard and Henrique Teotónio

(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)

R!package!lme4!(Bates+et+al.!2015).!Dead!plants!were!included!in!the!non^flowering! category.!Second,!we!excluded!plants!that!did!not!flower!and!analysed!flower!number! with!a!negative!binomial!model!and!a!log!link!with!the!glmmadmb!function!of!the! glmmADMB!package!(Fournier+et+al.!2012;!Skaug+et+al.!2013).! For!the!comparison!among!species,!we!were!specifically!interested!in!the!species! x!treatment!interaction!term!to!determine!whether!the!effect!of!competition!differed! among!species.!For!comparison!within!C.+bursa3pastoris,!we!were!interested!in!the!area! x!treatment!interaction!term!to!determine!whether!the!effect!of!competition!differed! across!the!expansion!range.!If!these!interaction!terms!were!significant,!differences! among!interaction!components!(“contrast!of!contrasts”)!were!tested!with!the! testInteraction+function!of!the!phia!package!(https://CRAN.R^ project.org/package=phia),!with!False!Discovery!Rate!(FDR)!correction!for!multiple! testing.!To!avoid!over^parameterization,!other!interaction!terms!were!removed!if!not! significant!before!contrast!testing.!To!get!a!more!direct!estimate!and!more!intuitive! interpretation!of!the!result,!we!computed!a!competition!index,!as!defined!in!Petrone! Mendoza!et!al.!(Petrone!Mendoza+et+al.!2018):!! !! =!!"#$%&'&'"( !!"#$% !

where!Walone+and!Wcompetition!are!the!least^square!mean!of!a!trait!without!and!with! competition,!respectively.!Mean!effects!were!estimated!with!the!lsmean+function!of!the!

lmerTest+package!(Kuznetsova+et+al.!2016).!The!lower!Ic,!the!more!sensitive!to!

competition!the!species!or!the!geographic!group!is.!

(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)

tetraploid!selfer,!C.+bursa3pastoris,!we!also!characterized!the!effect!of!competition!across! the!expansion!range!of!the!species.!Rapid!range!expansion!thanks!to!good!colonizing! abilities!is!also!an!ecological!attribute!of!selfing!species!(Randle+et+al.!2009;! Grossenbacher+et+al.!2015),!and!has!been!suggested!to!be!negatively!associated!with! competitiveness!(e.g.!Burton+et+al.!2010).! Competitive)ability)varies)within)and)among)Capsella)species) ! Using!the!number!of!flowers!as!a!proxy!for!fitness,!our!results!are!in!agreement! with!theoretical!predictions:!the!outcrossing!species,!C.+grandiflora,!was!the!least! sensitive!to!competition!while!the!two!diploid!selfers,!C.+orientalis!and!C.+rubella,!were! the!most!sensitive!(Figure!2).!The!tetraploid!selfer,!C.+bursa3pastoris,!was!intermediate! between!its!two!putative!parents!(Figure!2),!and!within!the!species,!the!sensitivity!to! competition!increased!from!the!possible!region!of!origin!to!the!expansion!front!(Figure! 4).!In!a!previous!experiment,!C.+rubella!was!already!found!as!the!most!sensitive!to! competition!but!no!significant!difference!was!found!between!C.+grandiflora!and!C.+ rubella!(Petrone!Mendoza+et+al.!2018).!However,!in!that!experiment!only!Greek! accessions!were!used!for!C.+bursa3pastoris,!mainly!corresponding!to!the!Middle!East! genetic!cluster!(Cornille+et+al.!2016).!Here!too,!Middle!East!accessions!of!C.+bursa3

pastoris!(Ic!=!0.81,!Figure!2)!did!not!differ!from!C.+grandiflora!(Ic!=!0.74,!Figure!1).!The!

global!difference!between!the!two!species!was!mainly!attributable!to!the!rest!of!the! species!range.!

(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)
(25)
(26)
(27)
(28)
(29)
(30)

Tables'

Table'1:'characteristics'of'the'dataset' '

Species' #'accessions'used' Survival'rate'(%)! Flowering'rate'(%)!

(31)

Table'2.'Analyses'of'variance'for'vegetative'traits'for'the'comparison'among'species!

p?values!≤!0.05!are!in!bold!and!p?values!≤!0.1!in!italics.!The!grey!line!corresponds!to!the!interaction!term!of!interest.!DoF,!and!LR! stands!for!Degrees!of!Freedom!and!Likelihood!Ratio,!respectively.!

!

! ! Rosette!surface!1! Rosette!surface!2! Growth!rate!

! DoF! SS! F! p?value! SS! F! p?value! SS' F! p?value!

block# 3! 194.2! 63.39! <'2eD16' 157.8! 47.3! <'2eD16' 1.08! 17.21! 8.37eD11'

species# 3! 7.32! 2.39! 0.073# 7.07! 2.12! 0.10! 0.06! 0.91! 0.438!

treatment# 1! 86.53! 84.72! <'2eD16' 141.9! 127.7! <'2eD16' 0.00! 0.32! 0.573!

block!x!species# 3! 34.55! 3.81! 0.0001' 17.23! 1.78! 0.069# 0.38! 2.01! 0.035'

block!x!treatment! 9! 5.107! 1.69! 0.167! 2.68! 0.83! 0.478! 0.28! 4.46! 0.004'

species!x!treatment! 3! 5.83! 1.93! 0.123! 6.31! 1.95! 0.120! 0.08! 1.29! 0.278!

! ! LR! p?value! LR! p?value! LR! p?value!

accession!(random)# 1! 382! <'2eD16' 389! <'2eD16' 129! <'2eD16'

(32)

Table'3.'Analyses'of'deviance'for'reproductive'traits'for'the'comparison'among'species' Same!legend!as!Table!2.!

