Congruence amalgamation of lattices
Texte intégral
Documents relatifs
In this paper we give a strong negative solution to this problem, by proving (Corollary 4.2) that in any non-distributive variety of lattices, if F is any (bounded or not) free
Semilattices; weakly distributive homomorphisms; congruence split- ting lattices; uniform refinement property; von Neumann regular
It originates in the observation that the construction of the Boolean algebra of the proof of Theorem A does not rely on the Axiom of Choice (but it has size the continuum), while
Every finite, atomistic, join-semidistributive (resp., lower bounded) lattice L admits a h∨, ∧, 0, 1, at i-embedding with the congruence extension property into some finite,
It follows from [10, Example 8.1] that there exists a (non subdirectly irreducible) finite lattice L without D-cycle in SUB 2 that cannot be embedded atom-preservingly into any
Proof. This raises the question whether Theorem 2 can be strengthened by requiring that L be an ideal in K. Every lattice L with more than one element has a proper
The Strong Independence Theorem for automorphism groups and congruence lattices of arbitrary lattices.. George Grätzer,
Most known partial neg- ative solutions to CLP are obtained via certain infinitary sentences of the theory of semilattices that hold in all semilattices of the form Con c L, for L