!

! ! Proportion!of!flowering!plants! Number!of!flowers!

! DoF! LR! p?value! LR! p?value!

block! 3! 3.59! 0.309! 38.61! 2.10eD08' rosette!surface!at!t2! 1! 2.89! 0.089# 1.12! 0.290! species! 3! 18.70! 0.0003' 180.9! <'2.2eD16' treatment! 1! 3.41! 0.065# 23.19! 1.47eD06' block!x!rosette!surface!at!t2! 3! 3.36! 0.340! 7.65! 0.054# block!x!species! 9! 3.27! 0.953! 27.78! 0.0010' block!x!treatment! 3! 6.62! 0.085! 3.09! 0.378! rosette!surface!at!t2!x!species! 3! 3.17! 0.366! 6.20! 0.102!

rosette!surface!at!t2!x!treatment! 3! 0.69! 0.407! 16.81! 4.13eD05'

species!x!treatment! 3! 0.92! 0.819! 55.74! 4.77eD12'

Accession!(random)! 1! 25.89! 3.62eD07' 377.7! <'2eD16!

'

(33)

Table'4.'Analyses'of'variance'for'vegetative'traits'for'the'comparison'among'C.#bursa)pastoris'geographic'areas' Same!legend!as!Table!2!

!

! ! Rosette!surface!1! Rosette!surface!2! Growth!rate!

! DoF! SS! F! p?value! SS! F! p?value! SS! F! p?value!

block# 3! 179.7! 64.19! <'2.2eD16' 94.41! 27.51! 8.88eD16' 0.76! 13.12! 4.50eD08'

area# 3! 19.01! 6.79! 0.0007' 43.75! 14.58! 2.64eD06' 0.08! 1.40! 0.254!

treatment# 1! 17.67! 18.94! 1.85eD05' 40.84! 36.09! 5.35eD09' 0.02! 1.22! 0.270!

block!x!area! 9! 5.62! 0.70! 0.708! 8.76! 0.89! 0.536! 0.24! 1.49! 0.152!

block!x!treatment! 3! 1.12! 0.41! 0.740! 2.01! 0.61! 0.607! 0.15! 2.73! 0.044'

area!x!treatment# 3! 6.57! 2.46! 0.063# 26.20! 7.96! 3.95eD05' 0.06! 1.11! 0.346!

! ! LR! p?value! LR! p?value! LR! p?value!

accession!(random)# 1! 177! <'2eD16! 146! <'2eD16! 70.4! <'2eD16!

'

(34)

Table'5.'Analyses'of'deviance'for'reproductive'traits'for'the'comparison'among'C.#bursa)pastoris'geographic'areas' Same!legend!as!Table!2.!

!

! ! Proportion!of!flowering!plants! Number!of!flowers!

! DoF! LR! p?value! LR! p?value!

(35)

Figure'1:'Rosette'surface'and'flowers'number'without'and'with'competitors'in' the'four'species.!

Each! grey! line! corresponds! to! one! accession! (average! over! the! four! blocks)! and! the! black! lines! join! the! least;square! mean! estimates! (with! confidence! intervals).! Ic:! competition! index.! Ic! with! different! letters! corresponds! to! significant! treatment! x! species!interactions!(see!Tables!S3!to!S5).! ! ' ' ' Alone Competitor Ic = 0.95 Alone Competitor Ic = 0.96 Alone Competitor Ic = 0.94 Alone Competitor Ic = 0.96

C. grandiflora C. bursa−pastoris C. orientalis C. rubella

10 15 20 Rosette surf ace (in cm2) Alone Competitor Ic = 0.74a Alone Competitor Ic = 0.65b Alone Competitor Ic = 0.52c Alone Competitor Ic = 0.52c

C. grandiflora C. bursa−pastoris C. orientalis C. rubella

(36)

Figure'2:'Rosette'surface'and'flowers'number'without'and'with'competitors'for' the'four'geographic'area'of'Capsella'bursa+pastoris.' Same!legend!as!in!Figure!1.! ' Alone Competitor Ic = 0.92a Alone Competitor Ic = 0.97b Alone Competitor Ic = 0.95 a,b Alone Competitor Ic = 0.99b

Middle East Europe Central Asia China

10 15 20 Rosette surf ace (in cm2) Alone Competitor Ic = 0.81 a Alone Competitor Ic = 0.69 b Alone Competitor Ic = 0.71 a,b Alone Competitor Ic = 0.54 c

Middle East Europe Central Asia China

Références

Documents relatifs

Da die Kryokonservierung von Ovar- gewebe beim vorliegenden Befund nicht sinnvoll war, eine Follikelpunktion unter Schonung der unklaren Raumforderun- gen aber möglich schien,

The excited atom in the larger bubble can decay to the ground state either via atomic D 1 emission (at 880 nm) or via exciplex formation and subsequent exciplex fluorescence.. Figure

In the above given concrete syntax definition for graphical representations of class diagrams (see Fig. 5 ), display manager classes are defined only for the metaclasses

The resumption of pituitary and ovarian activity was investigated by hormonal measurements and ultrasound scanning in 45 healthy post-partum women who were treated with

Since the mating probability increases exponentially with the daily number of mature males (Eq. 1), increased dispersion in the emergence curve is unfavorable for mating

melanogaster species complex, for instance (Table I), sperm length distributions appear to be divergent in most closely related species (e.g. sechellia), but

Mean survival time in days of insects treated with Beauveria hoplocheli strain B507 and Beauveria bassiana strains I-2960 and I-2961 at 10 6 conidia.mL -1 or 10 8 conidia..

explored genome size variation using flow cytometry in 23 coconut genotypes from 175.. around the globe, including two Australian wild-sown coconuts. Our objectives were: